Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
Health Insurance CEO "Wanted" posters in New York City
Further

Deny, Defend, Depose: They Eat Off Your Family Member's Grave

Exposing "the rotten core of American health care," the shooting of United Health's CEO/ mafia kingpin sparked a flash flood of long-simmering fury at the "legalized murder practiced by all the Brian Thompsons" of a universally despised system run by "heartless vampires" who routinely refuse care in exchange for bloody profit. The pitiless response by tens of millions of their victims: Wanted posters, judging the shooter "too hot to convict" and grimly declaring, "Thoughts and prayers are out of network."

Early last Wednesday, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, 50, was en route to an investor conference at the Hilton Hotel in midtown Manhattan, reportedly to collect his massive Christmas bonus, when he was shot in the back and killed, allegedly by 26-year-old Luigi Mangione. The action, both shocking and deeply unsurprising, was widely met with "a morbid sense of inevitability" from a wrung-dry populace; Elizabeth Warren spoke for many when she asserted, "Violence is never the answer, but people can only be pushed so far.” Citing the brutality of a much-hated, for-profit system run by rapacious executives getting rich by denying (sometimes lifesaving) healthcare to sick people who often subsequently either die or go bankrupt trying not to, Maureen Tkacik of The American Prospect wryly noted, “Only about 50 million customers of America’s reigning medical monopoly might have a motive to exact revenge upon the UnitedHealthcare CEO.”

The numbers are telling. A recent Kaiser report found that Americans owe at least $220 billion in medical debt, which for about three million is over $10,000; in a poll asking who they blame for exorbitant health prices, 97% named insurance companies. Last year UnitedHealthcare, the world's eighth largest corporation, had the highest denial rate - 32%, double the industry average - while taking in $371.6 billion, $47.5 billion more than the year before; their net profit was$22 BILLION. CEO Thompson made almost $20 million, or almost $40K a day, mostly in non-taxable bonuses or stock options; unknown to shareholders, he had also allegedly dumped $15 million in stocks and faced a federal investigation. Almost 70,000 Americans needlessly die each year due to denied care; at United, that decision was often made by an AI robot found to make medically unsound decisions in 90% of its cases - which the company, and presumably Thompson, knew.

Among the world's 10 highly developed countries, the U.S., the only one without universal health care, ranks last. But despite ubiquitous, verifiable, deeply cruel evidence of the failings of a profiteering private system, idiotic self-serving Republicans continue to argue that health care, like any other aspect of governance subsumed by late-stage capitalism, "should be run like a business," apparently by the same morbidly rich oligarchs who not only have no interest in meeting citizens' needs but don't even want to pay their own friggin' taxes. In a "cosmic confirmation" of the hollowness of their argument, on the same day Thompson was shot, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield announced it would newly, insanely limit coverage on anesthesia during surgery. After an outcry, they retracted the change. Still, pundits noted of the attempted move, a corporate world so brazenly unshy about its own arrogance "is not one that incurs sympathy for a dead CEO."

Some did insist on sympathy: "A Man Was murdered (and) You're Laughing?" But the shooting often inspired tales of righteous rage at a ravenous company whose ghouls "eat off your family members grave." A mother was told an overnight hospital stay was "not medically necessary" after her 12-year-old's heart surgery. The families of two patients who died sued for using "a flawed AI model (in) place of real medical professionals to wrongfully deny care.” An oncologist raged - "Dear buttheads" - about the refusal to cover anti-nausea meds for a child during chemo: "No reason to be nauseated." "Obviously, you know better about the side effects of chemo than me, my peers, and the entire scientific community," he wrote. "You have saved your greedy, blood-sucking corporation a great deal of money I'm sure." "We mourn the death (of) Brian Thompson..." one wrote. "Wait, I'm sorry. We mourn the deaths of 68,000 Americans who needlessly die each year so that insurance executives (like) Thompson can become multimillionaires."

Added to the rancor often bubbling under the surface as we rant and fret and watch bills pile up, there's a growing incidence of random political violence born of our polarization; a poll last year found almost 1 in 4 Americans agreed "patriots may have to resort to violence (to) save our country," though as usual "save our country" is open to wide and lunatic interpretation depending on who you are and who you kill. George Zimmerman, Kyle Rittenhouse, Daniel Penny and many, many cops have gotten away with (usually racist) murder. But none of them killed a rich, white, male, elite member of the master class. Thus does the killing of one of their own evince predictable pearl-clutching when someone eventually takes "lethal exception" to a grossly unfair system that has failed so many. "Corporate America is nervous," says one observer of the brutal "wake-up call" of Thompson's killing."The mood changed dramatically in a very short period of time.”

