SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Walter Scott appears in his Coast Guard uniform in this undated photo. (Credit: The Scott family)
An 'Abomination' of Justice: Mistrial Declared Over Police Shooting of Walter Scott
Video showed Scott being shot five times in the back while running from North Charleston police officer Michael Slager
Dec 05, 2016
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBCnotes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBCnotes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBCnotes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.