July, 25 2017, 04:30pm EDT
Small Businesses Oppose Senate Vote on Health Care
Small business owners and small business groups across the country staunchly oppose the Senate's Motion to Proceed today on health care legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
WASHINGTON
Small business owners and small business groups across the country staunchly oppose the Senate's Motion to Proceed today on health care legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This morning, more than one thousand small business owners delivered a letter to Congress, urging Senators to protect the health care gains they made under the ACA.
Senate Republicans have put forward several versions of their bill, including a repeal of the Affordable Care Act without replacement, yet none of the options of the table serve to improve the quality, cost, or coverage of health care for small businesses or their employees. In fact, every version of this bill poses a grave threat to the health care of tens of millions of people and the economy - decimating Medicaid's budget, destabilizing the private market, and throwing no fewer than 22 million people off insurance.
The Main Street Alliance and its allies urge the Senate to stop the Motion to Proceed on reckless legislation that will once again make it difficult for small business owners and their employees to afford high quality health care.
"Senate Republican leadership is gutting our healthcare system in order to give tax breaks to the very wealthy and drug and insurance companies. This is a move that will hurt millions of people and drive up costs for small business owners. Americans do not want this bill, and neither do America's small business owners." -- Amanda Ballantyne, National Director of Main Street Alliance.
"Senate Republicans have had a difficult time mustering support to pass a repeal of the Affordable Care Act, and with good reason. These bills hurt small business owners, entrepreneurs and the economy. Congress should now stop the political games, and work together to find bipartisan solutions that will improve upon the successes of the existing law." -- Rhett Buttle, founder of Public Private Strategies and former director of private sector engagement in the Office of the HHS Secretary.
"If Congress truly cared about American business, it would tackle the high administrative costs and high drug prices that undermine our economy and hamper the international competitiveness of our businesses. Congress should not be playing politics with our healthcare system. Instead we need comprehensive reform with best business practices such as lean production, and processes that are transparent, evidence-based and priced as a function of measurable value." -- David Levine, Co-founder and CEO, American Sustainable Business Council.
"For the good of America's small businesses, the U.S. Senate must immediately stop its efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act. None of the healthcare proposals offered by congressional Republicans thus far will do anything but hurt small firms. In fact, their proposals will make health insurance less accessible for small businesses and aspiring entrepreneurs by driving up premiums, scaling back tax credits and Medicaid expansion and limiting protections for those with pre-existing conditions. Instead of continuing to tinker with a plan that cannot be fixed with minor adjustments, lawmakers should craft a bipartisan solution that focuses on improving the ACA because it is already working for America's job creators." -- John Arensmeyer, Founder & CEO, Small Business Majority.
"If the Senate proceeds to debate healthcare reform, they will vote to have either 32, 22 or 15 million Americans lose their health insurance. Deductibles would soar by thousands of dollars. The end result of all proposals would be an economic disaster for the nation and small businesses." -- Frank Knapp Jr., President & CEO, South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.
"With all of the talk today in Washington, D.C. about how to address the future of healthcare in the United States, it is clear that there are no easy answers. But let's start with at least this: small businesses and motivated entrepreneurs looking to pursue the American Dream cannot afford to go back to the days before the ACA. One of the great strengths of the American economy is its national backbone of small businesses. Small businesses who desperately need Washington to put policy before politics. If we choose to work together on fixes, and not succumb to the partisan politics that calls for moving backward instead of forward, we can continue on the path to making America's health care system the envy of the world. Our small businesses deserve nothing less." -- David Borris, owner of Hel's Kitchen Catering in Illinois, and Main Street Alliance Executive Committee member.
"The Affordable Care Act is the first real attempt to bring some order and consistency to our approach to delivery of health care in the United States. It didn't address every challenge but there is no question that for millions of Americans and small business owners the ACA has been an important improvement in their lives. The Republican plans are not only cruel and amoral they are an economic travesty that will drive up cost, deny timely care, put lives at risk and draw trillions out of the general economy to prop up an inefficient and cumbersome patch work of health care delivery. This is simple- we cannot afford to move backwards. We need the Senate to reject the motion to proceed." -- Kelly Conklin, owner of Foley-Waite Associates in New Jersey and Main Street Alliance Executive Committee member.
