(Flickr/geoftheref - Creative Commons)
Dec 17, 2009
COPENHAGEN - With the Copenhagen talks at an impasse [1],
President Barack Obama and the leaders of other developed nations have
deployed a divide-and-conquer strategy. Until now, poorer countries
have presented a united front, calling for major long-term investments
to help vulnerable nations deal with climate change, and a more
ambitious effort to slow the warming of the planet. But industrialized
nations are unwilling to make such commitments, and are now seeking to
break that alliance by picking off countries one by one.
Late on Tuesday, the governments of Ethiopia and France [2]
announced that Ethiopia, "representing Africa," had agreed to adopt an
"ambitious agreement" that would call for limiting the average global
temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius. Previously, the African bloc,
along with the G77 coalition [3]
of poor countries and the Alliance of Small Island States, had firmly
insisted that a 1.5 degree limit was imperative to prevent dire
consequences in their regions, which are especially vulnerable to
climate change. Some observers see the France-Ethiopia side deal as a
breakthrough that could bring developed and developing nations closer
to a final agreement. But others view it as an attempt to drive a wedge
through the bloc of developing nations in pursuit of a weaker deal that
won't protect the most at-risk nations from harm.
Ethiopia's
break with its fellow developing nations is significant because of the
central role it plays in the African bloc. Ethiopia chairs climate
efforts for the 53-nation African Union and is also home to its
headquarters. Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi is the coordinator
of African Heads of State and Governments on Climate Change. "I know my
proposal will disappoint some Africans," said Zenawi on Tuesday. "It
scales back the ambition in return for more reliable funding and a seat
at the table in the management of any such funding." He added: "Because
we have more to lose than others, we have to be more flexible than
others and go the extra mile."
The statement endorses the EU's plans for a $10 billion "fast-start"
climate fund, and says that 40 percent of that fund should be dedicated
to adaptation in Africa. On Wednesday, Zenawi, European Union president
Fredrik Reinfeldt and European Commission President Jose Barroso called
for $100 billion in annual funding for climate action in developing
countries by 2020. This money, they said in a statement, is needed
"particularly in Africa, least developed countries, small island states
and other developing countries with a low per-capita income." Still,
it's not clear whether Ethiopia secured anything more solid than
aspirational calls for extra money.
The major powers welcomed Ethiopia's defection from the 1.5-degree
target. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has endorsed the side deal
with France, and on Tuesday, White House officials confirmed to
reporters that Obama had placed a call to Zenawi earlier in the day.
The US president, they said, had "expressed his appreciation for the
leadership role the Prime Minister was playing in work with African
countries on climate change." Obama has also made overtures to Prime
Minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh-which faces catastrophic flooding
from rising sea levels-and "emphasized his desire to reach a pragmatic
solution that encompasses action by all countries."
But developing nations-which appear to have been caught somewhat off
guard by the announcement-aren't applauding. They fear that major
powers are trying to pick off key players from the developing bloc via
secret pacts. The fact that the agreement was made and announced in
Paris-not at the official United Nations negotiations in Copenhagen-has
fueled such suspicions. And the arrangement stands at odds with the
positioning statement by the Africa group, a regional working coalition
within the UN, submitted to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change [4]
over the weekend. That document called for emissions cuts on the order
of at least 45 percent from 1990 levels by 2020 and a $400 billion
climate fund from developed nations.
African nations are also protesting that Ethiopia doesn't represent
the position of the African bloc. Pakalitha Mosisili, the Prime
Minister of Lesotho (an African Union member) and the chair of the Least Developed Countries [5]
grouping, fired off a statement affirming that this bloc intends to
stick to the 1.5 degree target. (This goal was also reaffirmed by the
Alliance of Small Island States on Wednesday.) "We respectfully remind
rich countries-you have the responsibility for delivering a good
climate deal, but we, the poor countries, have the right to refuse a
bad deal," Mosisili said. "Just as poor countries are suffering most
from the adverse impacts of climate change, we will also suffer most
from any deal in Copenhagen should it be so thoroughly compromised as
to be ineffective."
The proposal offers "some positive signs" in terms of getting some
sort of agreement between the most significant blocs, said Romain
Benicchio, a policy adviser at Oxfam International. But, he continued,
"It would have been stronger if there had been some clearer support
from the Africa group and Europe on both sides." That the announcement
was delivered from Paris, he added, was "unfortunate." "We already have
a very complicated process here," said Benicchio. "To have something
coming from the outside which is not very clearly accepted ... can lead
to misunderstanding.
Some developing nations fear that the stalemate at Copenhagen will
impel more countries to make concessions out of a desire to get
something-anything-done before the summit concludes on Friday. But for
Africa, giving ground on temperature rise is a concession fraught with
risk. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an
average global temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius-the target
industrialized nations are pushing for-would represent a rise of 3 or 4
degrees in Africa. That in turn would trigger severe drought and
hunger. "This is death to millions of Africans," said Hon Awudu Mbaya,
President of Pan-African Parliamentarians Network on Climate Change.
Said Mosisili of Lesotho. "At this 11th hour of negotiations, we
appreciate that the issues are complex-but we will not sign a suicide
pact."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kate Sheppard
Kate Sheppard is a staff reporter for Mother Jones, focusing on energy and environmental politics from Washington, D.C. She was previously the political reporter for Grist and a writing fellow at The American Prospect. Her work has also been featured in the Washington Post, The Guardian, The Center for Public Integrity, In These Times, and Bitch.
COPENHAGEN - With the Copenhagen talks at an impasse [1],
President Barack Obama and the leaders of other developed nations have
deployed a divide-and-conquer strategy. Until now, poorer countries
have presented a united front, calling for major long-term investments
to help vulnerable nations deal with climate change, and a more
ambitious effort to slow the warming of the planet. But industrialized
nations are unwilling to make such commitments, and are now seeking to
break that alliance by picking off countries one by one.
Late on Tuesday, the governments of Ethiopia and France [2]
announced that Ethiopia, "representing Africa," had agreed to adopt an
"ambitious agreement" that would call for limiting the average global
temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius. Previously, the African bloc,
along with the G77 coalition [3]
of poor countries and the Alliance of Small Island States, had firmly
insisted that a 1.5 degree limit was imperative to prevent dire
consequences in their regions, which are especially vulnerable to
climate change. Some observers see the France-Ethiopia side deal as a
breakthrough that could bring developed and developing nations closer
to a final agreement. But others view it as an attempt to drive a wedge
through the bloc of developing nations in pursuit of a weaker deal that
won't protect the most at-risk nations from harm.
Ethiopia's
break with its fellow developing nations is significant because of the
central role it plays in the African bloc. Ethiopia chairs climate
efforts for the 53-nation African Union and is also home to its
headquarters. Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi is the coordinator
of African Heads of State and Governments on Climate Change. "I know my
proposal will disappoint some Africans," said Zenawi on Tuesday. "It
scales back the ambition in return for more reliable funding and a seat
at the table in the management of any such funding." He added: "Because
we have more to lose than others, we have to be more flexible than
others and go the extra mile."
The statement endorses the EU's plans for a $10 billion "fast-start"
climate fund, and says that 40 percent of that fund should be dedicated
to adaptation in Africa. On Wednesday, Zenawi, European Union president
Fredrik Reinfeldt and European Commission President Jose Barroso called
for $100 billion in annual funding for climate action in developing
countries by 2020. This money, they said in a statement, is needed
"particularly in Africa, least developed countries, small island states
and other developing countries with a low per-capita income." Still,
it's not clear whether Ethiopia secured anything more solid than
aspirational calls for extra money.
The major powers welcomed Ethiopia's defection from the 1.5-degree
target. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has endorsed the side deal
with France, and on Tuesday, White House officials confirmed to
reporters that Obama had placed a call to Zenawi earlier in the day.
