SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Photo: dailyagenda.org.)
Sanders: Going Over 'Fiscal Cliff' Better than Bad Tax Deal
Senator says new Congress could recover 'in the first month or two'
Nov 12, 2012
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
"Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?" Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is."
The "fiscal cliff" refers to a package of severe tax increases and cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid set to automatically go into effect on Jan. 1.
Sanders said Republicans who support the plan are "way, way outside the mainstream," The Burlington Free Press reports.
"Obviously, I would prefer to not go over the fiscal cliff," Sanders said. "I hope we can reach an agreement now, but if we can't, we will reach it in the first few months of the next session." He said Congress could then address the "fiscal cliff" situation in "the first month or two of the new session without any damage whatsoever."
Sanders advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting defense spending and tracking down individuals and companies that hide money in off-shore accounts.
He also said he hopes the Senate will change the filibuster rule that in many cases requires a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, according to The Republic.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
"Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?" Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is."
The "fiscal cliff" refers to a package of severe tax increases and cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid set to automatically go into effect on Jan. 1.
Sanders said Republicans who support the plan are "way, way outside the mainstream," The Burlington Free Press reports.
"Obviously, I would prefer to not go over the fiscal cliff," Sanders said. "I hope we can reach an agreement now, but if we can't, we will reach it in the first few months of the next session." He said Congress could then address the "fiscal cliff" situation in "the first month or two of the new session without any damage whatsoever."
Sanders advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting defense spending and tracking down individuals and companies that hide money in off-shore accounts.
He also said he hopes the Senate will change the filibuster rule that in many cases requires a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, according to The Republic.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
"Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?" Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is."
The "fiscal cliff" refers to a package of severe tax increases and cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid set to automatically go into effect on Jan. 1.
Sanders said Republicans who support the plan are "way, way outside the mainstream," The Burlington Free Press reports.
"Obviously, I would prefer to not go over the fiscal cliff," Sanders said. "I hope we can reach an agreement now, but if we can't, we will reach it in the first few months of the next session." He said Congress could then address the "fiscal cliff" situation in "the first month or two of the new session without any damage whatsoever."
Sanders advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting defense spending and tracking down individuals and companies that hide money in off-shore accounts.
He also said he hopes the Senate will change the filibuster rule that in many cases requires a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, according to The Republic.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.