

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
For years, the state of West Virginia was proud to say that it was "open
for business."
In
a twist, now it might be open for a homicide prosecution in connection with
the deaths of 29 miners at the Massey Energy mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia
earlier this month.
"If
there is evidence to support a homicide prosecution, I would not hesitate to
prosecute," Kristen Keller, the prosecuting attorney for Raleigh County
told Corporate Crime Reporter last week.
Keller
says she has been in touch with the West Virginia State Police on the matter.
And
she says that any federal regulatory investigation would not preclude a state
homicide investigation.
"A
federal regulatory investigation does not satisfy the need for a state criminal
investigation," Keller said. "If there were a car accident where
one or ten or 29 people were killed - a federal investigation would not
preclude a state criminal investigation. In fact, there would be a state criminal
investigation."
Twenty-nine
miners died at Massey's Upper Big Branch mine in Raleigh County as the
result of an explosion on April 5.
Since
then, there have been calls for both federal and state criminal prosecution.
Bob
Franken, wrote
an article last week for The Hill titled "Murder in the Coal
Fields?"
"Plain and simply, the police and prosecutors need to pursue this case,"
Franken wrote. "And if those who run Massey can be shown to be culpable
beyond a reasonable doubt, they need to be thrown into prison. The sentence
for involuntary manslaughter, as just one possible charge, in West Virginia,
is a year in prison. For each case."
West
Virginia has an involuntary manslaughter statute.
Here's
the state's definition: "Involuntary manslaughter involves the accidental
causing of death of another person, although unintended, which death is the
proximate result of negligence so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a reckless
disregard for human life."
Under
West Virginia law, reckless disregard is something more than ordinary or simple
negligence.
It
is negligence that consciously ignores the safety of others.
And
so the question is - do Massey's actions at the Upper Big Branch
mine meet the standard for reckless disregard?
The
Charleston Gazette's Ken Ward Jr. reported
last week that three months before last week's deadly explosion, "Massey
Energy managers at the Upper Big Branch Mine told workers 'not to worry'
that the flow of air in the mine - meant to control deadly gases and coal
dust - was headed in the wrong direction."
The
comment was made in January, when state and federal inspectors were battling
Massey over what Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the state
Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training said were major ventilation problems.
"When
questioned, Terry Moore, mine foreman, said he knew of [the] condition and that
he asked Everett Hager, superintendent, about it and he was told not to worry
about it," the MSHA inspector, whose name was not released, wrote in his
official notebook, the Gazette reported.
"When
mine ventilation moves in the wrong direction, that's a big deal,"
Dan Heyman, a stringer for the New York Times based in Charleston told
Corporate Crime Reporter last week. "The inspector was complaining
to the foreman that the ventilation was moving in the wrong direction and it
was not being fixed."
"The
foreman at the company went to the mine supervisor and was told not to worry
about it," Heyman said. "That's really a smoking gun."
"Inspectors
have told me that it's a constant tug of war trying to get Massey to obey
the rules," Heyman said.
Over
the past two decades, there have been a
number of criminal manslaughter prosecutions around the country for worker
deaths
In
the 1980s, every time a worker died on the job in Los Angeles County, the district
attorney would send out a team to investigate the case for a possible manslaughter
investigation.
And
many successful homicide prosecutions were brought against companies and executives
as a result.
We
asked Heyman what impact he thought the 29 coal miner deaths have on public
opinion in West Virginia.
"I've
been surprised as to how these things will settle back down," Heyman said.
"I thought the coal industry was in terrible trouble after the Sago mine
accident that took 12 lives. And for a time, it was. But eventually, it begins
to try to exercise the influence that it always had in the state."
"This
feels a bit different this time. At least in the worlds of journalism and politics
that I follow - inside the equivalent of the West Virginia beltway -
I sense a willingness to get tough. I don't know whether that will result
in criminal charges. But there have been a couple of op-eds in the states'
largest newspapers calling for criminal prosecutions."
"We
have also seen people saying publically that the coal industry in general is
bad for the state of West Virginia - which is tantamount to heresy. Many
have thought these things, but there hasn't been a willingness to voice
it."
"There
was a lot more shock and dismay in 2006, because it seemed like such a surprise.
This time, there is less rhetoric and more anger."
Heyman
says that coal still has its supporters.
"People
who are tied into the economy - successful local business owners -
will say - this is the only thing that brings money into our area,"
Heyman said.
"I
was making this point to another reporter - that there is a split -
between people like car dealers, who are successful and tied into the American
dream in a sense - and people who live on the margins. I was saying the
successful businessmen are much less likely to criticize Massey."
"And
he went and talked to a local prominent businessman in Raleigh County. And that
businessman refused to talk with him because he said - there is so much
anger at the company, that if his customers heard him on the air saying good
things about Massey and Blankenship, that it would blow back on him."
"That's
the reverse of what we would have seen in the past. So, there's a power
dynamic. And there is a tipping point where the king loses control of the kingdom.
And then everything goes to hell for him. I don't know if we are at that
point."
"Yes,
coal is king in West Virginia. But it's never been a peaceful kingdom.
There has been a long history of conflict and dispute and even violence between
the coal industry and workers or environmentalists. It's always a very
restive situation."
Last
week, an editorial in the Mountain Eagle newspaper of Whitesville, Kentucky
asked the question - Why
Do Miners Die?
And
the paper answered this way:
"They
die because of negligence. They die because the company they work for cares
more about running coal than making mines safe. And they die because the federal
agency that is charged with protecting them fails in its mission."
"The
mine was projected to earn $145.6 million for Massey this year, and nothing
was going to get in the way of meeting that goal. Massey CEO Don Blankenship
has dismissed any and all criticism as the work of 'the enemies of coal.'
He's God, in short, and you're not."
In
a now infamous 2005 memo, Blankenship wrote
this to his workforce:
"If
any of you have been asked by your group presidents, your supervisors, engineers,
or anyone else to do anything other than run coal (i.e. build overcasts, do
construction jobs, or whatever) you need to ignore them and run coal."
The
following year, a deadly fire broke out at another Massey mine, Aracoma, killing
two men.
The
memo helped federal prosecutors secure a guilty plea from Massey's Aracoma
unit in January 2009. The company was fined $2.5 million.
[For
a complete transcript of Interview with Dan Heyman, see 24 Corporate Crime
Reporter 16(12), print edition only.]
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
For years, the state of West Virginia was proud to say that it was "open
for business."
In
a twist, now it might be open for a homicide prosecution in connection with
the deaths of 29 miners at the Massey Energy mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia
earlier this month.
"If
there is evidence to support a homicide prosecution, I would not hesitate to
prosecute," Kristen Keller, the prosecuting attorney for Raleigh County
told Corporate Crime Reporter last week.
Keller
says she has been in touch with the West Virginia State Police on the matter.
And
she says that any federal regulatory investigation would not preclude a state
homicide investigation.
"A
federal regulatory investigation does not satisfy the need for a state criminal
investigation," Keller said. "If there were a car accident where
one or ten or 29 people were killed - a federal investigation would not
preclude a state criminal investigation. In fact, there would be a state criminal
investigation."
Twenty-nine
miners died at Massey's Upper Big Branch mine in Raleigh County as the
result of an explosion on April 5.
Since
then, there have been calls for both federal and state criminal prosecution.
Bob
Franken, wrote
an article last week for The Hill titled "Murder in the Coal
Fields?"
"Plain and simply, the police and prosecutors need to pursue this case,"
Franken wrote. "And if those who run Massey can be shown to be culpable
beyond a reasonable doubt, they need to be thrown into prison. The sentence
for involuntary manslaughter, as just one possible charge, in West Virginia,
is a year in prison. For each case."
West
Virginia has an involuntary manslaughter statute.
Here's
the state's definition: "Involuntary manslaughter involves the accidental
causing of death of another person, although unintended, which death is the
proximate result of negligence so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a reckless
disregard for human life."
Under
West Virginia law, reckless disregard is something more than ordinary or simple
negligence.
It
is negligence that consciously ignores the safety of others.
And
so the question is - do Massey's actions at the Upper Big Branch
mine meet the standard for reckless disregard?
The
Charleston Gazette's Ken Ward Jr. reported
last week that three months before last week's deadly explosion, "Massey
Energy managers at the Upper Big Branch Mine told workers 'not to worry'
that the flow of air in the mine - meant to control deadly gases and coal
dust - was headed in the wrong direction."
The
comment was made in January, when state and federal inspectors were battling
Massey over what Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the state
Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training said were major ventilation problems.
"When
questioned, Terry Moore, mine foreman, said he knew of [the] condition and that
he asked Everett Hager, superintendent, about it and he was told not to worry
about it," the MSHA inspector, whose name was not released, wrote in his
official notebook, the Gazette reported.