Despite the elite's fearful, phantasmic vision of a class war led by angry, unwashed, pitchfork-wielding Bolsheviks, alleged shooter Luigi Mangione not only doesn't fit the profile, but comes from their own gilded ranks. The scion of a prominent Baltimore real-estate consortium and valedictorian of his pricey prep school, he earned a B.A. and Master's at Ivy league Penn before he reportedly suffered a painful back injury and tough surgery, moved to Hawaii, and went AWOL from his famiiy in recent months. As for the manifesto and digital foot print he left behind: While law enforcement initially said he betrayed “some ill will towards corporate America" and idiotic Ted Cruz cited his concerns about capitalism and climate change to proclaim "leftism is a mental disease," Mangione's politics have been best described as "indecipherable," with "all-over-the-map," vaguely libertarian beliefs that don't fall neatly into either end of the political spectrum.

He read a lot, and reviewed or quoted "a mish-mash" of books about back pain, AI, self-help, Kurt Vonnegut, Peter Thiel, The Lorax, The New Jim Crow; like many others, he didn't finish David Foster Wallace's arcane Infinite Jest. Most famously, last year he posted a review of Unabomber Ted Kaczynski’s manifesto, which he declared too violent but "prescient on modern society." He called Kaczynski "an extreme political revolutionary" who "had the balls to recognize that peaceful protest has gotten us absolutely nowhere, and at the end of the day he's right...When all other forms of communication fail, violence is necessary to survive." Among his disparate stances, he focused his anger most clearly on a failed health system where predatory insurance companies "abuse our country for immense profit." Posing the question, "What do you do?" he replied, "You wack the CEO at the annual parasitic bean-counter convention. It’s targeted, precise, and doesn’t risk innocents."

After the shooter went missing, frantic police offered a reward and sought tips from a public they didn't know had quickly chosen sides in the new drama, and it wasn't theirs. Many bitter responses echoed the language of stonyhearted insurers: "This claim for sympathy has been denied," "We need prior authorization," "My insurance doesn't cover vision so I can't really see." A mock logo showed United in a scope's crosshairs; when the company posted the sad news of Thompson's death, it swiftly met with over 65,000 laughing emojis. A typical online response: "Thoughts and prayers to the family of a billionaire guy who got rich off hardworking Americans' insurance premiums, and then signed their death warrants." New Yorkers held a shooter lookalike contest, all hood and mask, in Washington Square. The McDonald's where he was later caught got 1-star review bombed: "Has rats in the kitchen that will make you sick, and your insurance won't cover it."

Faced with omnipresent images from surveillance cameras of the masked, bundled shooter at his hostel, Internet sleuths found the green jacket he was wearing and declared it Levi's $225 Sherpa Lined Two-Pocket Hooded Trucker Jacket. Once posted, it drew hundreds of thousands of views; at Macy's, where it was being offered for just $80 using the code "FRIEND," it began morbidly flying off the shelves, with over 700 quickly sold and the large sold out. "I already loved Macy's but wow," said one fan. Another: "Macy's saying 'Not our CEO.' I love it." Never mind the old when-the-revolution-comes mantra about putting the owners of the means of production up against the wall; many were dismayed by the macabre spectacle of the rush to consume and emulate, however triflingly. Wrote one, "It is as chilling as it is pitifully ironic to see blood lust for corporate moguls bubbling up on the website of Macy’s." Once they caught Mangione, though, it got way worse.

Sensing the fervor for a righteous outlaw radicalized by the injustices of a skewered health system - the same system that hurt and infuriated us - officials worried Mangione could inspire other "grievance-driven malicious actors" to violence. Little did they know: When the flood of images began - handsome frat bro, six-pack gym bro, "appallingly glamorous" mugshot - the Internet swooned. Within hours, Mangione was "a hero," an icon, a sex symbol straight, gay or bi. There were video mashups, Biblical memes, gags about "the line for the Mangione conjugal visit," the fine Italian-American tradition of "taking matters into our own hands," the manhunt ending with police declaring "too hot to convict,'" the dating profile: "Loves to travel, leaves thoughtful notes, has hobbies (assassination)." Also, "He is setting unrealistic beauty standards for men - we can't all go kill someone...Who among us has not been radicalized by pack pain?...If he is fit, you must acquit...Today, we are all Italian." And online, companies are scrambling to remove Mangione merch and fundraisers where thousands of fans have donated.

Meanwhile, a nervous corporate America recoiled. As police warned of "a heightened risk environment," insurance companies increased armed security and began scrubbing names and photos from their websites; one security firm reported 70 calls a day from anxious insurers. Online, multiple posts warned of a secret "executive hit list" in the works, and said "CEOs should be afraid. They should act like they have a target on their back." This week, that target got closer as "Wanted" posters went up around New York City featuring the names, crimes and obscene salaries of eight insurance CEOS; some were also adorned with the Delay, Defend, Depose maxim of a now-best-selling exposé of insurance malfeasance. "Wanted. Denying medical care for corporate profit," one poster read. Another: "UnitedHealthcare killed everyday people for the sake of profit. As a result, Brian Thompson was denied his claim to life. Who will be denied next?"

Possibly nobody, at least in the ruling class. It could all end up as hyperbole, play-acting, the fever-dream of an aggrieved populace newly, painfully attuned to the wrongs done them by those who can, to date without accountability. Thompson is dead, Mangione's productive life is likely over, United is denying coverage to someone sick as you read this, and universal health care - as deeply moral as it is pragmatic - remains a chimera, nowhere in sight for at least four years; after that, Dems who've themselves supped at the trough of Big Pharma will have to do better. Grievously, for now we remain at the mercy of glorified, often criminal accountants who, playing God and doctor, make millions off the suffering of others. Only in America, says one sage, "You can be driven into homelessness by someone like Brian Thompson, then legally murdered by someone like Daniel Penny, while the money that could have saved you is spent on murdering children in Gaza."

In a leaked video to employees after the shooting, Andrew Witty, CEO of parent company UnitedHealth Group, vowed to continue preventing "unnecessary care" that would make the health system "too complex and ultimately unsustainable," aka would cut into profits. Witty, who last year was paid $23,534,936, mostly in non-taxable "bonuses," told staff to "tune out" criticism of their industry, which "does not reflect reality." Thousands responded with stories of their own reality: burst appendix care denied, delayed chemo until the cancer was terminal, declined back surgery so "25/8/366 AGONY," a father-in-law with colon cancer told he didn't need a colon scan, bladder treatment costing $250 in China and $13,200 in Texas, asthma meds denied: "BREATHING is apparently not necessary." Meanwhile Mangione, denied bail, is being held at Pennsylvania's SCI Huntingdon. This week, as media broadcast live outside, inmates yelled from their cells. "Conditions suck!" one shouted. From another, “Free Luigi!”

SEE ALL
Greenpeace activists board a Shell platform
News

'People Power Works': Shell Backs Down in Anti-Protest Lawsuit Against Greenpeace

The United Kingdom-based oil giant Shell agreed Tuesday to settle a major lawsuit the company brought against Greenpeace after activists from the group boarded and occupied a company oil platform last year to protest fossil fuel expansion.

Greenpeace said in a statement that as part of the settlement, it agreed to donate £300,000—roughly $382,000—to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, a charity that helps save lives at sea, but will pay nothing to Shell and accept no liability. The donation represents a fraction of the over $11 million in damages and legal costs defendants faced, the group said.

The Greenpeace defendants have also "agreed to avoid protesting for a period at four Shell sites in the northern North Sea."

"Shell thought suing us for millions over a peaceful protest would intimidate us, but this case became a PR millstone tied around its neck," said Areeba Hamid, co-executive director of Greenpeace U.K. "The public backlash against its bullying tactics made it back down and settle out of court."

"This settlement shows that people power works. Thousands of ordinary people across the country backed our fight against Shell and their support means we stay independent and can keep holding Big Oil to account," Hamid added. "This legal battle might be over, but Big Oil's dirty tricks aren't going away. With Greenpeace facing further legal battles around the world, we won't stop campaigning until the fossil fuel industry stops drilling and starts paying for the damage it is causing to people and planet."

"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat."

Shell brought the case, which Greenpeace characterized as a "textbook" strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), in February 2023 and sought $1 million in damages from activists who boarded a Shell-contracted ship carrying equipment to drill for oil in the North Sea.

