SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As menacingly foretold, an addled, vengeful dolt has unleashed a deluge of mindless venom, rancor, racism, cruelty - and domestic terrorists - on a populace he just vowed "to serve and protect," banishing any vestige of fairness or mercy in the name of a re-whitened "blood-and-soil America (where) their worst self is their truest self." With a shiny new Gulf of America and soon-rotting crops on the vine, are eggs cheaper yet? Are we great now?
Thus has a tawdry, unmoored, insensate man-child who "represents everything this country flattered itself it was not" sought to create a "United States of Backlash" wherein "virtually all the social progress of the last half-century is reversed." Yes, it's that bad. Massive wrecking ball bad. Petulant, self-serving, weirdly shark-and-windmill-obsessed, with the bottomless animus of a sick middle-school bully, he has flung open the orange-makeup-encrusted floodgates of hell to prey on the most vulnerable among us and sulkily proclaim, "Nothing will stand in our way." In his first demented days of power, Trump has launched a torrent of executive orders that effectively "declare war on the American people," seeking to abrogate every denizen's rights, dreams and safety except those of his cadre of tech bros and billionaires. The result, writes Paul Waldman, is a "meaner, angrier place where there is no greater happiness than seeing those you hate suffer, and not only no shame but even a kind of nobility in being like Trump: rude, cruel, petty, greedy and small."
With only his wee brain, thin skin, squinty pig eyes and remnants of a $400-million-dollar faux silver spoon stuck up a grievance-filled ass at his disposal, Trump is nonetheless doggedly working to strip the basic rights of every queer, poor, trans, sick, female, migrant, mouthy or non-white "other" by any means necessary. If he was Taliban in Afghanistan, he could ban windows and the seductive sound of women's voices; here, he can only raise drug prices, kill environmental protections, end birthright citizenship, dismiss science, encourage pandemics, silence gun reform efforts, and categorically banish any and all rules that forbid or hamper discrimination, anywhere. As he ignores "virtually every important issue facing the working families of this country" - housing, health care, racial or economic equity - Bernie Sanders, who God love him almost alone refused to bow down or stand up for his oligarch-packed coronation, argues our job in the dark days ahead is "not to respond to every absurd statement" but to "stay focused on the issues, to do the right thing."
A prodigious if admirable ask, as Trump lurches on, terrifyingly powerful yet still incoherent, slurring, rambling, "declining right in front of us." In a vainglorious inauguration speech proclaiming "Liberation Day for America," he bleated that his "journey to reclaim our Republic has not been an easy one, that I can tell you," charging that evil libtards "who wish to stop our cause have tried to take my freedom and, indeed, to take my life." Still, he boasted from his fact-free universe, "The golden age of America begins right now. My recent election is a (fictional) mandate to completely and totally reverse a horrible betrayal. And all of these many betrayals that have taken place....I was saved by God to make America great again." It was a bit much for the usually eloquent Charlie Pierce, who "struggled for a way to memorialize the dawning of Hell's Encore" and its unending "festival of grievance." For help, he turned to Hunter Thompson's Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail at the woeful moment in 1972 when Richard Nixon beat George McGovern.
"This may be the year," Thompson wrote, "when we finally come face to face with ourselves; finally just lay back and say it - that we are really just a nation of 220 million used car salesmen with all the money we need to buy guns, and no qualms at all about killing anybody else in the world who tries to make us uncomfortable." Amidst the turmoil of civil rights unrest and the Vietnam War, the deeply decent McGovern, who lost in an ignoble landslide, was that "rare candidate who really understands what a fantastic monument to all the best instincts of the human race this country might have been," Thompson lamented, "if we could have kept it out of the hands of greedy little hustlers like Richard Nixon." Eerily prescient, he went on, "Jesus! Where will it end? How low do you have to stoop in this country to be President?" To which Pierce sadly adds that even the sage, caustic Thompson "didn’t have a clue that the answer would prove to be infinity."
What better image of a macabre inauguration day than that of gazillionaire nerd and Trump best buddy Elmo Musk shooting out a virulent arm, twice, in a Nazi salute to dubiously declare the election "no ordinary victory," but one that assured "the future of civilization" (for rich white men with bunkers.) Alas, complicit, gaslighting corporate media, ignoring Maya Angelou's "When someone shows you who they are, believe them," still declines to, instead preposterously pivoting to a “controversial gesture,” "an odd-looking salute...evocative of things we have seen through history,” "an exuberant speech" - also an exuberant Nazi salute - and, from the ostensibly anti-hate Anti-Defamation League, "an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm." "This is a delicate moment," they blathered. "So many are on edge. All sides should give one another a bit of grace." Grace with jackboots? Thrilled Nazis were "abuzz." They gleefully extolled their "White Power Moment,” shrieked, "Hail Trump!" and vowed, "The White Flame will rise again!" And it might.
?
The day's other big Nazi salute to civil order and decency came with Trump's decision to give a blanket pardon or clemency to all the Jan. 6 yahoos, because, literally, Fuck You. Weighing his options in sober Winston Churchill mode, an advisor reported, "He just said, 'Fuck it. Release ‘em all.'" Most of the 1,500 had done their time, but with his virtually unchecked pardon power, he freed the last, most violent 211 - who'd trashed the Capitol, called for lynching lawmakers, bludgeoned cops with fire extinguishers, flag poles, bear spray, broken furniture, stun guns, crutches, fists and feet. He freed the Oath Keepers' Stewart Rhodes, who assembled a heavily armed "quick reaction force" and got 18 years for seditious conspiracy. He freed the guys who dragged, beat, stun-gunned Mike Fanone, the guy who shit on Nancy Pelosi's desk, the horned, face-painted QAnon shaman Jacob Chansley, who later said, "I regret nothing." "THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!” he posted online. "NOW I AM GONNA BY (sic) SOME MOTHAFUCKIN GUNS!!! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!!."
