To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
commondreams-mobile-logo
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF

Abu Ghraib Case Challenges 'Lawlessness' of Private Contractors in Times of War

Eleven years since US invasion of Iraq, lawyers call on courts to hold contractors accountable for war crimes

Roughly eleven years since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, human rights lawyers called on a federal appeals court on Tuesday to reopen a case brought by four former Iraqi detainees who were tortured at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison against the private military contractor who ordered the atrocities, CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

"U.S. courts must at last provide a remedy for the victims of torture at Abu Ghraib," said Baher Azmy Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights who is representing the former detainees. "CACI indisputably played a key role in those atrocities, and it is time for them to be held accountable."

"The lower court's ruling creates lawless spaces where corporations can commit torture and war crimes and then find safe haven in the United States," said Azmy. "That's a ruling that should not stand."

Lawyers for CCR said CACI walked free despite having ordered soldiers, who were later court martialed, to commit "sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses," as described by military investigators at the time, which included electric shocks, sexual violence, forced nudity, broken bones, and deprivation of oxygen, food, and water, in order to "soften" the detainees for interrogations.

Photos of the detainees' brutal torture, which surfaced in 2004, shocked the nation and created "universal condemnation among U.S. political and military leaders," the plaintiffs said in court papers.

Last June, a district court judge had dismissed the case "by narrowly interpreting" a former Supreme Court decision that limited U.S. courts' ability to rule on human rights violations committed outside the United States.

CACI International "is a US corporation" that was working "in a US-run prison at a time when Abu Ghraib and Iraq were occupied by the US," so they should be held accountable in a U.S. court, Azmy explained to Agence France-Presse.

The appeals court could now take several weeks, or even months, to rule on the case.

______________________

An Unconstitutional Rampage


Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next.

It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk.

Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
abu ghraibbaghdadcenter for constitutional rightsprivatizationtehran

Roughly eleven years since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, human rights lawyers called on a federal appeals court on Tuesday to reopen a case brought by four former Iraqi detainees who were tortured at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison against the private military contractor who ordered the atrocities, CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

"U.S. courts must at last provide a remedy for the victims of torture at Abu Ghraib," said Baher Azmy Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights who is representing the former detainees. "CACI indisputably played a key role in those atrocities, and it is time for them to be held accountable."

"The lower court's ruling creates lawless spaces where corporations can commit torture and war crimes and then find safe haven in the United States," said Azmy. "That's a ruling that should not stand."

Lawyers for CCR said CACI walked free despite having ordered soldiers, who were later court martialed, to commit "sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses," as described by military investigators at the time, which included electric shocks, sexual violence, forced nudity, broken bones, and deprivation of oxygen, food, and water, in order to "soften" the detainees for interrogations.

Photos of the detainees' brutal torture, which surfaced in 2004, shocked the nation and created "universal condemnation among U.S. political and military leaders," the plaintiffs said in court papers.

Last June, a district court judge had dismissed the case "by narrowly interpreting" a former Supreme Court decision that limited U.S. courts' ability to rule on human rights violations committed outside the United States.

CACI International "is a US corporation" that was working "in a US-run prison at a time when Abu Ghraib and Iraq were occupied by the US," so they should be held accountable in a U.S. court, Azmy explained to Agence France-Presse.

The appeals court could now take several weeks, or even months, to rule on the case.

______________________

Roughly eleven years since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, human rights lawyers called on a federal appeals court on Tuesday to reopen a case brought by four former Iraqi detainees who were tortured at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison against the private military contractor who ordered the atrocities, CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

"U.S. courts must at last provide a remedy for the victims of torture at Abu Ghraib," said Baher Azmy Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights who is representing the former detainees. "CACI indisputably played a key role in those atrocities, and it is time for them to be held accountable."

"The lower court's ruling creates lawless spaces where corporations can commit torture and war crimes and then find safe haven in the United States," said Azmy. "That's a ruling that should not stand."

Lawyers for CCR said CACI walked free despite having ordered soldiers, who were later court martialed, to commit "sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses," as described by military investigators at the time, which included electric shocks, sexual violence, forced nudity, broken bones, and deprivation of oxygen, food, and water, in order to "soften" the detainees for interrogations.

Photos of the detainees' brutal torture, which surfaced in 2004, shocked the nation and created "universal condemnation among U.S. political and military leaders," the plaintiffs said in court papers.

Last June, a district court judge had dismissed the case "by narrowly interpreting" a former Supreme Court decision that limited U.S. courts' ability to rule on human rights violations committed outside the United States.

CACI International "is a US corporation" that was working "in a US-run prison at a time when Abu Ghraib and Iraq were occupied by the US," so they should be held accountable in a U.S. court, Azmy explained to Agence France-Presse.

The appeals court could now take several weeks, or even months, to rule on the case.

______________________

abu ghraibbaghdadcenter for constitutional rightsprivatizationtehran
Join the Conversation