SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Love won again today," said Lambda Legal CEO Rachel B. Tiven. (Photo: mathiaswasik/flickr/cc)
In a groundbreaking decision for equality, a federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that LGBTQ people cannot be fired for their sexual orientation on the grounds that it violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act--a ruling that sets up a possible Supreme Court showdown.
The U.S. Appeals Court for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago found 8-3 that Kimberly Hively, an instructor at Ivy Tech Community College in South Bend, Indiana, was denied a full-time position because she was a lesbian, which the panel said went against Title VII of the 1964 law.
Although the Civil Rights Act does not explicitly block discrimination on the basis of sexuality, it does prohibit it on the basis of gender. The court found that Hively was passed over because of gender prejudice.
"Hively represents the ultimate case of failure to conform to the female stereotype... she is not heterosexual," Chief Judge Diane Wood wrote in the opinion. "Our panel described the line between a gender nonconformity claim and one based on sexual orientation as gossamer-thin; we conclude that it does not exist at all."
"Hively's claim is no different from the claims brought by women who were rejected for jobs in traditionally male workplaces, such as fire departments, construction, and policing," Wood wrote. "The employers in those cases were policing the boundaries of what jobs or behaviors they found acceptable for a woman (or in some cases, for a man)."
The Seventh Circuit is the highest court thus far to rule on the issue. But it conflicts with a decision last month by the 11th Circuit, which found in a separate case that that the Civil Rights Act did not protect sexual orientation.
A split in the circuits could lead to a confrontation in the Supreme Court.
"I have been saying all this time that what happened to me wasn't right and was illegal," said Hively. "No one should be fired for being lesbian, gay, or transgender like happened to me and it's incredibly powerful to know that the law now protects me and other LGBT workers."
Hively filed suit in 2014. She alleged she was denied a full-time position after she was seen kissing her then-girlfriend in the parking lot. The case was dismissed by a trial court, but the LGBTQ-focused law firm Lambda Legal appealed in 2015.
"Love won again today," said Lambda Legal CEO Rachel B. Tiven. "Kim Hively loved her job teaching math at Ivy Tech Community College, but she was fired because she is a lesbian. Today the Seventh Circuit said clearly: that's wrong. Our movement is about love and pride. Pride in yourself and your work, and the freedom to love and to be treated equally."
Greg Nevins, director of the organization's Employment Fairness program, added, "This decision is gamechanger for lesbian and gay employees facing discrimination in the workplace and sends a clear message to employers: it is against the law to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a groundbreaking decision for equality, a federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that LGBTQ people cannot be fired for their sexual orientation on the grounds that it violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act--a ruling that sets up a possible Supreme Court showdown.
The U.S. Appeals Court for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago found 8-3 that Kimberly Hively, an instructor at Ivy Tech Community College in South Bend, Indiana, was denied a full-time position because she was a lesbian, which the panel said went against Title VII of the 1964 law.
Although the Civil Rights Act does not explicitly block discrimination on the basis of sexuality, it does prohibit it on the basis of gender. The court found that Hively was passed over because of gender prejudice.
"Hively represents the ultimate case of failure to conform to the female stereotype... she is not heterosexual," Chief Judge Diane Wood wrote in the opinion. "Our panel described the line between a gender nonconformity claim and one based on sexual orientation as gossamer-thin; we conclude that it does not exist at all."
"Hively's claim is no different from the claims brought by women who were rejected for jobs in traditionally male workplaces, such as fire departments, construction, and policing," Wood wrote. "The employers in those cases were policing the boundaries of what jobs or behaviors they found acceptable for a woman (or in some cases, for a man)."
The Seventh Circuit is the highest court thus far to rule on the issue. But it conflicts with a decision last month by the 11th Circuit, which found in a separate case that that the Civil Rights Act did not protect sexual orientation.
A split in the circuits could lead to a confrontation in the Supreme Court.
"I have been saying all this time that what happened to me wasn't right and was illegal," said Hively. "No one should be fired for being lesbian, gay, or transgender like happened to me and it's incredibly powerful to know that the law now protects me and other LGBT workers."
Hively filed suit in 2014. She alleged she was denied a full-time position after she was seen kissing her then-girlfriend in the parking lot. The case was dismissed by a trial court, but the LGBTQ-focused law firm Lambda Legal appealed in 2015.
"Love won again today," said Lambda Legal CEO Rachel B. Tiven. "Kim Hively loved her job teaching math at Ivy Tech Community College, but she was fired because she is a lesbian. Today the Seventh Circuit said clearly: that's wrong. Our movement is about love and pride. Pride in yourself and your work, and the freedom to love and to be treated equally."
Greg Nevins, director of the organization's Employment Fairness program, added, "This decision is gamechanger for lesbian and gay employees facing discrimination in the workplace and sends a clear message to employers: it is against the law to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation."
In a groundbreaking decision for equality, a federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that LGBTQ people cannot be fired for their sexual orientation on the grounds that it violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act--a ruling that sets up a possible Supreme Court showdown.
The U.S. Appeals Court for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago found 8-3 that Kimberly Hively, an instructor at Ivy Tech Community College in South Bend, Indiana, was denied a full-time position because she was a lesbian, which the panel said went against Title VII of the 1964 law.
Although the Civil Rights Act does not explicitly block discrimination on the basis of sexuality, it does prohibit it on the basis of gender. The court found that Hively was passed over because of gender prejudice.
"Hively represents the ultimate case of failure to conform to the female stereotype... she is not heterosexual," Chief Judge Diane Wood wrote in the opinion. "Our panel described the line between a gender nonconformity claim and one based on sexual orientation as gossamer-thin; we conclude that it does not exist at all."
"Hively's claim is no different from the claims brought by women who were rejected for jobs in traditionally male workplaces, such as fire departments, construction, and policing," Wood wrote. "The employers in those cases were policing the boundaries of what jobs or behaviors they found acceptable for a woman (or in some cases, for a man)."
The Seventh Circuit is the highest court thus far to rule on the issue. But it conflicts with a decision last month by the 11th Circuit, which found in a separate case that that the Civil Rights Act did not protect sexual orientation.
A split in the circuits could lead to a confrontation in the Supreme Court.
"I have been saying all this time that what happened to me wasn't right and was illegal," said Hively. "No one should be fired for being lesbian, gay, or transgender like happened to me and it's incredibly powerful to know that the law now protects me and other LGBT workers."
Hively filed suit in 2014. She alleged she was denied a full-time position after she was seen kissing her then-girlfriend in the parking lot. The case was dismissed by a trial court, but the LGBTQ-focused law firm Lambda Legal appealed in 2015.
"Love won again today," said Lambda Legal CEO Rachel B. Tiven. "Kim Hively loved her job teaching math at Ivy Tech Community College, but she was fired because she is a lesbian. Today the Seventh Circuit said clearly: that's wrong. Our movement is about love and pride. Pride in yourself and your work, and the freedom to love and to be treated equally."
Greg Nevins, director of the organization's Employment Fairness program, added, "This decision is gamechanger for lesbian and gay employees facing discrimination in the workplace and sends a clear message to employers: it is against the law to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation."