SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Trump administration in the United States has prepared criminal charges in order to arrest Julian Assange, founder and publisher of the media outlet WikiLeaks, CNN reported on Thursday.
Citing "U.S. officials familiar with the matter," CNN reports the Justice Department "investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010"--which is around the time when WikiLeaks first gained international attention after it published thousands of leaked classified documents, including footage of military helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq. U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning was ultimately convicted for being the source of those leaks and is still serving a sentence in a U.S. military prison.
\u201cUS admits it has charges to arrest Assange according to CNN https://t.co/qopTAaRbPc\n\nContribute to his defense: https://t.co/77ASQfcNXt\u201d— WikiLeaks (@WikiLeaks) 1492727235
Though U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday said that arresting Assange was a "priority," nobody in the government has yet gone public with the filing of official charges or the issuance of an arrest warrant. A lawyer representing Assange said neither he nor his client has been notified of any charges.
"We've had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr. Assange," attorney Barry Pollack told CNN. "They've been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr. Assange's status is in any pending investigations. There's no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher."
Assange has long believed the U.S. maintains a sealed indictment against him, the key reason he has remained under asylum protection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Last week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo stirred condemnation from free speech and journalistic watchdogs by threatening Assange and describing WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency."
In response to Thursday's reporting, Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said charges against the WikiLeaks' publisher would send a chilling message and called on journalists and other media outlets to denounce any such move:
\u201cThis would be incredibly dangerous for press freedom & all reporters. I hope even WL's harshest critics in the media will denounce this. https://t.co/7hho9gGmJ1\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
\u201cAs the Washington Post notes, once WikiLeaks is prosecuted, it will make it much easier for the Trump admin to go after other news orgs too.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
If the reporting is accurate, it remains unclear exactly how the U.S. would hope to take Assange into custody. As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted:
\u201cThe UK early on contemplated breaking into Ecuador embassy to seize Assange. Would US do that now? A deal with Ecuador? Or just for show? https://t.co/0O3MeJUVdf\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1492726363
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
The Trump administration in the United States has prepared criminal charges in order to arrest Julian Assange, founder and publisher of the media outlet WikiLeaks, CNN reported on Thursday.
Citing "U.S. officials familiar with the matter," CNN reports the Justice Department "investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010"--which is around the time when WikiLeaks first gained international attention after it published thousands of leaked classified documents, including footage of military helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq. U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning was ultimately convicted for being the source of those leaks and is still serving a sentence in a U.S. military prison.
\u201cUS admits it has charges to arrest Assange according to CNN https://t.co/qopTAaRbPc\n\nContribute to his defense: https://t.co/77ASQfcNXt\u201d— WikiLeaks (@WikiLeaks) 1492727235
Though U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday said that arresting Assange was a "priority," nobody in the government has yet gone public with the filing of official charges or the issuance of an arrest warrant. A lawyer representing Assange said neither he nor his client has been notified of any charges.
"We've had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr. Assange," attorney Barry Pollack told CNN. "They've been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr. Assange's status is in any pending investigations. There's no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher."
Assange has long believed the U.S. maintains a sealed indictment against him, the key reason he has remained under asylum protection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Last week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo stirred condemnation from free speech and journalistic watchdogs by threatening Assange and describing WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency."
In response to Thursday's reporting, Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said charges against the WikiLeaks' publisher would send a chilling message and called on journalists and other media outlets to denounce any such move:
\u201cThis would be incredibly dangerous for press freedom & all reporters. I hope even WL's harshest critics in the media will denounce this. https://t.co/7hho9gGmJ1\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
\u201cAs the Washington Post notes, once WikiLeaks is prosecuted, it will make it much easier for the Trump admin to go after other news orgs too.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
If the reporting is accurate, it remains unclear exactly how the U.S. would hope to take Assange into custody. As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted:
\u201cThe UK early on contemplated breaking into Ecuador embassy to seize Assange. Would US do that now? A deal with Ecuador? Or just for show? https://t.co/0O3MeJUVdf\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1492726363
The Trump administration in the United States has prepared criminal charges in order to arrest Julian Assange, founder and publisher of the media outlet WikiLeaks, CNN reported on Thursday.
Citing "U.S. officials familiar with the matter," CNN reports the Justice Department "investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010"--which is around the time when WikiLeaks first gained international attention after it published thousands of leaked classified documents, including footage of military helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq. U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning was ultimately convicted for being the source of those leaks and is still serving a sentence in a U.S. military prison.
\u201cUS admits it has charges to arrest Assange according to CNN https://t.co/qopTAaRbPc\n\nContribute to his defense: https://t.co/77ASQfcNXt\u201d— WikiLeaks (@WikiLeaks) 1492727235
Though U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday said that arresting Assange was a "priority," nobody in the government has yet gone public with the filing of official charges or the issuance of an arrest warrant. A lawyer representing Assange said neither he nor his client has been notified of any charges.
"We've had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr. Assange," attorney Barry Pollack told CNN. "They've been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr. Assange's status is in any pending investigations. There's no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher."
Assange has long believed the U.S. maintains a sealed indictment against him, the key reason he has remained under asylum protection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Last week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo stirred condemnation from free speech and journalistic watchdogs by threatening Assange and describing WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency."
In response to Thursday's reporting, Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said charges against the WikiLeaks' publisher would send a chilling message and called on journalists and other media outlets to denounce any such move:
\u201cThis would be incredibly dangerous for press freedom & all reporters. I hope even WL's harshest critics in the media will denounce this. https://t.co/7hho9gGmJ1\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
\u201cAs the Washington Post notes, once WikiLeaks is prosecuted, it will make it much easier for the Trump admin to go after other news orgs too.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
If the reporting is accurate, it remains unclear exactly how the U.S. would hope to take Assange into custody. As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted:
\u201cThe UK early on contemplated breaking into Ecuador embassy to seize Assange. Would US do that now? A deal with Ecuador? Or just for show? https://t.co/0O3MeJUVdf\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1492726363