His blithe rebranding of the GOP as "the Jailbreak Party" was widely deemed "a slap in the face" to things they're supposed to represent - rule of law, back the blue - but clearly don't. Even the staid Wall Street Journal decried "setting free the cop beaters" as "another stain (on) Trump's legacy," a stain in and of itself. Even as police unions that endorsed him blasted the pardons, the media again did a tip-toeing, gaslighting, "What in the holy name of Both-Sides Jesus is this?" dodge, with the New York Times, describing "dueling pardons" and "an intensified fight over the meaning of Jan. 6."Given that most Americans, and even GOP lawmakers, had said they "obviously" opposed pardons for violent offenders, MAGA Mike had to get even slimier than usual.Then, he urged prosecution "to the fullest extent of the law" and called Biden's preemptive pardons for law-abiding relatives "shocking," "disgusting," "breathtaking." Now, he says, "We believe in second chances...We're looking forward." Still, Susan Collins was said to be leaning toward being "disturbed."
The pardons quickly boomeranged: One goon is back inside on a gun charge, another is terrified his newly released father will kill him as "a traitor," Stewart Rhodes strolled into the Capitol to greet appalled media, talk with a GOP rep and whine, "Why should I feel responsible?" and another raved "What did I do (that) caused the harm?” but said he regrets threatening to “fucking hang" then-Speaker Pelosi: "I was drunk and pissed off.” To bolster the denial, daft Michele Bachmann emerged to dreamily recall Jan. 6: "It was like a prayer meeting, people preaching the gospel...There was no discontent - the happiest people you'd ever see." Just one rioter, Pamela Hemphill, who did 60 days, declined the pardon because "we were wrong that day" and accepting it would "rewrite history." Several judges also slammed pardons based on "revisionist myth” that "cannot whitewash the blood, feces, and terror the mob left in its wake." In the end, noted one online sage, "the only country that opened (its) prisons and (sent) criminals to prey upon innocent Americans was us."
Still, the slapdash unleashing of a couple hundred hoodlums into our midst pales before the devastation wrought by Trump's barrage of over 80 rash, cruel, heedless "executive orders" rescinding literally decades of hard-won protections for millions of Americans - against discrimination, climate change, police violence, hunger, fear, disease, death; and for health care, immigration access, ethical governance, decent education, fair wages, affordable prescription drugs, reproductive freedom, voting rights, same-sex safeguards, racial and ethnic equity, a Constitution-pledged place at the table. His revocations by dumpster fire could gut medical insurance for over 20 million people, raise prescription costs for millions more, reduce workplace health and safety provisions, loosen rules on hiring discrimination, reverse longstanding civil rights provisions, remove protections against drilling, halt clean energy programs, end all federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and suspend foreign aid "to determine whether they are aligned with (our) policies."
Charging the Biden administration has "embedded deeply unpopular, illegal and radical practices" within the federal government, including "corrupting" DEI programs, the new regime seeks to "restore common sense" to government and "unleash the potential of the American citizen." Toward that hellscape, it "hereby revoked" membership in WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement, dozens of initiatives toward pay equity, multiple bans on oil or gas leases, calls for accountable policing, incarceration reform," "educational excellence," clean energy programs, economic, educational and racial equity for Native, Hispanic, Asian, underserved, queer, trans, refugee and asylum seeker populations, and the removal of Cuba as a "State Sponsor of Terrorism." To move along Trump's planned mass deportations, he wants to overturn the 14th Amendment's l00-years-long guarantee of birthright citizenship and force SCOTUS to give him that power, though we all know brown kids "aren't the reason we can't afford eggs or prescription drugs - billionaire CEOs are."
To kick off his promised purge of 1,000-plus Biden appointees to replace them with ill-equipped loyalists, he also fired Mark Milley for calling him "a total fascist,” Nobel Peace Prize-nominated chef and World Central Kitchen founder José Andrés for feeding people in disaster zones and criticizing Israel - already resigned, Andrés posted shrug/laugh emojis - and Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Linda Fagan for being the first woman to lead our armed forces and her "excessive" focus on fairness. He changed the name of Alaska's Mt. Denali back to McKinley for "a great president (who) made our country very rich," and on MLK Jr. Day, the racist pig who once demanded the execution of the now exonerated Central Park Five ended Biden's death penalty moratorium and urged expanding it because it deters "heinous crimes" - a claim rejected as "a false, dark fantasy." He also directed the DOJ to ditch SCOTUS-set limits on killings and "ensure sufficient supply" of their drugs, which one expert called "one of the most ghoulish things I've ever fucking read."
