SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Georgia Prepares for 'Another Grotesque and Unjust Execution'
Mentally disabled Warren Hill slated for execution Tuesday
Feb 18, 2013
The state of Georgia is set to execute Warren Hill, a mentally disabled, African-American man, on Tuesday.
The state's last execution was that of Troy Davis, prompting Christof Heyns, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, to write that "the world community is again watching Georgia with great concern as it prepares to carry out another grotesque and unjust execution."
Hill was given a death sentence after killing a fellow inmate while already serving a life sentence for the murder of his girlfriend.
Hill is reported to have an IQ of 70, and The Guardian reports that
All medical specialists who have examined Hill now agree that he is "mentally retarded" - the designation of intellectual disability still widely used in the US - and should be protected under the supreme court ban. In an important break in the case, three forensic psychiatrists who had previously testified that Hill did not meet the legal criteria for "mental retardation", and was thus eligible for execution, have in recent days announced that they now believe their opinion was wrong.
All three doctors say that their original evaluation - given 12 years ago at a crucial stage in the case - was rushed and ill-conceived.
Thomas Sachy, a neuropsychiatrist, has stated in an affidavit that he came to his opinion that Hill was fit to be executed in November 2000 after having seen him only for an hour. It was the medic's first experience of a capital case, he had no experience evaluating patients with learning difficulties and almost no experience testifying in a forensic setting.
So how is it that Georgia is allowed to give a death sentence to Hill? Agence France-Presse reports:
The US Supreme Court ruled against the execution of prisoners with mental disabilities in 2002, but left each state with the authority to determine what constitutes mental disability.
Georgia has the strictest standard of any US state when it comes to determining this, with courts requiring "proof of retardation beyond a reasonable doubt" -- a burden that some mental health professionals say is almost impossible to meet.
A Georgia court agreed with an appeal by Hill's lawyers that he should not be put to death, but it was overruled by a higher court in the state, which found that Hill could not prove his retardation beyond a reasonable doubt.
Eric Jacobson, Executive Director of the Georgia Council on Developmental Disabilities, writes that if the U.S. Supreme Court does not intervene to stop the execution, "a man with an undisputed intellectual disability will be unconstitutionally put to death."
And Andrew Cohen writes in The Atlantic that Hill's case represents "nothing less than the state-sanctioned defiance of a recent Supreme Court mandate: Thou shalt not execute the mentally retarded."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The state of Georgia is set to execute Warren Hill, a mentally disabled, African-American man, on Tuesday.
The state's last execution was that of Troy Davis, prompting Christof Heyns, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, to write that "the world community is again watching Georgia with great concern as it prepares to carry out another grotesque and unjust execution."
Hill was given a death sentence after killing a fellow inmate while already serving a life sentence for the murder of his girlfriend.
Hill is reported to have an IQ of 70, and The Guardian reports that
All medical specialists who have examined Hill now agree that he is "mentally retarded" - the designation of intellectual disability still widely used in the US - and should be protected under the supreme court ban. In an important break in the case, three forensic psychiatrists who had previously testified that Hill did not meet the legal criteria for "mental retardation", and was thus eligible for execution, have in recent days announced that they now believe their opinion was wrong.
All three doctors say that their original evaluation - given 12 years ago at a crucial stage in the case - was rushed and ill-conceived.
Thomas Sachy, a neuropsychiatrist, has stated in an affidavit that he came to his opinion that Hill was fit to be executed in November 2000 after having seen him only for an hour. It was the medic's first experience of a capital case, he had no experience evaluating patients with learning difficulties and almost no experience testifying in a forensic setting.
So how is it that Georgia is allowed to give a death sentence to Hill? Agence France-Presse reports:
The US Supreme Court ruled against the execution of prisoners with mental disabilities in 2002, but left each state with the authority to determine what constitutes mental disability.
Georgia has the strictest standard of any US state when it comes to determining this, with courts requiring "proof of retardation beyond a reasonable doubt" -- a burden that some mental health professionals say is almost impossible to meet.
A Georgia court agreed with an appeal by Hill's lawyers that he should not be put to death, but it was overruled by a higher court in the state, which found that Hill could not prove his retardation beyond a reasonable doubt.
Eric Jacobson, Executive Director of the Georgia Council on Developmental Disabilities, writes that if the U.S. Supreme Court does not intervene to stop the execution, "a man with an undisputed intellectual disability will be unconstitutionally put to death."
And Andrew Cohen writes in The Atlantic that Hill's case represents "nothing less than the state-sanctioned defiance of a recent Supreme Court mandate: Thou shalt not execute the mentally retarded."
The state of Georgia is set to execute Warren Hill, a mentally disabled, African-American man, on Tuesday.
The state's last execution was that of Troy Davis, prompting Christof Heyns, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, to write that "the world community is again watching Georgia with great concern as it prepares to carry out another grotesque and unjust execution."
Hill was given a death sentence after killing a fellow inmate while already serving a life sentence for the murder of his girlfriend.
Hill is reported to have an IQ of 70, and The Guardian reports that
All medical specialists who have examined Hill now agree that he is "mentally retarded" - the designation of intellectual disability still widely used in the US - and should be protected under the supreme court ban. In an important break in the case, three forensic psychiatrists who had previously testified that Hill did not meet the legal criteria for "mental retardation", and was thus eligible for execution, have in recent days announced that they now believe their opinion was wrong.
All three doctors say that their original evaluation - given 12 years ago at a crucial stage in the case - was rushed and ill-conceived.
Thomas Sachy, a neuropsychiatrist, has stated in an affidavit that he came to his opinion that Hill was fit to be executed in November 2000 after having seen him only for an hour. It was the medic's first experience of a capital case, he had no experience evaluating patients with learning difficulties and almost no experience testifying in a forensic setting.
So how is it that Georgia is allowed to give a death sentence to Hill? Agence France-Presse reports:
The US Supreme Court ruled against the execution of prisoners with mental disabilities in 2002, but left each state with the authority to determine what constitutes mental disability.
Georgia has the strictest standard of any US state when it comes to determining this, with courts requiring "proof of retardation beyond a reasonable doubt" -- a burden that some mental health professionals say is almost impossible to meet.
A Georgia court agreed with an appeal by Hill's lawyers that he should not be put to death, but it was overruled by a higher court in the state, which found that Hill could not prove his retardation beyond a reasonable doubt.
Eric Jacobson, Executive Director of the Georgia Council on Developmental Disabilities, writes that if the U.S. Supreme Court does not intervene to stop the execution, "a man with an undisputed intellectual disability will be unconstitutionally put to death."
And Andrew Cohen writes in The Atlantic that Hill's case represents "nothing less than the state-sanctioned defiance of a recent Supreme Court mandate: Thou shalt not execute the mentally retarded."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.