SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
If it was up to him, Sen. Sanders said he would have raised the eligibilty for the salary limit for overtime workers even higher -- up from President Obama's $970 per week to $1,090.
Though he was quick to note that even more Americans deserve fair compensation for working more than 40 hours per week, presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Tuesday endorsed President Barack Obama's announcement that he will soon update overtime pay regulations--a move that will give approximately 5 million middle-income workers a bump in their annual pay.
"We've got to keep making sure hard work is rewarded," Obama wrote in an op-ed announcing his decision. "Right now, too many Americans are working long days for less pay than they deserve. That's partly because we've failed to update overtime regulations for years--and an exemption meant for highly paid, white collar employees now leaves out workers making as little as $23,660 a year--no matter how many hours they work."
Jared Bernstein, a former White House adviser and now a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, explained in the Washington Post on Tuesday why protections for this kind of workers were initially imposed:
Because [the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938, legislation that included a national minimum wage and time-and-a-half pay for hourly and certain salaried workers after 40 hours of weekly work] needed to preempt the possibility that some employers might just label someone a salaried worker to avoid having to pay time-and-a-half. So a salary threshold was introduced, below which workers were automatically non-exempt. The problem is the threshold wasn't regularly adjusted for inflation, and while it has been sporadically raised, it has fallen well behind its historical levels, once you adjust for inflation (the new rule also proposes to index the new threshold to either price or wage growth; which one will be decided during the forthcoming comment period, where outside stakeholders can weigh in on the proposed rule).
According to Bernstein, who praised the move by Obama, it would be very difficult to "come up with a rule change or executive order--i.e., non-legislation--to lift the pay of this many middle-wage workers." It's especially important, he said, "because we live in a time when the bargaining power of many who depend on their paychecks is much diminished relative to the clout and power of those whose income derives from their wealth portfolios."
Sanders, who has made raising workers' wages and combating the nation's extreme levels of economic inequality a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, said Obama's move is good news for the nation's struggling workers.
"Businesses no longer will be able to shirk their responsibility to pay fair wages by simply labeling workers earning as little as $24,000-a-year as supervisors," said Sanders.
If it was up to him, however, Sanders said he would have raised the eligibility for the salary limit even higher--up from Obama's $970 per week to $1,090.
Earlier this year, Sanders and 25 other senators sent a letter to the White House urging the U.S. Department of Labor to modernize overtime regulations. In the letter, they detailed how many U.S. corporations had exploited antiquated regulations to avoid paying time-and-a-half for workers who put in more than 40 hours a week on the job.
"These long hours are straining middle-class workers and their families," the letter stated. "Since the 1970s, average salaries for middle-class individuals have dropped even while salaried workers have increased the hours they spend on the job. Strengthening overtime protections will help millions of middle-class families."
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Though he was quick to note that even more Americans deserve fair compensation for working more than 40 hours per week, presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Tuesday endorsed President Barack Obama's announcement that he will soon update overtime pay regulations--a move that will give approximately 5 million middle-income workers a bump in their annual pay.
"We've got to keep making sure hard work is rewarded," Obama wrote in an op-ed announcing his decision. "Right now, too many Americans are working long days for less pay than they deserve. That's partly because we've failed to update overtime regulations for years--and an exemption meant for highly paid, white collar employees now leaves out workers making as little as $23,660 a year--no matter how many hours they work."
Jared Bernstein, a former White House adviser and now a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, explained in the Washington Post on Tuesday why protections for this kind of workers were initially imposed:
Because [the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938, legislation that included a national minimum wage and time-and-a-half pay for hourly and certain salaried workers after 40 hours of weekly work] needed to preempt the possibility that some employers might just label someone a salaried worker to avoid having to pay time-and-a-half. So a salary threshold was introduced, below which workers were automatically non-exempt. The problem is the threshold wasn't regularly adjusted for inflation, and while it has been sporadically raised, it has fallen well behind its historical levels, once you adjust for inflation (the new rule also proposes to index the new threshold to either price or wage growth; which one will be decided during the forthcoming comment period, where outside stakeholders can weigh in on the proposed rule).
