To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
This remains a five-alarm fire. We have just days left in our Fall Campaign and the numbers we’re seeing are not good. This is terrifying for us, especially when everything we cherish is on the ballot just one week from now.
Selsun Blue is one of the products that lists trade secret for an ingredient. (Photo: Retoxx/cc/flickr)
Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public's right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.
As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women's Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.
Consumers searching the database may see "trade secret" listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.
One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches "trade secret" on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.
Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.
"Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers," said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women's Voices for the Earth.
"We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product's competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health," Switalski said.
The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.
__________________
The future of all that we cherish is on the line and we have to fight like hell to protect democracy, human decency, and a liveable planet. The last line of defense is people who understand what’s at stake—activists, writers, thinkers, doers, and everyday people who see what is happening, know in their hearts that a better world is possible, and are willing to fight for it. You are one of the good people Common Dreams was built for. We provide independent news, progressive opinion, and crucial analysis on the day’s most important issues. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. But to keep publishing and remain strong in these dangerous times, we need your support. So we’re asking you today: Will you donate to our Fall Campaign and keep the progressive, nonprofit journalism of Common Dreams alive? |
Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public's right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.
As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women's Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.
Consumers searching the database may see "trade secret" listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.
One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches "trade secret" on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.
Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.
"Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers," said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women's Voices for the Earth.
"We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product's competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health," Switalski said.
The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.
__________________
Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public's right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.
As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women's Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.
Consumers searching the database may see "trade secret" listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.
One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches "trade secret" on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.
Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.
"Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers," said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women's Voices for the Earth.
"We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product's competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health," Switalski said.
The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.
__________________