September, 29 2008, 07:02pm EDT
Lehrer's Debate Ignores World's Vast Majority
WASHINGTON
PBS's Jim Lehrer, as the moderator of the sole
presidential debate dedicated to international policy and security issues,
asked a narrow set of questions that left the vast majority
of the world and its problems undiscussed.
Lehrer spent much of the debate asking about the ongoing global financial
crisis, quoting President Dwight Eisenhower as saying that "the
foundation of military strength is economic strength." When he turned
to questions more specifically about foreign policy, he asked about the
"lessons of Iraq"; whether "more U.S. troops should be sent
to Afghanistan, how many and when"; the degree of threat posed by
Iran; whether Russia was a "competitor," an "enemy" or
a "potential partner"; and the likelihood of another September
11-style attack.
These are all important international policy areas, but what Lehrer didn't
ask about--and what the candidates subsequently didn't discuss--was
striking.
Two of the U.S.'s three largest trading partners--Canada and Mexico--were
never mentioned. Nor was India, the second largest country in the world by
population and the fourth largest economy.
The U.S.'s most important European allies--the British, French and
Germans--were each mentioned once, by McCain, as countries that might help
us influence Iran.
Japan was mentioned once, by Obama--as a place where we don't want the
energy-efficient cars of the future being built.
China, the most populous country in the world, the second biggest economy
in the world and probably the second most powerful country in the world,
was mentioned five times by the candidates, but wasn't brought up in any of
the questions.
While Israel was not mentioned in Lehrer's questioning, it was brought up
several times by McCain and Obama in the context of the candidates' claims
that Iran posed a potential threat to that country. Palestinians or
Palestine were not mentioned.
Africa and Latin America were each mentioned once, by Obama--as places
where China is active. Current and recent hot spots in Africa like the
Congo, Zimbabwe, Sudan and Rwanda were omitted; Somalia was mentioned only
when McCain discussed his stance on the intervention there in the 1990s.
Brazil, Colombia, Cuba and Haiti never came up; Venezuela was mentioned once,
by Obama--as a "rogue state."
Serbia and the former Yugoslavia were not referred to; Kosovo was mentioned
once, by McCain--as a place where he had supported military action.
(He actually said he "supported what we did in Kosovo," which
isn't true--he wanted to send ground troops in.)
Topics like global poverty, hunger and the food crisis were not asked about
or brought up by the candidates. AIDS and international health
policy went unmentioned as well. Climate change was mentioned three times
by the candidates (once as a reason to support nuclear power), but not
brought up by Lehrer.
Nobody mentioned human rights. "Torture" was mentioned three
times, but not brought up by Lehrer.
Clearly, a 90-minute debate cannot touch on every topic of international
policy. But the narrow focus of Lehrer's questioning suggested that, the
financial crisis aside, military intervention and confrontation were the
only issues worth talking about. Given the wide variety of complex problems
facing the globe, the missed opportunity is tragic.
ACTION: Ask Jim Lehrer why his
questions focused so disproportionately on military intervention and confrontation,
to the exclusion of many of the most pressing global problems.
CONTACT: Jim Lehrer
Email: jlehrer@newshour.org
Phone: 703-998-2150
FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints.
LATEST NEWS
RFK Jr Running Mate Floats Joining 'Forces With Trump' to Thwart Harris-Walz
"From the beginning of this race, we've said that RFK Jr. is nothing more than a spoiler for Donald Trump, and we're glad that his running mate is finally admitting it," said one Democratic strategist.
Aug 20, 2024
Nicole Shanahan—the billionaire who poured millions of dollars of her own money into Robert F. Kennedy's presidential campaign before the conspiracy theorist chose her as his running mate—on Tuesday raised the possibility that Kennedy could drop his independent White House bid and throw his support behind former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee.
"There's two options and one is staying in, forming that new party, but we run the risk of a Kamala Harris and [Minnesota Gov. Tim] Walz presidency, because we draw votes from Trump," Shanahan told Tom Bilyeu during the latest episode of his "Impact Theory" podcast. "Or we walk away right now and join forces with Donald Trump and... we explain to our base why we're making this decision."
"I will say that Trump has taken genuine, sincere interest in our policiesaround chronic disease," Shanahan added. "He takes it seriously. For that reason, I think it behooves us to sit and see if we can actually make some real change."
During his first term, Trump repeatedly proposed massive cuts in federal funding for medical and scientific research and other programs.
Shanahan said she envisions a situation in which Kennedy "does an incredible job" as Trump's Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary.
Responding to Shanahan's remarks, Democratic National Committee (DNC) communications adviser Lis Smith said in a statement that "Nicole Shanahan isn't even pretending to be a serious VP candidate anymore."
