SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As Senate Republicans scramble to pass legislation that experts say is their "most radical" and damaging healthcare repeal yet--gutting Medicaid and leaving millions uninsured--reproductive rights advocates warn the new bill would be especially damaging for women.
\u201cGraham-Cassidy is even worse for women's health than previous repeal bills, says @DrKBrandi. #ProtectOurCare https://t.co/Df1SyevZQW\u201d— Physicians for Reproductive Health (@Physicians for Reproductive Health) 1505842857
\u201c#GrahamCassidy threatens to strip millions of basic reproductive care. Tell your Senators to oppose the bill: https://t.co/JlTfNvFUtA\u201d— Center for Reproductive Rights (@Center for Reproductive Rights) 1505837101
The bill, coauthored by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.), would eliminate Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates requiring all Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty, and all large employers to offer insurance plans. It would also end cost-sharing subsidies for insurers and tax credits that help Americans afford coverage.
Further, the plan would halt Medicaid expansion, and restructure the distribution of federal funding so that states receive block grants, or lump sums to allocate as they see fit. As Anna North at Vox notes, "its program of block grants would create new ways for the federal government to restrict abortion coverage."
As North explains:
Many states already have restrictions on insurance coverage for abortion. But Graham-Cassidy would require all states to ban abortion coverage in any program that gets federal block grant money. If it took money to offer subsidies for individual coverage or otherwise bolster the individual market, then it would have to restrict abortion coverage on that market. If it used federal funds to offer subsidies to employers, the ban on abortion coverage would affect the employer market too.
Essentially, the federal government would have the states over a barrel--if they wanted money to help keep their residents covered, they'd have to sacrifice abortion coverage to get it.
The bill would also limit access to Planned Parenthood and allow states to apply for waivers to scrap rules that mandate coverage for essential health benefits such as maternity care.
While an estimated 13 million women would lose access to maternal care under Graham-Cassidy, others would be forced to pay higher premiums. A Center for American Progress analysis estimated that insurance providers would charge upwards of $17,000 more in premiums for pregnancy.
\u201c#GrahamCassidy\u2014a bill written by (surprise!) all Republican\nmen\u2014defunds @PPFA & makes you pay an ADDITIONAL $17,320 for pregnancy.\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1505925541
Ending Medicaid expansion would significantly affect millions of women of color and those with low incomes. According to the Guttmacher Institute, Medicaid covers 20 percent of American women aged 15-44, and in 2015, provided coverage for 48 percent of women whose incomes were below the federal poverty line.
Andy Slavitt, who ran the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under former President Barack Obama, shared a bulleted list detailing the ways in which Graham-Cassidy would impact women.
\u201cNEW: What would Graham-Cassidy ACA repeal mean for women?\n\nRT if useful.\u201d— Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1505871066
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) shared a similar list based on a Senate Budget Committee analysis, and also tweeted an image illustrating the bill's proposed restrictions on abortions.
\u201cThese flags mark all the abortion restrictions in the Republican repeal of Obamacare. This is a major rollback of women\u2019s rights.\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1505921412
Comparing the bill to previous proposals, Vox's Sarah Kliff writes: "While other Republican plans essentially create a poorly funded version of the Affordable Care Act, Graham-Cassidy blows it up."
A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) confirmed Wednesday that Republicans intend to bring the bill to the floor for a vote next week, ahead of the September 30 deadline to pass the measure with a simple majority.
Several national progressive groups, lawmakers, and others have mobilized to defeat Graham-Cassidy through protests in Washington and online campaigns to raise awareness about the bill's consequences and urge voters to contact their senators:
\u201c@JimmyKimmelLive \ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffe\ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffc\ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffd Stop to watch this - then:\n\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffe\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffc\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffd\ud83d\udcf1 Get back on the phone & tell your senator to #ProtectOurCare: 202-804-8210 https://t.co/zhW52Qj6IE\u201d— Cecile Richards (@Cecile Richards) 1505875491
\u201c#GrahamCassidyBill Insurance premiums:\n\ud83d\udc49Pregnancy: $17K\n\ud83d\udc49Breast cancer: $28K\n\ud83d\udc49Depression: $8K\n\ud83d\udc49Arthritis: $26K\nhttps://t.co/KuApSKnVHj\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1505914263
\u201c#GrahamCassidy bill wld let states undermine requirement that all health plans cover #maternitycare. https://t.co/CDBCZdtbce #ProtectOurCare\u201d— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher Institute) 1505862008
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
As Senate Republicans scramble to pass legislation that experts say is their "most radical" and damaging healthcare repeal yet--gutting Medicaid and leaving millions uninsured--reproductive rights advocates warn the new bill would be especially damaging for women.
