SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
More than a dozen national groups came together to propose a pro-choice progressive platform for the Democratic Party, in response to the party's willingness to provide campaign funding to congressional candidates who do not support abortion rights.
"Democrats will fail to retake power in 2018 if we allow ourselves to be forced into a false choice between a populist progressive agenda and reproductive justice."
--Charles Chamberlain, Democracy for America
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), who chairs the party's House campaign arm--the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)--confirmed the DCCC will not withhold funds from anti-choice candidates for the 2018 election.
Rep. Lujan said the Democrats need to attract "a broad coalition" to regain a majority in the House, adding: "As we look at candidates across the country, you need to make sure you have candidates that fit the district, that can win in these districts across America."
Reproductive rights advocates criticized Rep. Lujan's comments and warned that if the party follows through on its plan to support anti-choice candidates in the upcoming midterm election, it could cost Democrats seats in Congress.
"Democrats will fail to retake power in 2018 if we allow ourselves to be forced into a false choice between a populist progressive agenda and reproductive justice," said Charles Chamberlain, executive director of Democracy for America (DFA).
DFA and NARAL Pro-Choice for America led the development of the "Statement of Principles" (pdf) as an official condemnation of the Democrats' campaign funding plans. They brought together groups that supported Sec. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders in last year's presidential primary to establish a list of priniciples they collectively support "as progressives."
"We cannot have a real conversation about economic security that does not include the ability to decide if, when, and how to raise a family," the statement says. The groups also assert:
Reproductive rights advocates have increasingly argued that access to family planning healthcare is both an economic and racial justice issue. As Destiny Lopez of All* Above All Action Fund told Elle after Rep. Lujan's statements on Monday: "This flirtation with abandoning support for abortion rights, where women's health, racial justice, and family economics intersect, is deeply troubling, especially from those who profess a commitment to economic justice. Support for women's health and rights is inseparable from economic and racial justice."
Those who crafted the statement emphasized the economic argument for providing women with family planning services, and worried about the party's fate if it endorses anti-choice congressional candidates.
"The Democratic Party cannot and will not win if it turns its back on women and our fundamental rights."
--Ilyse Hogue, NARAL Pro-Choice America
"Abortion rights are inextricably tied to the fight against economic and racial inequity, full stop, and until all leaders of our party fully understand that we're going to keep losing," said Chamberlain.
"The Democratic Party cannot and will not win if it turns its back on women and our fundamental rights," said Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
NARAL and DFA partnered with 11 other leading organizations to develop the statement: MoveOn Political Action, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, EMILY's List, Working Families Party, Ultraviolet, Daily Kos, Demos, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Indivisible Project, American Federation of Teachers, and Social Security Works.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
More than a dozen national groups came together to propose a pro-choice progressive platform for the Democratic Party, in response to the party's willingness to provide campaign funding to congressional candidates who do not support abortion rights.
"Democrats will fail to retake power in 2018 if we allow ourselves to be forced into a false choice between a populist progressive agenda and reproductive justice."
--Charles Chamberlain, Democracy for America
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), who chairs the party's House campaign arm--the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)--confirmed the DCCC will not withhold funds from anti-choice candidates for the 2018 election.
Rep. Lujan said the Democrats need to attract "a broad coalition" to regain a majority in the House, adding: "As we look at candidates across the country, you need to make sure you have candidates that fit the district, that can win in these districts across America."
Reproductive rights advocates criticized Rep. Lujan's comments and warned that if the party follows through on its plan to support anti-choice candidates in the upcoming midterm election, it could cost Democrats seats in Congress.
"Democrats will fail to retake power in 2018 if we allow ourselves to be forced into a false choice between a populist progressive agenda and reproductive justice," said Charles Chamberlain, executive director of Democracy for America (DFA).
DFA and NARAL Pro-Choice for America led the development of the "Statement of Principles" (pdf) as an official condemnation of the Democrats' campaign funding plans. They brought together groups that supported Sec. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders in last year's presidential primary to establish a list of priniciples they collectively support "as progressives."