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Amidst the casual cruelty, career criminal Donny Shitweasel is still grifting. His latest tower of corruption will be in Serbia, where Jared Kushner, last seen salivating over waterfront property in ravaged Gaza, has raised millions from foreign governments including blood-spattered Saudi Arabia for his Affinity Partners to build the Trump Tower Belgrade and funnel a few to Trump, part of what Jamie Raskin calls "ongoing efforts to sell political influence to the highest bidder." The king of the long con has moved on from sneakers, cologne, $100,000 watches to a cash grab "shameless even by his standards" - hawking "digital magic beans," aka $TRUMP crypto tokens, volatile assets that briefly peaked at $50 billion but worth only what MAGA nitwits will pay. "My new official Trump Meme is HERE!" he shrieked. "Celebrate everything we stand for: WINNING!" The White House is again for sale, says Walter Schaub: "America voted for corruption, and that’s what Trump is delivering. The very idea of government ethics is now a smoldering crater."
When not peddling power, Trump is busy walking back campaign promises. It turns out lowering prices is "hard" - signs in stores: "Egg Supplies Limited" - and so is ending the Ukraine war "within 24 hours," which is all Biden's fault. He's still taking dodgy, often vicious actions. In the last three days, he pardoned Ross Ulbricht, serving life in prison, whose online Silk Road used cryptocurrency.to buy/sell $200 million in illegal, sometimes fatal drugs; removed the Office of Gun Violence Prevention from the White House website; revoked LBJ's 1965 equal employment order banning discrimination in hiring, thus rolling back 60 years of civil rights progress; threatened uppity state and local "actors" with prosecution for "resisting, obstructing and otherwise failing to comply with" racist immigration policies; effectively closed the Southern border to migrants or asylum seekers and directed his dystopian minions to "take all necessary action to immediately repel, repatriate, and remove (any) illegal alien involved in an invasion across (the) border."
En route, he's already getting pushback. At least 22 Dem-led states, along with D.C., San Francisco, the ACLU, other advocacy groups and one expectant mother, have sued to halt his effort to rescind the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship; a Reagan-appointed judge in Seattle temporarily blocked it, agreeing it was "blatantly unconstitutional" and telling Trump lawyers "it boggles my mind" they're trying to argue otherwise. Three lawsuits have been filed against the Department of Government Efficiency for violating transparency laws, though one could argue DOGE has already proven so efficient it's cut the number of billlionaires running it by half. As to his imperialist fever dream of taking over Greenland, which Denmark has owned for 800 years, a Danish lawmaker at the European Parliament re-iterated, "It is not for sale." When he added, “Let me put it in words you might understand: 'Mr. Trump, fuck off!'”, he was chastised for language "not OK in this house of democracy. Regardless of what we think of Mr. Trump."
Still, America's newest hero, and the first truth-teller to confront Trump to his pasty orange face, is the Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, Episcopal bishop at D.C.'s National Cathedral, where Trump inexplicably attended a national prayer service with his dead-eyed family and minions. Engaging in "some next-level, Jesus-style calling out the powerful," Budde looked at Trump's rows of "hellbound souls" - smirking Tiffany, glaring Melania, eye-rolling Vance, scowling Trump - and deciding "no fucking way she's obeying in advance," Budde asked the foul Mob Boss of this vile crew to show mercy to the vulnerable, like, you know, Jesus did with, “Whatever you did for the least of these, you did for me," etc. "In the name of our God (the one who saved him, remember?), I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now," said Budde, citing migrant, gay, transgender, birthright children, fleeing wars, "some who fear for their lives." For them, improbably, she called on Trump to "find compassion and welcome here."
Nazis evidently hate it when faith leaders ask people in power to heed Jesus' teachings - in church, yet, clearly no place for calls of "compassion" and "welcome." Charlie Kirk raved Budde "disgraced herself," the Cathedral had "fallen into the hands of LGBT activists," it had "become a sanctuary of Satan." A Hannity railed this "lady bishop spewed hate" in a "woke tirade" of "fearmongering and division." Mike Collins snarled Budde should be "added to the deportation list." Back to her native New Jersey? Presumably by cattle car? Tommy No-Brains castigated "the radical left...It just absolutely amazes me how far these people will go." Indeed. Trump sat helplessly seething; afterwards, he told reporters the service was “not too exciting” and "they can do much better." In the middle of the night, he ranted online "the so-called Bishop was a Radical Left hard-line Trump hater. Very ungracious, nasty in tone, and not compelling or smart...She is not very good at her job! She and her church owe the public an apology!”
The next day, the malevolent man-child signed a directive empowering "the brave men and women" of ICE to conduct raids and "catch criminal aliens, including murderers and rapists who no longer will be able to hide," in formerly "sensitive locations" like churches, schools, hospitals. Sigh. He's been in office three days. From one suffering soul, "It's a lot. It's a fucking lot." Yet there are so many of us reeling, raging, mourning, fighting. The great Jasmine Crockett, who just became Vice Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee, vows she will keep "shining a light on every attack on our rights," and she's "not gonna play...Buckle up, buttercup." The band Rage Against the Machine, longtime supporters of native activist Leonard Peltier, honored his release after (too many) decades in prison with a video; its message: Anger - not consuming but cleansing, righteous, propulsive enough to keep us upright - "is a gift." And the Rev. Budde, facing death threats, has stood firm: "I don't feel there's a need to apologize for a request for mercy." Can we get an Amen?
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers (and sisters). - Samuel Jackson's Jules tweaking Ezekiel 25:17 in Pulp Fiction.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Victims of the deadly wildfires still devastating large swaths of Los Angeles County were joined Thursday by scientists and legal experts at a press conference demanding criminal accountability for the fossil fuel industry over its role in the climate crisis.
