April, 08 2010, 02:00pm EDT
Media Matters Offers Assistance With Rupert Murdoch's Investigation
Media Matters sends Murdoch more than a dozen examples of Fox News promoting the Tea Party movement
WASHINGTON
Today, Media Matters for America's Ari Rabin-Havt sent a
letter to News Corp. chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch noting Fox News'
role in regularly promoting the Tea Party movement. When Rabin-Havt
asked Murdoch about that topic at the National Press Club on Tuesday
night, Murdoch said he didn't think Fox News "should be supporting the
Tea Party" but would like to "investigate" "before condemning anyone."
The letter reads:
Dear Mr. Murdoch:
I wanted to thank you for taking my question Tuesday night at the
National Press Club. As a reminder, I asked you
whether it was "appropriate for a news network to engage in that much
politics" in regards to Fox News' role in regularly promoting the Tea
Party movement.You
replied: "No. I don't think we should be supporting the Tea Party or
any other party. But I'd like to investigate what you are saying before
condemning anyone."We appreciate your willingness to look into this matter. To aid in
your investigation, Media Matters has
compiled over 15 examples of your network's "support" of the Tea Party
movement. And, contrary to a Fox News spokesperson's suggestion
that only the "opinion commentators" are actively encouraging
participation in the protests, it is a problem that stretches across
the entire network.Tuesday
night, I was pleased to learn that you don't believe that Fox News
should be "supporting the Tea Party or any other party" and that you
were open to "condemning" anyone who had done so. For the past year, Media
Matters has
been vocal in criticizing the network's tea party coverage. I hope the
attached evidence is enough to convince you to take action. We look
forward to hearing the results of your investigation.Please don't hesitate to contact me if you would like any additional
information.Kind regards,
Ari Rabin-Havt
Vice President of Research & Communications
Media Matters for America
With the letter, Rabin-Havt included the following attachment:
"Join Your Local Tea Party": Fox News' history of promoting
the tea party movement
Anchor: "It's now my great duty to promote the tea parties.
Here we go!" During the April 13, 2009, edition of Your
World, Fox Business anchor and "business journalist" Stuart Varney plugged
Fox News' presence at the April 15, 2009, tea parties, saying: "It's now my great duty to promote the tea
parties. Here we go!"
Fox News aired more than 100 commercial promotions for tea
party protests in less than two weeks. From April
6 to April 15, Fox News aired at least 107 commercial promotions
for their coverage of the April 15, 2009, tea party protests.
Beck encouraged viewers to "please go" to "FNC Tax Day Tea
Parties." Fox News aired graphics on repeated occasions in
which they dubbed the April 15, 2009, Tax Day Tea Parties, "FNC Tax Day
Tea Parties." Host Glenn Beck told viewers
they could "[c]elebrate with Fox News" at any of four Fox
News-described "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties," saying: "If you can't make
the one in San Antonio" -- which Beck himself attended -- "please go to
the one with Neil or with Sean in Atlanta, that's supposed to be great,
Greta is in Washington, D.C. Just get out and let your face be seen."
"Can't get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea
party." On the April 11, 2009, edition of Fox News Watch,
Fox News host Bill Hemmer said:
HEMMER: While the mainstream media's ignored
the tea party movement, here at the Fox News Channel, we're gearing up
to bring you special coverage of the events all across the country.
Sean Hannity is in Atlanta; Glenn Beck's at the Alamo -- where else
would he be? -- San Antonio; Neil Cavuto is live in Sacramento; and
Greta is in Washington, D.C.Can't
get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea party. You can check
it out on the site for the location of a tea party in your area. Again,
that is Wednesday, the 15th of April.