"In one interview alone, she floated RFK Jr. for HHS secretary in a Trump administration, discussed her interest in running for governor of California in 2026, admitted that the Kennedy-Shanahan campaign has no path to victory, and raised the possibility of joining forces with Trump to defeat Vice President Harris," Smith continued.
"From the beginning of this race, we've said that RFK Jr. is nothing more than a spoiler for Donald Trump, and we're glad that his running mate is finally admitting it," she added.
The Washington Postreported last week that Kennedy sought a meeting with the Harris-Walz campaign to discuss a possible job in their administration should they defeat Trump and Republican U.S. Sen. JD Vance of Ohio in November. According to sources, the Harris campaign has so far ignored Kennedy.
While Kennedy called that reporting "fake news," hesaid on social media Tuesday that "as always, I am willing to talk with leaders of any political party to further the goals I have served for 40 years in my career and in this campaign."
Shanahan's interview isn't the first time someone in Kennedy's campaign has given up the game. In April, Rita Palma was fired from her job as Kennedy's New York campaign director after she admitted behind closed doors that her "No. 1 priority" was to take electoral votes away from President Joe Biden, then the presumptive Democratic nominee and the "mutual enemy" of Trump and Kennedy voters.
Earlier this year, More Perfect Unionrevealed that ultrawealthy Trump donors were also bankrolling Kennedy's campaign.
Kennedy chose Shanahan as his running mate after she contributed heavily to his campaign, which has been derided as a potential "spoiler."
"I did not put in tens of millions of dollars to be a spoiler candidate," she said in the interview Tuesday. "They have, unfortunately, turned us into a spoiler. And we don't want to be a spoiler. We wanted to win. We wanted a fair shot."
Shanahan added that the DNC "made that impossible for us."
"They have banned us, shadowbanned us, kept us off stages, manipulated polls, used lawfare against us, sued us in every possible state," she explained.
In 2004, Ralph Nader, who ran an independent campaign for president, was sued in 18 states by the DNC in a bid to keep him off the ballot after he was falsely blamed for spoiling the 2000 election for Republican President George W. Bush.
Some Kennedy supporters recoiled at the thought of him joining forces with Trump. Kennedy campaigner Kyle Kemper toldNBC News he would be "heartbroken" if Kennedy were to "sell his soul" to Trump.
"Don't make a deal with the devil," he pleaded.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Complicity in War Crimes': Report Names Countries, Companies Supplying Fuel to Israel
"Corporations supplying jet fuel and oil to Israel may be providing material support to the military," one expert said, "and therefore risk complicity in war crimes, genocide, and other crimes under international law."
Aug 20, 2024
Oil Change International on Tuesday released a report detailing fossil fuel transfers to Israel since its siege of Gaza began in October, arguing that the countries and companies responsible, which include the United States and U.S.-based multinationals, could be held liable for contributing to "acts of genocide" under international law.
Azerbaijan, Kazahstan, and Gabon are major suppliers of crude oil to Israel, as are Big Oil companies such as BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell, according to the report, which comes from data that the U.S.-based advocacy group commissioned from Data Desk, an investigative consultancy.
Data Desk tracked 65 shipments of petroleum products delivered to Israel between late October and mid-July, more than half of which were sent after the International Court of Justice ruled on January 26 that Israel must take steps to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza and that some of Israel's acts "appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the [Genocide] Convention"—part of an ongoing judicial process.
"Corporations supplying jet fuel and oil to Israel may be providing material support to the military, aware of its foreseeable harmful effects, and therefore risk complicity in war crimes, genocide, and other crimes under international law," Irene Pietropaoli, a fellow in business and human rights at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, said in a statement.
1/ 🚨NEW research reveals the ongoing oil shipments fueling Israel's war machine. 65 tankers of crude oil & refined petroleum products have shipped to Israel since Oct, 1/2 after @CIJ_ICJ ruled in January that Israel is plausibly committing genocide. https://t.co/GEBB25Phnl pic.twitter.com/IzPr5q46HR
— Oil Change International (@PriceofOil) August 20, 2024
While human rights groups have long called for an arms embargo on Israel and progressives in the U.S. have pushed the Biden administration to stop supplying weapons, there has been less focus on the energy supply chain that makes the destruction in Gaza possible.
The U.S. supplies JP-8 jet fuel that's used in Israeli warplanes, the report says. The fuel travels from a Valero refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas, to Israel via tanker. A recent shipment on a U.S.-registered tanker was the subject of controversy in Europe, where there was pressure to forbid it from docking.