"The disasters we are seeing today are not natural. They are crimes," Danielle Levanas, who grew up in Pacific Palisades and whose parents' home was destroyed by the Palisades Fire, said during the press conference attended by Common Dreams. "My elementary and middle school, our rec center, our library, the local community theater, the banks, the post office where we voted, the grocery stores, our favorite restaurants—they have all been taken out."
"How do you communicate the value of your deceased mom's journal from 1981, when she was pregnant with you, or the textiles you collected when you worked in West Africa in your mid-20s, or the boxes of home videos carefully labeled and organized, but not yet digitized, that captured moments with your family you had hoped to one day share with your own kids?" she asked. "Losing that house in some ways feels like losing my mom all over again."
"The severity of these fires has escalated dramatically due to climate change and the actions of Big Oil companies that have exacerbated this crisis."
Sam James, a 24-year-old Santa Monica resident, watched the Palisades Fire rage from her window. James grew up in Altadena, where the Eaton Fire destroyed the homes of her grandfather and other relatives.
"Our roots in Altadena and Pasadena go back to at least 1890, with a legacy of building opportunities for Black generational wealth primarily through home ownership," she explained. "Much of this progress has been destroyed by recent wildfires including the Eaton Fire."
"While we always understood the risks of living in this area, the severity of these fires has escalated dramatically due to climate change and the actions of Big Oil companies that have exacerbated this crisis," James said. "Their reckless pollution and disregard for the environmental impact have directly contributed to climate change and the intensification of natural disasters like these wildfires. They must take responsibility for the harm that they've caused, pay reparations to the affected communities… and take immediate steps to mitigate further damage."
"The science is clear," she added. "We've seen the writing on the walls. Climate change is here, and it's only getting worse. Our communities cannot continue to bear the physical and emotional toll of this crisis caused by the actions of a powerful few. It's time for Big Oil to be held accountable and take real, measurable steps toward a more sustainable future."
Kristina Dahl, vice president of science at Climate Central, told reporters at the news conference that "we are up against a very deep-pocketed fossil fuel industry that has made it very difficult to address the crisis."
However, "California has held corporations accountable for their role in wildfires, and yet much of the financial burden is still falling on taxpayers and ratepayers," she added, "and the companies that are shaping the conditions under which these fires are occurring are largely let off the hook."
Wildfire evacuee Maya Golden-Krasner, the deputy director and senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, said during the press conference: "Having inflicted as much as—or maybe more than—$250 billion in damages, the LA fires already rank as one of the worst disasters in U.S. history. Yet the fossil fuel polluters who rake in massive profits and have created the conditions for the fires, the floods, and the other disasters have faced no responsibility to pay for the consequences, and that leaves the rest of us stuck with the multibillion-dollar tab."
Golden-Krasner continued:
So one of my and my organization's top priorities this legislative session is to pass a climate superfund bill. The bill is modeled on federal law that requires hazardous waste polluters to clean up their toxic messes and also on California's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Act. It would make the largest fossil fuel polluters pay a portion of their huge profits to address the climate consequences they helped create and help California adapt to future disasters. Vermont and New York have actually already passed similar bills last year. And in California we're already paying for Big Oil's climate destruction not just with money but with our lives.
"That's why we need our own climate superfund bill, to put billions of dollars in climate costs back on corporate polluters where they belong," she added.
While unable to share details about which state lawmakers will sponsor it or exactly when it will be introduced, Golden-Krasner told reporters that new California climate superfund legislation is likely to be released "within the next few days."
"Please stay tuned for that," she said. "There was a bill last session that made it through three committees in 60 days and the fossil fuel industry pushed really hard against it. So we're hoping that this year folks will come out and support it and we'll be able to pass it."
Noting that "climate change didn't happen out of the blue," attorney and Public Citizen Climate Program Accountability Project director Aaron Regunberg said that "the climate effects driving these fires are the direct and foreseeable—and in fact foreseen—consequences of the actions of a small number of fossil fuel companies that knowingly generated a huge portion of all the greenhouse gasses that caused this crisis and fraudulently deceived the public about the dangerousness of their products specifically in order to block and delay the very solutions that could have avoided these catastrophes."
"What's more, they did all of this with full knowledge of just how lethal their conduct really was, having long predicted that the continued burning of their fossil fuel products would cause, in their own words, 'catastrophic' climate harms," he continued.
"We have a concept in the law for when someone consciously disregards a substantial risk of causing harm to another person," Regunberg said. "That is called recklessness. And that's what we mean when we say that, while these deaths and injuries are unspeakably tragic, they aren't just tragedies, they're also crimes."
"The victims and survivors of climate disasters deserve justice, and fortunately we have mechanisms to give it to them," he stressed. "We have new legislative frameworks like the climate superfund. We have the civil justice system, which is designed to repair harms and compensate those who have been injured."
"The victims and survivors of climate disasters deserve justice, and fortunately we have mechanisms to give it to them."
"And that's exactly what cities and states all across the country including California are seeking with their climate accountability lawsuits, which continue to move forward and just this week overcame another dismissal attempt by Big Oil at the [U.S.] Supreme Court," Regunberg said. "And we also have the criminal justice system, which is designed to protect citizens from harm and hold wrongdoers accountable."
Regunberg last year co-authored a legal memo laying out how local or state prosecutors could bring criminal charges against Big Oil for deaths from extreme heat.
"Did you know that it's a felony in California to recklessly cause a fire?" he added. "It's involuntary manslaughter to recklessly cause a death. Local prosecutors should consider whether Big Oil's conduct here amounts to violations of these kind of criminal laws."
