SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The public cost of cleaning up the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster topped Y=4.2 trillion (roughly $40 billion) as of March, and is expected to keep climbing, the Japan Times reported on Sunday.
That includes costs for radioactive decontamination and compensation payments. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) will sell off its shares to eventually pay back the cost of decontamination and waste disposal, but the Environment Ministry expects that the overall price of those activities could exceed what TEPCO would get for its shares.
Meanwhile, the taxpayer burden is expected to increase and TEPCO is asking for additional help from the government.
The Times reports:
The government estimates the proceeds from TEPCO share sale at Y=2.5 trillion, but to generate the estimated gain, the TEPCO stock price needs to trade at around Y=1,050, up sharply from current market levels of some Y=360.
In addition, the Environment Ministry expects that the cumulative total of decontamination and related costs could surpass the estimated share proceeds by the March 2017 end of the current fiscal year.
[....] TEPCO and six other power utilities charged their customers at least Y=327 billion in electricity rate hikes after Japan's worst-ever nuclear accident. Moreover, consumers paid Y=219.3 billion or more for TEPCO, chiefly to finance the maintenance of equipment to clean up radioactive water at the plant and the operation of call centers to deal with inquiries about compensation payments.
Moreover, as Deutsche Wellenoted on Monday, problems still persist at the nuclear plant, most notably with the "highly contaminated" water being stored in tanks at the site.
"There are numerous problems that are all interconnected, but one of the biggest that we are facing at the moment is the highly contaminated water that is being stored in huge steel tanks at the site," Aileen Mioko-Smith, an anti-nuclear activist with the group Green Action Japan, told DW. "They are running out of space at the site to put these tanks, the water that is being generated on a daily basis means they have to keep constructing more, and the ones that are not welded have a history of leaking."
"The situation with contaminated water at the site is a ticking time bomb and they don't seem to know what they can do--other than to construct more tanks," she said.
Correction: An earlier version of this article miscalculated the conversion rates of the cleanup costs.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
The public cost of cleaning up the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster topped Y=4.2 trillion (roughly $40 billion) as of March, and is expected to keep climbing, the Japan Times reported on Sunday.
That includes costs for radioactive decontamination and compensation payments. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) will sell off its shares to eventually pay back the cost of decontamination and waste disposal, but the Environment Ministry expects that the overall price of those activities could exceed what TEPCO would get for its shares.
Meanwhile, the taxpayer burden is expected to increase and TEPCO is asking for additional help from the government.
The Times reports:
The government estimates the proceeds from TEPCO share sale at Y=2.5 trillion, but to generate the estimated gain, the TEPCO stock price needs to trade at around Y=1,050, up sharply from current market levels of some Y=360.
In addition, the Environment Ministry expects that the cumulative total of decontamination and related costs could surpass the estimated share proceeds by the March 2017 end of the current fiscal year.
[....] TEPCO and six other power utilities charged their customers at least Y=327 billion in electricity rate hikes after Japan's worst-ever nuclear accident. Moreover, consumers paid Y=219.3 billion or more for TEPCO, chiefly to finance the maintenance of equipment to clean up radioactive water at the plant and the operation of call centers to deal with inquiries about compensation payments.
Moreover, as Deutsche Wellenoted on Monday, problems still persist at the nuclear plant, most notably with the "highly contaminated" water being stored in tanks at the site.
"There are numerous problems that are all interconnected, but one of the biggest that we are facing at the moment is the highly contaminated water that is being stored in huge steel tanks at the site," Aileen Mioko-Smith, an anti-nuclear activist with the group Green Action Japan, told DW. "They are running out of space at the site to put these tanks, the water that is being generated on a daily basis means they have to keep constructing more, and the ones that are not welded have a history of leaking."
"The situation with contaminated water at the site is a ticking time bomb and they don't seem to know what they can do--other than to construct more tanks," she said.
Correction: An earlier version of this article miscalculated the conversion rates of the cleanup costs.
The public cost of cleaning up the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster topped Y=4.2 trillion (roughly $40 billion) as of March, and is expected to keep climbing, the Japan Times reported on Sunday.
That includes costs for radioactive decontamination and compensation payments. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) will sell off its shares to eventually pay back the cost of decontamination and waste disposal, but the Environment Ministry expects that the overall price of those activities could exceed what TEPCO would get for its shares.
Meanwhile, the taxpayer burden is expected to increase and TEPCO is asking for additional help from the government.
The Times reports:
The government estimates the proceeds from TEPCO share sale at Y=2.5 trillion, but to generate the estimated gain, the TEPCO stock price needs to trade at around Y=1,050, up sharply from current market levels of some Y=360.
In addition, the Environment Ministry expects that the cumulative total of decontamination and related costs could surpass the estimated share proceeds by the March 2017 end of the current fiscal year.
[....] TEPCO and six other power utilities charged their customers at least Y=327 billion in electricity rate hikes after Japan's worst-ever nuclear accident. Moreover, consumers paid Y=219.3 billion or more for TEPCO, chiefly to finance the maintenance of equipment to clean up radioactive water at the plant and the operation of call centers to deal with inquiries about compensation payments.
Moreover, as Deutsche Wellenoted on Monday, problems still persist at the nuclear plant, most notably with the "highly contaminated" water being stored in tanks at the site.
"There are numerous problems that are all interconnected, but one of the biggest that we are facing at the moment is the highly contaminated water that is being stored in huge steel tanks at the site," Aileen Mioko-Smith, an anti-nuclear activist with the group Green Action Japan, told DW. "They are running out of space at the site to put these tanks, the water that is being generated on a daily basis means they have to keep constructing more, and the ones that are not welded have a history of leaking."
"The situation with contaminated water at the site is a ticking time bomb and they don't seem to know what they can do--other than to construct more tanks," she said.
Correction: An earlier version of this article miscalculated the conversion rates of the cleanup costs.