As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month, "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records." (Photo: Free Press/Flickr/cc)
Aug 04, 2017
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two nominees for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-- Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, and Brendan Carr, a Republican--bringing the agency back to full staff and sparking fears among Open Internet activists and lawmakers that net neutrality will soon be under threat once more.
As Politicoreports, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai now "has the votes he needs to roll back" the 2015 Open Internet Order, which prevents large telecommunications companies from controlling online content and requires that all traffic be treated equally. He also has an ally in Carr, who was a lawyer for large telecom companies.
Activists and Democratic lawmakers also raised alarm on Thursday as Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) met with some of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs)--including Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T--to discuss scrapping net neutrality, which some have labeled "the First Amendment of the Internet."
Writing for Mashable, Dipayan Ghosh and Joshua Stager summarized why Open Internet advocates should be concerned about the meeting:
Walden says he wants to bring an end to the "ping-pong games of regulation and litigation." But that ping-pong game only exists because the big ISPs insist on endlessly relitigating this settled law. Walden also wants to examine legislation on net neutrality, citing a dangerous and misguided draft bill from 2015. That bill would gut net neutrality and the FCC's authority to address future problems. It would have been a disaster for the open internet and an unnecessary government intrusion into an online marketplace that is functioning well under current law. It does not need to be resurrected in 2017, and it is not the starting point for negotiation that Walden seems to think it is.
The meeting came in the midst of an unprecedented surge in support for net neutrality at the grassroots. As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records."
Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), and several other prominent senators highlighted the growing support behind net neutrality in a letter asking Pai to "extend the comment period for its proposal to undo the Open Internet Order and net neutrality protections."
\u201c.@FCC has received 16+ million comments on proposal to undo strong #netneutrality protections. It's clear ppl are making their voices heard.\u201d— U.S. Senator Al Franken (@U.S. Senator Al Franken) 1501788745
In addition to the lawmakers' effort, Change.org is circulating a petition warning of the consequences of the FCC's proposed net neutrality rollback, and urging the public to resist.
"The [FCC] is moving to end net neutrality--which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users," the petition reads. "This decision could have global implications for the way the world shares and receives information from journalists, newsrooms, and NGOs."
Join Us: Everything is on the Line
The future of all that we cherish is on the line and we have to fight like hell to protect democracy, human decency, and a liveable planet. The last line of defense is people who understand what’s at stake—activists, writers, thinkers, doers, and everyday people who see what is happening, know in their hearts that a better world is possible, and are willing to fight for it. You are one of the good people Common Dreams was built for. We provide independent news, progressive opinion, and crucial analysis on the day’s most important issues. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. But to keep publishing and remain strong in these dangerous times, we need your support. So we’re asking you today: Will you donate to our Fall Campaign and keep the progressive, nonprofit journalism of Common Dreams alive? |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two nominees for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-- Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, and Brendan Carr, a Republican--bringing the agency back to full staff and sparking fears among Open Internet activists and lawmakers that net neutrality will soon be under threat once more.
As Politicoreports, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai now "has the votes he needs to roll back" the 2015 Open Internet Order, which prevents large telecommunications companies from controlling online content and requires that all traffic be treated equally. He also has an ally in Carr, who was a lawyer for large telecom companies.
Activists and Democratic lawmakers also raised alarm on Thursday as Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) met with some of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs)--including Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T--to discuss scrapping net neutrality, which some have labeled "the First Amendment of the Internet."
Writing for Mashable, Dipayan Ghosh and Joshua Stager summarized why Open Internet advocates should be concerned about the meeting:
Walden says he wants to bring an end to the "ping-pong games of regulation and litigation." But that ping-pong game only exists because the big ISPs insist on endlessly relitigating this settled law. Walden also wants to examine legislation on net neutrality, citing a dangerous and misguided draft bill from 2015. That bill would gut net neutrality and the FCC's authority to address future problems. It would have been a disaster for the open internet and an unnecessary government intrusion into an online marketplace that is functioning well under current law. It does not need to be resurrected in 2017, and it is not the starting point for negotiation that Walden seems to think it is.
The meeting came in the midst of an unprecedented surge in support for net neutrality at the grassroots. As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records."
Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), and several other prominent senators highlighted the growing support behind net neutrality in a letter asking Pai to "extend the comment period for its proposal to undo the Open Internet Order and net neutrality protections."
\u201c.@FCC has received 16+ million comments on proposal to undo strong #netneutrality protections. It's clear ppl are making their voices heard.\u201d— U.S. Senator Al Franken (@U.S. Senator Al Franken) 1501788745
In addition to the lawmakers' effort, Change.org is circulating a petition warning of the consequences of the FCC's proposed net neutrality rollback, and urging the public to resist.
"The [FCC] is moving to end net neutrality--which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users," the petition reads. "This decision could have global implications for the way the world shares and receives information from journalists, newsrooms, and NGOs."
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two nominees for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-- Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, and Brendan Carr, a Republican--bringing the agency back to full staff and sparking fears among Open Internet activists and lawmakers that net neutrality will soon be under threat once more.
As Politicoreports, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai now "has the votes he needs to roll back" the 2015 Open Internet Order, which prevents large telecommunications companies from controlling online content and requires that all traffic be treated equally. He also has an ally in Carr, who was a lawyer for large telecom companies.
Activists and Democratic lawmakers also raised alarm on Thursday as Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) met with some of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs)--including Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T--to discuss scrapping net neutrality, which some have labeled "the First Amendment of the Internet."
Writing for Mashable, Dipayan Ghosh and Joshua Stager summarized why Open Internet advocates should be concerned about the meeting:
Walden says he wants to bring an end to the "ping-pong games of regulation and litigation." But that ping-pong game only exists because the big ISPs insist on endlessly relitigating this settled law. Walden also wants to examine legislation on net neutrality, citing a dangerous and misguided draft bill from 2015. That bill would gut net neutrality and the FCC's authority to address future problems. It would have been a disaster for the open internet and an unnecessary government intrusion into an online marketplace that is functioning well under current law. It does not need to be resurrected in 2017, and it is not the starting point for negotiation that Walden seems to think it is.
The meeting came in the midst of an unprecedented surge in support for net neutrality at the grassroots. As Free Press, an Open Internet advocacy group, noted last month: "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) docket for public comments on the existing net neutrality rules has already surpassed all records."
Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), and several other prominent senators highlighted the growing support behind net neutrality in a letter asking Pai to "extend the comment period for its proposal to undo the Open Internet Order and net neutrality protections."
\u201c.@FCC has received 16+ million comments on proposal to undo strong #netneutrality protections. It's clear ppl are making their voices heard.\u201d— U.S. Senator Al Franken (@U.S. Senator Al Franken) 1501788745
In addition to the lawmakers' effort, Change.org is circulating a petition warning of the consequences of the FCC's proposed net neutrality rollback, and urging the public to resist.
"The [FCC] is moving to end net neutrality--which could mean giving big cable companies room to charge extra fees, block, and censor users," the petition reads. "This decision could have global implications for the way the world shares and receives information from journalists, newsrooms, and NGOs."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.