On April 15, 2009, news anchor Megyn Kelly said,
"you can join the tea party action from your home if you go to the
FoxNation.com ... a virtual tax day tea party." On April 16, 2009, Fox
& Friends co-host Gretchen Carlson told viewers that
they "can still have a virtual tea party" at Fox Nation
Fox News host: "[H]opefully millions of people" will
participate. While reporting live at a protest on April 15,
2009, former Big Story host John Gibson, a Fox News Radio host,
remarked that
"hopefully millions of people" will participate in the protests.
Anchor to viewers: You "need to go" to tea party merchandise
site. On April 15, 2009, Fox Business anchor David Asman told viewers they
"need to go" to a tea party merchandise site "no matter what side of the
issue you're on."
News anchor on list of nationwide tea party events: "Check it
out online right now." On March 24, 2009, Hemmer noted
protests in Florida and Ohio and directed
viewers to the program's website to learn more about the protests:
HEMMER:
It's called the tea party. And check out the scene in Orlando, Florida.
More than 4,000 turned out over the weekend protesting government
spending and a big thumbs-down to the policies currently in Washington.
Radio host Bud Hedinger hosted that event. Protesters, well, they waved
flags and signs and with slogans like "Repeal the Pork" and "Our Bacon
is Cooked." I say, our bacon is cooked.They're
popping up literally all across the country now. They had about 5,000
in Cincinnati last weekend. If you go to our website, you will find a
growing list of these events, hundreds of photos, and a new tea-party
anthem that you will hear from the man who wrote it and recorded it
next hour. And there's a list of the nationwide Tax Day tea party
events coming up on the 15th of April, which will be a huge deal for
those organizations. So check it out online right now.
News anchor: To find "one happening near you, head to our
website." On April 6, 2009, Hemmer again directed
viewers to Fox News' website to find a tea party "happening near you"
HEMMER:
If you want to know more about the tea-party movement, if there is one
happening near you, head to our website FoxNews.com/americasnewsroom.
We have an entire section devoted to the growing tea-party movement.
That's our America's Newsroom website online. All the
information you need to know. Check it out right now.
Hannity: "We hope you'll join us." On April 3, 2009,
Fox News host Sean Hannity said:
"And also log on to our Web site to get all the details about our
special 'Tax Day Tea Party.' We're going to be live in Atlanta, April
15th. Governor [and Fox News host Mike] Huckabee, by the way, will be
on that show." Hannity also said during the program: "And then it's
April 15, it's our tea party tax day show. And I'll be hosting the show
from Atlanta, where one of dozens of tea party protests are going to be
going on that evening. So we hope you'll join us."
Reporter: "We want to let folks know" tea party schedule so
"they can be a part" of events. The August 23, 2009, edition of Fox
News' America's News HQ
hosted Tea Party Express organizer Mark Williams to promote the tour.
During the segment, anchor and reporter Shannon Bream said of the
tour's schedule:
BREAM: You do have a bit of a cohesive, at least organized schedule.
We want to let folks know you're going to be making --WILLIAMS: Yes.
BREAM:
-- 34, 35 stops, I believe it is, all across the country, so if they
want to come out and take part, they certainly can be a part of what
you're doing. And, you know, this has definitely struck a chord with
people.
Reporter: "[H]opefully Washington will listen to their
concerns." During the August 28, 2009, edition of Fox &
Friends, William La Jeunesse reported
live from Sacramento on the kickoff of the Tea Party Express. At the
conclusion of his report, La Jeunesse said of the tour's concerns:
"[T]hey believe, collectively, that they at least have a voice, and
hopefully Washington will listen to their concerns."
Host: "How you can join, next." On its August 19,
2009, broadcast, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade told
viewers "how you can join" the Tea Party Express:
KILMEADE:
Straight ahead, citizens take their concerns about health care on the
road to -- on the road. The organizer of a cross-country tea party
tour, and how you can join, next.[...]
KILMEADE:
The Tea Party Express will make 35 stops across the country, giving
Americans a constructive outlet in which to share their concerns on
health care, and I imagine more.
During
the segment, Fox News helped viewers find out "how you can join" the
Tea Party Express by displaying the dates and locations of 22 stops.