\u201cGraham-Cassidy is even worse for women's health than previous repeal bills, says @DrKBrandi. #ProtectOurCare https://t.co/Df1SyevZQW\u201d— Physicians for Reproductive Health (@Physicians for Reproductive Health) 1505842857
\u201c#GrahamCassidy threatens to strip millions of basic reproductive care. Tell your Senators to oppose the bill: https://t.co/JlTfNvFUtA\u201d— Center for Reproductive Rights (@Center for Reproductive Rights) 1505837101
The bill, coauthored by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.), would eliminate Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates requiring all Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty, and all large employers to offer insurance plans. It would also end cost-sharing subsidies for insurers and tax credits that help Americans afford coverage.
Further, the plan would halt Medicaid expansion, and restructure the distribution of federal funding so that states receive block grants, or lump sums to allocate as they see fit. As Anna North at Vox notes, "its program of block grants would create new ways for the federal government to restrict abortion coverage."
As North explains:
Many states already have restrictions on insurance coverage for abortion. But Graham-Cassidy would require all states to ban abortion coverage in any program that gets federal block grant money. If it took money to offer subsidies for individual coverage or otherwise bolster the individual market, then it would have to restrict abortion coverage on that market. If it used federal funds to offer subsidies to employers, the ban on abortion coverage would affect the employer market too.
Essentially, the federal government would have the states over a barrel--if they wanted money to help keep their residents covered, they'd have to sacrifice abortion coverage to get it.
The bill would also limit access to Planned Parenthood and allow states to apply for waivers to scrap rules that mandate coverage for essential health benefits such as maternity care.
While an estimated 13 million women would lose access to maternal care under Graham-Cassidy, others would be forced to pay higher premiums. A Center for American Progress analysis estimated that insurance providers would charge upwards of $17,000 more in premiums for pregnancy.
\u201c#GrahamCassidy\u2014a bill written by (surprise!) all Republican\nmen\u2014defunds @PPFA & makes you pay an ADDITIONAL $17,320 for pregnancy.\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1505925541
Ending Medicaid expansion would significantly affect millions of women of color and those with low incomes. According to the Guttmacher Institute, Medicaid covers 20 percent of American women aged 15-44, and in 2015, provided coverage for 48 percent of women whose incomes were below the federal poverty line.
Andy Slavitt, who ran the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under former President Barack Obama, shared a bulleted list detailing the ways in which Graham-Cassidy would impact women.
\u201cNEW: What would Graham-Cassidy ACA repeal mean for women?\n\nRT if useful.\u201d— Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1505871066
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) shared a similar list based on a Senate Budget Committee analysis, and also tweeted an image illustrating the bill's proposed restrictions on abortions.
\u201cThese flags mark all the abortion restrictions in the Republican repeal of Obamacare. This is a major rollback of women\u2019s rights.\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1505921412
Comparing the bill to previous proposals, Vox's Sarah Kliff writes: "While other Republican plans essentially create a poorly funded version of the Affordable Care Act, Graham-Cassidy blows it up."
A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) confirmed Wednesday that Republicans intend to bring the bill to the floor for a vote next week, ahead of the September 30 deadline to pass the measure with a simple majority.
Several national progressive groups, lawmakers, and others have mobilized to defeat Graham-Cassidy through protests in Washington and online campaigns to raise awareness about the bill's consequences and urge voters to contact their senators:
\u201c@JimmyKimmelLive \ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffe\ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffc\ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffd Stop to watch this - then:\n\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffe\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffc\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffd\ud83d\udcf1 Get back on the phone & tell your senator to #ProtectOurCare: 202-804-8210 https://t.co/zhW52Qj6IE\u201d— Cecile Richards (@Cecile Richards) 1505875491
\u201c#GrahamCassidyBill Insurance premiums:\n\ud83d\udc49Pregnancy: $17K\n\ud83d\udc49Breast cancer: $28K\n\ud83d\udc49Depression: $8K\n\ud83d\udc49Arthritis: $26K\nhttps://t.co/KuApSKnVHj\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1505914263
\u201c#GrahamCassidy bill wld let states undermine requirement that all health plans cover #maternitycare. https://t.co/CDBCZdtbce #ProtectOurCare\u201d— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher Institute) 1505862008
As Senate Republicans scramble to pass legislation that experts say is their "most radical" and damaging healthcare repeal yet--gutting Medicaid and leaving millions uninsured--reproductive rights advocates warn the new bill would be especially damaging for women.