According to Bernstein, who praised the move by Obama, it would be very difficult to "come up with a rule change or executive order--i.e., non-legislation--to lift the pay of this many middle-wage workers." It's especially important, he said, "because we live in a time when the bargaining power of many who depend on their paychecks is much diminished relative to the clout and power of those whose income derives from their wealth portfolios."
Sanders, who has made raising workers' wages and combating the nation's extreme levels of economic inequality a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, said Obama's move is good news for the nation's struggling workers.
"Businesses no longer will be able to shirk their responsibility to pay fair wages by simply labeling workers earning as little as $24,000-a-year as supervisors," said Sanders.
If it was up to him, however, Sanders said he would have raised the eligibility for the salary limit even higher--up from Obama's $970 per week to $1,090.
Earlier this year, Sanders and 25 other senators sent a letter to the White House urging the U.S. Department of Labor to modernize overtime regulations. In the letter, they detailed how many U.S. corporations had exploited antiquated regulations to avoid paying time-and-a-half for workers who put in more than 40 hours a week on the job.
"These long hours are straining middle-class workers and their families," the letter stated. "Since the 1970s, average salaries for middle-class individuals have dropped even while salaried workers have increased the hours they spend on the job. Strengthening overtime protections will help millions of middle-class families."
Though he was quick to note that even more Americans deserve fair compensation for working more than 40 hours per week, presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Tuesday endorsed President Barack Obama's announcement that he will soon update overtime pay regulations--a move that will give approximately 5 million middle-income workers a bump in their annual pay.
"We've got to keep making sure hard work is rewarded," Obama wrote in an op-ed announcing his decision. "Right now, too many Americans are working long days for less pay than they deserve. That's partly because we've failed to update overtime regulations for years--and an exemption meant for highly paid, white collar employees now leaves out workers making as little as $23,660 a year--no matter how many hours they work."
Jared Bernstein, a former White House adviser and now a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, explained in the Washington Post on Tuesday why protections for this kind of workers were initially imposed:
Because [the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938, legislation that included a national minimum wage and time-and-a-half pay for hourly and certain salaried workers after 40 hours of weekly work] needed to preempt the possibility that some employers might just label someone a salaried worker to avoid having to pay time-and-a-half. So a salary threshold was introduced, below which workers were automatically non-exempt. The problem is the threshold wasn't regularly adjusted for inflation, and while it has been sporadically raised, it has fallen well behind its historical levels, once you adjust for inflation (the new rule also proposes to index the new threshold to either price or wage growth; which one will be decided during the forthcoming comment period, where outside stakeholders can weigh in on the proposed rule).
According to Bernstein, who praised the move by Obama, it would be very difficult to "come up with a rule change or executive order--i.e., non-legislation--to lift the pay of this many middle-wage workers." It's especially important, he said, "because we live in a time when the bargaining power of many who depend on their paychecks is much diminished relative to the clout and power of those whose income derives from their wealth portfolios."
Sanders, who has made raising workers' wages and combating the nation's extreme levels of economic inequality a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, said Obama's move is good news for the nation's struggling workers.
"Businesses no longer will be able to shirk their responsibility to pay fair wages by simply labeling workers earning as little as $24,000-a-year as supervisors," said Sanders.
If it was up to him, however, Sanders said he would have raised the eligibility for the salary limit even higher--up from Obama's $970 per week to $1,090.
Earlier this year, Sanders and 25 other senators sent a letter to the White House urging the U.S. Department of Labor to modernize overtime regulations. In the letter, they detailed how many U.S. corporations had exploited antiquated regulations to avoid paying time-and-a-half for workers who put in more than 40 hours a week on the job.
"These long hours are straining middle-class workers and their families," the letter stated. "Since the 1970s, average salaries for middle-class individuals have dropped even while salaried workers have increased the hours they spend on the job. Strengthening overtime protections will help millions of middle-class families."