"Affordable health care is critical to the well being of Vermonters and the health of our local economies. I was encouraged to see Governor Phil Scott stand with our congressional delegation in opposition to recent attempts by the Republicans in Washington to dismantle the ACA and slash Medicaid. The bipartisanship in our state sends a clear message. I urge all of Vermont's elected officials to continue to stand together to protect the progress that has been made and build a healthy future for our state." -- Jen Kimmich, Owner of The Alchemist in Stowe, Vermont, and Main Street Alliance Vermont Board Chair.
"The ACA afforded Zootility another way to be risk averse. Instead committing to health plans that all of our employees would be satisfied with and committing to an amount that we cover for all of our employees, we could roll our total compensation into pure salary. This affords us the flexibility to reward the best performing employees differently than across the board. When considering replacing the ACA, legislators should be considering how the result will impact makers and startups as these are the engines of the change that American's are truly hungry for." -- Nate Barr, owner of Zootility in Maine, and Maine Small Business Coalition member.
"As a small businessperson, my family and most of my employees are dependent on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), so I have a hard time understanding the controversy. Keeping the ACA in place puts Pennsylvania's businesses and customers in the best place to succeed. Not without its flaws, it's the best approach to a market dominated by powerful drug manufacturers and healthcare providers with a storied history of putting profits before patients." -- Michael Row, owner of Penn Book Center in Philadelphia, Main Street Alliance member.
"Fulfillment in my career was an intangible dream I never thought I would achieve. The monotony of the daily routine of clocking in and out of a job I didn't enjoy for the sole purpose of providing health benefits for myself and my children was beginning to wear me down and take away my joie de vivre. After the Affordable Care Act was signed into law I able to take a chance and become a small business owner without fear of financial ruin due to a medical catastrophe. The security of having medical benefits for my family and I gave me the opportunity to become the business woman I had always dreamed of -- don't take that away from us." -- Amber Tamayo owner of High Ridge Construction Oregon, and Main Street Alliance member.
"I'm lucky to be afforded the ability to work at building a business around my passions, however, it came at the cost of my husband's dreams. Before the Affordable Care Act, he had to give up his small business to work for the public school system so that we could afford the insurance coverage that our growing family needed. Now my daughter is a budding entrepreneur and I don't want to see her sacrifice her dreams in order to have the health care that every human deserves. I want to see us strengthen the ACA -- not repeal it." -- Martha Ehlman owner of Tenfold Fair Trade in West Virginia and Main Street Alliance member
"As someone who suffers from chronic pain, I'm only able to work because I can get treatment for my illness through Medicaid. If this coverage were taken from me, I definitely wouldn't be able to work or have my own business, and I would probably be on disability." -- Tim Foster, owner of Patriotic Motors in Spokane, Washington, and Main Street Alliance member.
The Main Street Alliance (MSA) is a national network of small business coalitions working to build a new voice for small businesses on important public policy issues. Main Street Alliance members are working throughout the country to build policies that work for business owners, their employees, and the communities they serve.
LATEST NEWS
'Weasel Words': Julian Assange's Wife Slams US Assurances to UK
"The diplomatic note does nothing to relieve our family's extreme distress about his future—his grim expectation of spending the rest of his life in isolation in U.S. prison for publishing award-winning journalism."
Apr 16, 2024
The wife of jailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange sharply criticized "assurances" the U.S. government made as the U.K. High Court considers allowing the 52-year-old Australian's extradition to the United States, where he faces 175 years in prison.
The U.S. document states that if extradited, "Assange will have the ability to raise and seek to rely upon at trial (which includes any sentencing hearing) the rights and protections given under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States," though it points out that "a decision as to the applicability of the First Amendment is exclusively within the purview of the U.S. courts."
"A sentence of death will neither be sought nor imposed on Assange," the document adds, noting that he has not been charged with any offense for which that is a possible punishment. It comes after the U.K. court ruled last month that the Biden administration had until Tuesday to confirm that he wouldn't face the death penalty and if it did not, he could continue appealing his extradition.