"To sign up for Tea Party 2.0 Go to ..." On May 13,
2009, On the Record host Greta Van Susteren did
a segment
on the "Tea Party 2.0," saying: "If you wanted to go to a tea party on
April 15 but could not make it or there was none in your hometown,
tomorrow's your big chance." She later asked Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC),
"What do they do, do they log on a particular place? And will they be
able to interact with you? I mean, how's this gonna work?" and later,
"[W]hen is this tea party? When does it begin? Is there a Web address
or a phone number?"
Cavuto on protestors: "God bless these folks."
On March 27, while showing footage of tea party protestors gathering
for a tea party rally "four and a half hours from now," Fox Business
senior vice president Neil Cavuto commented,
"I don't do that [gather to protest] for anything. ... God bless these
folks."
Reporter endorsed tea partier's call to "get these liberal
communists out of our government." While covering
a tea party protest for FoxNews.com on September 4, 2009, reporter
Griff Jenkins interviewed a tea partier who said he wanted to "get
these liberal communists out of our government." Jenkins replied: "How
about that. I couldn't have said anything better than that." On the
September 12, 2009, edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Dave
Briggs said of Tea Party Express-embedded Jenkins: "You might call him a
tea party groupie."
Fox News employee: Some members of Fox "cheerlead for rallies
and tea parties." Fox News contributor Bernard Goldberg stated
on September 29, 2009: "There are some programs on Fox that are not
only not 'Fair and Balanced' -- they're commentary shows, they don't
have to be -- but they brag about how 'Fair and Balanced' they are.
They don't cover rallies and tea parties; they cheerlead for rallies and
tea parties. And as a journalist, I am totally against that."
Tea party participants credited Fox promotions for bringing
them to the April 15, 2009, protests.For instance:
- The Odessa American (TX) reported
of a rally outside Odessa City Hall: "Statements like 'I saw it on Fox'
were heard around the crowd, which organizers hope will be the first of
many in the area."
- An April 15, 2009, Associated Press article
reported of a protest in Louisville, Kentucky: "Laura Watkins pushed
her 2-year-old daughter Zoe in a stroller with a sign strapped to the
front reading 'My Piggy Bank is not Your ATM.' Watkins said she joined
the protest after reading about it online and hearing about it on Fox
News."
- WOAI-TV (NBC, San Antonio) reported
that the "San Antonio Tea Party grabbed national attention with radio
and TV talk show host Glenn Beck airing his TV show here on Fox[.]
While many came to see that, others came to say 'no more spending.' "
- The Anchorage Daily News (AK) reported
of a local protest: "Hundreds more gathered in the Mat-Su later in the
day as a coalition of conservative groups, spurred by Fox News,
organized hundreds of similar events around the country.
Tea party organizers used Fox News to increase attendance.
For instance:
- San Antonio Express-News media columnist Jeanne Jakle wrote
in an April 2, 2009, blog post
that "Eric Adam, the media correspondent for the San Antonio Tea Party,
said he's expecting thousands to attend the event now that Beck and his
national forum are involved."
- Tea parties across the country used
Fox News' presence at the events to draw protesters. For instance, the
Sacramento Tea Party website used Cavuto's image at the top of its home
page to promote its event. The website AtlantaTeaParty.net used Hannity's appearance at its Atlanta protest to
promote its event. The website TaxDayTeaParty.com
promoted a protest in New York City by featuring Fox News' Newt
Gingrich as a featured speaker.
Appendix: Fox News Tea Party promotional graphics
The following are examples of images that appeared on Fox News
properties, which promoted various Tea Party protests:
(Click here.)
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
LATEST NEWS
Critics Blast 'Reckless and Impossible' Bid to Start Operating Mountain Valley Pipeline
"The time to build more dirty and dangerous pipelines is over," said one environmental campaigner.