The US president, they said, had "expressed his appreciation for the
leadership role the Prime Minister was playing in work with African
countries on climate change." Obama has also made overtures to Prime
Minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh-which faces catastrophic flooding
from rising sea levels-and "emphasized his desire to reach a pragmatic
solution that encompasses action by all countries."
But developing nations-which appear to have been caught somewhat off
guard by the announcement-aren't applauding. They fear that major
powers are trying to pick off key players from the developing bloc via
secret pacts. The fact that the agreement was made and announced in
Paris-not at the official United Nations negotiations in Copenhagen-has
fueled such suspicions. And the arrangement stands at odds with the
positioning statement by the Africa group, a regional working coalition
within the UN, submitted to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change [4]
over the weekend. That document called for emissions cuts on the order
of at least 45 percent from 1990 levels by 2020 and a $400 billion
climate fund from developed nations.
African nations are also protesting that Ethiopia doesn't represent
the position of the African bloc. Pakalitha Mosisili, the Prime
Minister of Lesotho (an African Union member) and the chair of the Least Developed Countries [5]
grouping, fired off a statement affirming that this bloc intends to
stick to the 1.5 degree target. (This goal was also reaffirmed by the
Alliance of Small Island States on Wednesday.) "We respectfully remind
rich countries-you have the responsibility for delivering a good
climate deal, but we, the poor countries, have the right to refuse a
bad deal," Mosisili said. "Just as poor countries are suffering most
from the adverse impacts of climate change, we will also suffer most
from any deal in Copenhagen should it be so thoroughly compromised as
to be ineffective."
The proposal offers "some positive signs" in terms of getting some
sort of agreement between the most significant blocs, said Romain
Benicchio, a policy adviser at Oxfam International. But, he continued,
"It would have been stronger if there had been some clearer support
from the Africa group and Europe on both sides." That the announcement
was delivered from Paris, he added, was "unfortunate." "We already have
a very complicated process here," said Benicchio. "To have something
coming from the outside which is not very clearly accepted ... can lead
to misunderstanding.
Some developing nations fear that the stalemate at Copenhagen will
impel more countries to make concessions out of a desire to get
something-anything-done before the summit concludes on Friday. But for
Africa, giving ground on temperature rise is a concession fraught with
risk. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an
average global temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius-the target
industrialized nations are pushing for-would represent a rise of 3 or 4
degrees in Africa. That in turn would trigger severe drought and
hunger. "This is death to millions of Africans," said Hon Awudu Mbaya,
President of Pan-African Parliamentarians Network on Climate Change.
Said Mosisili of Lesotho. "At this 11th hour of negotiations, we
appreciate that the issues are complex-but we will not sign a suicide
pact."
Kate Sheppard
Kate Sheppard is a staff reporter for Mother Jones, focusing on energy and environmental politics from Washington, D.C. She was previously the political reporter for Grist and a writing fellow at The American Prospect. Her work has also been featured in the Washington Post, The Guardian, The Center for Public Integrity, In These Times, and Bitch.
COPENHAGEN - With the Copenhagen talks at an impasse [1],
President Barack Obama and the leaders of other developed nations have
deployed a divide-and-conquer strategy. Until now, poorer countries
have presented a united front, calling for major long-term investments
to help vulnerable nations deal with climate change, and a more
ambitious effort to slow the warming of the planet. But industrialized
nations are unwilling to make such commitments, and are now seeking to
break that alliance by picking off countries one by one.
Late on Tuesday, the governments of Ethiopia and France [2]
announced that Ethiopia, "representing Africa," had agreed to adopt an
"ambitious agreement" that would call for limiting the average global
temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius. Previously, the African bloc,
along with the G77 coalition [3]
of poor countries and the Alliance of Small Island States, had firmly
insisted that a 1.5 degree limit was imperative to prevent dire
consequences in their regions, which are especially vulnerable to
climate change. Some observers see the France-Ethiopia side deal as a
breakthrough that could bring developed and developing nations closer
to a final agreement. But others view it as an attempt to drive a wedge
through the bloc of developing nations in pursuit of a weaker deal that
won't protect the most at-risk nations from harm.
