SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A top human rights official for the United Nations is concerned that President Trump's pro-torture rhetoric could usher in a new era marked by the broad use of torture by world powers.
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said this week that Trump's "persistent flirtation" with a return to torture could lead to the exploitation of tactics like waterboarding and other so-called enhanced interrogation techniques by governments.
President Trump said in January that waterboarding "absolutely works," echoing the support he expressed for the practice on the campaign trail. Waterboarding simulates drowning, was banned by President Barack Obama in 2009, and was officially condemned by 58 retired military generals and admirals in 2016.
Meanwhile, Americans are divided on torture. According to a Pew Research poll earlier this year, forty-eight percent say there are some circumstances in which torture is acceptable, while 49 percent say the practice has no place in US military operations.
The lack of a clear national stance against torture worries High Commissioner Zeid.
"Mindful of how the American public has, over the last 10 years, become far more accepting of torture," said Zeid, "the balance could be tipped in favor of its practice."
He noted that this could be especially plausible in the event of an attack on U.S. soil.
The U.N. Convention on Torture explicitly bans the use of torture by world governments.
"If other leaders start to follow the same rhetorical course, undermining the Convention with their words," Zeid said, "the practice of torture is likely to broaden, and that would be fatal."
Zeid pointed to recent comments by British Prime Minister Theresa May, who talked of flouting human rights laws in order to rid the United Kingdom of suspected terrorists. Following attacks in Manchester and London, May told reporters, "If human rights laws get in the way of doing these things, we will change those laws to make sure we can do them."
The High Commissioner called May's remarks "a gift from a major Western leader to every authoritarian figure around the world who shamelessly violates human rights under the pretext of fighting terrorism."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
A top human rights official for the United Nations is concerned that President Trump's pro-torture rhetoric could usher in a new era marked by the broad use of torture by world powers.
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said this week that Trump's "persistent flirtation" with a return to torture could lead to the exploitation of tactics like waterboarding and other so-called enhanced interrogation techniques by governments.
President Trump said in January that waterboarding "absolutely works," echoing the support he expressed for the practice on the campaign trail. Waterboarding simulates drowning, was banned by President Barack Obama in 2009, and was officially condemned by 58 retired military generals and admirals in 2016.
Meanwhile, Americans are divided on torture. According to a Pew Research poll earlier this year, forty-eight percent say there are some circumstances in which torture is acceptable, while 49 percent say the practice has no place in US military operations.
The lack of a clear national stance against torture worries High Commissioner Zeid.
"Mindful of how the American public has, over the last 10 years, become far more accepting of torture," said Zeid, "the balance could be tipped in favor of its practice."
He noted that this could be especially plausible in the event of an attack on U.S. soil.
The U.N. Convention on Torture explicitly bans the use of torture by world governments.
"If other leaders start to follow the same rhetorical course, undermining the Convention with their words," Zeid said, "the practice of torture is likely to broaden, and that would be fatal."
Zeid pointed to recent comments by British Prime Minister Theresa May, who talked of flouting human rights laws in order to rid the United Kingdom of suspected terrorists. Following attacks in Manchester and London, May told reporters, "If human rights laws get in the way of doing these things, we will change those laws to make sure we can do them."
The High Commissioner called May's remarks "a gift from a major Western leader to every authoritarian figure around the world who shamelessly violates human rights under the pretext of fighting terrorism."
A top human rights official for the United Nations is concerned that President Trump's pro-torture rhetoric could usher in a new era marked by the broad use of torture by world powers.
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said this week that Trump's "persistent flirtation" with a return to torture could lead to the exploitation of tactics like waterboarding and other so-called enhanced interrogation techniques by governments.
President Trump said in January that waterboarding "absolutely works," echoing the support he expressed for the practice on the campaign trail. Waterboarding simulates drowning, was banned by President Barack Obama in 2009, and was officially condemned by 58 retired military generals and admirals in 2016.
Meanwhile, Americans are divided on torture. According to a Pew Research poll earlier this year, forty-eight percent say there are some circumstances in which torture is acceptable, while 49 percent say the practice has no place in US military operations.
The lack of a clear national stance against torture worries High Commissioner Zeid.
"Mindful of how the American public has, over the last 10 years, become far more accepting of torture," said Zeid, "the balance could be tipped in favor of its practice."
He noted that this could be especially plausible in the event of an attack on U.S. soil.
The U.N. Convention on Torture explicitly bans the use of torture by world governments.
"If other leaders start to follow the same rhetorical course, undermining the Convention with their words," Zeid said, "the practice of torture is likely to broaden, and that would be fatal."
Zeid pointed to recent comments by British Prime Minister Theresa May, who talked of flouting human rights laws in order to rid the United Kingdom of suspected terrorists. Following attacks in Manchester and London, May told reporters, "If human rights laws get in the way of doing these things, we will change those laws to make sure we can do them."
The High Commissioner called May's remarks "a gift from a major Western leader to every authoritarian figure around the world who shamelessly violates human rights under the pretext of fighting terrorism."