Mark Muenster, an organizer in Corpus Christi, said in the statement that he was "upset and disgusted" that the refinery there was supplying jet fuel to Israel, arguing that the negative local impact of Valero's work, which he said included pollution and resource depletion, was bad enough.
Israel, which has refineries but relies on imports for raw energy, gets it from all over the world. Azerbaijan, the host of this year's COP29 climate summit, provided Israel with 28% of its crude oil during the study period, sending it through the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which is majority-owned and operated by BP. Kazakhstan and Gabon each supplied another 22%. Brazil contributed 9%, even though it's led by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, a left-leaning critic of Israel's war.
Lula "has the opportunity to help bring about a cease-fire by pursuing an oil embargo," the report says.
Mahmoud Nawajaa, general coordinator of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement in Gaza and the West Bank, didn't name Brazil or any other country but spoke harshly of countries that continued supplying Israel with fuel.
"It is unconscionable that in the midst of Israel's genocide against 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza, governments that publicly condemn the genocide and support Palestinian rights as stipulated in international law continue business as usual with apartheid Israel, supplying it with energy and profiting from its crimes," he said in the statement. "The BDS movement calls for escalating grassroots and civil society pressure to make those hypocritical governments stop their complicity in Israel's mass murder and starvation of Palestinians."
The report cites Colombia as a model. The country's coal has accounted for about half of Israel's coal imports, but President Gustavo Petro just issued an embargo. He explained on social media that "Colombian coal is used to make bombs to kill Palestinian children."
The report's country-by-country breakdown overlaps with the company-by-company breakdown, as multinationals work all over the world. Chevron, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell, Eni, and TotalEnergies together accounted for 35% of Israel's crude oil supply.
Tuesday's report was an update of one that Oil Change International issued in March, which Common Dreamsreported on at the time.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fresh Warnings of Election Deepfakes After Trump's Taylor Swift Stunt
"The potential harms to our society that could result from such misinformation, including abuses of our elections, are wide-reaching and immensely damaging."
Aug 20, 2024
U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's posting of artificial intelligence-generated images suggesting pop star Taylor Swift had endorsed him earned him the ridicule of Swift's fans and journalists this week, but at least one pro-democracy watchdog warned that the incident served as a reminder that regulators must act with much more urgency to stop such behavior.
On Sunday, Trump used his Truth Social account to share the AI-generated images, known as "deepfakes," one of which showed Swift dressed up as Uncle Sam with the caption, "Taylor Wants You to Vote for Donald Trump." Others showed people wearing shirts that read, "Swifties for Trump."
Trump wrote, "I accept," in his post sharing the images, suggesting he was accepting a formal endorsement.
"The AI-generated deepfakes of Taylor Swift are yet another example of AI's power to create misinformation that deceives and defrauds voters," said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen. "The potential harms to our society that could result from such misinformation, including abuses of our elections, are wide-reaching and immensely damaging."
The images represent the latest escalation in Trump's fixation with Swift, who has made headlines over the last year with her record-breaking Eras Tour and who publicly supported President Joe Biden in 2020.
Far-right commentators melted down earlier this year as misinformation and baseless conspiracy theories spread about Swift and her boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, being part of a "deep state" plan to secure a Democratic victory in November.
Swift has made her liberal political views well-known in recent years but has yet to announce an endorsement in the 2024 presidential race. She condemned Trump's violent rhetoric during nationwide racial justice protests in 2020, and accused him of "stoking the fires of white supremacy and racism."
"The AI-generated deepfakes of Taylor Swift are yet another example of AI's power to create misinformation that deceives and defrauds voters."
Her criticism appears to have irritated Trump for years, with the former president complaining earlier this year that a failure by Swift to endorse him would be "disloyal" because he signed legislation making it easier for musical artists to collect royalties from streaming platforms.
Political observers have speculated that this year, repeated criticism of so-called "childless cat ladies" by Trump's running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), as well as the Republicans' support for forced pregnancy laws, will not help the GOP ticket win over Swift's large fan base.
Trump's use of deepfake images comes after Public Citizen has spearheaded calls for the Federal Elections Commission to regulate AI-generated images; earlier this month, the FEC's Republican chair, Sean Cooksey, announced the agency would not establish rules prohibiting political candidates or groups from misrepresenting opponents or issues with deceptive images.
Prior to Trump sharing the fake images of Swift and her fans on Sunday, billionaire Tesla owner Elon Musk had posted a deepfake video featuring a manipulated image of Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.
Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman said earlier this month that political deepfakes "are rushing at us, threatening to disrupt electoral integrity."
"Requiring that political deepfakes be labeled doesn't favor any political party or candidate," he said. "It simply protects voters from fraud and chaos."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular