Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
Trump and clueless MAGA family at Arlington Cemetery
Further

A Despicable Individual: On Using Graves As Billboards

Even by "seditionist crapsack standards," Trump's grotesque fuckery at Arlington Cemetery, where he and his henchmen used dead soldiers as a campaign prop, has been reviled as "repugnant," "nauseating," and "Too Damn Much," especially after news they shoved aside a female employee to do it. The desperate "hole-in-the-soul" stunt pissed off veterans, their families, the Army and many others; some said they've never grinned thumbs-up at a grave, but now they hope to live long enough to get to do it.

Trump's latest loathsome move is part of a long, inglorious slide to the bottom. As his numbers drop and his crimes resurface - thank you Jack Smith - he's ever more incoherent, vindictive, preposterous, often babbling on crumbling Truth Social. On Kamala Harris: her "FAKE NUMBERS VERSUS MY NUMBERS," how she "HAS TO PAY FOR HER FAKE ENGAGEMENT," how "WE'RE BEATING HER 'LIKE A DRUM.'" (Harris campaign: "Rent free.") Trashing Walz - RIP Minnesota! - he mourned a "state in shock, the city burned down and it was never built back, it was terrible." He says Dems want to kill newborns, Biden sleeps too much, Kim Jong Un doesn't, Hillary and Kamala gave (many) blow jobs, crime is down worldwide because the perps come here. Asked in Wisconsin what he'd do to "make life more affordable," he said, "Some people don't eat bacon anymore...This was caused by their horrible energy - they want wind all over the place." One comment: "Operation let him talk is going exceedingly well."

For a five-time-draft-dodger who's heedlessly savored his escape from hell by calling those who didn't "suckers and losers" - and who famously said of wounded warriors, "Nobody wants to see that" - his imbroglio at Arlington National Cemetery was both shocking and not. Having assembled "all the assholes somehow compelled to find their way to the side of the one silver-spoon failson asshole who would reign supreme over them all" - thank you Uncharted Blue - he decided the best way to troll enemies was by "decorating your campaign with their fallen friends" on Arlington's hallowed ground. The central irony of his hope to highlight the flaws of Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan by joining with family members of a soldier killed in the Kabul airport attack: It was Bone Spurs himself who approved the release of 5,000 Taliban fighters in a widely panned deal he negotiated, ignoring warnings from sidelined Afghan president Ashraf Ghani that the move would lead to deadly chaos, which - surprise! - it did.

So it was that he and his gang of thugs turned up at a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on the attack's third anniversary. Then, per the Army, they "abruptly pushed aside" a female public servant who tried to stop them, lumbered into Section 60's home to fallen veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan - so heavily restricted that any filming at a grave site for political purposes is a violation of federal law - and stood at a grave with his leering goon smirk and teeny thumbs-up to have his fucking gruesome, gaudy picture taken at a grave next to several others whose denizens and their pain-filled families were not consulted. Hours later, having loudly denied they were using the solemn occasion to make cheesy "badly edited propaganda for their hellscape vision of America," they released a TikTok video of cheesy badly edited propaganda for their hellscape vision of America. Several classy MAGA pols also appeared, including Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, now under fire for using the images for fundraising.

After military police were called and wrote up a report, the Army issued an angry statement about the "unfortunate" incident - a rare move, because normal people largely obey the rules of common decency. In what was called "a stern rebuke," they said Trump staff were "made aware of federal laws, Army regulations and DoD policies, which clearly prohibit political activities on cemetery grounds"; they also confirmed the woman was physically shoved, praised her "professionalism...consistent with the decorum expected at ANC," and noted they conduct nearly 3,000 public wreath-laying ceremonies a year "without incident." Calling ANC "a national shrine to (our) honored dead," they declared "its dedicated staff will continue to ensure public ceremonies are conducted with the dignity and respect the nation’s fallen deserve." Deep down, though, they probably know anything involving Cadet Orange Slimebag and his horde of scuzzy minions render the likelihood of dignity or respect pretty slim. And so it went.

Responding with typical restraint and grace, Trump staffers quickly lashed out. Spokesman and piece of work Stephen Cheung sneered the worker "was clearly suffering from a mental health episode," denied any "altercation," and threatened to release video proof "if such defamatory claims are made." In a real shocker, they haven't, except for the mewling TikTok video in which a pious Trump lies, "We didn’t lose one person in 18 months, and then they took over, and that disaster, leaving Afghanistan.” Campaign co-chair Chris LaCivita called the woman they assaulted "a disgrace" and "a despicable individual"; later, "taking the team on a death spiral against America’s military," he said he hoped to "trigger the hacks" at the office of the (female) Army Secretary. After the woman employee declined to press charges, reportedly because she feared retaliation by vengeful MAGA-ites, the campaign called her fear "ridiculous," adding, "It sounds like someone who has Trump Derangement Syndrome." They seem nice.

Still, it kept getting worse. There were emails confirming the campaign was told about the rules, but barged in regardless. Federal law § 553.32 was cited: "Memorial services and ceremonies at Army National Military Cemeteries will not include partisan political activities." The "ripples of outrage" swiftly spread to veterans and their families, incensed at a tawdry effort to "borrow their valor." A pained, plaintive protest came from the family of Green Beret Master Sgt. Andrew Marckesano, a father of three who earned Silver and Bronze Stars in eight combat tours before dying by suicide in 2020 after enduring PTSD; his grave, clearly visible in the video, is adjacent to that of Staff Sgt. Darin Hoover, killed in the Kabul bombing, whose family had invited Trump. "Staffers did not adhere to the rules," wrote Marckesano's sister of their trespass on "this sacred site." "Understand that these were real people who sacrificed for our freedom," she wrote, "and that they are honored and respected accordingly."

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, whose father is buried in Section 60, called the stunt "nauseating" and "repugnant": "Someone who'd do that should never be Commander-in-Chief." A Vote Vets ad echoed him. After clips of Trump saying execrable things, they vow, "We are doing our damnedest to make sure no service member ever has to salute you as commander-in chief ever again." "Unforgivable," wrote a "pissed-off old Army wife" of his "self-aggrandizing behavior on hallowed grounds." She went on, "Every time I turn around and am virtually certain there's no more room beneath contempt for any more of Drumpfenfuehrer's egregious behavior, that malcontent motherfucker proves me wrong." Another: "I have not been able to shake the memory since that disgusting piece of sidewalk scum politicized the sacrifices (made) by those brave enough to do what his cowardice prevented him from doing." And, "If he wants to film a campaign ad at a cemetery, he should do it on the 1st hole at Bedminster."

People stayed pissed when the Army said it "considers this matter closed." They noted "assaulting a federal employee in the performance of her duties is a felony (18 USC 111)." Some felt higher-ups, quoted anonymously praising the woman for keeping things from "escalating," were making her a scapegoat to avoid confronting MAGA mania. "He’s a public menace" who'd only be more menacing in power, noted a critic who cited the Army's "Be All You Can Be" boast. "Maybe try being a little more dedicated to enforcing your own friggin' RULES." They had a point, made clearer after Jack Smith re-indicted him and Trump went on a full-on fascist, bonkers, delirious QAnon social media bender with a deluge of over 50 rabid posts: Dems in orange prison jump suits, Obama tried in public military tribunals, "The World Will Soon Understand" what all these glowing orbs, lights, soldiers, lightning and fat, old, white guy in baggy suit and clown make-up mean: "Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming!"

Hmm. If it is, they better get their lame act together; so far, J.D. Hillbilly isn't yet up to the task. After Arlington he tried to deflect, dismiss - "Apparently, somebody (had) a little disagreement with somebody” - and go on wildly misfired offense, telling Kamala she could "go to hell" for criticizing what she hasn't mentioned. Then, hilariously, "You guys in the media are acting like Donald Trump filmed a TV commercial at a gravesite." LOL. Also: "Abbey Road!" "Hulk Hogan!", booing firefighters! Trump still yammers: "Who's Harris?", "Joe Biden killed their children." "I really don't know anything about it," he prattled on the cemetery video backlash. "We have alotta people, you know we're leading the Internet...It coulda been the parents, it coulda been somebody. If somebody did it, this was a set-up by the people in the Administration. This all comes out of Washington, just like all of these prosecutors come out of Washington...These are bad people we’re dealing with." Huh. Please just keep talking.

