SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sunset at the Arctic Ocean, north of western Russia. (Photo: Mike Dunn, NC State Museum of Natural Sciences/NOAA Climate Program Office)
The rush for claims to the resource-rich Arctic continued on Tuesday when Russia submitted to the United Nations a renewed bid for territories, sparking environmental fears.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the "application covers an underwater space covering an area of about 1.2 million sq km at a distance of over 350 nautical miles from the coast."
Agence France-Presse reports that the Arctic shelf area it hopes to claim "would include the North Pole and potentially give Russia access to an estimated 4.9 billion tonnes of hydrocarbons, according to government estimates."
A 2008 U.S. Geological Survey assessment estimated the Arctic to hold about 13 percent of the world's undiscovered oil and 30 percent of its undiscovered natural gas.
Because its 2002 application for the area was rejected because of lack of evidence, Russia said its new claim is based on "extensive scientific data collected during many years of Arctic research."
Environmental group Greenpeace cautioned against exploiting the region for fossil fuel riches.
"The melting of the Arctic ice is uncovering a new and vulnerable sea, but countries like Russia and Norway want to turn it into the next Saudi Arabia," Greenpeace Russia Arctic campaigner Vladimir Chuprov said in a statement. "Unless we act together, this region could be dotted with oil wells and fishing fleets within our lifetimes."
"Today's news feel ominous, but it need not be," Chuprov stated. "The protection of the Arctic is a defining issue for our times and it can help bring countries together."
Canadian environmental activist David Suzuki has previously written that looking to mine Arctic fossil fuels in the face of its risks is "incomprehensible," and that the only sensible approach is to heed climate activists' advice and leave the fossil fuels in the ground.
"Responding to climate change and vanishing Arctic ice by gearing up to drill for the stuff at the root of the problem is insane. Unfortunately, many fossil fuel companies and governments are engaged in a mad rush to get as much oil and gas out of the ground -- no matter how difficult -- while there's still a market," Suzuki continued.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The rush for claims to the resource-rich Arctic continued on Tuesday when Russia submitted to the United Nations a renewed bid for territories, sparking environmental fears.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the "application covers an underwater space covering an area of about 1.2 million sq km at a distance of over 350 nautical miles from the coast."
Agence France-Presse reports that the Arctic shelf area it hopes to claim "would include the North Pole and potentially give Russia access to an estimated 4.9 billion tonnes of hydrocarbons, according to government estimates."
A 2008 U.S. Geological Survey assessment estimated the Arctic to hold about 13 percent of the world's undiscovered oil and 30 percent of its undiscovered natural gas.
Because its 2002 application for the area was rejected because of lack of evidence, Russia said its new claim is based on "extensive scientific data collected during many years of Arctic research."
Environmental group Greenpeace cautioned against exploiting the region for fossil fuel riches.
"The melting of the Arctic ice is uncovering a new and vulnerable sea, but countries like Russia and Norway want to turn it into the next Saudi Arabia," Greenpeace Russia Arctic campaigner Vladimir Chuprov said in a statement. "Unless we act together, this region could be dotted with oil wells and fishing fleets within our lifetimes."
"Today's news feel ominous, but it need not be," Chuprov stated. "The protection of the Arctic is a defining issue for our times and it can help bring countries together."
Canadian environmental activist David Suzuki has previously written that looking to mine Arctic fossil fuels in the face of its risks is "incomprehensible," and that the only sensible approach is to heed climate activists' advice and leave the fossil fuels in the ground.
"Responding to climate change and vanishing Arctic ice by gearing up to drill for the stuff at the root of the problem is insane. Unfortunately, many fossil fuel companies and governments are engaged in a mad rush to get as much oil and gas out of the ground -- no matter how difficult -- while there's still a market," Suzuki continued.
The rush for claims to the resource-rich Arctic continued on Tuesday when Russia submitted to the United Nations a renewed bid for territories, sparking environmental fears.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the "application covers an underwater space covering an area of about 1.2 million sq km at a distance of over 350 nautical miles from the coast."
Agence France-Presse reports that the Arctic shelf area it hopes to claim "would include the North Pole and potentially give Russia access to an estimated 4.9 billion tonnes of hydrocarbons, according to government estimates."
A 2008 U.S. Geological Survey assessment estimated the Arctic to hold about 13 percent of the world's undiscovered oil and 30 percent of its undiscovered natural gas.
Because its 2002 application for the area was rejected because of lack of evidence, Russia said its new claim is based on "extensive scientific data collected during many years of Arctic research."
Environmental group Greenpeace cautioned against exploiting the region for fossil fuel riches.
"The melting of the Arctic ice is uncovering a new and vulnerable sea, but countries like Russia and Norway want to turn it into the next Saudi Arabia," Greenpeace Russia Arctic campaigner Vladimir Chuprov said in a statement. "Unless we act together, this region could be dotted with oil wells and fishing fleets within our lifetimes."
"Today's news feel ominous, but it need not be," Chuprov stated. "The protection of the Arctic is a defining issue for our times and it can help bring countries together."
Canadian environmental activist David Suzuki has previously written that looking to mine Arctic fossil fuels in the face of its risks is "incomprehensible," and that the only sensible approach is to heed climate activists' advice and leave the fossil fuels in the ground.
"Responding to climate change and vanishing Arctic ice by gearing up to drill for the stuff at the root of the problem is insane. Unfortunately, many fossil fuel companies and governments are engaged in a mad rush to get as much oil and gas out of the ground -- no matter how difficult -- while there's still a market," Suzuki continued.