"When
mine ventilation moves in the wrong direction, that's a big deal,"
Dan Heyman, a stringer for the New York Times based in Charleston told
Corporate Crime Reporter last week. "The inspector was complaining
to the foreman that the ventilation was moving in the wrong direction and it
was not being fixed."
"The
foreman at the company went to the mine supervisor and was told not to worry
about it," Heyman said. "That's really a smoking gun."
"Inspectors
have told me that it's a constant tug of war trying to get Massey to obey
the rules," Heyman said.
Over
the past two decades, there have been a
number of criminal manslaughter prosecutions around the country for worker
deaths
In
the 1980s, every time a worker died on the job in Los Angeles County, the district
attorney would send out a team to investigate the case for a possible manslaughter
investigation.
And
many successful homicide prosecutions were brought against companies and executives
as a result.
We
asked Heyman what impact he thought the 29 coal miner deaths have on public
opinion in West Virginia.
"I've
been surprised as to how these things will settle back down," Heyman said.
"I thought the coal industry was in terrible trouble after the Sago mine
accident that took 12 lives. And for a time, it was. But eventually, it begins
to try to exercise the influence that it always had in the state."
"This
feels a bit different this time. At least in the worlds of journalism and politics
that I follow - inside the equivalent of the West Virginia beltway -
I sense a willingness to get tough. I don't know whether that will result
in criminal charges. But there have been a couple of op-eds in the states'
largest newspapers calling for criminal prosecutions."
"We
have also seen people saying publically that the coal industry in general is
bad for the state of West Virginia - which is tantamount to heresy. Many
have thought these things, but there hasn't been a willingness to voice
it."
"There
was a lot more shock and dismay in 2006, because it seemed like such a surprise.
This time, there is less rhetoric and more anger."
Heyman
says that coal still has its supporters.
"People
who are tied into the economy - successful local business owners -
will say - this is the only thing that brings money into our area,"
Heyman said.
"I
was making this point to another reporter - that there is a split -
between people like car dealers, who are successful and tied into the American
dream in a sense - and people who live on the margins. I was saying the
successful businessmen are much less likely to criticize Massey."
"And
he went and talked to a local prominent businessman in Raleigh County. And that
businessman refused to talk with him because he said - there is so much
anger at the company, that if his customers heard him on the air saying good
things about Massey and Blankenship, that it would blow back on him."
"That's
the reverse of what we would have seen in the past. So, there's a power
dynamic. And there is a tipping point where the king loses control of the kingdom.
And then everything goes to hell for him. I don't know if we are at that
point."
"Yes,
coal is king in West Virginia. But it's never been a peaceful kingdom.
There has been a long history of conflict and dispute and even violence between
the coal industry and workers or environmentalists. It's always a very
restive situation."
Last
week, an editorial in the Mountain Eagle newspaper of Whitesville, Kentucky
asked the question - Why
Do Miners Die?
And
the paper answered this way:
"They
die because of negligence. They die because the company they work for cares
more about running coal than making mines safe. And they die because the federal
agency that is charged with protecting them fails in its mission."
"The
mine was projected to earn $145.6 million for Massey this year, and nothing
was going to get in the way of meeting that goal. Massey CEO Don Blankenship
has dismissed any and all criticism as the work of 'the enemies of coal.'
He's God, in short, and you're not."
In
a now infamous 2005 memo, Blankenship wrote
this to his workforce:
"If
any of you have been asked by your group presidents, your supervisors, engineers,
or anyone else to do anything other than run coal (i.e. build overcasts, do
construction jobs, or whatever) you need to ignore them and run coal."
The
following year, a deadly fire broke out at another Massey mine, Aracoma, killing
two men.
The
memo helped federal prosecutors secure a guilty plea from Massey's Aracoma
unit in January 2009. The company was fined $2.5 million.
[For
a complete transcript of Interview with Dan Heyman, see 24 Corporate Crime
Reporter 16(12), print edition only.]
For years, the state of West Virginia was proud to say that it was "open
for business."
In
a twist, now it might be open for a homicide prosecution in connection with
the deaths of 29 miners at the Massey Energy mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia
earlier this month.
"If
there is evidence to support a homicide prosecution, I would not hesitate to
prosecute," Kristen Keller, the prosecuting attorney for Raleigh County
told Corporate Crime Reporter last week.
Keller
says she has been in touch with the West Virginia State Police on the matter.
And
she says that any federal regulatory investigation would not preclude a state
homicide investigation.