Apr 23, 2024
Environmental defenders on Tuesday ripped the company behind the Mountain Valley Pipeline for asking the federal government—on Earth Day—for permission to start sending methane gas through the 303-mile conduit despite a worsening climate emergency caused largely by burning fossil fuels.
Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC sent a letter Monday to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Acting Secretary Debbie-Anne Reese seeking final permission to begin operation on the MVP next month, even while acknowledging that much of the Virginia portion of the pipeline route remains unfinished and developers have yet to fully comply with safety requirements.
"In a manner typical of its ongoing disrespect for the environment, Mountain Valley Pipeline marked Earth Day by asking FERC for authorization to place its dangerous, unnecessary pipeline into service in late May," said Jessica Sims, the Virginia field coordinator for Appalachian Voices.
"MVP brazenly asks for this authorization while simultaneously notifying FERC that the company has completed less than two-thirds of the project to final restoration and with the mere promise that it will notify the commission when it fully complies with the requirements of a consent decree it entered into with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration last fall," she continued.
"Requesting an in-service decision by May 23 leaves the company very little time to implement the safety measures required by its agreement with PHMSA," Sims added. "There is no rush, other than to satisfy MVP's capacity customers' contracts—a situation of the company's own making. We remain deeply concerned about the construction methods and the safety of communities along the route of MVP."
Russell Chisholm, co-director of the Protect Our Water, Heritage, Rights (POWHR) Coalition—which called MVP's request "reckless and impossible"—said in a statement that "we are watching our worst nightmare unfold in real-time: The reckless MVP is barreling towards completion."
"During construction, MVP has contaminated our water sources, destroyed our streams, and split the earth beneath our homes. Now they want to run methane gas through their degraded pipes and shoddy work," Chisholm added. "The MVP is a glaring human rights violation that is indicative of the widespread failures of our government to act on the climate crisis in service of the fossil fuel industry."
POWHR and activists representing frontline communities affected by the pipeline are set to take part in a May 8 demonstration outside project financier Bank of America's headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Appalachian Voices noted that MVP's request comes days before pipeline developer Equitrans Midstream is set to release its 2024 first-quarter earnings information on April 30.
MVP is set to traverse much of Virginia and West Virginia, with the Southgate extension running into North Carolina. Outgoing U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and other pipeline proponents fought to include expedited construction of the project in the debt ceiling deal negotiated between President Joe Biden and congressional Republicans last year.
On Monday, climate and environmental defenders also petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, challenging FERC's approval of the MVP's planned Southgate extension, contending that the project is so different from original plans that the government's previous assent is now irrelevant.
"Federal, state, and local elected officials have spoken out against this unneeded proposal to ship more methane gas into North Carolina," said Sierra Club senior field organizer Caroline Hansley. "The time to build more dirty and dangerous pipelines is over. After MVP Southgate requested a time extension for a project that it no longer plans to construct, it should be sent back to the drawing board for this newly proposed project."
David Sligh, conservation director at Wild Virginia, said: "Approving the Southgate project is irresponsible. This project will pose the same kinds of threats of damage to the environment and the people along its path as we have seen caused by the Mountain Valley Pipeline during the last six years."
"FERC has again failed to protect the public interest, instead favoring a profit-making corporation," Sligh added.
Others renewed warnings about the dangers MVP poses to wildlife.
"The endangered bats, fish, mussels, and plants in this boondoggle's path of destruction deserve to be protected from killing and habitat destruction by a project that never received proper approvals in the first place," Center for Biological Diversity attorney Perrin de Jong said. "Our organization will continue fighting this terrible idea to the bitter end."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Seismic Win for Workers': FTC Bans Noncompete Clauses
Advocates praised the FTC "for taking a strong stance against this egregious use of corporate power, thereby empowering workers to switch jobs and launch new ventures, and unlocking billions of dollars in worker earnings."
