

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
After a groundswell of support from state residents fueled by grassroots activism, Vermont is on track to become the first state to require the labeling of food that contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
"This is a victory for everyone who eats."
A bill making its way through the Vermont legislature won preliminary approval on Tuesday when the Senate voted 26-2 in favor. On Wednesday, the legislation goes before the House, which previously passed a slightly different version of the bill. Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin said he's likely to sign the bill should it reach his desk.
"This is a victory for everyone who eats," said Andrea Stander, Director of Rural Vermont. "It is fitting that Vermont, where we take food seriously, is on the way to becoming the first state in the U.S. to require that genetically engineered foods be labeled."
Bill H.112 requires that food sold in Vermont stores that contains genetically modified ingredients will be labeled starting July 2016. The bill also makes it illegal to call any food product containing GMOs "natural" or "all natural."
During the vote, legislators acknowledged that it was the rallying cry of their constituents that pushed them to back the bill.
The Burlington Free Press reports:
Some senators who had been skeptical of GMO labeling said they were persuaded that their constituents want the information clarified on the food they buy. Senators said they were flooded with emails and calls from people urging them to pass the bill.
[...]
Sen. Bobby Starr, D-Essex/Orleans, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said he, too, had been unenthusiastic about GMO labeling, but at every public meeting he heard from Vermonters who wanted a labeling law. "Lo and behold, GMOs would float to the top of the debate within those meetings," he said.
"Today the Senate stood up for the vast majority of Vermonters who want to see genetically engineered foods labeled," said Vermont PIRG Consumer Protection Advocate Falko Schilling. "Vermont is once again leading the nation by acknowledging the important fact that everyone has a right to know what they are eating."
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said that he is proud that his state is "taking the lead in a growing national movement." In Washington, Sanders has been pushing for federal action on food labels. Last year he proposed an amendement to the farm bill, which lost, that would have granted states the authority to require GMO labeling.
Unlike other New England states, Maine and Connecticut, which passed labeling laws that delay implementation until neighboring states sign on--in an effort to share the cost of a potential suit--the Vermont bill will immediately become law.
If and when the law passes, most assume that a lawsuit by large business interests would be inevitable. Proponents of the bill, however, say that the wording of the law gives it a good chance of withstanding such a challenge in the courts.
Recent efforts to pass similar legislation in Washington and California both failed due to an influx of cash from big agribusiness and food companies, including Monsanto, Pepsi, and industry lobbyists.
Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), hailed the vote as a win for the grassroots movement.
"Today, consumers and a number of principled legislators in Vermont made it clear to Monsanto, Coca-Cola and other opponents of consumers' right to know," Cummins said. "We will not back down. This movement is here to stay."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After a groundswell of support from state residents fueled by grassroots activism, Vermont is on track to become the first state to require the labeling of food that contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
"This is a victory for everyone who eats."
A bill making its way through the Vermont legislature won preliminary approval on Tuesday when the Senate voted 26-2 in favor. On Wednesday, the legislation goes before the House, which previously passed a slightly different version of the bill. Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin said he's likely to sign the bill should it reach his desk.
"This is a victory for everyone who eats," said Andrea Stander, Director of Rural Vermont. "It is fitting that Vermont, where we take food seriously, is on the way to becoming the first state in the U.S. to require that genetically engineered foods be labeled."
Bill H.112 requires that food sold in Vermont stores that contains genetically modified ingredients will be labeled starting July 2016. The bill also makes it illegal to call any food product containing GMOs "natural" or "all natural."
During the vote, legislators acknowledged that it was the rallying cry of their constituents that pushed them to back the bill.
The Burlington Free Press reports:
Some senators who had been skeptical of GMO labeling said they were persuaded that their constituents want the information clarified on the food they buy. Senators said they were flooded with emails and calls from people urging them to pass the bill.
[...]
Sen. Bobby Starr, D-Essex/Orleans, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said he, too, had been unenthusiastic about GMO labeling, but at every public meeting he heard from Vermonters who wanted a labeling law. "Lo and behold, GMOs would float to the top of the debate within those meetings," he said.
"Today the Senate stood up for the vast majority of Vermonters who want to see genetically engineered foods labeled," said Vermont PIRG Consumer Protection Advocate Falko Schilling. "Vermont is once again leading the nation by acknowledging the important fact that everyone has a right to know what they are eating."
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said that he is proud that his state is "taking the lead in a growing national movement." In Washington, Sanders has been pushing for federal action on food labels. Last year he proposed an amendement to the farm bill, which lost, that would have granted states the authority to require GMO labeling.
Unlike other New England states, Maine and Connecticut, which passed labeling laws that delay implementation until neighboring states sign on--in an effort to share the cost of a potential suit--the Vermont bill will immediately become law.
If and when the law passes, most assume that a lawsuit by large business interests would be inevitable. Proponents of the bill, however, say that the wording of the law gives it a good chance of withstanding such a challenge in the courts.
Recent efforts to pass similar legislation in Washington and California both failed due to an influx of cash from big agribusiness and food companies, including Monsanto, Pepsi, and industry lobbyists.
Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), hailed the vote as a win for the grassroots movement.
"Today, consumers and a number of principled legislators in Vermont made it clear to Monsanto, Coca-Cola and other opponents of consumers' right to know," Cummins said. "We will not back down. This movement is here to stay."
_____________________
After a groundswell of support from state residents fueled by grassroots activism, Vermont is on track to become the first state to require the labeling of food that contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
"This is a victory for everyone who eats."
A bill making its way through the Vermont legislature won preliminary approval on Tuesday when the Senate voted 26-2 in favor. On Wednesday, the legislation goes before the House, which previously passed a slightly different version of the bill. Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin said he's likely to sign the bill should it reach his desk.
"This is a victory for everyone who eats," said Andrea Stander, Director of Rural Vermont. "It is fitting that Vermont, where we take food seriously, is on the way to becoming the first state in the U.S. to require that genetically engineered foods be labeled."
Bill H.112 requires that food sold in Vermont stores that contains genetically modified ingredients will be labeled starting July 2016. The bill also makes it illegal to call any food product containing GMOs "natural" or "all natural."
During the vote, legislators acknowledged that it was the rallying cry of their constituents that pushed them to back the bill.
The Burlington Free Press reports:
Some senators who had been skeptical of GMO labeling said they were persuaded that their constituents want the information clarified on the food they buy. Senators said they were flooded with emails and calls from people urging them to pass the bill.
[...]
Sen. Bobby Starr, D-Essex/Orleans, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said he, too, had been unenthusiastic about GMO labeling, but at every public meeting he heard from Vermonters who wanted a labeling law. "Lo and behold, GMOs would float to the top of the debate within those meetings," he said.
"Today the Senate stood up for the vast majority of Vermonters who want to see genetically engineered foods labeled," said Vermont PIRG Consumer Protection Advocate Falko Schilling. "Vermont is once again leading the nation by acknowledging the important fact that everyone has a right to know what they are eating."
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said that he is proud that his state is "taking the lead in a growing national movement." In Washington, Sanders has been pushing for federal action on food labels. Last year he proposed an amendement to the farm bill, which lost, that would have granted states the authority to require GMO labeling.
Unlike other New England states, Maine and Connecticut, which passed labeling laws that delay implementation until neighboring states sign on--in an effort to share the cost of a potential suit--the Vermont bill will immediately become law.
If and when the law passes, most assume that a lawsuit by large business interests would be inevitable. Proponents of the bill, however, say that the wording of the law gives it a good chance of withstanding such a challenge in the courts.
Recent efforts to pass similar legislation in Washington and California both failed due to an influx of cash from big agribusiness and food companies, including Monsanto, Pepsi, and industry lobbyists.
Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), hailed the vote as a win for the grassroots movement.
"Today, consumers and a number of principled legislators in Vermont made it clear to Monsanto, Coca-Cola and other opponents of consumers' right to know," Cummins said. "We will not back down. This movement is here to stay."
_____________________