The "winners" of the annual Shkreli Awards—named after notorious "pharma bro" Martin Shkreli and given to the 10 "worst examples of profiteering and dysfunction in healthcare"—include a Texas medical school that sold body parts of deceased people without relatives' consent, an alleged multibillion-dollar catheter scam, an oncologist who subjected patients to unnecessary cancer treatments, and a "monster monopoly" insurer.
The Shkreli Awards, now in their eighth year, are given annually by the Lown Institute, a Massachusetts-based think tank "advocating bold ideas for a just and caring system for health." A panel of 20 expert judges—who include physicians, professors, activists, and others—determine the winners.
This year's awardees are:
10: The University of North Texas Health Science Center "dissected and distributed unclaimed bodies without properly seeking consent from the deceased or their families" and supplied the parts "to medical students as well as major for-profit ventures like Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson," reporting revealed.
9:
Baby tongue-tie cutting procedures are "being touted as a cure for everything from breastfeeding difficulties to sleep apnea, scoliosis, and even constipation"—despite any conclusive evidence that the procedure is effective.
8: Zynex Medical is a company facing scrutiny for its billing practices related to nerve stimulation devices used for pain management.
7: Insurance giant Cigna is under fire for billing a family nearly $100,000 for an infant's medevac flight.
6: Seven suppliers allegedly ran a multibillion-dollar urinary catheter billing scam that affected hundreds of thousands of Medicare patients.
5: Memorial Medical Center in Las Cruces, New Mexico allegedly refused cancer treatment "to patients or demanding upfront payments, even from those with insurance."
4: Dr. Thomas C. Weiner is a Montana oncologist who allegedly "subjected a patient to unnecessary cancer treatments for over a decade," provided "disturbingly high doses of barbiturates to facilitate death in seriously ill patients, when those patients may not have actually been close to death," and "prescribed high doses of opioids to patients that did not need them." Weiner denies any wrongdoing.
3: Pharma giant Amgen was accused of pushing 960-milligram doses of its highly toxic cancer drug Lumakras, when "a lower 240mg dose offers similar efficacy with reduced toxicity"—but costs $180,000 less per patient annually at the lower dose.
2: UnitedHealth allegedly exploited "its vast physician network to maximize profits, often at the expense of patients and clinicians," including by pressuring doctors "to reduce time with patients and to practice aggressive medical coding tactics that make patients seem as sick as possible" in order to earn higher reimbursements from the federal government."
🥁🥁🥁
1: Steward Health Care CEO Dr. Ralph de la Torre was accused of orchestrating "a dramatic healthcare debacle by prioritizing private equity profits over patient care" amid "debt and sale-leaseback schemes" and a bankruptcy that "left hospitals gutted, employees laid off, and communities underserved" as he reportedly walked away "with more than $250 million over the last four years as hospitals tanked."
"All these stories paint a picture of a healthcare industry in desperate need of transformation," Lown Institute president Dr. Vikas Saini said during the award ceremony, according toThe Guardian.
"Doing these awards every year shows us that this is nothing new," he added. "We're hoping that these stories illuminate what changes are needed."
The latest Shkreli Awards came just weeks after the brazen assassination of Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealth subsidiary UnitedHealthcare. Although alleged gunman Luigi Mangione has pleaded not guilty, his reported manifesto—which rails against insurance industry greed—resonated with people across the country and sparked discussions about the for-profit healthcare system.
While U.S. President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency has faced intense criticism and even multiple lawsuits, some progressive groups and lawmakers are also engaging, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Thursday.
When Trump announced DOGE in November, he said the presidential advisory commission would work to "slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies." Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday detailed 30 proposals that would cut at least $2 trillion of government spending over the next decade.
In a lengthy letter to the chair of DOGE, billionaire Elon Musk, that was first reported by Time, Warren highlighted that "you have publicly called for sizable cuts in funding—from $500 billion in annual spending to 'at least' $2 trillion in cuts to federal spending—although recently, you said you may not actually be able to meet that goal."
"I have very serious concerns about both the DOGE process and the policies that you have publicly discussed to date," she wrote. "With regard to process, as I raised in a still-unanswered letter to President-elect Trump regarding Mr. Musk sent on December 16, 2024, it is not clear that you and other DOGE leaders are able to identify and mitigate your conflicts of interest and adhere to commonsense ethics standards. As a result, the committee appears to be a venue for corruption, allowing well-connected billionaires to put government policies in place that enrich them while hurting ordinary Americans."
"I am disturbed by the dangerous proposals you have discussed and released to date: proposals from you and your allies to cut Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, veterans' benefits, and other programs."
"With regard to policy, I am disturbed by the dangerous proposals you have discussed and released to date: proposals from you and your allies to cut Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, veterans' benefits, and other programs that tens of millions of Americans count on and rely on are unrealistic and cruel. It would be outrageous to cut these programs in the name of government thriftiness while handing out trillions of dollars in tax cuts for billionaires and big corporations," she continued. "But, your broad point—that the federal government spends trillions of dollars on wasteful spending is correct. And if you are serious about working together in good faith to cut government spending—in a way that does not harm the middle class—I have proposals for your consideration."
The letter features several recommendations to cut spending at the U.S. Department of Defense, which has never passed an audit. Specifically, it says: negotiate better contracts, recreate a renegotiation board to challenge excess profits, stop using the military to perform civilian jobs, end corporate welfare for Pentagon contractors and foreign governments, instruct the agency to stop gaming the budget process, boost energy efficiency and industry competition, tackle repair restrictions on military equipment, and "avert wasteful government spending on plutonium pit production at the Savannah River Site."
