SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Though he acknowledged that Edward Snowden did indeed perform a "public service" by starting a national conversation about government surveillance, former Attorney General Eric Holder still insists that the NSA whistleblower should be prosecuted for supposedly "harming American interests."
"We can certainly argue about the way in which Snowden did what he did, but I think that he actually performed a public service by raising the debate that we engaged in and by the changes that we made," Holder told David Axelrod in an interview on CNN's "The Axe Files," which was published on Monday.
Nonetheless, Holder, who oversaw the U.S. Department of Justice in 2013 when Snowden's revelations were first made public, said that leaking government surveillance practices to media outlets was "inappropriate and illegal" and claimed that as a result "agents were put at risk, relationships with other countries were harmed, our ability to keep the American people safe was compromised."
Thus, Holder argued that Snowden, who has spent the last few years exiled in Russia, should return to the U.S. to face prosecution.
"I think that he's got to make a decision," he continued. "He's broken the law in my view. He needs to get lawyers, come on back, and decide, see what he wants to do: Go to trial, try to cut a deal. I think there has to be a consequence for what he has done."
"But," Holder added, "I think in deciding what an appropriate sentence should be, I think a judge could take into account the usefulness of having had that national debate."
Holder's comments come one week after a former Department of Defense official revealed that the Pentagon has deliberately harassed and silenced whistleblowers who attempted to raise concerns through the proper channels--information which, for many, validated Snowden's decision to go public with his leak.
Many advocates said Holder's remarks were "hypocritical" given the extreme number of whistleblowers that were prosecuted during his tenure. Among them, Thomas Drake--a former NSA employee who in 2010 was charged with violating the Espionage Act--wrote: "So there IS a public interest defense for Snowden? Holder's hypocrisy. Tell that to [whistleblowers] charged w/ espionage!"
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Though he acknowledged that Edward Snowden did indeed perform a "public service" by starting a national conversation about government surveillance, former Attorney General Eric Holder still insists that the NSA whistleblower should be prosecuted for supposedly "harming American interests."
"We can certainly argue about the way in which Snowden did what he did, but I think that he actually performed a public service by raising the debate that we engaged in and by the changes that we made," Holder told David Axelrod in an interview on CNN's "The Axe Files," which was published on Monday.
Nonetheless, Holder, who oversaw the U.S. Department of Justice in 2013 when Snowden's revelations were first made public, said that leaking government surveillance practices to media outlets was "inappropriate and illegal" and claimed that as a result "agents were put at risk, relationships with other countries were harmed, our ability to keep the American people safe was compromised."
Thus, Holder argued that Snowden, who has spent the last few years exiled in Russia, should return to the U.S. to face prosecution.
"I think that he's got to make a decision," he continued. "He's broken the law in my view. He needs to get lawyers, come on back, and decide, see what he wants to do: Go to trial, try to cut a deal. I think there has to be a consequence for what he has done."
"But," Holder added, "I think in deciding what an appropriate sentence should be, I think a judge could take into account the usefulness of having had that national debate."
Holder's comments come one week after a former Department of Defense official revealed that the Pentagon has deliberately harassed and silenced whistleblowers who attempted to raise concerns through the proper channels--information which, for many, validated Snowden's decision to go public with his leak.
Many advocates said Holder's remarks were "hypocritical" given the extreme number of whistleblowers that were prosecuted during his tenure. Among them, Thomas Drake--a former NSA employee who in 2010 was charged with violating the Espionage Act--wrote: "So there IS a public interest defense for Snowden? Holder's hypocrisy. Tell that to [whistleblowers] charged w/ espionage!"
Though he acknowledged that Edward Snowden did indeed perform a "public service" by starting a national conversation about government surveillance, former Attorney General Eric Holder still insists that the NSA whistleblower should be prosecuted for supposedly "harming American interests."
"We can certainly argue about the way in which Snowden did what he did, but I think that he actually performed a public service by raising the debate that we engaged in and by the changes that we made," Holder told David Axelrod in an interview on CNN's "The Axe Files," which was published on Monday.
Nonetheless, Holder, who oversaw the U.S. Department of Justice in 2013 when Snowden's revelations were first made public, said that leaking government surveillance practices to media outlets was "inappropriate and illegal" and claimed that as a result "agents were put at risk, relationships with other countries were harmed, our ability to keep the American people safe was compromised."
Thus, Holder argued that Snowden, who has spent the last few years exiled in Russia, should return to the U.S. to face prosecution.
"I think that he's got to make a decision," he continued. "He's broken the law in my view. He needs to get lawyers, come on back, and decide, see what he wants to do: Go to trial, try to cut a deal. I think there has to be a consequence for what he has done."
"But," Holder added, "I think in deciding what an appropriate sentence should be, I think a judge could take into account the usefulness of having had that national debate."
Holder's comments come one week after a former Department of Defense official revealed that the Pentagon has deliberately harassed and silenced whistleblowers who attempted to raise concerns through the proper channels--information which, for many, validated Snowden's decision to go public with his leak.
Many advocates said Holder's remarks were "hypocritical" given the extreme number of whistleblowers that were prosecuted during his tenure. Among them, Thomas Drake--a former NSA employee who in 2010 was charged with violating the Espionage Act--wrote: "So there IS a public interest defense for Snowden? Holder's hypocrisy. Tell that to [whistleblowers] charged w/ espionage!"