

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As Canada's provincial and territorial leaders meet Tuesday in Quebec City to develop a national energy strategy in the face of federal inaction on climate change, a new report warns that tar sands megaprojects like the Energy East pipeline could hinder the country's ability to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.
"Canada's premiers have an opportunity to collaborate and provide leadership through a Canadian Energy Strategy," said Erin Flanagan, an analyst with the Pembina Institute and author of the report, Crafting an Effective Canadian Energy Strategy (pdf). "But to achieve shared climate objectives, the provinces will have to address carbon-intensive megaprojects and their consequences in terms of emissions."
In particular, the think tank singles out tar sands operations, which the report notes are "Canada's fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions and, as such, the largest barrier to achieving national climate objectives."
TransCanada's Energy East pipeline proposal, for example, "would provide an outlet for expanded [tar sands] production at a time when emissions are not adequately regulated--locking Canada in to more emissions growth," the report reads. The crude oil production needed to fill Energy East could generate up to 32 million tons of carbon emissions each year, the researchers add, an amount roughly equal to the emission reductions Ontario made by phasing out coal-fired power in its province.
With international climate negotiations set to take place in Paris this December, 2015 is "set to be a significant year for governments around the world working to address climate change," the report declares, adding that "Canada will have to work hard to overcome its dismal record on climate."
In an October 2014 report, the auditor general's office stated that Canada was not on track to meet its international emissions targets because the federal government's plan to reduce carbon pollution "has been ineffective and the action it has taken has been slow and not well coordinated" among provinces. Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper is known for his dismal record on climate change; in 2014, Jamie Henn of 350.org called the Harper administration "just another member of the carbon cartel."
It's up to the country's premiers to fill the "leadership vacuum" left by Harper's administration on climate change, the researchers say--and to do so they must "urgently reduce" the climate impacts of continued tar sands development.
"For a multi-province strategy to be credible and effective," the report reads, "it must take the full emissions footprint of fossil fuel projects into account."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As Canada's provincial and territorial leaders meet Tuesday in Quebec City to develop a national energy strategy in the face of federal inaction on climate change, a new report warns that tar sands megaprojects like the Energy East pipeline could hinder the country's ability to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.
"Canada's premiers have an opportunity to collaborate and provide leadership through a Canadian Energy Strategy," said Erin Flanagan, an analyst with the Pembina Institute and author of the report, Crafting an Effective Canadian Energy Strategy (pdf). "But to achieve shared climate objectives, the provinces will have to address carbon-intensive megaprojects and their consequences in terms of emissions."
In particular, the think tank singles out tar sands operations, which the report notes are "Canada's fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions and, as such, the largest barrier to achieving national climate objectives."
TransCanada's Energy East pipeline proposal, for example, "would provide an outlet for expanded [tar sands] production at a time when emissions are not adequately regulated--locking Canada in to more emissions growth," the report reads. The crude oil production needed to fill Energy East could generate up to 32 million tons of carbon emissions each year, the researchers add, an amount roughly equal to the emission reductions Ontario made by phasing out coal-fired power in its province.
With international climate negotiations set to take place in Paris this December, 2015 is "set to be a significant year for governments around the world working to address climate change," the report declares, adding that "Canada will have to work hard to overcome its dismal record on climate."
In an October 2014 report, the auditor general's office stated that Canada was not on track to meet its international emissions targets because the federal government's plan to reduce carbon pollution "has been ineffective and the action it has taken has been slow and not well coordinated" among provinces. Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper is known for his dismal record on climate change; in 2014, Jamie Henn of 350.org called the Harper administration "just another member of the carbon cartel."
It's up to the country's premiers to fill the "leadership vacuum" left by Harper's administration on climate change, the researchers say--and to do so they must "urgently reduce" the climate impacts of continued tar sands development.
"For a multi-province strategy to be credible and effective," the report reads, "it must take the full emissions footprint of fossil fuel projects into account."
As Canada's provincial and territorial leaders meet Tuesday in Quebec City to develop a national energy strategy in the face of federal inaction on climate change, a new report warns that tar sands megaprojects like the Energy East pipeline could hinder the country's ability to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.
"Canada's premiers have an opportunity to collaborate and provide leadership through a Canadian Energy Strategy," said Erin Flanagan, an analyst with the Pembina Institute and author of the report, Crafting an Effective Canadian Energy Strategy (pdf). "But to achieve shared climate objectives, the provinces will have to address carbon-intensive megaprojects and their consequences in terms of emissions."
In particular, the think tank singles out tar sands operations, which the report notes are "Canada's fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions and, as such, the largest barrier to achieving national climate objectives."
TransCanada's Energy East pipeline proposal, for example, "would provide an outlet for expanded [tar sands] production at a time when emissions are not adequately regulated--locking Canada in to more emissions growth," the report reads. The crude oil production needed to fill Energy East could generate up to 32 million tons of carbon emissions each year, the researchers add, an amount roughly equal to the emission reductions Ontario made by phasing out coal-fired power in its province.
With international climate negotiations set to take place in Paris this December, 2015 is "set to be a significant year for governments around the world working to address climate change," the report declares, adding that "Canada will have to work hard to overcome its dismal record on climate."
In an October 2014 report, the auditor general's office stated that Canada was not on track to meet its international emissions targets because the federal government's plan to reduce carbon pollution "has been ineffective and the action it has taken has been slow and not well coordinated" among provinces. Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper is known for his dismal record on climate change; in 2014, Jamie Henn of 350.org called the Harper administration "just another member of the carbon cartel."
It's up to the country's premiers to fill the "leadership vacuum" left by Harper's administration on climate change, the researchers say--and to do so they must "urgently reduce" the climate impacts of continued tar sands development.
"For a multi-province strategy to be credible and effective," the report reads, "it must take the full emissions footprint of fossil fuel projects into account."