SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Warren: Trump Climate Move a "Gift" to Right-Wing Donors, Not American Workers
In withdrawing from the climate pact, Trump caved to big money interests, Senator Warren argued
Jun 02, 2017
Adding to the massive wave of outrage sparked by President Donald Trump's "stupid and reckless" decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday denounced the move as a "big gift to Republican donors" at the 'Joyous Persistence' rally in San Francisco.
In response to critics like Warren and countless others, White House officials and Trump allies have attempted to defend the withdrawal by characterizing it as part of a broader plan to protect American jobs and spur economic growth.
"This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Warren, a leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who is widely viewed as a potential 2020 presidential contender, forcefully dismissed this reasoning as a trope perpetuated in service of the donor class.
"[T]he Republicans have been framing this for a long time, jobs versus the environment," she said. "It is not. This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
For weeks, Trump was lobbied by a coalition consisting of, among others, his daughter Ivanka, Pope Francis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all of whom urged him to stick with the international community by firmly committing to the climate pact. In the end, however, it was the "big oil darlings" who won out, as the Guardian put it on Thursday.
The 22 Republican senators who signed a letter in May urging Trump to withdraw from the agreement received "a total of $10,694,284" in donations from oil, gas, and coal interests "over the past three election cycles," the Guardian added.
But, as some commentators pointed out, one did not need to look far to determine who would benefit from Trump's decision to side with big money over the climate. Attending Trump's "fact-free speech" in the Rose Garden of the White House was Thomas Pyle, the president of the American Energy Alliance. The fossil fuel industry group, as Politico reported, "has received some of its past funding from billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch."
For Warren, this is an indication that Trump's assault on the environment is part of a larger attempt to undermine the fundamental tenets of democracy. Trump's decision, Warren said, is "symptomatic of what's wrong" with American politics. Corporate cash, she added, "slithers through Washington like a snake."
In closing, the Massachusetts senator told the crowd gathered in the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre to resist the administration and to not treat politics as "something that just happens every four years."
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Adding to the massive wave of outrage sparked by President Donald Trump's "stupid and reckless" decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday denounced the move as a "big gift to Republican donors" at the 'Joyous Persistence' rally in San Francisco.
In response to critics like Warren and countless others, White House officials and Trump allies have attempted to defend the withdrawal by characterizing it as part of a broader plan to protect American jobs and spur economic growth.
"This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Warren, a leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who is widely viewed as a potential 2020 presidential contender, forcefully dismissed this reasoning as a trope perpetuated in service of the donor class.
"[T]he Republicans have been framing this for a long time, jobs versus the environment," she said. "It is not. This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
For weeks, Trump was lobbied by a coalition consisting of, among others, his daughter Ivanka, Pope Francis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all of whom urged him to stick with the international community by firmly committing to the climate pact. In the end, however, it was the "big oil darlings" who won out, as the Guardian put it on Thursday.
The 22 Republican senators who signed a letter in May urging Trump to withdraw from the agreement received "a total of $10,694,284" in donations from oil, gas, and coal interests "over the past three election cycles," the Guardian added.
But, as some commentators pointed out, one did not need to look far to determine who would benefit from Trump's decision to side with big money over the climate. Attending Trump's "fact-free speech" in the Rose Garden of the White House was Thomas Pyle, the president of the American Energy Alliance. The fossil fuel industry group, as Politico reported, "has received some of its past funding from billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch."
For Warren, this is an indication that Trump's assault on the environment is part of a larger attempt to undermine the fundamental tenets of democracy. Trump's decision, Warren said, is "symptomatic of what's wrong" with American politics. Corporate cash, she added, "slithers through Washington like a snake."
In closing, the Massachusetts senator told the crowd gathered in the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre to resist the administration and to not treat politics as "something that just happens every four years."
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said.
Adding to the massive wave of outrage sparked by President Donald Trump's "stupid and reckless" decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday denounced the move as a "big gift to Republican donors" at the 'Joyous Persistence' rally in San Francisco.
In response to critics like Warren and countless others, White House officials and Trump allies have attempted to defend the withdrawal by characterizing it as part of a broader plan to protect American jobs and spur economic growth.
"This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Warren, a leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who is widely viewed as a potential 2020 presidential contender, forcefully dismissed this reasoning as a trope perpetuated in service of the donor class.
"[T]he Republicans have been framing this for a long time, jobs versus the environment," she said. "It is not. This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
For weeks, Trump was lobbied by a coalition consisting of, among others, his daughter Ivanka, Pope Francis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all of whom urged him to stick with the international community by firmly committing to the climate pact. In the end, however, it was the "big oil darlings" who won out, as the Guardian put it on Thursday.
The 22 Republican senators who signed a letter in May urging Trump to withdraw from the agreement received "a total of $10,694,284" in donations from oil, gas, and coal interests "over the past three election cycles," the Guardian added.
But, as some commentators pointed out, one did not need to look far to determine who would benefit from Trump's decision to side with big money over the climate. Attending Trump's "fact-free speech" in the Rose Garden of the White House was Thomas Pyle, the president of the American Energy Alliance. The fossil fuel industry group, as Politico reported, "has received some of its past funding from billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch."
For Warren, this is an indication that Trump's assault on the environment is part of a larger attempt to undermine the fundamental tenets of democracy. Trump's decision, Warren said, is "symptomatic of what's wrong" with American politics. Corporate cash, she added, "slithers through Washington like a snake."
In closing, the Massachusetts senator told the crowd gathered in the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre to resist the administration and to not treat politics as "something that just happens every four years."
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.