"A
federal regulatory investigation does not satisfy the need for a state criminal
investigation," Keller said. "If there were a car accident where
one or ten or 29 people were killed - a federal investigation would not
preclude a state criminal investigation. In fact, there would be a state criminal
investigation."
Twenty-nine
miners died at Massey's Upper Big Branch mine in Raleigh County as the
result of an explosion on April 5.
Since
then, there have been calls for both federal and state criminal prosecution.
Bob
Franken, wrote
an article last week for The Hill titled "Murder in the Coal
Fields?"
"Plain and simply, the police and prosecutors need to pursue this case,"
Franken wrote. "And if those who run Massey can be shown to be culpable
beyond a reasonable doubt, they need to be thrown into prison. The sentence
for involuntary manslaughter, as just one possible charge, in West Virginia,
is a year in prison. For each case."
West
Virginia has an involuntary manslaughter statute.
Here's
the state's definition: "Involuntary manslaughter involves the accidental
causing of death of another person, although unintended, which death is the
proximate result of negligence so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a reckless
disregard for human life."
Under
West Virginia law, reckless disregard is something more than ordinary or simple
negligence.
It
is negligence that consciously ignores the safety of others.
And
so the question is - do Massey's actions at the Upper Big Branch
mine meet the standard for reckless disregard?
The
Charleston Gazette's Ken Ward Jr. reported
last week that three months before last week's deadly explosion, "Massey
Energy managers at the Upper Big Branch Mine told workers 'not to worry'
that the flow of air in the mine - meant to control deadly gases and coal
dust - was headed in the wrong direction."
The
comment was made in January, when state and federal inspectors were battling
Massey over what Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the state
Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training said were major ventilation problems.
"When
questioned, Terry Moore, mine foreman, said he knew of [the] condition and that
he asked Everett Hager, superintendent, about it and he was told not to worry
about it," the MSHA inspector, whose name was not released, wrote in his
official notebook, the Gazette reported.
"When
mine ventilation moves in the wrong direction, that's a big deal,"
Dan Heyman, a stringer for the New York Times based in Charleston told
Corporate Crime Reporter last week. "The inspector was complaining
to the foreman that the ventilation was moving in the wrong direction and it
was not being fixed."
"The
foreman at the company went to the mine supervisor and was told not to worry
about it," Heyman said. "That's really a smoking gun."
"Inspectors
have told me that it's a constant tug of war trying to get Massey to obey
the rules," Heyman said.
Over
the past two decades, there have been a
number of criminal manslaughter prosecutions around the country for worker
deaths
In
the 1980s, every time a worker died on the job in Los Angeles County, the district
attorney would send out a team to investigate the case for a possible manslaughter
investigation.
And
many successful homicide prosecutions were brought against companies and executives
as a result.
We
asked Heyman what impact he thought the 29 coal miner deaths have on public
opinion in West Virginia.
"I've
been surprised as to how these things will settle back down," Heyman said.
"I thought the coal industry was in terrible trouble after the Sago mine
accident that took 12 lives. And for a time, it was. But eventually, it begins
to try to exercise the influence that it always had in the state."
"This
feels a bit different this time. At least in the worlds of journalism and politics
that I follow - inside the equivalent of the West Virginia beltway -
I sense a willingness to get tough. I don't know whether that will result
in criminal charges. But there have been a couple of op-eds in the states'
largest newspapers calling for criminal prosecutions."
"We
have also seen people saying publically that the coal industry in general is
bad for the state of West Virginia - which is tantamount to heresy. Many
have thought these things, but there hasn't been a willingness to voice
it."
"There
was a lot more shock and dismay in 2006, because it seemed like such a surprise.
This time, there is less rhetoric and more anger."
Heyman
says that coal still has its supporters.
"People
who are tied into the economy - successful local business owners -
will say - this is the only thing that brings money into our area,"
Heyman said.
"I
was making this point to another reporter - that there is a split -
between people like car dealers, who are successful and tied into the American
dream in a sense - and people who live on the margins. I was saying the
successful businessmen are much less likely to criticize Massey."
"And
he went and talked to a local prominent businessman in Raleigh County. And that
businessman refused to talk with him because he said - there is so much
anger at the company, that if his customers heard him on the air saying good
things about Massey and Blankenship, that it would blow back on him."
"That's
the reverse of what we would have seen in the past. So, there's a power
dynamic. And there is a tipping point where the king loses control of the kingdom.
And then everything goes to hell for him. I don't know if we are at that
point."
"Yes,
coal is king in West Virginia. But it's never been a peaceful kingdom.