Warren also has suggestions for federal healthcare programs, such as curbing taxpayer abuse by Medicare Advantage insurers, engaging in more Medicare negotiations to lower prescription drug costs, supporting efforts to crack down on pharmacy benefit managers, quashing patent abuses by the pharmaceutical industry, exercising march-in rights to reduce medication prices, breaking up conglomerates, and keeping private equity out of the industry.
To save on education, the senator called for eliminating or reducing funding for the federal Charter Schools Program and making for-profit colleges ineligible for federal grant aid. On the taxation front, she advised fully funding the Internal Revenue Service as well as clawing back tax expenditures and closing loopholes for the wealthy.
Her letter further suggests keeping the federal government's cloud and other information technology markets competitive, reducing waste in unnecessary federal arrests and detention programs, and working with the Government Accountability Office, inspector general offices, and other watchdogs "to detect and combat fraud, waste, and abuse."
"DOGE's agenda has focused on limiting the size of the federal government to increase efficiency and save taxpayer dollars. As the list above indicates, there are many opportunities for identifying savings that would not hurt the middle class, and that would eliminate wasteful special interest spending," Warren wrote. "But focusing solely on cutting federal budgets is myopic and counterproductive, and misses key ways in which the government can cut costs for ordinary Americans, saving them billions of dollars."
"For example, the federal government should continue its efforts to target abusive surprise fees charged by businesses across the economy," she noted, pointing to rules from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, U.S. Department of Transportation, and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) targeting "junk fees."
Empowering the U.S. Department of Justice and the FTC "to break up monopolies and ensure competition would have extraordinary benefits for families," the senator wrote. She also argued that "DOGE should ensure that federal agency contracts do not create monopolies that can hike prices for small businesses and consumers indefinitely."
"By making the tax code fairer, DOGE recommendations could provide a roadmap for additional government revenues that could be used for important investments or to cut the deficit," she added, spotlighting the anticipated benefits of ending tax breaks and loopholes for offshoring jobs and profits, raising the corporate tax rate and the corporate alternative minimum tax rate, and enacting her "Ultra-Millionaire Tax."
"In the interest of taking aggressive, bipartisan action to ensure sustainable spending, protect taxpayer dollars, curb abusive practices by giant corporations, and improve middle-class Americans' quality of life," Warren concluded, "I would be happy to work with you on these matters."
Warren's letter followed an
MSNBCop-ed that Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) wrote in December, offering Musk some recommendations, and a report that the watchdog Public Citizen released earlier this month identifying "what an efficiency agenda based on evidence, not ideology, would include," in the words of the group's co-president, Robert Weissman, who has formally requested to join DOGE to serve as a voice "for the interests of consumers and the public."
While some of Warren, Khanna, and Public Citizen's proposals could win bipartisan support, many would likely be met with strong resistance from the Trump White House and Republican-controlled Congress. As
Time put it, "Her missive might do more to make a point than spur an improbable collaboration."
The inaugural interfaith service at the Washington National Cathedral on Tuesday proceeded with the usual prayers and music, but after delivering her sermon, the Right Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde appeared to go off-script and made a direct appeal to President Donald Trump.
Recalling the Republican president's assertion on Monday that he was "saved by God" after a bullet hit his ear in an assassination attempt in July, Budde asked Trump, who was seated in the church, "in the name of our God... to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now."
"There are gay, lesbian, and transgender children in Democratic, Republican, and Independent families," said Budde, "some who fear for their lives. And the people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings, who labor in poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the night shifts in hospitals. They may not be citizens or have the proper documentation, but the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals."
"I ask you to have mercy, Mr. President, on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away, and that you help those fleeing war zones and persecution in their own lands to find compassion and welcome here," said Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington, D.C.
Budde's appeal followed Trump's signing of 26 executive orders in his first day in office, with dozens more expected in the first days of his second term. The president signed orders ending birthright citizenship—provoking legal challenges from immigrant rights groups and state attorneys general—and pausing refugee admissions, leading to devastation among people who had been waiting for asylum appointments at ports of entry. Official proclamations declared a national emergency at the southern border and asserted that the entry of migrants there is an "invasion."
Trump also took executive action to declare that the federal government recognizes only two sexes, male and female.
"May God grant us the strength and courage to honor the dignity of every human being, to speak the truth to one another in love, and walk humbly with each other and our God for the good of all people in this nation and the world," said Budde in her address to Trump.
The president kept his eyes on Budde for much of her speech, at one point looking annoyed and casting his eyes downward. Vice President JD Vance leaned over and spoke to his wife, Usha Vance, as Budde talked about undocumented immigrants, and raised his eyebrows when she said the majority of immigrants are not criminals.
Trump later told reporters that the service was "not too exciting."
"I didn't think it was a good service," he said. "They can do much better."
Democratic strategist Keith Edwards applauded Budde's decision to speak directly to the president, calling her "incredibly brave."
Budde "confronted Trump's fascism to his face," he said on the social media platform Bluesky.
A day after the cease-fire deal between Israel and Hamas took effect, the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem said Monday that attacks by settlers in the West Bank—carried out with the "full cooperation" of Israeli soldiers, according to one rights group—were meant to "impose a 'price tag' for the release of Palestinians" as part of the truce.