"When the protest ended, the only damage Shell could find was a padlock which, they alleged, our activists broke. That's it," Greenpeace U.K. said Tuesday. "Yet they came after us with a million-dollar lawsuit, which they justified for their spending on safety."

The group, which warned that the case had dire implications for the right to protest, credited a "sustained, year-long campaign against the suit" for forcing the oil behemoth to back down. The campaign, according to Greenpeace, "turned the legal move into a PR embarrassment for Shell."

"The case was dubbed the 'Cousin Greg' lawsuit by Forbes after a scene in the Emmy-awarded drama Succession, in which the hapless character threatens to sue Greenpeace to universal dismay," the environmental group noted Tuesday.


Greenpeace is currently facing several other SLAPP suits, including one brought by Energy Transfer, majority-owner of the Dakota Access pipeline. The group said Tuesday that the Energy Transfer suit "threatens the very existence of Greenpeace in the U.S."

"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat. It could stop Greenpeace being able to make a real difference on the things that matter most," the organization said Tuesday. "It's part of a growing trend by powerful corporations and governments to crush peaceful protest—using draconian laws or intimidation lawsuits like this."

"It seeks to silence the people most impacted by the climate crisis. This threatens the global fight for climate justice," the group added. "We won't give up. This is Shell versus all of us."

SEE ALL
Elizabeth Warren
News

Warren Bill Would Stop Companies From Placing Shareholder Paydays Over Worker Rights

Aiming to confront "a root cause of many of America's fundamental economic problems," U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday unveiled a bill to require corporations to balance growth with fair treatment of their employees and consumers.

The Massachusetts Democrat introduced the Accountable Capitalism Act, explaining that for much of U.S. history, corporations reinvested more than half of their profits back into their companies, working in the interest of employees, customers, business partners, and shareholders.

In the 1980s, said Warren corporations began placing the latter group above all, adopting "the belief that their only legitimate and legal purpose was 'maximizing shareholder value.'"

That view was further cemented in 1997 when the Business Roundtable, a lobbying group that represents chief executives across the country, declared that the "principal objective of a business enterprise is to generate economic returns to its owners."

Now, Warren said in a policy document, "around 93% of American-held corporate shares are owned by just 10% of our nation's richest households, while more than 40% of American households hold no shares at all."

"This means that corporate America's commitment to 'maximizing shareholder return' is a commitment to making the rich even richer, while leaving workers and families behind," said Warren in a statement.

The Accountable Capitalism Act would require:

  • Corporations with more than $1 billion in annual revenue to obtain a federal charter as a "United States corporation," obligating executives to consider the interests of all stakeholders, not just investors;
  • Corporate political spending to be approved by at least 75% of a company's shareholders and 75% of its board of directors; and
  • At least 40% of a company's board of directors to be selected by employees.

The bill would also prohibit directors of U.S. corporations from selling company shares within five years of receiving them or within three years of a company stock buyback.

Warren noted that as companies have increasingly poured their profits into stock buybacks to benefit shareholders, worker productivity has steadily increased while real wages have gone up only slightly. The share of national income that goes to workers has also significantly dropped.

"Workers are a major reason corporate profits are surging, but their salaries have barely moved while corporations' shareholders make out like bandits," said Warren told The Guardian. "We need to stand up for working people and hold giant companies responsible for decisions that hurt workers and consumers while lining shareholders' pockets."

The senator highlighted that big business interests invested heavily in November's U.S. presidential election.

"Following the most lucrative election in history for special interests," she said, "my bill will empower workers to hold corporations to responsible decisions that benefit more than just shareholders."

SEE ALL
NATO trainings in Poland
News

Despite 100% Pentagon Audit Failure Rate, House Passes $883.7 Billion NDAA

Despite the Pentagon's repeated failures to pass audits and various alarming policies, 81 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives voted with 200 Republicans on Wednesday to advance a $883.7 billion annual defense package.

The Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025, unveiled by congressional negotiators this past Saturday, still needs approval from the Senate, which is expected to vote next week. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Wednesday that he plans to vote no and spoke out against the military-industrial complex.

The push to pass the NDAA comes as this congressional session winds down and after the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) announced last month that it had failed yet another audit—which several lawmakers highlighted after the Wednesday vote.

Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) and Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), co-chairs and co-founders of the Defense Spending Reduction Caucus, said in a joint statement, "Time and time again, Congress seems to be able to find the funds necessary to line the pockets of defense contractors while neglecting the problems everyday Americans face here at home."

