November, 01 2016, 02:00pm EDT
Paris Agreement Enters into Force This Week, What to Expect at November Climate Talks
WASHINGTON
Nearly every nation banded together less than a year ago to adopt the Paris Agreement, a plan aimed at limiting global climate change. Since then, momentum for tackling global warming emissions has continued to build among nations. The Paris Agreement will enter into force on November 4, earlier than most had predicted and just in advance of the United Nation's annual climate change summit, which takes place in Marrakech, Morocco from November 7 to 18 this year and will be attended by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
"This milestone is certainly cause for celebration, perhaps with a glass or two of French Champagne, but nations still have a lot of hard work ahead of them," said Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy at UCS who has been involved in international climate negotiations since they began in 1990. "In Marrakech, countries will be tasked with building on the Paris Agreement's strong foundation to ensure it can be properly implemented and strengthened."
The Paris Agreement's temperature limitation goal, net zero emissions objective and process to steadily increase the ambition of national emissions reduction commitments sent a strong signal to the fossil fuel industry that their efforts to block action on climate change after decades of deception are no longer working. However, maintaining the momentum on climate action depends on progress being made on multiple fronts at this year's climate change summit in Marrakech, including the following:
- Agreement on a process and timeframe for finalizing the Paris Agreement implementation rules on issues such as transparency and reporting, use of market mechanisms to achieve national commitments, land use sector emissions accounting, and creation of a compliance structure.
- Concrete steps to ramp up public and private sector financial support to aid developing countries with adaptation and mitigation actions, implementing their national plans, and accelerating their transition to climate-friendly technologies.
- Determine how the "facilitative dialogue"--a mandated review slated for COP24 in late 2018 to determine if national climate action plans are collectively adequate for meeting the bold temperature limits established in Paris--should be structured.
"The Marrakech climate summit needs to catalyze action on three fronts simultaneously," said Meyer. "Countries need to ramp up near-term actions to reduce their emissions and increase their resilience to climate impacts, intensify efforts to complete the Paris Agreement rule book, and lay the groundwork for stronger national commitments to be put forward by the end of this decade. The unprecedented speed with which countries acted to bring the Paris Agreement into force, as well as last month's agreement on phasing down production and use of hydrofluorocarbons under the Montreal Protocol, gives me hope that Marrakech can and will make the progress needed on all three of these fronts."
IPCC Report on Climate Change Coming, But Countries Experiencing Impacts Now
Communities across the globe are already experiencing the impacts of climate change in the form of droughts, wildfires, more intense hurricanes, climbing temperatures and rising seas. Science tells us these problems will only continue to worsen without more drastic action. Therefore, as called for in Paris, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will issue a special report in 2018 aimed at comparing what life would look like in a world where the global average temperature has increased by 1.5 degrees Celsius, as compared to an increase of 2 degrees Celsius, and laying out the actions needed to meet the Paris Agreement's ambitious temperature limitation goals.
"Work on the IPCC report has already begun, and it will provide an important piece of the scientific puzzle in helping us understand the consequences of not meeting the 1.5 degree Celsius limit," said Adam Markham, deputy director of the Climate and Energy Program at UCS. "But that's of little consolation to the communities that are already bearing the brunt of climate change impacts."
"Therefore, nations need to take actions in Marrakech laying out how countries in need of immediate adaptation and mitigation assistance can obtain the help they require," added Markham. "Furthermore the mounting, ever-worsening climate change impacts should provide nations the impetus to ratchet up their ambition to reduce global warming emissions sooner rather than later."
U.S. Expected to Continue Its Leadership Role at Marrakech
So far, the U.S.--in partnership with China, Canada, Mexico and other nations--has proven to be a strong leader in the U.N. process to decrease global warming emissions and in turn help limit some of the worst impacts of climate change.
"The Paris Agreement will be entering into force in record time largely because of actions taken by the U.S. and other nations that acted early to formally join the Paris Agreement," said Rachel Cleetus, lead economist and climate policy manager at UCS. "When the U.S. and China--two economic power houses and clean energy leaders--announced their intentions to join the Paris Agreement in advance of November's climate summit, they led the way for other nations to act, and made global businesses and investors take notice. Similarly, the U.S. has joined with Canada and Mexico to lay out an ambitious vision for coordinated North American climate and clean energy actions."
This leadership is anticipated to continue in Marrakech, with the U.S expected to release its long-term plan to dramatically lower global warming emissions by mid-century during the second week of negotiations. Nations were invited to submit these plans by 2020 in keeping with the long-term decarbonization goals laid out in the Paris Agreement.