Responding on social media, his wife, Stella Assange—who is an attorney—blasted the U.S. assurances as "weasel words."
"The United States has issued a nonassurance in relation to the First Amendment, and a standard assurance in relation to the death penalty," she said. "It makes no undertaking to withdraw the prosecution's previous assertion that Julian has no First Amendment rights because he is not a U.S citizen."
"The Biden administration must drop this dangerous prosecution before it is too late."
"Instead, the U.S. has limited itself to blatant weasel words claiming that Julian can 'seek to raise' the First Amendment if extradited," she added. "The diplomatic note does nothing to relieve our family's extreme distress about his future—his grim expectation of spending the rest of his life in isolation in U.S. prison for publishing award-winning journalism. The Biden administration must drop this dangerous prosecution before it is too late."
The U.K. court's next hearing is scheduled for May 20. Last week, reporters asked U.S. President Joe Biden about requests from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and members of the country's Parliament to drop the extradition effort and charges. He said that "we're considering it."
So far, the Biden administration has ignored significant pressure from Australian and U.S. politicians as well as human rights and press freedom groups, and continued to pursue the extradition of Julian Assange, who was charged under former President Donald Trump—the Republican expected to face the Democratic president in the November election.
Assange was charged under the Espionage Act and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for publishing classified documents including the "Collateral Murder" video and the Afghan and Iraq war logs. Since British authorities dragged Assange out of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London—where he lived with political asylum for seven years—he has been jailed in the city's Belmarsh Prison.
The WikiLeaks founder's wife, with whom he has two children, was not alone in condemning the U.S. assurances on Tuesday.
"This 'assurance' should make journalists even more worried about how the Assange prosecution could impact press freedom in the U.S. and globally. The U.K. should grant Assange's appeal and refuse to extradite him," said the Freedom of the Press Foundation. "The U.S. doesn't disclaim the ability to argue that the First Amendment doesn't apply to Assange because of his nationality or other reasons, or for a court to rule against a First Amendment challenge to his prosecution."
Jameel Jaffer, director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, similarly said that "no one who cares about press freedom should take any comfort at all from the United States' assurance that Assange will be permitted to 'rely upon' the First Amendment."
"If the prosecution goes forward, the U.S. government will be trying to persuade American courts that the First Amendment poses no bar to the prosecution of a publisher under the Espionage Act," Jaffer warned. "And if the government is successful, no journalist will ever again be able to publish U.S. government secrets without risking her liberty."
"So the government's First Amendment assurances aren't responsive at all to the concerns that press freedom advocates have been raising," he concluded. "This case poses essentially the same threat to press freedom today as it did yesterday."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Workers Stage Sit-Ins to Demand Google End Israeli Cloud Contract
"Just as people of conscience demanded institutions cut ties with apartheid South Africa in the 1980s, the time is now to rise up in support of Palestinian human rights," said Google employees in an open letter.
Apr 16, 2024
Following recent reports that Google may soon expand its tech collaboration with the Israeli government, dozens of the company's employees on Tuesday entered its offices in New York City and Sunnyvale, California and announced that they wouldn't leave until executives pull out of its $1.2 billion cloud services and data contract with the country.
The No Tech for Apartheid coalition—including the Muslim-led MPower Change and the Jewish-led Jewish Voice for Peace—organized the sit-in, which marks an escalation in Google workers' protests against Project Nimbus, the 2021 contract under which Google and Amazon provide cloud infrastructure across Israel's government.
The deal includes a stipulation that the companies cannot prevent Israel from using Project Nimbus for any government agency, including the Israel Defense Forces (IDF)—which means Google employees' work may be directly supporting the country's assault on the Gaza and its killing of at least 33,843 Palestinians since October.
"Workers will NOT allow business as usual while Google continues to profit from the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza," said MPower Change.
In Sunnyvale, workers began occupying the office of Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian, while employees in the company's New York office began a sit-in in a common space.
Outdoor rallies were also scheduled to take place in San Francisco and Seattle, with both Amazon and Google employees attending.
Former Google cloud software engineer Eddie Hatfield, who was fired last month for disrupting a Google Israel event, was among those who protested in New York.