"Instead of fighting the rising cost of healthcare, gas, or groceries, this Congress prioritized rewarding the wealthy and well-connected military-industrial complex with even more unaccountable funds," they continued. "After a seventh failed audit in a row, it's disappointing that our amendment to hold the Pentagon accountable by penalizing the DOD's budget by 0.5% for each failed audit was stripped out of the final bill. It's time Congress demanded accountability from the Pentagon."

"While we're glad many of the poison pill riders that were included in the House-passed version were ultimately removed from the final bill, the bill does include a ban on access to medically necessary healthcare for transgender children of service members, which will force service members to choose between serving their country and getting their children the care they need," the pair noted. "The final bill also failed to expand coverage for fertility treatments, including in vitro fertilization (IVF), for service members regardless of whether their infertility is service-connected."

Several of the 124 House Democrats who voted against the NDAA cited those "culture war" policies, in addition to concerns about how the Pentagon spends massive amounts of money that could go toward improving lives across the country.

"Once again, Congress has passed a massive military authorization bill that prioritizes endless military spending over the critical needs of American families. This year's NDAA designates $900 billion for military spending," said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), noting the audit failures. "While I recognize the long-overdue 14.5% raise for our lowest-ranking enlisted personnel is important, this bill remains flawed. The bloated military budget continues to take away crucial funding from programs that could help millions of Americans struggling to make ends meet."

Taking aim at the GOP's push to deny gender-affirming care through TRICARE, the congresswoman said that "I cannot support a bill that continues unnecessary military spending while also attacking the rights and healthcare of transgender youth, and for that reason, I voted NO."

As Omar, a leading critic of the U.S.-backed Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip, also pointed out: "The NDAA includes a provision that blocks the Pentagon from using data on casualties and deaths from the Gaza Ministry of Health or any sources relying on those statistics. This is an alarming erasure of the suffering of the Palestinian people, ignoring the human toll of ongoing violence."

Israel—which receives billions of dollars in annual armed aid from the United States—faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court last month issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The NDAA includes over $627 million in provisions for Israel.

Congresswoman Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), who voted against the NDAA, directed attention to U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's proposed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), set to be run by billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.

"How do we know that DOGE is not a good-faith effort to address wasted funding and unaccountable government? The NDAA passed today," Ramirez said. "Republicans overwhelmingly supported the $883.7 billion authorization bill even though the Pentagon just failed its seventh audit in a row."

"Billions of dollars go to make defense corporations and their investors, including Members of Congress, rich while Americans go hungry, families are crushed by debt, and bombs we fund kill children in Gaza," she added. "No one who voted for this bill can credibly suggest that they care about government waste."

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who also opposed the NDAA, wrote in a Tuesday opinion piece for MSNBC that he looks forward to working with DOGE "to reduce waste and fraud at the Pentagon, while strongly opposing any cuts to programs likeSocial Security, Medicare, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau."

"We should make defense contracting more competitive, helping small and medium-sized businesses to compete for Defense Department projects," Khanna argued. "The Defense Department also needs better acquisition oversight. Defense contractors have gotten away with overcharging the Pentagon and ripping off taxpayers for too long."

"Another area where we can work with DOGE is reducing the billions being spent to maintain excess military property and facilities domestically and abroad," he suggested. "Finally, DOGE can also cut the Nuclear-Armed Sea-Launched Cruise Missile program."

The congressman, who is expected to run for president in 2028, concluded that "American taxpayers want and deserve the best return on their investment. Let's put politics aside and work with DOGE to reduce wasteful defense spending. And let's invest instead in domestic manufacturing, good-paying jobs, and a modern national security strategy."

SEE ALL
FBI Director Christopher Wray
News

Watchdog Says Wray Should Not Assist Trump's Attack on FBI by Resigning

Current FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Wednesday that he will depart his post when President Joe Biden's term ends in January—a move that drew criticism from the watchdog group Public Citizen.

Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman pointed out that Wray's planned departure follows President-elect Donald Trump's threat to fire him.

"FBI directors are given 10-year terms for a reason: to insulate them from political pressure. To defend the vital independence of the FBI, Director Wray should not preemptively resign in face of Donald Trump's bad-faith threats to remove him," Weissman said in a statement.

Patel, who served as chief of staff to acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller at the end of Trump's first term, was characterized by The Associated Press earlier this year as a "trusted aide and swaggering campaign surrogate who mythologizes the former president while promoting conspiracy theories and his own brand."