There has been a long history of conflict and dispute and even violence between
the coal industry and workers or environmentalists. It's always a very
restive situation."
Last
week, an editorial in the Mountain Eagle newspaper of Whitesville, Kentucky
asked the question - Why
Do Miners Die?
And
the paper answered this way:
"They
die because of negligence. They die because the company they work for cares
more about running coal than making mines safe. And they die because the federal
agency that is charged with protecting them fails in its mission."
"The
mine was projected to earn $145.6 million for Massey this year, and nothing
was going to get in the way of meeting that goal. Massey CEO Don Blankenship
has dismissed any and all criticism as the work of 'the enemies of coal.'
He's God, in short, and you're not."
In
a now infamous 2005 memo, Blankenship wrote
this to his workforce:
"If
any of you have been asked by your group presidents, your supervisors, engineers,
or anyone else to do anything other than run coal (i.e. build overcasts, do
construction jobs, or whatever) you need to ignore them and run coal."
The
following year, a deadly fire broke out at another Massey mine, Aracoma, killing
two men.
The
memo helped federal prosecutors secure a guilty plea from Massey's Aracoma
unit in January 2009. The company was fined $2.5 million.
[For
a complete transcript of Interview with Dan Heyman, see 24 Corporate Crime
Reporter 16(12), print edition only.]
"This was an illegal act," said U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis.
A federal court judge on Sunday declared the Trump administration's refusal to return a man they sent to an El Salvadoran prison in "error" as "totally lawless" behavior and ordered the Department of Homeland Security to repatriate the man, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, within 24 hours.
In a 22-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis doubled down on an order issued Friday, which Department of Justice lawyers representing the administration said was an affront to his executive authority.
"This was an illegal act," Xinis said of DHS Secretary Krisi Noem's attack on Abrego Garcia's rights, including his deportation and imprisonment.
"Defendants seized Abrego Garcia without any lawful authority; held him in three separate domestic detention centers without legal basis; failed to present him to any immigration judge or officer; and forcibly transported him to El Salvador in direct contravention of [immigration law]," the decision states.
Once imprisoned in El Salvador, the order continues, "U.S. officials secured his detention in a facility that, by design, deprives its detainees of adequate food, water, and shelter, fosters routine violence; and places him with his persecutors."
Trump's DOJ appealed Friday's order to 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia, but that court has not yet ruled on the request to stay the order from Xinis, which says Abrego Garcia should be returned to the United States no later than Monday.
"You'd be a fool to think Trump won't go after others he dislikes," warned Sen. Ron Wyden, "including American citizens."
Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon slammed the Trump administration over the weekend in response to fresh reporting that the Department of Homeland Security has intensified its push for access to confidential data held by the Internal Revenue Service—part of a sweeping effort to target immigrant workers who pay into the U.S. tax system yet get little or nothing in return.
Wyden denounced the effort, which had the fingerprints of the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, all over it.
"What Trump and Musk's henchmen are doing by weaponizing taxpayer data is illegal, this abuse of the immigrant community is a moral atrocity, and you'd be a fool to think Trump won't go after others he dislikes, including American citizens," said Wyden, ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, on Saturday.
Last week, the White House admitted one of the men it has sent to a prison in El Salvador was detained and deported in schackles in "error." Despite the admitted mistake, and facing a lawsuit for his immediate return, the Trump administration says a federal court has no authority over the president to make such an order.
"Even though the Trump administration claims it's focused on undocumented immigrants, it's obvious that they do not care when they make mistakes and ruin the lives of legal residents and American citizens in the process," Wyden continued. "A repressive scheme on the scale of what they're talking about at the IRS would lead to hundreds if not thousands of those horrific mistakes, and the people who are disappeared as a result may never be returned to their families."
According to the Washington Post reporting on Saturday:
Federal immigration officials are seeking to locate up to 7 million people suspected of being in the United States unlawfully by accessing confidential tax data at the Internal Revenue Service, according to six people familiar with the request, a dramatic escalation in how the Trump administration aims to use the tax system to detain and deport immigrants.
Officials from the Department of Homeland Security had previously sought the IRS’s help in finding 700,000 people who are subject to final removal orders, and they had asked the IRS to use closely guarded taxpayer data systems to provide names and addresses.
As the Post notes, it would be highly unusual, and quite possibly unlawful, for the IRS to share such confidential data. "Normally," the newspaper reports, "personal tax information—even an individual's name and address—is considered confidential and closely guarded within the IRS."