Apr 23, 2024
U.S. workers' rights advocates and groups celebrated on Tuesday after the Federal Trade Commission voted 3-2 along party lines to approve a ban on most noncompete clauses, which Democratic FTC Chair Lina Khansaid "keep wages low, suppress new ideas, and rob the American economy of dynamism."
"The FTC's final rule to ban noncompetes will ensure Americans have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business, or bring a new idea to market," Khan added, pointing to the commission's estimates that the policy could mean another $524 for the average worker, over 8,500 new startups, and 17,000 to 29,000 more patents each year.
As Economic Policy Institute (EPI) president Heidi Shierholz explained, "Noncompete agreements are employment provisions that ban workers at one company from working for, or starting, a competing business within a certain period of time after leaving a job."
"These agreements are ubiquitous," she noted, applauding the ban. "EPI research finds that more than 1 out of every 4 private-sector workers—including low-wage workers—are required to enter noncompete agreements as a condition of employment."
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has suggested it plans to file a lawsuit that, as The American Prospectdetailed, "could more broadly threaten the rulemaking authority the FTC cited when proposing to ban noncompetes."
Already, the tax services and software provider Ryan has filed a legal challenge in federal court in Texas, arguing that the FTC is unconstitutionally structured.
Still, the Democratic commissioners' vote was still heralded as a "seismic win for workers." Echoing Khan's critiques of such noncompetes, Public Citizen executive vice president Lisa Gilbert declared that such clauses "inflict devastating harms on tens of millions of workers across the economy."
"The pervasive use of noncompete clauses limits worker mobility, drives down wages, keeps Americans from pursuing entrepreneurial dreams and creating new businesses, causes more concentrated markets, and keeps workers stuck in unsafe or hostile workplaces," she said. "Noncompete clauses are both an unfair method of competition and aggressively harmful to regular people. The FTC was right to tackle this issue and to finalize this strong rule."
Morgan Harper, director of policy and advocacy at the American Economic Liberties Project, praised the FTC for "listening to the comments of thousands of entrepreneurs and workers of all income levels across industries" and finalizing a rule that "is a clear-cut win."
Demand Progress' Emily Peterson-Cassin similarly commended the commission "for taking a strong stance against this egregious use of corporate power, thereby empowering workers to switch jobs and launch new ventures, and unlocking billions of dollars in worker earnings."
While such agreements are common across various industries, Teófilo Reyes, chief of staff at the Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, said that "many restaurant workers have been stuck at their job, earning as low as $2.13 per hour, because of the noncompete clause that they agreed to have in their contract."
"They didn't know that it would affect their wages and livelihood," Reyes stressed. "Most workers cannot negotiate their way out of a noncompete clause because noncompetes are buried in the fine print of employment contracts. A full third of noncompete clauses are presented after a worker has accepted a job."
Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) executive director Mike Pierce pointed out that the FTC on Tuesday "recognized the harmful role debt plays in the workplace, including the growing use of training repayment agreement provisions, or TRAPs, and took action to outlaw TRAPs and all other employer-driven debt that serve the same functions as noncompete agreements."
Sandeep Vaheesan, legal director at Open Markets Institute, highlighted that the addition came after his group, SBPC, and others submitted comments on the "significant gap" in the commission's initial January 2023 proposal, and also welcomed that "the final rule prohibits both conventional noncompete clauses and newfangled versions like TRAPs."
Jonathan Harris, a Loyola Marymount University law professor and SBPC senior fellow, said that "by also banning functional noncompetes, the rule stays one step ahead of employers who use 'stay-or-pay' contracts as workarounds to existing restrictions on traditional noncompetes. The FTC has decided to try to avoid a game of whack-a-mole with employers and their creative attorneys, which worker advocates will applaud."
Among those applauding was Jean Ross, president of National Nurses United, who said that "the new FTC rule will limit the ability of employers to use debt to lock nurses into unsafe jobs and will protect their role as patient advocates."
