A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the DAPA and DACA programs.
(Photo: Bread for the World/flickr/cc)
Jun 23, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court has deadlocked on President Barack Obama's executive order on immigration.
The 4-4 tie on United States v. Texas (pdf) sets no precedent. Still, it leaves in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocks the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) order from going into effect, meaning five million undocumented immigrants are now at risk of deportation and being separated from their families.
In a press conference following the decision, Obama said, "This is a very clear reminder of why it's so important for the Supreme Court to have a full bench," castigating Republicans for refusing to meet with his Judge Merrick Garland, his nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
Ana Maria Archila, co-executive director at the Center for Popular Democracy, said in a statement Thursday, "Today, we mourn the Supreme Court deadlock on President Obama's executive order. The lack of a decision allows the politically motivated ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to stand. Millions of immigrant families have lived in limbo for the past 18 months, and this decision prolongs their agony."
"If the highest court in the land cannot find a majority for justice and compassion, there is something truly broken in our system of laws, checks and balances," she said.
The ACLU's Immigration Rights Project director Cecillia Wang added, "Today's non-decision in the DAPA case leaves the legal questions about the president's immigration authority unanswered. But by leaving in place the injunction issued by the district judge, today's 4-4 tie has a profound impact on millions of American families whose lives will remain in limbo and who will now continue the fight.
"In setting the DAPA guidelines, President Obama exercised the same prosecutorial discretion his predecessors have wielded without controversy, and ultimately the courts should hold that the action was lawful," Wang said.
According toSCOTUSblog, there will be a later appeal, so the Obama immigration policy "will be revived if [Hillary] Clinton wins and a Democratic nominee provides the 5th vote."
Several cases have deadlocked since Scalia's death in February.
DAPA was an expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which prevented the deportation of undocumented youths brought to the U.S. as children.
Texas led 26 Republican-controlled states in challenging the order, announced in November 2014. The previous ruling by a New Orleans federal appeals court stated that the Obama administration lacked the authority to shield the millions of immigrants from deportation and make them eligible for work permits without Congressional approval.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
barack obamacenter for popular democracyimmigrationundocumented immigrantsus supreme courtimmigrant rights
The U.S. Supreme Court has deadlocked on President Barack Obama's executive order on immigration.
The 4-4 tie on United States v. Texas (pdf) sets no precedent. Still, it leaves in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocks the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) order from going into effect, meaning five million undocumented immigrants are now at risk of deportation and being separated from their families.
In a press conference following the decision, Obama said, "This is a very clear reminder of why it's so important for the Supreme Court to have a full bench," castigating Republicans for refusing to meet with his Judge Merrick Garland, his nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
Ana Maria Archila, co-executive director at the Center for Popular Democracy, said in a statement Thursday, "Today, we mourn the Supreme Court deadlock on President Obama's executive order. The lack of a decision allows the politically motivated ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to stand. Millions of immigrant families have lived in limbo for the past 18 months, and this decision prolongs their agony."
"If the highest court in the land cannot find a majority for justice and compassion, there is something truly broken in our system of laws, checks and balances," she said.
The ACLU's Immigration Rights Project director Cecillia Wang added, "Today's non-decision in the DAPA case leaves the legal questions about the president's immigration authority unanswered. But by leaving in place the injunction issued by the district judge, today's 4-4 tie has a profound impact on millions of American families whose lives will remain in limbo and who will now continue the fight.
"In setting the DAPA guidelines, President Obama exercised the same prosecutorial discretion his predecessors have wielded without controversy, and ultimately the courts should hold that the action was lawful," Wang said.
According toSCOTUSblog, there will be a later appeal, so the Obama immigration policy "will be revived if [Hillary] Clinton wins and a Democratic nominee provides the 5th vote."
Several cases have deadlocked since Scalia's death in February.
DAPA was an expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which prevented the deportation of undocumented youths brought to the U.S. as children.
Texas led 26 Republican-controlled states in challenging the order, announced in November 2014. The previous ruling by a New Orleans federal appeals court stated that the Obama administration lacked the authority to shield the millions of immigrants from deportation and make them eligible for work permits without Congressional approval.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court has deadlocked on President Barack Obama's executive order on immigration.
The 4-4 tie on United States v. Texas (pdf) sets no precedent. Still, it leaves in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocks the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) order from going into effect, meaning five million undocumented immigrants are now at risk of deportation and being separated from their families.
In a press conference following the decision, Obama said, "This is a very clear reminder of why it's so important for the Supreme Court to have a full bench," castigating Republicans for refusing to meet with his Judge Merrick Garland, his nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
Ana Maria Archila, co-executive director at the Center for Popular Democracy, said in a statement Thursday, "Today, we mourn the Supreme Court deadlock on President Obama's executive order. The lack of a decision allows the politically motivated ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to stand. Millions of immigrant families have lived in limbo for the past 18 months, and this decision prolongs their agony."
"If the highest court in the land cannot find a majority for justice and compassion, there is something truly broken in our system of laws, checks and balances," she said.
The ACLU's Immigration Rights Project director Cecillia Wang added, "Today's non-decision in the DAPA case leaves the legal questions about the president's immigration authority unanswered. But by leaving in place the injunction issued by the district judge, today's 4-4 tie has a profound impact on millions of American families whose lives will remain in limbo and who will now continue the fight.
"In setting the DAPA guidelines, President Obama exercised the same prosecutorial discretion his predecessors have wielded without controversy, and ultimately the courts should hold that the action was lawful," Wang said.
According toSCOTUSblog, there will be a later appeal, so the Obama immigration policy "will be revived if [Hillary] Clinton wins and a Democratic nominee provides the 5th vote."
Several cases have deadlocked since Scalia's death in February.
DAPA was an expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which prevented the deportation of undocumented youths brought to the U.S. as children.
Texas led 26 Republican-controlled states in challenging the order, announced in November 2014. The previous ruling by a New Orleans federal appeals court stated that the Obama administration lacked the authority to shield the millions of immigrants from deportation and make them eligible for work permits without Congressional approval.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.