West Bank residents shared accounts—backed up by footage that was verified by The New York Times—of masked Israeli settlers in the Israeli-occupied territory burning homes and vehicles on Sunday, with gangs of "dozens of men, some carrying slingshots," rampaging through at least three Palestinian villages.
The cease-fire deal reached last week was widely celebrated after more than 15 months of Israel's U.S.-backed assault on Gaza, which has killed at least 46,913 Palestinians.
But some on the far-right in Israel, including settlers in the West Bank, object to the release of Palestinians from Israeli prisons.
In the first phase of the agreement, 33 Israeli hostages are set to be released by Hamas, while 737 Palestinian prisoners being held in Israel and 1,167 Palestinians detained by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will be freed. On Sunday, the first three Israeli hostages and 90 Palestinians were released.
B'Tselem reported that a 15-year-old boy was killed in the West Bank town of Sabastiya by soldiers who "escorted" gangs of settlers on Sunday.
In Sinjil, the Times reported that dozens of men threw stones and set houses ablaze, injuring several people, including an 86-year-old man.
"People screamed as their homes were burning," a resident, Ayed Jafry, told the newspaper.
Villagers in Turmus Aya reported that Israeli police officers did not try to stop at least 20 masked settlers who entered the town and threw stones, and CCTV footage showed Israeli police cars in the area.
Ofer Cassif, a member of the Israeli Knesset who has expressed support for South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, called on the international community to "enforce accountability on its own and bring these violent, racist criminals to justice."
"If their flames of hatred will not be vanquished," said Cassif, "it will engulf us all."
"They do not reliably increase employment, but they do kick people off essential benefits like food assistance and healthcare," said an expert at the Economic Policy Institute.
After nominees for U.S. President Donald Trump's Cabinet this week endorsed work requirements for social safety net programs, an economic think tank released a Friday report detailing the policy's drawbacks.
"Work requirements for safety net programs are a punitive solution that solves no real problem," said Economic Policy Institute (EPI) economist and report author Hilary Wething in a statement about her new publication.
"They do not reliably increase employment, but they do kick people off essential benefits like food assistance and healthcare," she stressed. "If policymakers are genuinely concerned about improving access to work, they should support policies like affordable child- and eldercare."
"The existing safety net is too stingy and tilts too hard toward making benefits difficult to access."
EPI's report explains that recently, congressional Republicans—who now have a majority in both chambers—"have embraced proposals to ratchet up work requirements as conditions for the receipt of some federal government benefits. These proposals are clearly trying to exploit a vague, but pervasive, sense that some recipients of public support are gaming the system to get benefits that they do not need, as they could be earning money in the labor market to support themselves instead."
"However, a careful assessment of the current state of public benefit programs demonstrates that almost none of the alleged benefits of ratcheting up work requirements are economically significant, but that the potential costs of doing this could be large and fall on the most economically vulnerable," the document states. "The most targeted programs for more stringent work requirements are the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, popularly referred to as food stamps) and Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income people."
"EPI has surveyed the research literature on work requirements and how they interact with these two programs in particular, and we find that the existing safety net is too stingy and tilts too hard toward making benefits difficult to access," the report continues. "Tightening eligibility by increasing work requirements for these programs will make this problem even worse with no tangible benefit in the form of higher levels of employment among low-income adults."
Wething found that work requirements generally target nonelderly adults without documented disabilities who don't have official dependents living in their homes, formally called "able-bodied adults without dependents" (ABAWDs).
"While ABAWDs might not have documented disabilities that result in benefit receipt or have dependent children living at home full-time, they often experience health challenges and must take on some caregiving duties, each of which could provide a genuine barrier to finding steady work," the report says. "We find that 21% reported having a disability that affects their ability to find and sustain work, suggesting that adults with genuine health barriers are being swept up in overly stringent work requirements."
Additionally, "13.8% of ABAWDs live with an adult over the age of 65 in their household, suggesting that many are potential caregivers in some form and likely have caregiving responsibilities beyond what is captured on paper," the document notes. "Despite ABAWDs having health challenges and caregiving responsibilities that make participation in the labor market difficult, our current social safety net does very little to support these adults."
The publication highlights that "low-income adults generally face steep labor market challenges, making it difficult to meet work requirements," including that "low-wage work is precarious, making work time hard to maintain."
The report also emphasizes that "by making the process of applying for crucial safety net programs more burdensome, work requirements effectively function like a cut to programs," and "the consequences of losing access to SNAP and Medicaid for low-income adults are severe, often resulting in food and health insecurity."
Despite the abundance of research about the downsides of work requirements, Brooke Rollins, Trump's nominee to lead the U.S. Department of Agriculture—which administers SNAP—expressed support for the policy during a Thursday Senate confirmation hearing, echoing what Russell Vought, the president's pick to direct the Office of Management and Budget, said about Medicaid on Wednesday.
Rather than pushing work requirements, the EPI report argues, decision-makers could advocate for "policies that would measurably improve employment in low-income households," including "macroeconomic policy to maintain full employment."
The publication also promotes policies that increase scheduling predictability, provide better help with caregiving responsibilities, assist formerly incarcerated people with finding and maintaining jobs, reduce unnecessary education mandates for employment, and improve transportation options. It further calls for reducing existing work requirements.
"It is entirely possible that reducing eligibility barriers to safety net programs—barriers like work requirements—may well be more effective in promoting work than raising those barriers would be," the report states. "A majority of adults who gained coverage through Medicaid expansion in Ohio and Michigan found that having healthcare made it easier to find and maintain work."