Some of Patel's past statements have alarmed critics, who worry he may be willing to weaponize the agency to go after political enemies or media critics of Trump.

"We will go out and find the conspirators, not just in government, but in the media. Yes, we're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections," he said during an appearance on former Trump advisor Steve Bannon's War Room podcast last year.

Weissman said that "if Donald Trump fires [Wray], so be it. But Wray should not aid and abet the effort to weaponize the FBI by bowing out in advance."

Weissman was not the only person to criticize Wray along these lines: "A profile in courage, Chris Wray is not. Wray bowed to political pressure; his early resignation is the easy way out. It avoids a very public conversation when Trump inevitably would have fired him," wrote Anthony Coley, an analyst at NBC News, CNBC, and MSNBC.

In announcing his decision to leave, Wray said the choice "is the best way to avoid dragging the bureau deeper into the fray, while reinforcing the values and principles that are so important to how we do our work," according to The New York Times.

He also struck a wistful tone. "This is not easy for me," Wray said, per the Times. "I love this place, I love our mission, and I love our people."

SEE ALL
CPC Chair Pramila Jayapal
News

As Senate Prepares for NDAA Vote, Progressive Caucus Says It Is 'Past Time' to Slash Pentagon Budget

As Senate Democrats prepared to move forward with a procedural vote on the annual defense budget package that passed in the House earlier this week, the Congressional Progressive Caucus outlined its objections to the legislation and called for the Pentagon budget to be cut, with military funding freed up to "reinvest in critical human needs."

CPC Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said following the passage of the Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2025 (H.R. 5009) that "it should alarm every American taxpayer that we are nearing a trillion-dollar annual budget for an agency rampant with waste, fraud, and abuse."

Jayapal, who was one of 140 lawmakers to oppose the package, emphasized that the Pentagon has failed seven consecutive annual audits.

Despite being the only federal agency to never have passed a federal audit, said Jayapal, the Department of Defense "continues to receive huge boosts to funding every year. Our constituents deserve better."

As Common Dreams reported last month, more than half of the department's annual budget now goes to military contractors that consistently overcharge the government, contributing to the Pentagon's inability to fully account for trillions of taxpayer dollars.

The $883.7 billion legislation that was advanced by the House on Wednesday would pour more money into the Pentagon's coffers. The package includes more than $500 million in Israeli military aid and two $357 million nuclear-powered attack submarine despite the Pentagon requesting only one, and would cut more than $621 million from President Joe Biden's budget request for climate action initiatives.

Jayapal noted that the legislation—which was passed with the support of 81 Democrats and 200 Republicans—also includes anti-transgender provisions, barring the children of military service members from receiving gender-affirming healthcare in "the first federal statute targeting LGBTQ people since the 1990s when Congress adopted 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' and the Defense of Marriage Act."

"This dangerous bigotry cannot be tolerated, let alone codified into federal law," said Jayapal.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday that the legislation "has some very good things we Democrats wanted in it, it has some bad things we wouldn't have put in there, and some things that were left out," and indicated that he had filed cloture for the first procedural vote on the NDAA.

The vote is expected to take place early next week, and 60 votes are needed to begin debate on the package.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime critic of exorbitant U.S. military spending, said in a floor speech on Wednesday that he plans to vote no on the budget.

"While middle-class and working-class families are struggling to survive, we supposedly just don't have the financial resources to help them," he said. "We just cannot afford to build more housing, we just cannot afford to provide quality childcare to our kids or to support public education, or to provide healthcare to all."

"But when the military industrial complex and all of their well-paid lobbyists come marching in to Capitol Hill," he continued, "somehow or another, there is more than enough money for Congress to provide them with virtually everything that they need."

Jayapal noted that the funding package includes substantive pay raises for service members and new investments in housing, healthcare, childcare, and other support for their families.

"Progressives will always fight to increase pay for our service members and ensure that our veterans are well taken care of," said Jayapal. "However, this legislation on balance moves our country and our national priorities in the wrong direction."

By cutting military spending, she said, the federal government could invest in the needs of all Americans, not just members of the military, "without sacrificing our national security or service member wages."

"It's past time we stop padding the pockets of price gouging military contractors who benefit from corporate consolidation," said Jayapal, "and reallocate that money to domestic needs."

SEE ALL