SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Anthony Scaramucci challenged chief of staff Reince Priebus to deny that he was behind White Houe leaks on Thursday. (Photo: Aleksei M/Flickr/cc)
Scaramucci Goes to War Over "Leak" That Turns Out To Be Public Document
Amid reported infighting, communications director threatens to turn FBI on White House staff
Jul 27, 2017
White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci waged war with President Trump's chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Thursday morning over leaks from the White House to journalists. But Scaramucci's fight against leaks appears to be at least partially focused on public information, and on the perfectly legal transfer of information from officials to the press.
After Politico reported Wednesday evening that Scaramucci could still profit from his former hedge fund while working in the White House, the new communications director tweeted an angry message regarding the website's use of his financial disclosure form.
By law the form had been submitted to the Office of Government Ethics when Scaramucci was hired by the White House, and was therefore public information.
Still, Scaramucci threatened to report the leak of the form to the FBI and the Justice Department, and tagged Priebus in the tweet, leading to speculation that he was implicating the chief of staff in the so-called leak.
Lorraine Woellert, the reporter who wrote the Politico story, explained on her own Twitter account that no one had leaked the form, leading Scaramucci to quickly delete his post.
\u201cWow, sorry I slept through all the fun! FWIW, Mr @Scaramucci's Form 278e is publicly available from ExIm. Just ask. https://t.co/Io2ed5IEuj\u201d— Lorraine (@Lorraine) 1501143221
While Scaramucci denied that he was making an accusation, saying he was simply making it known that senior administration officials were all helping to end leaks, he called in to CNN's "New Day" on Thursday morning to directly challenge Priebus to deny his involvement.
\u201c.@Scaramucci on WH Chief of Staff Priebus: "If Reince wants to explain that he's not a leaker, let him do that." https://t.co/H7s5SzqeOa\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1501154349
Later on "New Day," Joshua Green of Bloomberg noted that Scaramucci's fight against leakers appears to be having the unintended effect of creating an even closer relationship between journalists and some of their secret sources.
\u201c.@JoshuaGreen: Scaramucci's "performance is creating more leaks live in real time. My phone is blowing up." https://t.co/z50lPU3vqw\u201d— CNN This Morning (@CNN This Morning) 1501156898
Scaramucci's attempt at cracking down on leaks has so far been focused on the notion that leaks from the White House are inherently illegal, but according to an article posted earlier this year by Politifact, "There isn't a single law that criminalizes all leaks of classified or privileged government information to the media."
Politifact also noted as the president expressed anger about the leaks regarding information about the White House's Russian contacts, that "Trump's public railing against the leaks might be saber-rattling in order to deter future unwanted disclosures."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci waged war with President Trump's chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Thursday morning over leaks from the White House to journalists. But Scaramucci's fight against leaks appears to be at least partially focused on public information, and on the perfectly legal transfer of information from officials to the press.
After Politico reported Wednesday evening that Scaramucci could still profit from his former hedge fund while working in the White House, the new communications director tweeted an angry message regarding the website's use of his financial disclosure form.
By law the form had been submitted to the Office of Government Ethics when Scaramucci was hired by the White House, and was therefore public information.
Still, Scaramucci threatened to report the leak of the form to the FBI and the Justice Department, and tagged Priebus in the tweet, leading to speculation that he was implicating the chief of staff in the so-called leak.
Lorraine Woellert, the reporter who wrote the Politico story, explained on her own Twitter account that no one had leaked the form, leading Scaramucci to quickly delete his post.
\u201cWow, sorry I slept through all the fun! FWIW, Mr @Scaramucci's Form 278e is publicly available from ExIm. Just ask. https://t.co/Io2ed5IEuj\u201d— Lorraine (@Lorraine) 1501143221
While Scaramucci denied that he was making an accusation, saying he was simply making it known that senior administration officials were all helping to end leaks, he called in to CNN's "New Day" on Thursday morning to directly challenge Priebus to deny his involvement.
\u201c.@Scaramucci on WH Chief of Staff Priebus: "If Reince wants to explain that he's not a leaker, let him do that." https://t.co/H7s5SzqeOa\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1501154349
Later on "New Day," Joshua Green of Bloomberg noted that Scaramucci's fight against leakers appears to be having the unintended effect of creating an even closer relationship between journalists and some of their secret sources.
\u201c.@JoshuaGreen: Scaramucci's "performance is creating more leaks live in real time. My phone is blowing up." https://t.co/z50lPU3vqw\u201d— CNN This Morning (@CNN This Morning) 1501156898
Scaramucci's attempt at cracking down on leaks has so far been focused on the notion that leaks from the White House are inherently illegal, but according to an article posted earlier this year by Politifact, "There isn't a single law that criminalizes all leaks of classified or privileged government information to the media."
Politifact also noted as the president expressed anger about the leaks regarding information about the White House's Russian contacts, that "Trump's public railing against the leaks might be saber-rattling in order to deter future unwanted disclosures."
White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci waged war with President Trump's chief of staff, Reince Priebus, Thursday morning over leaks from the White House to journalists. But Scaramucci's fight against leaks appears to be at least partially focused on public information, and on the perfectly legal transfer of information from officials to the press.
After Politico reported Wednesday evening that Scaramucci could still profit from his former hedge fund while working in the White House, the new communications director tweeted an angry message regarding the website's use of his financial disclosure form.
By law the form had been submitted to the Office of Government Ethics when Scaramucci was hired by the White House, and was therefore public information.
Still, Scaramucci threatened to report the leak of the form to the FBI and the Justice Department, and tagged Priebus in the tweet, leading to speculation that he was implicating the chief of staff in the so-called leak.
Lorraine Woellert, the reporter who wrote the Politico story, explained on her own Twitter account that no one had leaked the form, leading Scaramucci to quickly delete his post.
\u201cWow, sorry I slept through all the fun! FWIW, Mr @Scaramucci's Form 278e is publicly available from ExIm. Just ask. https://t.co/Io2ed5IEuj\u201d— Lorraine (@Lorraine) 1501143221
While Scaramucci denied that he was making an accusation, saying he was simply making it known that senior administration officials were all helping to end leaks, he called in to CNN's "New Day" on Thursday morning to directly challenge Priebus to deny his involvement.
\u201c.@Scaramucci on WH Chief of Staff Priebus: "If Reince wants to explain that he's not a leaker, let him do that." https://t.co/H7s5SzqeOa\u201d— CNN (@CNN) 1501154349
Later on "New Day," Joshua Green of Bloomberg noted that Scaramucci's fight against leakers appears to be having the unintended effect of creating an even closer relationship between journalists and some of their secret sources.
\u201c.@JoshuaGreen: Scaramucci's "performance is creating more leaks live in real time. My phone is blowing up." https://t.co/z50lPU3vqw\u201d— CNN This Morning (@CNN This Morning) 1501156898
Scaramucci's attempt at cracking down on leaks has so far been focused on the notion that leaks from the White House are inherently illegal, but according to an article posted earlier this year by Politifact, "There isn't a single law that criminalizes all leaks of classified or privileged government information to the media."
Politifact also noted as the president expressed anger about the leaks regarding information about the White House's Russian contacts, that "Trump's public railing against the leaks might be saber-rattling in order to deter future unwanted disclosures."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.