SEE ALL
Sunrise Movement campaigners
News

To Defeat Trump, Sunrise Mobilizes to Reach 1.5M Young Voters in Swing States

The Sunrise Movement on Tuesday launched a campaign program in support of Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, aiming to reach 1.5 million young voters in key swing states.

The left-wing, youth-led climate action group didn't endorse Harris—though it's part of the Green New Deal Network, which has— but announced that it would mobilize to help her defeat Republican nominee Donald Trump, whom Kidus Girma, the group's campaign director, referred to as "Big Oil's favorite henchman."

The group's program will include canvassing, phone banking, and digital outreach, as well as protests and the creation of social media videos aimed at stoking youth enthusiasm.

"Young climate voters could decide this election," Stevie O'Hanlon, the group's communications director, said in a statement. "The Harris-Walz ticket means millions more young voters are tuning in and considering voting. We're going all-out to reach those voters and mobilize our generation to defeat Trump this November."

Sunrise argued in the statement that Harris is polling better than President Joe Biden did because she has more support from youth and climate-minded voters.

The group also cited a recent poll commissioned by Climate Power, an advocacy group, that showed the gap between public trust for Harris and Trump is larger on climate—at 23 percentage points—than on any other issue, even slightly more so than abortion. Sunrise wants to see Harris to press that climate advantage.

The group's program marks an increase in organizational ambition from what was planned in support of Biden's reelection bid—before Harris replaced him, Sunrise's voter engagement goal had been 1 million.

"The difference in excitement between Biden and Harris among young people we've been talking to is night and day," O'Hanlon toldThe Washington Post.

Media outlets have in the last three months made much of Sunrise's refusal to endorse either Biden or Harris, starting with Axios in early June and continuing with the Post on Tuesday.

Sunrise has explained that it's waiting for more information on Harris' climate policies, as well as her approach to Israel's war on Gaza. So far, climate hasn't been a point of emphasis for her; the issue received scant attention at last week's Democratic National Convention.

The group took a similar tack in 2020, mobilizing in support of Biden but declining to endorse him. They are trying to steer the Democratic nominee toward stronger climate action.

"We will continue to urge the Harris campaign to put forward a bold vision that will energize young voters," O'Hanlon said.

Sunrise has long been a lightning rod for criticism, not just from Republicans but also from the more technocratically oriented establishment wing of the Democratic Party. Jonathan Chait wrote a scathing column, full of straw man arguments, about the group in New York in June.

The Post on Tuesday suggested that any attempt by Harris to draw in younger voters with new climate or Gaza policies could alienate "moderate" voters in swing states, where fossil fuel groups have launched ad campaigns attacking her climate record and claiming she would ban gasoline-powered cars. Harris has already walked back some of the climate pledges she made while running for president in the 2020 cycle, including a ban on fracking.

Amid the challenges of operating in a media sphere and political system heavily influenced by corporate interests, Sunrise has continued to work with Democratic leaders while also pushing them to be bolder. Many progressives see the group's past work as key to the development of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act—the most notable climate action law in U.S. history, however flawed it may have been.

O'Hanlon, in an interview with Mother Jones on Thursday, expressed optimism that more change could be forthcoming, pointing out that the Democratic Party's climate platform is in fact strong.

"The 2024 platform calls out Big Oil, pledges to make polluters pay, and targets oil and gas company subsidies, which is really substantial," O'Hanlon said.

SEE ALL
Dollar General worker
News

Report Exposes How Chains Like Dollar General Prey on the Poor With Cash-Back Fees

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau published a report Tuesday highlighting how large retailers such as Dollar General and Kroger exploit low-income communities' lack of access to local banking to hit consumers with predatory cash-back fees.

The CFPB found that while many retailers still offer free cash back at the register, Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Kroger collectively rake in $90 million a year from fees imposed on people using the retail locations to access their own money.

"At Dollar General and Dollar Tree/Family Dollar, cash-back fees for small withdrawal amounts are the highest in the sample ($1 fee or more for cash-back amounts under $50)," the bureau found. "Kroger, the country's largest grocery chain, recently announced new charges at their Harris Teeter stores (75 cents for $100 cash back or less), and charges 50 cents for up to $100 cash back at their other brand stores such as Ralph's, Fred Meyer, and others."

