'Unconstitutional... Unconscionable': Texas Executes Intellectually Disabled Man
Despite Eighth Amendment protections and US Supreme Court rulings, state puts Robert Ladd to death
Texas executed an intellectually disabled man on Thursday, violating the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits putting mentally impaired prisoners to death as cruel and unusual punishment.
Robert Ladd, 57, was killed by lethal injection Thursday evening for the 1996 murder of Vicki Ann Garner. The procedure lasted 27 minutes. In any other state, Ladd would have been considered ineligible for the death penalty due to his IQ of 67, according to the ACLU.
Ladd's death highlights Texas's continued thwarting of two U.S. Supreme Court rulings, which not only protect the mentally challenged from execution, but also require that death penalty states use medically scientific definitions of those disabilities, rather than imposing their own standards. One of those rulings, Hall v. Florida, came in 2014.
Despite those rulings, Texas is still using its own controversial standards, the so-called "Briseno factors," a series of seven vague social criteria--such as whether a defendant can display leadership, communicate effectively, or lie--to determine mental capacity. The Briseno factors, so named for the court ruling that detailed them, compare prisoners to Lennie Small, the lumbering and intellectually disabled character in John Steinbeck's 1937 novella Of Mice and Men.
"Texas aggressively pursued Mr. Ladd's execution, despite the fact that our constitution categorically prohibits the use of capital punishment against persons with intellectual disability," said Brian Stull, Ladd's lawyer and a senior staff attorney with the ACLU. "Mr. Ladd... was executed because Texas uses idiosyncratic standards, based on stereotypes rather than science, to determine intellectual disability."
In his final statement, Ladd told the sister of his victim that he was "really, really sorry."
"I really, really hope and pray that you don't have hatred in your heart," he told her. He said he hoped she could find peace. "A revenge death won't get you anything."
After his injection, Ladd said, "Stings my arm, man!" and began taking deep breaths, according to the Associated Press. He was pronounced dead at 7:02 PM.
Ladd's death is the second execution of a mentally handicapped prisoner in the U.S. this week. Warren Lee Hill, who had an IQ of 70, was put to death in Georgia on Tuesday.
"We are eager for a court to address the fact that Texas' unscientific standards can't be reconciled with the Supreme Court's decision in Hall v. Florida, mandating that states must use universal medical diagnostic practices rather than inaccurate and self-invented methods for determining intellectual disability," Stull continued.
"However," he added, "no future ruling can undo the unconscionable fact that tonight Texas ended the life of an intellectually disabled man who deserved the protection of the Constitution."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Texas executed an intellectually disabled man on Thursday, violating the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits putting mentally impaired prisoners to death as cruel and unusual punishment.
Robert Ladd, 57, was killed by lethal injection Thursday evening for the 1996 murder of Vicki Ann Garner. The procedure lasted 27 minutes. In any other state, Ladd would have been considered ineligible for the death penalty due to his IQ of 67, according to the ACLU.
Ladd's death highlights Texas's continued thwarting of two U.S. Supreme Court rulings, which not only protect the mentally challenged from execution, but also require that death penalty states use medically scientific definitions of those disabilities, rather than imposing their own standards. One of those rulings, Hall v. Florida, came in 2014.
Despite those rulings, Texas is still using its own controversial standards, the so-called "Briseno factors," a series of seven vague social criteria--such as whether a defendant can display leadership, communicate effectively, or lie--to determine mental capacity. The Briseno factors, so named for the court ruling that detailed them, compare prisoners to Lennie Small, the lumbering and intellectually disabled character in John Steinbeck's 1937 novella Of Mice and Men.
"Texas aggressively pursued Mr. Ladd's execution, despite the fact that our constitution categorically prohibits the use of capital punishment against persons with intellectual disability," said Brian Stull, Ladd's lawyer and a senior staff attorney with the ACLU. "Mr. Ladd... was executed because Texas uses idiosyncratic standards, based on stereotypes rather than science, to determine intellectual disability."
In his final statement, Ladd told the sister of his victim that he was "really, really sorry."
"I really, really hope and pray that you don't have hatred in your heart," he told her. He said he hoped she could find peace. "A revenge death won't get you anything."
After his injection, Ladd said, "Stings my arm, man!" and began taking deep breaths, according to the Associated Press. He was pronounced dead at 7:02 PM.
Ladd's death is the second execution of a mentally handicapped prisoner in the U.S. this week. Warren Lee Hill, who had an IQ of 70, was put to death in Georgia on Tuesday.
"We are eager for a court to address the fact that Texas' unscientific standards can't be reconciled with the Supreme Court's decision in Hall v. Florida, mandating that states must use universal medical diagnostic practices rather than inaccurate and self-invented methods for determining intellectual disability," Stull continued.
"However," he added, "no future ruling can undo the unconscionable fact that tonight Texas ended the life of an intellectually disabled man who deserved the protection of the Constitution."
Texas executed an intellectually disabled man on Thursday, violating the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits putting mentally impaired prisoners to death as cruel and unusual punishment.
Robert Ladd, 57, was killed by lethal injection Thursday evening for the 1996 murder of Vicki Ann Garner. The procedure lasted 27 minutes. In any other state, Ladd would have been considered ineligible for the death penalty due to his IQ of 67, according to the ACLU.
Ladd's death highlights Texas's continued thwarting of two U.S. Supreme Court rulings, which not only protect the mentally challenged from execution, but also require that death penalty states use medically scientific definitions of those disabilities, rather than imposing their own standards. One of those rulings, Hall v. Florida, came in 2014.
Despite those rulings, Texas is still using its own controversial standards, the so-called "Briseno factors," a series of seven vague social criteria--such as whether a defendant can display leadership, communicate effectively, or lie--to determine mental capacity. The Briseno factors, so named for the court ruling that detailed them, compare prisoners to Lennie Small, the lumbering and intellectually disabled character in John Steinbeck's 1937 novella Of Mice and Men.
"Texas aggressively pursued Mr. Ladd's execution, despite the fact that our constitution categorically prohibits the use of capital punishment against persons with intellectual disability," said Brian Stull, Ladd's lawyer and a senior staff attorney with the ACLU. "Mr. Ladd... was executed because Texas uses idiosyncratic standards, based on stereotypes rather than science, to determine intellectual disability."
In his final statement, Ladd told the sister of his victim that he was "really, really sorry."
"I really, really hope and pray that you don't have hatred in your heart," he told her. He said he hoped she could find peace. "A revenge death won't get you anything."
After his injection, Ladd said, "Stings my arm, man!" and began taking deep breaths, according to the Associated Press. He was pronounced dead at 7:02 PM.
Ladd's death is the second execution of a mentally handicapped prisoner in the U.S. this week. Warren Lee Hill, who had an IQ of 70, was put to death in Georgia on Tuesday.
"We are eager for a court to address the fact that Texas' unscientific standards can't be reconciled with the Supreme Court's decision in Hall v. Florida, mandating that states must use universal medical diagnostic practices rather than inaccurate and self-invented methods for determining intellectual disability," Stull continued.
"However," he added, "no future ruling can undo the unconscionable fact that tonight Texas ended the life of an intellectually disabled man who deserved the protection of the Constitution."