SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Map from rncctv.com documenting the surveillance cameras in Tampa.
The two million dollar "crowd monitoring" surveillance system put in place in Tampa for the RNC may be there to stay.
The cameras were turned off when the convention ended on Aug. 30, the Tampa Tribune reports, but the nearly 60 cameras -- whose locations are documented by area resident and tech guy Jon Gales -- remain in place.
Even before the convention, Councilwoman Mary Mulhern voiced concerns about lasting surveillance, the Tribune reports.
"This is a huge thing," Mulhern said. "We'll have many dozens of security cameras overhead. We don't want permanent surveillance."
Baylor Johnson, spokesman for the Florida chapter of the ACLU, also warns of the permanent surveillance, as has happened in other cities which keep the surveillance systems long after they are put in place for a specific event.
"Almost every time, the system stays in place longer than it was intended for," said Johnson.
"This is an impulse, to blanket public spaces with surveillance. But that impulse is wrong," Johnson said. "The monitoring of citizens can quickly become invasive. They become a tool of potential abuses of power."
The Tribune reports that the city council will discuss on Sept. 20 the fate of the surveillance system.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
The two million dollar "crowd monitoring" surveillance system put in place in Tampa for the RNC may be there to stay.
The cameras were turned off when the convention ended on Aug. 30, the Tampa Tribune reports, but the nearly 60 cameras -- whose locations are documented by area resident and tech guy Jon Gales -- remain in place.
Even before the convention, Councilwoman Mary Mulhern voiced concerns about lasting surveillance, the Tribune reports.
"This is a huge thing," Mulhern said. "We'll have many dozens of security cameras overhead. We don't want permanent surveillance."
Baylor Johnson, spokesman for the Florida chapter of the ACLU, also warns of the permanent surveillance, as has happened in other cities which keep the surveillance systems long after they are put in place for a specific event.
"Almost every time, the system stays in place longer than it was intended for," said Johnson.
"This is an impulse, to blanket public spaces with surveillance. But that impulse is wrong," Johnson said. "The monitoring of citizens can quickly become invasive. They become a tool of potential abuses of power."
The Tribune reports that the city council will discuss on Sept. 20 the fate of the surveillance system.
The two million dollar "crowd monitoring" surveillance system put in place in Tampa for the RNC may be there to stay.
The cameras were turned off when the convention ended on Aug. 30, the Tampa Tribune reports, but the nearly 60 cameras -- whose locations are documented by area resident and tech guy Jon Gales -- remain in place.
Even before the convention, Councilwoman Mary Mulhern voiced concerns about lasting surveillance, the Tribune reports.
"This is a huge thing," Mulhern said. "We'll have many dozens of security cameras overhead. We don't want permanent surveillance."
Baylor Johnson, spokesman for the Florida chapter of the ACLU, also warns of the permanent surveillance, as has happened in other cities which keep the surveillance systems long after they are put in place for a specific event.
"Almost every time, the system stays in place longer than it was intended for," said Johnson.
"This is an impulse, to blanket public spaces with surveillance. But that impulse is wrong," Johnson said. "The monitoring of citizens can quickly become invasive. They become a tool of potential abuses of power."
The Tribune reports that the city council will discuss on Sept. 20 the fate of the surveillance system.