The CFPB emphasized that such fees are disproportionately levied against people with lower incomes, who are more likely to live in areas with fewer banking options—forcing residents to rely on dollar stores for easy access to cash. The report notes that banking industry consolidation and branch closures have left a "void" of cash access spots that retailers like Dollar General have rushed to fill.

"While retail chains had long provided cash back on debit card purchases for free, the CFPB has found that dollar store chains and other retailers are now charging fees for access to cash," Rohit Chopra, the CFPB's director, said in a statement Tuesday. "Many people living in small towns no longer have access to a local bank where they can withdraw money from their account for free. This has created the competitive conditions for retailers to charge fees for cash back."

"Dollar General alone chalked up gross profits of $11.82 billion in 2023. But they nonetheless find new ways to squeeze even more money from their shoppers."

Stacy Mitchell, co-executive director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), applauded the CFPB's new research as an "important report" that "exposes yet another way in which dollar stores' exploitative business practices take advantage of consumers."

"The three big dollar store chains make enormous profits," said Mitchell. "Dollar General alone chalked up gross profits of $11.82 billion in 2023. But they nonetheless find new ways to squeeze even more money from their shoppers—in this case, by charging them a few dollars to get cash back on their transactions, which average only a modest $25 or so. All three major dollar store chains have been fined for overcharge errors, and all use their market muscle to force suppliers to create 'cheater' sizes for them. CFPB's report will help alert shoppers to these abusive retailing practices."

ILSR has long worked to shine light on the abuses of dollar stores, releasing a report last year detailing how the retailers have invaded low-income communities and preyed on vulnerable consumers as well as workers.

"One might assume that the dollar chains are simply filling a need, providing basic retail options in cash-strapped communities. But the evidence shows something else," reads ILSR's report. "These stores aren't merely a byproduct of economic distress, they are a cause of it."

"In small towns and urban neighborhoods alike," the report adds, "dollar stores drive grocery stores and other retailers out of business, leave more people without access to fresh food, extract wealth from local economies, sow crime and violence, and further erode the prospects of the communities they target."

SEE ALL
Protest against AIPAC
News

'Very Bad Sign for Democracy': AIPAC Has Spent Over $100 Million on 2024 Elections

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a powerful lobbying group widely known as AIPAC, has officially spent more than $100 million in the 2024 election cycle so far, pouring staggering sums into Democratic primary races in an effort to unseat progressive opponents of Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.

Citing new Federal Election Commission filings, Sludgereported Tuesday that AIPAC's political action committee had spent $44.8 million as of the end of last month, mostly on donations to political campaigns and party organizations. The United Democracy Project (UDP), AIPAC's super PAC, has spent $55.4 million so far, bringing AIPAC's total spending this cycle to just over $100 million—surpassing its reported spending target for 2024 races.

AIPAC money has already made a significant impact, helping a pair of pro-Israel Democrats defeat progressive Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.)—two of Congress' most vocal critics of Israel's assault on Gaza—in recent primary contests.

"Supporting Palestinian rights is becoming so popular among American voters that pro-genocide groups have to spend over $100 million to hold on."

Sludge noted that UDP's financial support for Bowman's primary opponent, George Latimer, "set a record for spending by an outside group on a House election."

"A very bad sign for democracy that MAGA billionaires are spending this much money to shape our politics," the youth-led Sunrise Movementwrote in response to the new spending figures, referring to the Republican megadonors who have fueled spending by AIPAC-aligned groups.

Politicoreported in June that AIPAC has been "the biggest source of Republican money flowing into competitive Democratic primaries this year."

Sludge pointed out Tuesday that billionaire Jan Koum, the former WhatsApp CEO who helped bankroll Nikki Haley's failed presidential bid, is the top donor to AIPAC's super PAC.

"Other UDP donors in recent months have included the following: David Messer, CEO of Freepoint Commodities, who gave another $250,000 on July 1; Martin Geller, CEO of financial firm Geller & Company, who gave an additional $268,000 on June 25; and Frank Blair, equity portfolio manager at Capital Group, who gave an additional $200,000 in May," Sludge reported.