"We cannot have a real conversation about economic security that does not include the ability to decide if, when, and how to raise a family," the statement says. The groups also assert:
Reproductive rights advocates have increasingly argued that access to family planning healthcare is both an economic and racial justice issue. As Destiny Lopez of All* Above All Action Fund told Elle after Rep. Lujan's statements on Monday: "This flirtation with abandoning support for abortion rights, where women's health, racial justice, and family economics intersect, is deeply troubling, especially from those who profess a commitment to economic justice. Support for women's health and rights is inseparable from economic and racial justice."
Those who crafted the statement emphasized the economic argument for providing women with family planning services, and worried about the party's fate if it endorses anti-choice congressional candidates.
"The Democratic Party cannot and will not win if it turns its back on women and our fundamental rights."
--Ilyse Hogue, NARAL Pro-Choice America
"Abortion rights are inextricably tied to the fight against economic and racial inequity, full stop, and until all leaders of our party fully understand that we're going to keep losing," said Chamberlain.
"The Democratic Party cannot and will not win if it turns its back on women and our fundamental rights," said Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
NARAL and DFA partnered with 11 other leading organizations to develop the statement: MoveOn Political Action, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, EMILY's List, Working Families Party, Ultraviolet, Daily Kos, Demos, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Indivisible Project, American Federation of Teachers, and Social Security Works.
More than a dozen national groups came together to propose a pro-choice progressive platform for the Democratic Party, in response to the party's willingness to provide campaign funding to congressional candidates who do not support abortion rights.
"Democrats will fail to retake power in 2018 if we allow ourselves to be forced into a false choice between a populist progressive agenda and reproductive justice."
--Charles Chamberlain, Democracy for America
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), who chairs the party's House campaign arm--the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)--confirmed the DCCC will not withhold funds from anti-choice candidates for the 2018 election.
Rep. Lujan said the Democrats need to attract "a broad coalition" to regain a majority in the House, adding: "As we look at candidates across the country, you need to make sure you have candidates that fit the district, that can win in these districts across America."
Reproductive rights advocates criticized Rep. Lujan's comments and warned that if the party follows through on its plan to support anti-choice candidates in the upcoming midterm election, it could cost Democrats seats in Congress.
"Democrats will fail to retake power in 2018 if we allow ourselves to be forced into a false choice between a populist progressive agenda and reproductive justice," said Charles Chamberlain, executive director of Democracy for America (DFA).
DFA and NARAL Pro-Choice for America led the development of the "Statement of Principles" (pdf) as an official condemnation of the Democrats' campaign funding plans. They brought together groups that supported Sec. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders in last year's presidential primary to establish a list of priniciples they collectively support "as progressives."
"We cannot have a real conversation about economic security that does not include the ability to decide if, when, and how to raise a family," the statement says. The groups also assert:
Reproductive rights advocates have increasingly argued that access to family planning healthcare is both an economic and racial justice issue. As Destiny Lopez of All* Above All Action Fund told Elle after Rep. Lujan's statements on Monday: "This flirtation with abandoning support for abortion rights, where women's health, racial justice, and family economics intersect, is deeply troubling, especially from those who profess a commitment to economic justice. Support for women's health and rights is inseparable from economic and racial justice."
Those who crafted the statement emphasized the economic argument for providing women with family planning services, and worried about the party's fate if it endorses anti-choice congressional candidates.
"The Democratic Party cannot and will not win if it turns its back on women and our fundamental rights."
--Ilyse Hogue, NARAL Pro-Choice America
"Abortion rights are inextricably tied to the fight against economic and racial inequity, full stop, and until all leaders of our party fully understand that we're going to keep losing," said Chamberlain.
"The Democratic Party cannot and will not win if it turns its back on women and our fundamental rights," said Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
NARAL and DFA partnered with 11 other leading organizations to develop the statement: MoveOn Political Action, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, EMILY's List, Working Families Party, Ultraviolet, Daily Kos, Demos, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Indivisible Project, American Federation of Teachers, and Social Security Works.