

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Last week, the administration of President Barack Obama quietly opened more than 100,000 acres of public lands to coal mining, infuriating local residents who say the vast carbon footprint of this decision makes a "mockery of the President's touted climate change initiatives."
The Buffalo Field Office of U.S. Bureau of Land Management, which is overseen by the Department of the Interior, on May 28 released a regional management plan for a Wyoming stretch of the Powder River Basin. This basin is the largest coal-producing area of the United States, with most mining already occurring on federal property through the government's controversial leasing program.
The new plan, which requires a "30-day protest period and the 60-day Wyoming Governor's Consistency Review" before being signed into law, would open up the basin even further to the fossil fuel industry.
According to the BLM's own estimates, over the next 20 years it will issue 28 new leases to drill approximately 10.2 billion tons of coal on 106,400 acres of federal land.
The amount of carbon emissions from this coal would be staggering.
According to the calculations of Greenpeace, if all of this coal is burned, 16.9 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide will be released into the atmosphere. The organization says this is far more than the "the 5.3 billion metric tons of carbon pollution expected to be avoided" by the Obama administration's flagship Clean Power Plan between 2020 and 2030.
Immediately following the announcement, the BLM was accused by members of the advocacy organization Powder River Basin Resource Council of caving to the powerful fossil fuel industry.
"This proposal has opened even further the flood gates of extensive fossil fuel development and has relaxed existing protections for ensuring our land, air, water and wildlife are used wisely and conservatively," Gillian Malone, chair of the group, declared late last month. "On a broader scale, the proposed plan maximizes fossil fuel production, making a mockery of the President's touted climate change initiatives."
Shannon Anderson, an organizer with the group, emphasized to Common Dreams that the plan is not a shift in direction, but rather, "affirms the current status quo. The powder River Basin is already open."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last week, the administration of President Barack Obama quietly opened more than 100,000 acres of public lands to coal mining, infuriating local residents who say the vast carbon footprint of this decision makes a "mockery of the President's touted climate change initiatives."
The Buffalo Field Office of U.S. Bureau of Land Management, which is overseen by the Department of the Interior, on May 28 released a regional management plan for a Wyoming stretch of the Powder River Basin. This basin is the largest coal-producing area of the United States, with most mining already occurring on federal property through the government's controversial leasing program.
The new plan, which requires a "30-day protest period and the 60-day Wyoming Governor's Consistency Review" before being signed into law, would open up the basin even further to the fossil fuel industry.
According to the BLM's own estimates, over the next 20 years it will issue 28 new leases to drill approximately 10.2 billion tons of coal on 106,400 acres of federal land.
The amount of carbon emissions from this coal would be staggering.
According to the calculations of Greenpeace, if all of this coal is burned, 16.9 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide will be released into the atmosphere. The organization says this is far more than the "the 5.3 billion metric tons of carbon pollution expected to be avoided" by the Obama administration's flagship Clean Power Plan between 2020 and 2030.
Immediately following the announcement, the BLM was accused by members of the advocacy organization Powder River Basin Resource Council of caving to the powerful fossil fuel industry.
"This proposal has opened even further the flood gates of extensive fossil fuel development and has relaxed existing protections for ensuring our land, air, water and wildlife are used wisely and conservatively," Gillian Malone, chair of the group, declared late last month. "On a broader scale, the proposed plan maximizes fossil fuel production, making a mockery of the President's touted climate change initiatives."
Shannon Anderson, an organizer with the group, emphasized to Common Dreams that the plan is not a shift in direction, but rather, "affirms the current status quo. The powder River Basin is already open."
Last week, the administration of President Barack Obama quietly opened more than 100,000 acres of public lands to coal mining, infuriating local residents who say the vast carbon footprint of this decision makes a "mockery of the President's touted climate change initiatives."
The Buffalo Field Office of U.S. Bureau of Land Management, which is overseen by the Department of the Interior, on May 28 released a regional management plan for a Wyoming stretch of the Powder River Basin. This basin is the largest coal-producing area of the United States, with most mining already occurring on federal property through the government's controversial leasing program.
The new plan, which requires a "30-day protest period and the 60-day Wyoming Governor's Consistency Review" before being signed into law, would open up the basin even further to the fossil fuel industry.
According to the BLM's own estimates, over the next 20 years it will issue 28 new leases to drill approximately 10.2 billion tons of coal on 106,400 acres of federal land.
The amount of carbon emissions from this coal would be staggering.
According to the calculations of Greenpeace, if all of this coal is burned, 16.9 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide will be released into the atmosphere. The organization says this is far more than the "the 5.3 billion metric tons of carbon pollution expected to be avoided" by the Obama administration's flagship Clean Power Plan between 2020 and 2030.
Immediately following the announcement, the BLM was accused by members of the advocacy organization Powder River Basin Resource Council of caving to the powerful fossil fuel industry.
"This proposal has opened even further the flood gates of extensive fossil fuel development and has relaxed existing protections for ensuring our land, air, water and wildlife are used wisely and conservatively," Gillian Malone, chair of the group, declared late last month. "On a broader scale, the proposed plan maximizes fossil fuel production, making a mockery of the President's touted climate change initiatives."
Shannon Anderson, an organizer with the group, emphasized to Common Dreams that the plan is not a shift in direction, but rather, "affirms the current status quo. The powder River Basin is already open."