While lamenting the outsized influence that UDP and other billionaire-funded groups are able to wield in the U.S. political system, some observers have argued that AIPAC's aggressive spending is a sign of desperation in the face of growing public opposition to Israel's mass atrocities in Gaza. A majority of Democratic voters view Israel's war on Gaza as genocide, according to one recent survey.

"Supporting Palestinian rights is becoming so popular among American voters that pro-genocide groups have to spend over $100 million to hold on," said Beth Miller, policy director at Jewish Voice for Peace.

SEE ALL
Framed images are seen of Sandra Muñoz with her husband Luis, an undocumented immigrant
News

'Devastating Blow': Trump-Appointed Judge Halts Protections for Undocumented Spouses

Immigrant rights advocates said Monday that they were "deeply troubled" by Trump-appointed judge's ruling that brought the Biden administration's protections for undocumented spouses to a grinding halt, just a week after officials began taking applications from couples who wanted to take part in the Keeping Families Together program.

Siding with 16 Republican-led states that sued over the policy, Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an administrative stay to stop immigration authorities from approving applications.

The judge said the court needed time to determine whether the Biden administration violated the law by introducing the policy without going through the legislative process. Barker said the stay would be in place for 14 days, but Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council said the judge signaled that applications may ultimately be halted until at least mid-October.

"This is obviously devastating for people who would have hoped to benefit from the program, and for their U.S. citizen spouses who were hoping that their loved one could get more permanent status," said Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the organization.

The Keeping Families Together program, introduced by President Joe Biden in June, is designed to allow undocumented immigrants who cross the U.S.-Mexico border and later marry U.S. citizens to obtain a form of "parole" while they complete the green card process.

Usually, people who cross the southern border and marry American citizens are required to return to their home countries while their green card applications are adjudicated, separating them from their families for years.

Under Biden's program, spouses could receive work authorization while while they wait to obtain legal permanent residency, and eventually citizenship.

The program would apply only to undocumented immigrants who have been living in the U.S. for at least 10 years, and the Department of Homeland Security says the average beneficiary has been in the country for 23 years—but Republican officials led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton claimed the policy would encourage people to cross the border illegally.

"This is a baseless, politically-motivated Republican lawsuit that only serves to rip families apart," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) on Tuesday.

The ACLU said the ruling "threatens the livelihood of immigrant children and families," and one undocumented immigrant who filed a motion to intervene in the case on Monday called the decision "heartbreaking" for the estimated 500,000 people who were eligible for the program.

"My wife and I were really depending on this so we could move on with our lives and plan our future," Foday Turay toldNBC News. Turay was brought to the U.S. from Sierra Leone as a child and now works as an assistant district attorney in Philadelphia. "It feels like a knife to the heart."

In a video posted on social media by the immigrant rights group FWD.us, Turay said that he "should not have to live in constant fear of being separated from my wife and my son, both of whom are U.S. citizens."

Todd Schulte, president of FWD.us, said the 16 Republican-led states had filed "a politically-driven lawsuit that we believe will ultimately be defeated."

"Tonight's decision is deeply disappointing. This is an unsound and devastating blow to hundreds of thousands of American families across the country who are now thrown back into fear and uncertainty that their loved ones will be cruelly separated from them for years due to outdated immigration laws," said Schulte. "The Keeping Families Together Parole in Place program was crafted with the express purpose of supporting families who have built their lives in this country for an average of a quarter century. By barring its implementation after the program is already functional, the court has chosen to side with those who seek to sow fear and division rather than uphold the principles of justice and family unity."

Guerline Jozef, executive director of Haitian Bridge Alliance, said the lawsuit and ruling were attacks on a program that took "a vital step toward rectifying the inequities faced by these families, who often live in the shadows despite their deep ties to the United States."

"This federal program offers a crucial opportunity for undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to regularize their status, enabling them to contribute more fully to their communities and live without the constant fear of separation," said Jozef. "This legal action is a direct assault on the integrity of immigrant families and the principles of fairness and compassion that our nation should uphold."

SEE ALL
Josep Borrell rings a small bell to open an informal meeting of E.U. foreign ministers in Brussels.
News

EU's Top Diplomat Seeks Sanctions on Israeli Leaders for 'Incitement to Commit War Crimes'

European Union foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell said Thursday that he has recommended sanctioning Israeli leaders for hate speech and inciting war crimes in Gaza and the illegally occupied West Bank.