"At Marrakech, we hope to see an ambitious and comprehensive plan from the U.S. that lays out emission reduction opportunities across all sectors of our economy, in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement," said Cleetus. "Additionally, the plan should emphasize the need to protect and enhance the natural sinks--such as forests, grasslands and soils--that help absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it. The good news is that the costs of renewables are falling dramatically, which means the transition to a low-carbon economy is becoming increasingly affordable. In addition, it will bring a multitude of public health, economic and climate benefits."
"This blueprint is crucial for our next president and Congress, who will need to develop and adopt the policies that can put the U.S. on a path to achieving net zero emissions by mid-century," added Cleetus. "Such policies should include a robust price on carbon, as well as stronger policies on clean energy, energy efficiency, and land use and forest management. By sharing its plan early, the U.S. is setting an important example that will encourage other nations to follow suit."
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
​State of Emergency Declared After Cargo Ship Destroys Baltimore Bridge
Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin said he was "deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore."
Mar 26, 2024
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
A state of emergency was declared in Maryland early Tuesday morning after a large cargo ship slammed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore leading to its total collapse and sending a still unverified number of vehicles and people into the Patapsco River.
As the Baltimore Sunreports:
In a Tuesday morning news conference, just a few hours after the incident, Baltimore Fire Department Chief James Wallace said authorities are "still very much in an active search and rescue posture" noting they are searching for "upwards of seven individuals" and that sonar has detected the presence of vehicles in the water. There is no indication that the event was intentional, Wallace said.
"This is a tragedy that you could never imagine … It looked like something out of an action movie," Mayor Brandon Scott said.
The terrifying footage of the bridge's collapse—which CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez commented was "almost unbelievable" to watch—is circulating widely on news channels and social media:
This video is almost unbelievable. The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore literally collapsed this morning after it was struck by this large ship. pic.twitter.com/rYuy4U2r7H
— Omar Jimenez (@OmarJimenez) March 26, 2024
U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Tuesday that he had spoken with Mayor Scott and well as Maryland Governor Wes Moore and was helping to coordinate federal assistance.
"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," said Buttigieg.
Moore said in a statement he had declared a state of emergency and that work was underway to "quickly deploy federal resources" to the area.
"We are thankful for the brave men and women who are carrying out efforts to rescue those involved and pray for everyone's safety," said Moore. "We will remain in close contact with federal, state, and local entities that are carrying out rescue efforts as we continue to assess and respond to this tragedy."
Kevin Cartwright of the Baltimore Fire Department told CNN that the number of missing people may be higher than reported in other outlets. "Unfortunately," said Cartwright, "we understand that there were up to 20 individuals who may be in the Patapsco River right now as well as multiple vehicles."
Early reporting indicated that no crew members aboard the container ship, which sails under a Singapore flag, were injured or missing. A local harbor pilot was also said to be on board at the time of the crash.
"Deeply concerned for the safety and well-being of everyone affected by the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) following the accident. "I'm profoundly thankful to first responders on the scene and will track rescue efforts by local, state, and federal authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grave 'Threat to Journalists' Remains as UK Court Delays Assange Extradition Ruling
"The Biden administration should take the opportunity to drop this dangerous case once and for all," said the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
Mar 26, 2024
The United Kingdom's High Court ruled Tuesday that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange cannot immediately be extradited to the United States and gave the Biden administration three weeks to provide "assurances" that the publisher's First Amendment rights will be protected and that he won't face the death penalty.
If the U.S. does not provide the requested assurances, Assange will be allowed to pursue a limited appeal of his extradition. Should the U.S. submit assurances by the April 16 deadline, a hearing will be held on May 20 to determine whether they are "satisfactory."
Assange, whose health has deteriorated badly during his five years in a high-security London jail, faces 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act and a possible 175-year prison sentence in the U.S. for publishing classified information—a common journalistic practice. WikiLeaks disclosures exposed grave U.S. and U.K. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Press freedom and human rights groups say the extradition of Assange to the U.S. would set a dangerous precedent and pose a dire threat to journalism everywhere.
Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said in a statement Tuesday that "we are glad Julian Assange is not getting extradited today."
"But this legal battle is far from over, and the threat to journalists and the news media from the Espionage Act charges against Assange remains," said Timm. "Assange's conviction in American courts would create a dangerous precedent that the U.S. government can and will use against reporters of all stripes who expose its wrongdoing or embarrass it. The Biden administration should take the opportunity to drop this dangerous case once and for all."
