Julian Assange leaving the Royal Court of Justice on July 13th, 2011. (Photo: acidpolly/flickr/cc)
Apr 20, 2017
The Trump administration in the United States has prepared criminal charges in order to arrest Julian Assange, founder and publisher of the media outlet WikiLeaks, CNN reported on Thursday.
Citing "U.S. officials familiar with the matter," CNN reports the Justice Department "investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010"--which is around the time when WikiLeaks first gained international attention after it published thousands of leaked classified documents, including footage of military helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq. U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning was ultimately convicted for being the source of those leaks and is still serving a sentence in a U.S. military prison.
\u201cUS admits it has charges to arrest Assange according to CNN https://t.co/qopTAaRbPc\n\nContribute to his defense: https://t.co/77ASQfcNXt\u201d— WikiLeaks (@WikiLeaks) 1492727235
Though U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday said that arresting Assange was a "priority," nobody in the government has yet gone public with the filing of official charges or the issuance of an arrest warrant. A lawyer representing Assange said neither he nor his client has been notified of any charges.
"We've had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr. Assange," attorney Barry Pollack told CNN. "They've been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr. Assange's status is in any pending investigations. There's no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher."
Assange has long believed the U.S. maintains a sealed indictment against him, the key reason he has remained under asylum protection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Last week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo stirred condemnation from free speech and journalistic watchdogs by threatening Assange and describing WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency."
In response to Thursday's reporting, Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said charges against the WikiLeaks' publisher would send a chilling message and called on journalists and other media outlets to denounce any such move:
\u201cThis would be incredibly dangerous for press freedom & all reporters. I hope even WL's harshest critics in the media will denounce this. https://t.co/7hho9gGmJ1\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
\u201cAs the Washington Post notes, once WikiLeaks is prosecuted, it will make it much easier for the Trump admin to go after other news orgs too.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
If the reporting is accurate, it remains unclear exactly how the U.S. would hope to take Assange into custody. As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted:
\u201cThe UK early on contemplated breaking into Ecuador embassy to seize Assange. Would US do that now? A deal with Ecuador? Or just for show? https://t.co/0O3MeJUVdf\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1492726363
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Trump administration in the United States has prepared criminal charges in order to arrest Julian Assange, founder and publisher of the media outlet WikiLeaks, CNN reported on Thursday.
Citing "U.S. officials familiar with the matter," CNN reports the Justice Department "investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010"--which is around the time when WikiLeaks first gained international attention after it published thousands of leaked classified documents, including footage of military helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq. U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning was ultimately convicted for being the source of those leaks and is still serving a sentence in a U.S. military prison.
\u201cUS admits it has charges to arrest Assange according to CNN https://t.co/qopTAaRbPc\n\nContribute to his defense: https://t.co/77ASQfcNXt\u201d— WikiLeaks (@WikiLeaks) 1492727235
Though U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday said that arresting Assange was a "priority," nobody in the government has yet gone public with the filing of official charges or the issuance of an arrest warrant. A lawyer representing Assange said neither he nor his client has been notified of any charges.
"We've had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr. Assange," attorney Barry Pollack told CNN. "They've been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr. Assange's status is in any pending investigations. There's no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher."
Assange has long believed the U.S. maintains a sealed indictment against him, the key reason he has remained under asylum protection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Last week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo stirred condemnation from free speech and journalistic watchdogs by threatening Assange and describing WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency."
In response to Thursday's reporting, Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said charges against the WikiLeaks' publisher would send a chilling message and called on journalists and other media outlets to denounce any such move:
\u201cThis would be incredibly dangerous for press freedom & all reporters. I hope even WL's harshest critics in the media will denounce this. https://t.co/7hho9gGmJ1\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
\u201cAs the Washington Post notes, once WikiLeaks is prosecuted, it will make it much easier for the Trump admin to go after other news orgs too.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
If the reporting is accurate, it remains unclear exactly how the U.S. would hope to take Assange into custody. As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted:
\u201cThe UK early on contemplated breaking into Ecuador embassy to seize Assange. Would US do that now? A deal with Ecuador? Or just for show? https://t.co/0O3MeJUVdf\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1492726363
The Trump administration in the United States has prepared criminal charges in order to arrest Julian Assange, founder and publisher of the media outlet WikiLeaks, CNN reported on Thursday.
Citing "U.S. officials familiar with the matter," CNN reports the Justice Department "investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010"--which is around the time when WikiLeaks first gained international attention after it published thousands of leaked classified documents, including footage of military helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq. U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning was ultimately convicted for being the source of those leaks and is still serving a sentence in a U.S. military prison.
\u201cUS admits it has charges to arrest Assange according to CNN https://t.co/qopTAaRbPc\n\nContribute to his defense: https://t.co/77ASQfcNXt\u201d— WikiLeaks (@WikiLeaks) 1492727235
Though U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday said that arresting Assange was a "priority," nobody in the government has yet gone public with the filing of official charges or the issuance of an arrest warrant. A lawyer representing Assange said neither he nor his client has been notified of any charges.
"We've had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr. Assange," attorney Barry Pollack told CNN. "They've been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr. Assange's status is in any pending investigations. There's no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher."
Assange has long believed the U.S. maintains a sealed indictment against him, the key reason he has remained under asylum protection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Last week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo stirred condemnation from free speech and journalistic watchdogs by threatening Assange and describing WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency."
In response to Thursday's reporting, Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said charges against the WikiLeaks' publisher would send a chilling message and called on journalists and other media outlets to denounce any such move:
\u201cThis would be incredibly dangerous for press freedom & all reporters. I hope even WL's harshest critics in the media will denounce this. https://t.co/7hho9gGmJ1\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
\u201cAs the Washington Post notes, once WikiLeaks is prosecuted, it will make it much easier for the Trump admin to go after other news orgs too.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1492726864
If the reporting is accurate, it remains unclear exactly how the U.S. would hope to take Assange into custody. As journalist Glenn Greenwald noted:
\u201cThe UK early on contemplated breaking into Ecuador embassy to seize Assange. Would US do that now? A deal with Ecuador? Or just for show? https://t.co/0O3MeJUVdf\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1492726363
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.