SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBCnotes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBCnotes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBCnotes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028