The sit-ins came a week after Time magazine reported that Google has entered further negotiations with the Israeli government in recent weeks, even as international human rights experts raise alarm that Israeli officials have directly caused famine to take hold in parts of Gaza by blocking humanitarian aid.
No Tech for Apartheid released an open letter addressed to Kurian and other Google and Amazon executives, saying that as long as the companies' "tech continues to power the Israeli military and government, [they] are actively complicit in this genocide."
"Your workers do not want to be complicit in genocide," reads the letter, which has been signed by 93,000 supporters. "Just as people of conscience demanded institutions cut ties with apartheid South Africa in the 1980s, the time is now to rise up in support of Palestinian human rights, to end the Project Nimbus contract, and join calls to end the Israeli occupation and siege of Gaza. This has never been more urgent. We hope that you will take this opportunity to be on the right side of history. End the Project Nimbus contract and reestablish your companies' commitments to human rights."
Keep ReadingShow Less
AOC Rips GOP for Trying to 'Distract From Their Own Incompetence' With Anti-Iran Bills
"The country and the world need real leadership from the House of Representatives in this moment, not resolutions designed purposefully to increase the likelihood of a deadly regional war or worse."
Apr 16, 2024
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Tuesday accused her Republican colleagues of dangerously trying to cloak their own legislative impotence in a flurry of anti-Iran bills—including a bipartisan proposal to ban Americans from traveling to the country.
"Following last weekend's unprecedented response by Iran to Israel's attack on its consulate, the Republican majority is explicitly leveraging a series of bills to further escalate tensions in the Middle East," Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. "This is a blatant attempt to distract from their own incompetence."
On Monday, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) published this week's proposed bills and resolutions, which include 15 separate measures condemning or sanctioning Iran following the retaliatory missile and drone attack launched by Tehran against Israel last weekend.
"In light of Iran's unjustified attack on Israel, the House will move from its previously announced legislative schedule next week to instead consider legislation that supports our ally Israel and holds Iran and its terrorist proxies accountable," Scalise said in a statement.
Peace advocates expressed alarm over a bipartisan resolution introduced Tuesday by Rep. Randy Weber (R-Texas) calling for regime change in Iran—where the United States and United Kingdom led a 1953 coup that ensured the decadeslong rule of a repressive monarch that ended just before the current Islamist regime took power 45 years ago this month.
"Decades of a tyrannical regime in Tehran—destabilizing the Middle East and intentionally spreading chaos throughout the region—has culminated in Iran's direct attack on our greatest ally, Israel," Weber said in a statement. "The rogue regime needs to be overthrown immediately."
One of the most controversial bills on the docket, introduced by Reps. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) and Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), would urge the Biden administration to ban U.S. passport holders from traveling to Iran.
"This shameful idea that punishes people instead of governments was first proposed by [former U.S. President] Donald Trump's Iran envoy (and likely war criminal) Elliott Abrams," the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) said in a statement. "Now, Rep. Wilson—who has deep ties to the [Mojahedin-e-Khalq] and other hawkish groups—is partnering with a hawkish Democrat on this proposal."
"Make no mistake: A ban as called for by this bill could have serious ramifications for anyone traveling to Iran, regardless of passport. We must make clear that this is unacceptable," NIAC continued.
"What if you could no longer travel to Iran to see relatives, visit a sick family member, attend a wedding, or claim an inheritance, out of fear of being imprisoned by the U.S. government?" the group added. "Seeing our loved ones isn't a crime, and no government, whether Iranian or American, should prevent us from doing so."
Congressional progressives say the anti-Iran bills are part of a scheme to deflect attention from what many social media users are calling the "#GOPShitShow," exemplified by yet another effort by far-right lawmakers to dethrone a Republican House speaker—less than six months after his GOP predecessor was ousted.
"The country and the world need real leadership from the House of Representatives in this moment, not resolutions designed purposefully to increase the likelihood of a deadly regional war or worse," said Ocasio-Cortez. "I will oppose any cynical effort to further inflame tensions, destroy a path to peace in the region, and further divide the American people."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular