Obama Administration Continues Pitch to Steamroll Corporate-Friendly Trade Deal
Top trade authority continues line that legislation that would strip Congress of constitutional powers is good.
The Obama administration is continuing its push for controversial legislation that would fast track trade deals including the massive Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), now nearing the end stages.
The legislation is Trade Promotion Authority, also known as Fast Track, which Rich Bindell of watchdog group Food and Water Watch described as a "highway to hell."
TechDirt's Michael Masnick explains that Fast Track
is where Congress basically tells the USTR that it will only take a single "yes/no" vote on whatever the USTR comes back with, rather than delving into the details of the trade agreement and challenging specific aspects of it. In fact, there's an argument that, without fast track authority, the USTR can't really commit the US to anything. What's really odd is that, in a Republican-controlled Congress that seems to want to fight President Obama on just about anything that even has a whiff of the executive branch having more power, it's those Republicans in Congress who are pushing strongly for fast track authority -- effectively giving up their (Constitutionally-mandated) power to regulate international trade.
The latest pitch for the power came Monday from the nation's top trade authority, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, in his remarks to the National Association of Counties.
Froman called the TPP "the most ambitious trade agenda in American history" and said that "the finish line for TPP negotiations is in sight."
He called the trade deal "our main tool for leveling the playing field for American workers and businesses," and, in contrast to arguments made by watchdog groups, said the TPP "gives us the opportunity to protect workers, to protect the environment, and to tackle a number of issues that have never been addressed."
Froman said Fast Track is "the way Congress gives direction to the President about what to negotiate, how to consult with Congress before and during the negotiations and how Congress will decide at the end of the day--after an extensive public debate--whether to support or reject a trade agreement. "
But as Masnick's explanation of fast track elucidated, it prevents Congress from giving direction on deals by taking away their opportunities to add amendments.
Sen. Bernie Sanders is among those expressing opposition to Fast Track, but he told the Wall Street Journal Monday that felt it would pass the Senate.
Among its critics in the House are Representatives Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), who issued a statement last month that it's "clear that members of Congress do not want to abdicate their constitutional authority" with Fast Track, adding, "After seeing trade deal after trade deal send millions of U.S. jobs overseas, Congress can no longer give this administration--or any future one--the benefit of the doubt, especially given the scope of this particular deal."
Fast Track has also faced fierce opposition from a wide range of grassroots groups.
The AFL-CIO's executive council also issued a statement Monday in which it outlines its opposition to Fast Track, and cites the history of previous trade deals, which Sanders called "abysmal failures," as a sign that Froman's promises on TPP are false.
Trade negotiations, trade promotion authority (known as "TPA" or "Fast Track") and economic policy are inextricably intertwined. Because "trade" agreements include provisions on environmental policy, labor rights, foreign investment, food safety, anti-trust policy and more, these decisions should not be made behind closed doors--away from the eyes of the people and their elected representatives.
U.S. trade deals--from NAFTA and CAFTA to Korea and Colombia--form a mountain of broken promises made to workers. With NAFTA and Korea, we were promised more jobs and higher wages because the deals would make it easier to export U.S. products. Instead, the deals made it easier to export U.S. jobs, in part by including powerful legal rights for foreign investors, known as ISDS that provide an added incentive to move production offshore.
[...] the AFL-CIO commits to working with a broad coalition of allies to defeat "Fast Track" trade authority and instead develop more democratic and participatory trade negotiating procedures that lead to fairer and more balanced trade deals that put people and the planet over profits.
According to reporting by The Hill, Congress could be presented with the legislation soon: "Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), panel ranking member Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) are working on an updated version of the legislation, which could be ready by the end of the month."
And getting Fast Track passed is reportedly key to paving the way for the 12-nation TPP deal. Zach Carter reported at the Huffington Post: "TPP likely cannot pass without fast-track authority."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Obama administration is continuing its push for controversial legislation that would fast track trade deals including the massive Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), now nearing the end stages.
The legislation is Trade Promotion Authority, also known as Fast Track, which Rich Bindell of watchdog group Food and Water Watch described as a "highway to hell."
TechDirt's Michael Masnick explains that Fast Track
is where Congress basically tells the USTR that it will only take a single "yes/no" vote on whatever the USTR comes back with, rather than delving into the details of the trade agreement and challenging specific aspects of it. In fact, there's an argument that, without fast track authority, the USTR can't really commit the US to anything. What's really odd is that, in a Republican-controlled Congress that seems to want to fight President Obama on just about anything that even has a whiff of the executive branch having more power, it's those Republicans in Congress who are pushing strongly for fast track authority -- effectively giving up their (Constitutionally-mandated) power to regulate international trade.
The latest pitch for the power came Monday from the nation's top trade authority, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, in his remarks to the National Association of Counties.
Froman called the TPP "the most ambitious trade agenda in American history" and said that "the finish line for TPP negotiations is in sight."
He called the trade deal "our main tool for leveling the playing field for American workers and businesses," and, in contrast to arguments made by watchdog groups, said the TPP "gives us the opportunity to protect workers, to protect the environment, and to tackle a number of issues that have never been addressed."
Froman said Fast Track is "the way Congress gives direction to the President about what to negotiate, how to consult with Congress before and during the negotiations and how Congress will decide at the end of the day--after an extensive public debate--whether to support or reject a trade agreement. "
But as Masnick's explanation of fast track elucidated, it prevents Congress from giving direction on deals by taking away their opportunities to add amendments.
Sen. Bernie Sanders is among those expressing opposition to Fast Track, but he told the Wall Street Journal Monday that felt it would pass the Senate.
Among its critics in the House are Representatives Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), who issued a statement last month that it's "clear that members of Congress do not want to abdicate their constitutional authority" with Fast Track, adding, "After seeing trade deal after trade deal send millions of U.S. jobs overseas, Congress can no longer give this administration--or any future one--the benefit of the doubt, especially given the scope of this particular deal."
Fast Track has also faced fierce opposition from a wide range of grassroots groups.
The AFL-CIO's executive council also issued a statement Monday in which it outlines its opposition to Fast Track, and cites the history of previous trade deals, which Sanders called "abysmal failures," as a sign that Froman's promises on TPP are false.
Trade negotiations, trade promotion authority (known as "TPA" or "Fast Track") and economic policy are inextricably intertwined. Because "trade" agreements include provisions on environmental policy, labor rights, foreign investment, food safety, anti-trust policy and more, these decisions should not be made behind closed doors--away from the eyes of the people and their elected representatives.
U.S. trade deals--from NAFTA and CAFTA to Korea and Colombia--form a mountain of broken promises made to workers. With NAFTA and Korea, we were promised more jobs and higher wages because the deals would make it easier to export U.S. products. Instead, the deals made it easier to export U.S. jobs, in part by including powerful legal rights for foreign investors, known as ISDS that provide an added incentive to move production offshore.
[...] the AFL-CIO commits to working with a broad coalition of allies to defeat "Fast Track" trade authority and instead develop more democratic and participatory trade negotiating procedures that lead to fairer and more balanced trade deals that put people and the planet over profits.
According to reporting by The Hill, Congress could be presented with the legislation soon: "Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), panel ranking member Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) are working on an updated version of the legislation, which could be ready by the end of the month."
And getting Fast Track passed is reportedly key to paving the way for the 12-nation TPP deal. Zach Carter reported at the Huffington Post: "TPP likely cannot pass without fast-track authority."
The Obama administration is continuing its push for controversial legislation that would fast track trade deals including the massive Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), now nearing the end stages.
The legislation is Trade Promotion Authority, also known as Fast Track, which Rich Bindell of watchdog group Food and Water Watch described as a "highway to hell."
TechDirt's Michael Masnick explains that Fast Track
is where Congress basically tells the USTR that it will only take a single "yes/no" vote on whatever the USTR comes back with, rather than delving into the details of the trade agreement and challenging specific aspects of it. In fact, there's an argument that, without fast track authority, the USTR can't really commit the US to anything. What's really odd is that, in a Republican-controlled Congress that seems to want to fight President Obama on just about anything that even has a whiff of the executive branch having more power, it's those Republicans in Congress who are pushing strongly for fast track authority -- effectively giving up their (Constitutionally-mandated) power to regulate international trade.
The latest pitch for the power came Monday from the nation's top trade authority, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, in his remarks to the National Association of Counties.
Froman called the TPP "the most ambitious trade agenda in American history" and said that "the finish line for TPP negotiations is in sight."
He called the trade deal "our main tool for leveling the playing field for American workers and businesses," and, in contrast to arguments made by watchdog groups, said the TPP "gives us the opportunity to protect workers, to protect the environment, and to tackle a number of issues that have never been addressed."
Froman said Fast Track is "the way Congress gives direction to the President about what to negotiate, how to consult with Congress before and during the negotiations and how Congress will decide at the end of the day--after an extensive public debate--whether to support or reject a trade agreement. "
But as Masnick's explanation of fast track elucidated, it prevents Congress from giving direction on deals by taking away their opportunities to add amendments.
Sen. Bernie Sanders is among those expressing opposition to Fast Track, but he told the Wall Street Journal Monday that felt it would pass the Senate.
Among its critics in the House are Representatives Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), who issued a statement last month that it's "clear that members of Congress do not want to abdicate their constitutional authority" with Fast Track, adding, "After seeing trade deal after trade deal send millions of U.S. jobs overseas, Congress can no longer give this administration--or any future one--the benefit of the doubt, especially given the scope of this particular deal."
Fast Track has also faced fierce opposition from a wide range of grassroots groups.
The AFL-CIO's executive council also issued a statement Monday in which it outlines its opposition to Fast Track, and cites the history of previous trade deals, which Sanders called "abysmal failures," as a sign that Froman's promises on TPP are false.
Trade negotiations, trade promotion authority (known as "TPA" or "Fast Track") and economic policy are inextricably intertwined. Because "trade" agreements include provisions on environmental policy, labor rights, foreign investment, food safety, anti-trust policy and more, these decisions should not be made behind closed doors--away from the eyes of the people and their elected representatives.
U.S. trade deals--from NAFTA and CAFTA to Korea and Colombia--form a mountain of broken promises made to workers. With NAFTA and Korea, we were promised more jobs and higher wages because the deals would make it easier to export U.S. products. Instead, the deals made it easier to export U.S. jobs, in part by including powerful legal rights for foreign investors, known as ISDS that provide an added incentive to move production offshore.
[...] the AFL-CIO commits to working with a broad coalition of allies to defeat "Fast Track" trade authority and instead develop more democratic and participatory trade negotiating procedures that lead to fairer and more balanced trade deals that put people and the planet over profits.
According to reporting by The Hill, Congress could be presented with the legislation soon: "Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), panel ranking member Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) are working on an updated version of the legislation, which could be ready by the end of the month."
And getting Fast Track passed is reportedly key to paving the way for the 12-nation TPP deal. Zach Carter reported at the Huffington Post: "TPP likely cannot pass without fast-track authority."