SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Walter Scott appears in his Coast Guard uniform in this undated photo. (Credit: The Scott family)
An 'Abomination' of Justice: Mistrial Declared Over Police Shooting of Walter Scott
Video showed Scott being shot five times in the back while running from North Charleston police officer Michael Slager
Dec 05, 2016
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBC notes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBC notes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
The judge presiding over the case of Walter Scott, who in April 2015 was shot in the back by former South Carolina police officer Michael Slager, was forced to declare a mistrial on Monday after the jury announced that they were unable to come "to a unanimous decision."
"The court therefore must declare a mistrial in this case and I so declare that is case is mistried," Circuit Judge Clifton Newman declared after the jury announced the deadlock. The news comes after a single holdout juror sent a letter to Newman on Friday saying that he "cannot in good conscience consider a guilty verdict."
The defense had reportedly "claimed that [Slager] feared for his life when 50-year-old Walter Scott got control of the officer's stun gun and pointed it at him. But," NBC notes, "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager."
Indeed, the shooting--which was captured on video--catalyzed fierce local and national protests against police brutality, particularly against people of color, and spurred calls for a widespread overhaul of the justice system.
However, unlike the cases of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and countless others in which the police officers were not indicted, a federal grand jury charged Slager on three counts: "a federal civil rights offense for the shooting, excessive force without legal justification, and obstruction of justice for making false statements to South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigators," as Common Dreams previously reported.
According to reports from the courtroom, the Scott family walked "out of the room to silence in [the] hall." Afterwards, Walter Scott's mother, Judy Scott, told reporters: "He will get his just reward...I'm just waiting on the Lord...It's not over until God says it's over."
Many others took to social media to voice their outrage over the ruling:
\u201cSeriously a mistrial?After that vid of #WalterScott's murder?So can I go shoot someone in the back&say I was scared? #SlagerTrial was a sham\u201d— Bassem Masri (@Bassem Masri) 1480973093
\u201cIf this isn't murder, I don't know what is #walterscott\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1480971470
\u201cIf unarmed man running AWAY from you causes you to fear for your life, you have NO BUSINESS being a cop. Period. #WalterScott #charleston\u201d— Ron Asher (@Ron Asher) 1480971028
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.