\u201cGraham-Cassidy is even worse for women's health than previous repeal bills, says @DrKBrandi. #ProtectOurCare https://t.co/Df1SyevZQW\u201d— Physicians for Reproductive Health (@Physicians for Reproductive Health) 1505842857
\u201c#GrahamCassidy threatens to strip millions of basic reproductive care. Tell your Senators to oppose the bill: https://t.co/JlTfNvFUtA\u201d— Center for Reproductive Rights (@Center for Reproductive Rights) 1505837101
The bill, coauthored by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.), would eliminate Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates requiring all Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty, and all large employers to offer insurance plans. It would also end cost-sharing subsidies for insurers and tax credits that help Americans afford coverage.
Further, the plan would halt Medicaid expansion, and restructure the distribution of federal funding so that states receive block grants, or lump sums to allocate as they see fit. As Anna North at Vox notes, "its program of block grants would create new ways for the federal government to restrict abortion coverage."
As North explains:
Many states already have restrictions on insurance coverage for abortion. But Graham-Cassidy would require all states to ban abortion coverage in any program that gets federal block grant money. If it took money to offer subsidies for individual coverage or otherwise bolster the individual market, then it would have to restrict abortion coverage on that market. If it used federal funds to offer subsidies to employers, the ban on abortion coverage would affect the employer market too.
Essentially, the federal government would have the states over a barrel--if they wanted money to help keep their residents covered, they'd have to sacrifice abortion coverage to get it.
The bill would also limit access to Planned Parenthood and allow states to apply for waivers to scrap rules that mandate coverage for essential health benefits such as maternity care.
While an estimated 13 million women would lose access to maternal care under Graham-Cassidy, others would be forced to pay higher premiums. A Center for American Progress analysis estimated that insurance providers would charge upwards of $17,000 more in premiums for pregnancy.
\u201c#GrahamCassidy\u2014a bill written by (surprise!) all Republican\nmen\u2014defunds @PPFA & makes you pay an ADDITIONAL $17,320 for pregnancy.\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1505925541
Ending Medicaid expansion would significantly affect millions of women of color and those with low incomes. According to the Guttmacher Institute, Medicaid covers 20 percent of American women aged 15-44, and in 2015, provided coverage for 48 percent of women whose incomes were below the federal poverty line.
Andy Slavitt, who ran the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under former President Barack Obama, shared a bulleted list detailing the ways in which Graham-Cassidy would impact women.
\u201cNEW: What would Graham-Cassidy ACA repeal mean for women?\n\nRT if useful.\u201d— Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b (@Andy Slavitt \ud83d\udc99\ud83d\udc9b) 1505871066
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) shared a similar list based on a Senate Budget Committee analysis, and also tweeted an image illustrating the bill's proposed restrictions on abortions.
\u201cThese flags mark all the abortion restrictions in the Republican repeal of Obamacare. This is a major rollback of women\u2019s rights.\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1505921412
Comparing the bill to previous proposals, Vox's Sarah Kliff writes: "While other Republican plans essentially create a poorly funded version of the Affordable Care Act, Graham-Cassidy blows it up."
A spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) confirmed Wednesday that Republicans intend to bring the bill to the floor for a vote next week, ahead of the September 30 deadline to pass the measure with a simple majority.
Several national progressive groups, lawmakers, and others have mobilized to defeat Graham-Cassidy through protests in Washington and online campaigns to raise awareness about the bill's consequences and urge voters to contact their senators:
\u201c@JimmyKimmelLive \ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffe\ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffc\ud83d\udc47\ud83c\udffd Stop to watch this - then:\n\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffe\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffc\ud83d\udc49\ud83c\udffd\ud83d\udcf1 Get back on the phone & tell your senator to #ProtectOurCare: 202-804-8210 https://t.co/zhW52Qj6IE\u201d— Cecile Richards (@Cecile Richards) 1505875491
\u201c#GrahamCassidyBill Insurance premiums:\n\ud83d\udc49Pregnancy: $17K\n\ud83d\udc49Breast cancer: $28K\n\ud83d\udc49Depression: $8K\n\ud83d\udc49Arthritis: $26K\nhttps://t.co/KuApSKnVHj\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1505914263
\u201c#GrahamCassidy bill wld let states undermine requirement that all health plans cover #maternitycare. https://t.co/CDBCZdtbce #ProtectOurCare\u201d— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher Institute) 1505862008