Wyden warned that those who violate the law by disclosing personal tax data face the risk of civil sanction or even prosecution.
"While Trump's sycophants and the DOGE boys may be a lost cause," Wyden said, "IRS personnel need to think long and hard about whether they want to be a part of an effort to round up innocent people and send them to be locked away in foreign torture prisons."
"I'm sure Trump has promised pardons to the people who will commit crimes in the process of abusing legally-protected taxpayer data, but violations of taxpayer privacy laws carry hefty civil penalties too, and Trump cannot pardon anybody out from under those," he said. "I'm going to demand answers from the acting IRS commissioner immediately about this outrageous abuse of the agency.”
"I think that the Democratic Party has to make a fundamental decision," says the independent Senator from Vermont, "and I'm not sure that they will make the right decision."
"I think when we talk about America is a democracy, I think we should rephrase it, call it a 'pseudo-democracy.'"
That's what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Sunday morning in response to questions from CBS News about the state of the nation, with President Donald Trump gutting the federal government from head to toe, challenging constitutional norms, allowing his cabinet of billionaires to run key agencies they philosophically want to destroy, and empowering Elon Musk—the world's richest person—to run roughshod over public education, undermine healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid, and attack Social Security.
Taking a weekend away from his ongoing "Fight Oligarchy" tour, which has drawn record crowds in both right-leaning and left-leaning regions of the country over recent weeks, Sanders said the problem is deeply entrenched now in the nation's political system—and both major parties have a lot to answer for.
"One of the other concerns when I talk about oligarchy," Sanders explained to journalist Robert Acosta, "it's not just massive income and wealth inequality. It's not just the power of the billionaire class. These guys, led by Musk—and as a result of this disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision—have now allowed billionaires essentially to own our political process. So, I think when we talk about America is a democracy, I think we should rephrase it, call it a 'pseudo-democracy.' And it's not just Musk and the Republicans; it's billionaires in the Democratic Party as well."
Sanders said that while he's been out on the road in various places, what he perceives—from Americans of all stripes—is a shared sense of dread and frustration.
"I think I'm seeing fear, and I'm seeing anger," he said. "Sixty percent of our people are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Media doesn't talk about it. We don't talk about it enough here in Congress."
In a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate on Friday night, just before the Republican-controlled chamber was able to pass a sweeping spending resolution that will lay waste to vital programs like Medicaid and food assistance to needy families so that billionaires and the ultra-rich can enjoy even more tax giveaways, Sanders said, "What we have is a budget proposal in front of us that makes bad situations much worse and does virtually nothing to protect the needs of working families."
LIVE: I'm on the floor now talking about Trump's totally absurd budget.
They got it exactly backwards. No tax cuts for billionaires by cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid for Americans. https://t.co/ULB2KosOSJ
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) April 4, 2025
What the GOP spending plan does do, he added, "is reward wealthy campaign contributors by providing over $1 trillion in tax breaks for the top one percent."
"I wish my Republican friends the best of luck when they go home—if they dare to hold town hall meetings—and explain to their constituents why they think, at a time of massive income and wealth inequality, it's a great idea to give tax breaks to billionaires and cut Medicaid, education, and other programs that working class families desperately need."
On Saturday, millions of people took to the street in coordinated protests against the Trump administration's attack on government, the economy, and democracy itself.
Voiced at many of the rallies was also a frustration with the failure of the Democrats to stand up to Trump and offer an alternative vision for what the nation can be. In his CBS News interview, Sanders said the key question Democrats need to be asking is the one too many people in Washington, D.C. tend to avoid.
"Why are [the Democrats] held in so low esteem?" That's the question that needs asking, he said.
"Why has the working class in this country largely turned away from them? And what do you have to do to recapture that working class? Do you think working people are voting for Trump because he wants to give massive tax breaks to billionaires and cut Social Security and Medicare? I don't think so. It's because people say, 'I am hurting. Democratic Party has talked a good game for years. They haven't done anything.' So, I think that the Democratic Party has to make a fundamental decision, and I'm not sure that they will make the right decision, which side are they on? [Will] they continue to hustle large campaign contributions from very, very wealthy people, or do they stand with the working class?"
The next leg of Sanders' "Fight Oligarchy' tour will kick off next Saturday, with stops in California, Utah, and Idaho over four days.
"The American people, whether they are Democrats, Republicans or Independents, do not want billionaires to control our government or buy our elections," said Sanders. "That is why I will be visiting Republican-held districts all over the Western United States. When we are organized and fight back, we can defeat oligarchy."