"It's long past time for the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the Espionage Act charges and resolve this case."
The U.S., which has been aggressively pursuing Assange's extradition for years, previously provided the U.K. government with assurances that Assange would not be held at a supermax prison that's notorious for its inhumane treatment of inmates.
Human rights groups have said such assurances from the U.S. government are "inherently unreliable" and should not be taken seriously by British authorities.
"While the U.S. has allegedly assured the U.K. that it will not violate Assange's rights, we know from past cases that such 'guarantees' are deeply flawed—and the diplomatic assurances so far in the Assange case are riddled with loopholes," noted Simon Crowther, legal adviser at Amnesty International.
"The U.S. must stop its politically motivated prosecution of Assange, which puts Assange and media freedom at risk worldwide," Crowther said Tuesday. "In trying to imprison him, the U.S. is sending an unambiguous warning to publishers and journalists everywhere that they too could be targeted and that it is not safe for them to receive and publish classified material—even if doing so is in the public interest."
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, echoed that message, saying in a statement that "prosecuting Assange for the publication of classified information would have profound implications for press freedom, because publishing classified information is what journalists and news organizations often need to do in order to expose wrongdoing by government."
"It's long past time for the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the Espionage Act charges and resolve this case," said Jaffer.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Rips 'Absurd' US Claim That Israel Is Not Violating International Law
"The State Department's position makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Mar 26, 2024
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday said the U.S. State Department's determination that Israel is not violating international law with its assault on the Gaza Strip is "absurd on its face," pointing to the mass death, destruction, and starvation that Israeli forces have inflicted on the territory's population over the past six months.
"Thirty-two thousand Palestinians in Gaza have been killed and almost 75,000 injured, two-thirds of whom are women and children," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement. "Some 60% of the housing units have been damaged or destroyed, and almost all medical facilities have been made inoperable. Today, hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children are facing starvation because [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu won't let in sufficient humanitarian aid, while thousands of trucks are waiting to get into Gaza."
"The State Department's position," said Sanders, "makes a mockery of U.S. law and assurances provided to Congress."
The senator's statement came after State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told reporters during a press briefing earlier Monday that the Biden administration has not found Israel "to be in violation of international humanitarian law, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or when it comes to the provision of humanitarian assistance."
Miller was responding to a question about assurances the administration has received from the Israeli government that its use of American weaponry has complied with international law and that it has permitted U.S. humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, where the entire population is facing acute hunger.
Under a new Biden administration policy known as NSM-20, recipients of American military aid are required to provide the U.S. government with "credible and reliable" written assurances that they are using such assistance "in a manner consistent with all applicable international and domestic law and policy."
Late last week, a group of U.S. senators—including Sanders—warned the Biden administration that deeming Israeli assurances credible would "be inconsistent with the letter and spirit of NSM-20" and "establish an unacceptable precedent" for the application of the policy "in other situations around the world."
"Until Biden is ready to impose real policy consequences on Netanyahu's government, the famine will continue."
It is a violation of U.S. law to continue sending military assistance to a country that is obstructing the delivery of American humanitarian aid. Last month, far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich blocked a U.S.-funded flour shipment from entering the Gaza Strip, and Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on convoys attempting to deliver aid to desperate Gazans.
Prominent human rights groups have been calling on the U.S. to impose an arms embargo on Israel for months, pointing to documented examples of the Israeli military using American weaponry to commit atrocities in Gaza.
But the Biden administration has refused to even apply concrete restrictions on American military aid. Over the weekend, U.S. President Joe Biden signed into law a measure that approves $3.8 billion in unconditional military assistance for the Israeli government and imposes a one-year ban on funding for the primary humanitarian aid organization in Gaza.
Jeremy Konyndyk, the president of Refugees International and a former USAID official, said Monday that Israel's assurances to the U.S. are "not remotely credible" and argued the Biden administration is undermining efforts to combat the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza by accepting the Israeli government's claims.
The U.S., he said, is "talking a big game about fighting the famine that its bombs and diplomatic cover have helped create." Resorting to "gimmicky" efforts such as airdrops and temporary ports while a U.S. ally obstructs humanitarian aid "is not how you fight a famine," Konyndyk argued.
"Fundamentally Biden must choose: between continuing to enable Netanyahu, or ending the famine. There's no way to split the difference," said Konyndyk. "Until Biden is ready to impose real policy consequences on Netanyahu's government, the famine will continue."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular