SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Ahead of the 2016 elections, the verdict is in: Most people in the United States--including a large number of Republicans--think global warming poses a serious threat to the world and want the government to take action to stave off climate crisis.
A new nation-wide poll conducted by Stanford University, The New York Times, and environmental research organization Resources for the Future found that two-thirds of people in the U.S.--including almost half of Republicans--say they are more likely to back politicians who vow in their campaigns to fight global warming.
Likewise, the majority of respondents said they are less likely to vote for a candidate who denies the reality of human-caused global warming.
Jon A. Krosnick, Stanford University professor and an author of the poll, toldThe New York Times that the numbers on Republicans constitute "the most powerful finding" in the survey.
While most Republic candidates steer clear of addressing climate change, and many openly deny its scientific foundations, the study suggests that their base of support is moving in a different direction.
However, the gap between the public and their political representatives appears to extend across the political arena.
"The American people seem far more unified than our political leadership on the need to address climate change," said Resources for the Future president Phil Sharp. "As often happens, politicians would do well to catch up with the electorate."
According to the survey, 83 percent of people in the U.S. think inaction in the face of rising emissions would pose a very or somewhat serious problem in the future. At least 61 percent of Republicans fell within this grouping.
The poll also reveals that the most people in the United States believe they will personally suffer from climate change to some degree.
The bipartisan nature of this concern was demonstrated by Aliza Strauss, described by The New York Times as "a Republican homemaker in Teaneck, N.J."
"A tree fell on my house during Hurricane Sandy and in the future it might be worse," Strauss told researchers. "The stronger storms and the flooding will erode the coastline, and that is a big concern for me."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Ahead of the 2016 elections, the verdict is in: Most people in the United States--including a large number of Republicans--think global warming poses a serious threat to the world and want the government to take action to stave off climate crisis.
A new nation-wide poll conducted by Stanford University, The New York Times, and environmental research organization Resources for the Future found that two-thirds of people in the U.S.--including almost half of Republicans--say they are more likely to back politicians who vow in their campaigns to fight global warming.
Likewise, the majority of respondents said they are less likely to vote for a candidate who denies the reality of human-caused global warming.
Jon A. Krosnick, Stanford University professor and an author of the poll, toldThe New York Times that the numbers on Republicans constitute "the most powerful finding" in the survey.
While most Republic candidates steer clear of addressing climate change, and many openly deny its scientific foundations, the study suggests that their base of support is moving in a different direction.
However, the gap between the public and their political representatives appears to extend across the political arena.
"The American people seem far more unified than our political leadership on the need to address climate change," said Resources for the Future president Phil Sharp. "As often happens, politicians would do well to catch up with the electorate."
According to the survey, 83 percent of people in the U.S. think inaction in the face of rising emissions would pose a very or somewhat serious problem in the future. At least 61 percent of Republicans fell within this grouping.
The poll also reveals that the most people in the United States believe they will personally suffer from climate change to some degree.
The bipartisan nature of this concern was demonstrated by Aliza Strauss, described by The New York Times as "a Republican homemaker in Teaneck, N.J."
"A tree fell on my house during Hurricane Sandy and in the future it might be worse," Strauss told researchers. "The stronger storms and the flooding will erode the coastline, and that is a big concern for me."
Ahead of the 2016 elections, the verdict is in: Most people in the United States--including a large number of Republicans--think global warming poses a serious threat to the world and want the government to take action to stave off climate crisis.
A new nation-wide poll conducted by Stanford University, The New York Times, and environmental research organization Resources for the Future found that two-thirds of people in the U.S.--including almost half of Republicans--say they are more likely to back politicians who vow in their campaigns to fight global warming.
Likewise, the majority of respondents said they are less likely to vote for a candidate who denies the reality of human-caused global warming.
Jon A. Krosnick, Stanford University professor and an author of the poll, toldThe New York Times that the numbers on Republicans constitute "the most powerful finding" in the survey.
While most Republic candidates steer clear of addressing climate change, and many openly deny its scientific foundations, the study suggests that their base of support is moving in a different direction.
However, the gap between the public and their political representatives appears to extend across the political arena.
"The American people seem far more unified than our political leadership on the need to address climate change," said Resources for the Future president Phil Sharp. "As often happens, politicians would do well to catch up with the electorate."
According to the survey, 83 percent of people in the U.S. think inaction in the face of rising emissions would pose a very or somewhat serious problem in the future. At least 61 percent of Republicans fell within this grouping.
The poll also reveals that the most people in the United States believe they will personally suffer from climate change to some degree.
The bipartisan nature of this concern was demonstrated by Aliza Strauss, described by The New York Times as "a Republican homemaker in Teaneck, N.J."
"A tree fell on my house during Hurricane Sandy and in the future it might be worse," Strauss told researchers. "The stronger storms and the flooding will erode the coastline, and that is a big concern for me."