Angela Huffman, president of Farm Action, also cheered the effort to stop corporations from holding employees "hostage," saying that "this rule is a critical step for protecting our nation's workers and making labor markets fairer and more competitive."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Discriminatory' North Carolina Law Criminalizing Felon Voting Struck Down
One plaintiffs' attorney said the ruling "makes our democracy better and ensures that North Carolina is not able to unjustly criminalize innocent individuals with felony convictions who are valued members of our society."
Apr 23, 2024
Democracy defenders on Tuesday hailed a ruling from a U.S. federal judge striking down a 19th-century North Carolina law criminalizing people who vote while on parole, probation, or post-release supervision due to a felony conviction.
In Monday's decision, U.S. District Judge Loretta C. Biggs—an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama—sided with the North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute and Action NC, who argued that the 1877 law discriminated against Black people.
"The challenged statute was enacted with discriminatory intent, has not been cleansed of its discriminatory taint, and continues to disproportionately impact Black voters," Biggs wrote in her 25-page ruling.
Therefore, according to the judge, the 1877 law violates the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause.
"We are ecstatic that the court found in our favor and struck down this racially discriminatory law that has been arbitrarily enforced over time," Action NC executive director Pat McCoy said in a statement. "We will now be able to help more people become civically engaged without fear of prosecution for innocent mistakes. Democracy truly won today!"
Voting rights tracker Democracy Docket noted that Monday's ruling "does not have any bearing on North Carolina's strict felony disenfranchisement law, which denies the right to vote for those with felony convictions who remain on probation, parole, or a suspended sentence—often leaving individuals without voting rights for many years after release from incarceration."
However, Mitchell Brown, an attorney for one of the plaintiffs, said that "Judge Biggs' decision will help ensure that voters who mistakenly think they are eligible to cast a ballot will not be criminalized for simply trying to reengage in the political process and perform their civic duty."
"It also makes our democracy better and ensures that North Carolina is not able to unjustly criminalize innocent individuals with felony convictions who are valued members of our society, specifically Black voters who were the target of this law," Brown added.
North Carolina officials have not said whether they will appeal Biggs' ruling. The state Department of Justice said it was reviewing the decision.
According to Forward Justice—a nonpartisan law, policy, and strategy center dedicated to advancing racial, social, and economic justice in the U.S. South, "Although Black people constitute 21% of the voting-age population in North Carolina, they represent 42% of the people disenfranchised while on probation, parole, or post-release supervision."
The group notes that in 44 North Carolina counties, "the disenfranchisement rate for Black people is more than three times the rate of the white population."
"Judge Biggs' decision will help ensure that voters who mistakenly think they are eligible to cast a ballot will not be criminalized for simply trying to re-engage in the political process and perform their civic duty."
In what one civil rights leader called "the largest expansion of voting rights in this state since the 1965 Voting Rights Act," a three-judge state court panel voted 2-1 in 2021 to restore voting rights to approximately 55,000 formerly incarcerated felons. The decision made North Carolina the only Southern state to automatically restore former felons' voting rights.
Republican state legislators appealed that ruling to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, which in 2022 granted their request for a stay—but only temporarily, as the court allowed a previous injunction against any felony disenfranchisement based on fees or fines to stand.
However, last April the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the three-judge panel decision, stripping voting rights from thousands of North Carolinians previously convicted of felonies. Dissenting Justice Anita Earls opined that "the majority's decision in this case will one day be repudiated on two grounds."
"First, because it seeks to justify the denial of a basic human right to citizens and thereby perpetuates a vestige of slavery, and second, because the majority violates a basic tenant of appellate review by ignoring the facts as found by the trial court and substituting its own," she wrote.
As similar battles play out in other states, Democratic U.S. lawmakers led by Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont in December introduced legislation to end former felon disenfranchisement in federal elections and guarantee incarcerated people the right to vote.
Currently, only Maine, Vermont, and the District of Columbia allow all incarcerated people to vote behind bars.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular