SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Cornell Woolridge of Windsor Mill, Md., holds protest signs in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2013. (Photo: NickPrete)
As Expected, Big Money Flood Grows Bigger in Wake of McCutcheon Ruling
Center for Responsive Politics data shows wealthy donors have already contributed $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before ruling
Sep 02, 2014
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.