SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A federal court on Monday ruled that a Michigan man can challenge his inclusion on the government's "No Fly List," in a move that is being celebrated as a victory for the hundreds of U.S. citizens assigned to that secretive list, as well as the countless Arab-Americans routinely subjected to similar racial profiling.
Reversing a previous district court ruling, Circuit Judge Julia Smith Gibbons ordered (pdf) "further proceedings" in the case of Saeb Mokdad, a Lebanese-American who has been prohibited three times from boarding a plane to visit his family in Lebanon since September 2012.
The Arab-American Civil Rights League (ACRL), which is defending Mokdad, argues that his placement on the terrorist screening list is unconstitutional. The suit specifically singles out the U.S. Attorney General, the director of the FBI, and the director of the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), who are charged with placing people on the list. The ACRL also argues that the government must explain why Mokdad is included on the Terrorist Screening list and allow for a "meaningful opportunity" to contest his status.
Gibbons also ruled that a district court does have the authority to decide on such a case, which, as Salon reporter Ben Norton notes, "establish[es] a precedent for courts throughout the country."
There are as many as 47,000 people on the U.S. government's "No Fly List," according to documents leaked to The Intercept last year, including 800 Americans.
Following the court ruling, Mokdad's attorney, Nabih Ayad, said, "Today is a good day for our Constitution, a good day for Arab-Americans, and a good day for justice across this nation." Ayad added that the ruling confirms the ACRL's belief that "the unwarranted and unconstitutional profiling of an entire group of people simply based on their ethnicity must be struck down as a violation of this nation's highest law: the Constitution."
He continued, "By issuing today's ruling, the U.S. Sixth Circuit has dealt a huge blow against the continued and unjustifiable intimidation and harassment by the federal government against Arab Americans."
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
A federal court on Monday ruled that a Michigan man can challenge his inclusion on the government's "No Fly List," in a move that is being celebrated as a victory for the hundreds of U.S. citizens assigned to that secretive list, as well as the countless Arab-Americans routinely subjected to similar racial profiling.
Reversing a previous district court ruling, Circuit Judge Julia Smith Gibbons ordered (pdf) "further proceedings" in the case of Saeb Mokdad, a Lebanese-American who has been prohibited three times from boarding a plane to visit his family in Lebanon since September 2012.
The Arab-American Civil Rights League (ACRL), which is defending Mokdad, argues that his placement on the terrorist screening list is unconstitutional. The suit specifically singles out the U.S. Attorney General, the director of the FBI, and the director of the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), who are charged with placing people on the list. The ACRL also argues that the government must explain why Mokdad is included on the Terrorist Screening list and allow for a "meaningful opportunity" to contest his status.
Gibbons also ruled that a district court does have the authority to decide on such a case, which, as Salon reporter Ben Norton notes, "establish[es] a precedent for courts throughout the country."
There are as many as 47,000 people on the U.S. government's "No Fly List," according to documents leaked to The Intercept last year, including 800 Americans.
Following the court ruling, Mokdad's attorney, Nabih Ayad, said, "Today is a good day for our Constitution, a good day for Arab-Americans, and a good day for justice across this nation." Ayad added that the ruling confirms the ACRL's belief that "the unwarranted and unconstitutional profiling of an entire group of people simply based on their ethnicity must be struck down as a violation of this nation's highest law: the Constitution."
He continued, "By issuing today's ruling, the U.S. Sixth Circuit has dealt a huge blow against the continued and unjustifiable intimidation and harassment by the federal government against Arab Americans."
A federal court on Monday ruled that a Michigan man can challenge his inclusion on the government's "No Fly List," in a move that is being celebrated as a victory for the hundreds of U.S. citizens assigned to that secretive list, as well as the countless Arab-Americans routinely subjected to similar racial profiling.
Reversing a previous district court ruling, Circuit Judge Julia Smith Gibbons ordered (pdf) "further proceedings" in the case of Saeb Mokdad, a Lebanese-American who has been prohibited three times from boarding a plane to visit his family in Lebanon since September 2012.
The Arab-American Civil Rights League (ACRL), which is defending Mokdad, argues that his placement on the terrorist screening list is unconstitutional. The suit specifically singles out the U.S. Attorney General, the director of the FBI, and the director of the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), who are charged with placing people on the list. The ACRL also argues that the government must explain why Mokdad is included on the Terrorist Screening list and allow for a "meaningful opportunity" to contest his status.
Gibbons also ruled that a district court does have the authority to decide on such a case, which, as Salon reporter Ben Norton notes, "establish[es] a precedent for courts throughout the country."
There are as many as 47,000 people on the U.S. government's "No Fly List," according to documents leaked to The Intercept last year, including 800 Americans.
Following the court ruling, Mokdad's attorney, Nabih Ayad, said, "Today is a good day for our Constitution, a good day for Arab-Americans, and a good day for justice across this nation." Ayad added that the ruling confirms the ACRL's belief that "the unwarranted and unconstitutional profiling of an entire group of people simply based on their ethnicity must be struck down as a violation of this nation's highest law: the Constitution."
He continued, "By issuing today's ruling, the U.S. Sixth Circuit has dealt a huge blow against the continued and unjustifiable intimidation and harassment by the federal government against Arab Americans."