Borrell said during a meeting of E.U. foreign ministers in Brussels that he has asked member states if they support imposing sanctions on some Israeli Cabinet ministers who have disseminated "unacceptable hate messages against the Palestinians" and have proposed "things that clearly go against international law" and amount to "an incitement to war crimes."

At least one E.U. member said it supports Borrell's recommendation.

"This is a war against Palestinians, not just against Hamas. The level of civilian casualties and dead is unconscionable," Irish Foreign Minister Micheál Martin said Thursday in Brussels. "It's a war on the population. No point in trying to fudge this."

"It cannot be business as usual," Martin added. "It is very clear to us that international humanitarian law has been broken."

Earlier this year, the Irish Senate voted to impose sanctions on Israel, prohibit the transfer of U.S. weapons to Israel via Ireland, and push for an international arms embargo against the country.

While E.U. nations such as Ireland, Spain, Norway, and Slovenia have been outspoken critics of Israel's Gaza onslaught and have responded with moves including recognizing Palestinian statehood, other members of the bloc—notably Germany and France—have been staunch supporters of Israel, even as its forces have killed and wounded more than 144,000 Gazans and displaced, starved, or sickened millions more.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz has threatened "severe consequences" for European nations that recognize Palestinian statehood.

Like the United States—Israel's biggest international backer—the E.U. has imposed sanctions on a handful of far-right Israeli individuals and groups, including extremist settler colonists who incited deadly West Bank pogroms and an organization whose members have blocked humanitarian aid shipments from entering Gaza.

While Borrell did not publicly identify specific Israeli ministers he believes should be sanctioned, he has recently condemned the words and actions of far-right figures including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.

Ben-Gvir was widely condemned for defending Israeli soldiers accused of gang-raping a Palestinian man detained at the notorious Sde Teiman prison and for taking part in a highly controversial visit to Islam's third-holiest site, the al-Aqsa mosque compound—which is located on what Jews call the Temple Mount, Judaism's most sacred site. Ben-Gvir infuriated Muslims and other critics by declaring he wanted to "put an Israeli flag" and build a synagogue there.

Smotrich, who has also defended the alleged Sde Teiman rapists as "heroic warriors," has drawn condemnation for promoting new and expanded Israeli settler colonies in the West Bank, a policy he attributed partly to increasing international recognition of Palestinian statehood and the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) recent ruling affirming that Israel's 57-year occupation is a form of apartheid and illegal.

Statements by Ben-Gvir and Smotrich—who recently asserted that it may be "justified and moral" to starve 2 million Palestinians to death—have been entered as evidence in the South African-led ICJ genocide case concerning Israel's war on Gaza.

Borrell has mentioned some of the ministers' words and actions in previous calls for accountability for those who incite hate and violence.

"While the world pushes for a cease-fire in Gaza, Minister Ben-Gvir calls for cutting fuel and aid to civilians," he said on social media earlier this month. "Like Minister Smotrich's sinister statements, this is an incitement to war crimes."

"Sanctions must be on our E.U. agenda," Borrell added.

While human rights defenders welcomed Borrell's sanctions recommendations, some groups urged him to go even further.

"The [ICJ's] findings clearly point to violations of international law committed by Israel and to the obligations of third states not to legitimize or provide any assistance to Israel's illegal conduct," Eve Geddie, director of Amnesty International's European Institutions Office, said on Thursday.

Geddie continued:

E.U. members states' supply of arms and equipment as well as their trade and investment with illegal Israeli settlements are enabling Israel's violations of international law and are contrary to their obligations under international law. There can be no business as usual with a state maintaining a brutal, unlawful occupation and perpetrating serious violations of international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, on a mass scale.

The relentless bombardment of Gaza amid a clear risk of genocide, the deadly spike in state-backed settler violence, and the latest military offensive in the West Bank are all byproducts of Israel's unlawful occupation and decades of impunity enabled by E.U. inaction.

"The E.U.'s call for a cease-fire and curbing settler violence rings hollow until it takes concrete actions—an immediate arms embargo, a ban on trade with Israeli settlements, and support for action at the U.N. to bring an end to Israel's unlawful occupation of the occupied Palestinian territory," Geddie added.

SEE ALL