The cryptocurrency token that U.S. President Donald Trump launched right before his inauguration, $TRUMP, is now worth billions.
Following a torrent of executive orders issued in his first few days back in the White House, U.S. President Donald Trump added another one to the list Thursday, this time aimed at promoting U.S. leadership in cryptocurrency—an industry he now holds a considerable stake in.
Co-president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, Robert Weissman, decried the move, writing in a statement Thursday that "Trump is pushing crypto because he's in on the racket."
This executive order "will help super-inflate what's already a dangerous speculative bubble in an artificial, unregulated asset that will, eventually, burst. The inevitable crash will badly injure millions of everyday Americans," Weissman wrote.
The executive order calls for the establishment of a working group on digital assets to explore the possibility of creating a "national digit asset stockpile"—something that crypto industry has pushed Trump's administration to create. That group would also "propose a federal regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets." The order, however, didn't go as far as some in the crypto industry had hoped, remarkedThe New York Times.
Just prior to his inauguration, Trump launched a so-called meme coin—"$TRUMP"—which as of Thursday afternoon had a market cap of about $7 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. The digital asset bitcoin also surged to new heights Monday, the day of Trump's inauguration, buoyed by expectations that the incoming administration will be friendly to the crypto industry.
Trump's decision to launch his crypto coin has been criticized on ethics grounds.
Jeff Hauser, the executive director of the Revolving Door Project, wrote in an MSNBC op-ed published Friday that having wealth linked to cryptocurrency will "obviously impact" how Trump's administration approaches regulation the market.
What's more, Hauser warned, "crypto markets are frequently believed to be subject to manipulation by 'whales,' i.e., large investors. Having a Trump asset so susceptible to manipulation is highly concerning. Consider whales who might manipulate the Trump coin's worth to buy influence with the president by intervening with purchases at strategic moments."
"One of the things that we need to do is to talk to people directly," said the congresswoman. "There need to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk."
As Democratic lawmakers grappled with the reality of President Donald Trump's second term this week, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Thursday urged the party to see the president's devotion to billionaires and corporations—after he campaigned as a champion for the forgotten working class—as an opportunity to make clear that Democrats, not Republicans, will fight for the interests of "everyday people."
First, the New York Democratic congresswoman said in an interview with Jon Stewart on his podcast, "The Weekly Show," the party must abandon its own allegiances to the billionaire class.
Trump, his close ties with tech billionaires like Tesla founder Elon Musk, his plans to extend the 2017 tax cuts that primarily benefited the wealthy, and his promises of deregulation to oil executives ahead of the election all highlight "ways that we can fight back," said Ocasio-Cortez.
"One of the things that we need to do is to talk to people directly," said the congresswoman. "There need to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk. There is an insane amount of hypocrisy, and the hypocrisy is what gets exploited [by Republicans]."
Ocasio-Cortez pointed to the example of "insider trading" by lawmakers, with members of Congress who receive briefings on the defense industry, pharmaceuticals, and other businesses able to use information not available to the public to predict future stock prices. As Common Dreamsreported in December, dozens of members of Congress bought or sold up to $113 million worth of shares in Pentagon contractors last year, with three Democrats—Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and Suzan Delbene (D-Wash.)—trading the most.
Pelosi, the former House speaker, is among the lawmakers who have vehemently defended stock trading by lawmakers, while Ocasio-Cortez has frequently spoken out against the practice.
"People think that everyday people are stupid," Ocasio-Cortez told Stewart on Thursday. "Do you really think that people don't see this shit? ...And then we're supposed to act like money only corrupts Republicans? Give me a fucking break."
Trump won the support of working class people across the country, increasing his support among voters who earn less than $100,000 per year despite the fact, as Ocasio-Cortez said, "that he has a Supreme Court that guts labor rights, that [Republicans] are overwhelmingly opposed to raising a minimum wage, that they are really gutting the civil rights around working people and organizing."
Wealthier voters shifted toward the Democratic Party in the election, supporting Democratic candidate former Vice President Kamala Harris.
To respond to Trump's victory, Ocasio-Cortez said, "we need to be a party of brawlers for the working class."
"We've been chasing this affluent group and making all of these little concessions and hoping that working people don't notice," she added.
The congresswoman—who campaigned for a top House Oversight Committee seat in recent weeks but lost to a more senior Democrat—has been a leading proponent of the Green New Deal, which would fight the climate emergency while creating millions of green energy jobs over a decade; the push to expand Medicare coverage to every American; and a supporter of tuition-free public college, which was offered to students across the U.S. until at least the 1970s.
Her interview with Stewart came as Semaforreported that Democratic leaders are "wrestling with how much resistance to mount to Trump's Cabinet."
"We're obviously in a bit of disarray," one Democratic senator told the outlet. "I don't think people are really completely sure about what lesson is to be learned in this election."
Jesse Brenneman, an editor for the podcast "Know Your Enemy," commented that "the fact Democrats don't know what to do tells you everything about their priorities."
In an email to supporters the day after Trump was inaugurated this week, Ocasio-Cortez stuck to the same message she shared with Stewart.
Pointing to the tech billionaires who attended the inauguration, with many elected officials "kicked to the curb," the congresswoman told supporters: "You're getting ripped off. All of us are going to be getting ripped off for the next four years, but what do we do about it?"
"The Trump trifecta has taken hold, and so have their billionaire right-wing donors," she said. "Our movement for real progress will have to push harder than ever these next four years."