Ethiopia's
break with its fellow developing nations is significant because of the
central role it plays in the African bloc. Ethiopia chairs climate
efforts for the 53-nation African Union and is also home to its
headquarters. Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi is the coordinator
of African Heads of State and Governments on Climate Change. "I know my
proposal will disappoint some Africans," said Zenawi on Tuesday. "It
scales back the ambition in return for more reliable funding and a seat
at the table in the management of any such funding." He added: "Because
we have more to lose than others, we have to be more flexible than
others and go the extra mile."
The statement endorses the EU's plans for a $10 billion "fast-start"
climate fund, and says that 40 percent of that fund should be dedicated
to adaptation in Africa. On Wednesday, Zenawi, European Union president
Fredrik Reinfeldt and European Commission President Jose Barroso called
for $100 billion in annual funding for climate action in developing
countries by 2020. This money, they said in a statement, is needed
"particularly in Africa, least developed countries, small island states
and other developing countries with a low per-capita income." Still,
it's not clear whether Ethiopia secured anything more solid than
aspirational calls for extra money.
The major powers welcomed Ethiopia's defection from the 1.5-degree
target. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has endorsed the side deal
with France, and on Tuesday, White House officials confirmed to
reporters that Obama had placed a call to Zenawi earlier in the day.
The US president, they said, had "expressed his appreciation for the
leadership role the Prime Minister was playing in work with African
countries on climate change." Obama has also made overtures to Prime
Minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh-which faces catastrophic flooding
from rising sea levels-and "emphasized his desire to reach a pragmatic
solution that encompasses action by all countries."
But developing nations-which appear to have been caught somewhat off
guard by the announcement-aren't applauding. They fear that major
powers are trying to pick off key players from the developing bloc via
secret pacts. The fact that the agreement was made and announced in
Paris-not at the official United Nations negotiations in Copenhagen-has
fueled such suspicions. And the arrangement stands at odds with the
positioning statement by the Africa group, a regional working coalition
within the UN, submitted to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change [4]
over the weekend. That document called for emissions cuts on the order
of at least 45 percent from 1990 levels by 2020 and a $400 billion
climate fund from developed nations.
African nations are also protesting that Ethiopia doesn't represent
the position of the African bloc. Pakalitha Mosisili, the Prime
Minister of Lesotho (an African Union member) and the chair of the Least Developed Countries [5]
grouping, fired off a statement affirming that this bloc intends to
stick to the 1.5 degree target. (This goal was also reaffirmed by the
Alliance of Small Island States on Wednesday.) "We respectfully remind
rich countries-you have the responsibility for delivering a good
climate deal, but we, the poor countries, have the right to refuse a
bad deal," Mosisili said. "Just as poor countries are suffering most
from the adverse impacts of climate change, we will also suffer most
from any deal in Copenhagen should it be so thoroughly compromised as
to be ineffective."
The proposal offers "some positive signs" in terms of getting some
sort of agreement between the most significant blocs, said Romain
Benicchio, a policy adviser at Oxfam International. But, he continued,
"It would have been stronger if there had been some clearer support
from the Africa group and Europe on both sides." That the announcement
was delivered from Paris, he added, was "unfortunate." "We already have
a very complicated process here," said Benicchio. "To have something
coming from the outside which is not very clearly accepted ... can lead
to misunderstanding.
Some developing nations fear that the stalemate at Copenhagen will
impel more countries to make concessions out of a desire to get
something-anything-done before the summit concludes on Friday. But for
Africa, giving ground on temperature rise is a concession fraught with
risk. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an
average global temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius-the target
industrialized nations are pushing for-would represent a rise of 3 or 4
degrees in Africa. That in turn would trigger severe drought and
hunger. "This is death to millions of Africans," said Hon Awudu Mbaya,
President of Pan-African Parliamentarians Network on Climate Change.
Said Mosisili of Lesotho. "At this 11th hour of negotiations, we
appreciate that the issues are complex-but we will not sign a suicide
pact."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.