SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Clean Power Plan aims to cut carbon emissions from power plants to 32 percent below their 2005 levels. (Photo: Tony Webster/Flickr/cc)
EPA's Plan to Repeal Clean Power Plan 'Will Put Us All in Danger'
Internal document shows agency could soon move on repealing key rule meant to reduce U.S. carbon emissions
Oct 04, 2017
Environmental advocates expressed concern about the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) planned repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration's central legislation aimed at cutting carbon emissions from power plants.
"Rolling back this plan will put us all in danger," wrote the National Resources Defense Council on Twitter on Wednesday after Reuters obtained an internal EPA memo indicating the move.
The Clean Power Plan has been under the review by President Donald Trump's EPA since March. The rule was introduced in 2015 with the goal of bringing carbon emissions to 32 percent below pre-2005 levels, over 15 years.
Agency head Scott Pruitt is expected to "solicit input on a rule to replace" the plan, according to Reuters. The memo surfaced just a day after the New York Times reported how Pruitt has what is essentially an open-door policy for industry executives and lobbyists while shunning those pushing for environmental protections.
On social media, progressive voices stressed that the Clean Power Plan, while an imperfect solution to the issue of humans' contributions to climate change, represents the United States' strongest effort in recent years to reduce fossil fuel emissions and shift to other methods of producing energy. A growing number of countries around the world are taking their own steps in this direction, including China, which has steadily reduced its carbon emissions over the last four years, and Scotland, which announced on Tuesday that it would ban fracking.
\u201c@NRDC @EPA The future, job growth is in #CleanEnergy\nYou are on the wrong side of history @EPAScottPruitt\n\n#CleanPowerPlan @GOP\nhttps://t.co/4NVGygHJzh\u201d— NRDC \ud83c\udf0e\ud83c\udfe1 (@NRDC \ud83c\udf0e\ud83c\udfe1) 1507132818
Others drew attention to the EPA's own research which showed earlier this year that the Clean Power Plan would ultimately improve Americans' lives and prevent loss of life.
\u201cIf Trump repeals Clean Power Plan or replaces it w/a weaker plan, it will cost lives. EPA's own analysis shows this https://t.co/iALIspJQzo\u201d— Fred Krupp (@Fred Krupp) 1507133415
According to a CNN report in April, after the EPA announced it would review the plan, "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that when implemented, the plan would prevent 3,600 premature deaths a year. In addition, the agency said, it would prevent 1,700 heart attacks, 90,000 asthma attacks and 300,000 missed days of work or school a year."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Environmental advocates expressed concern about the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) planned repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration's central legislation aimed at cutting carbon emissions from power plants.
"Rolling back this plan will put us all in danger," wrote the National Resources Defense Council on Twitter on Wednesday after Reuters obtained an internal EPA memo indicating the move.
The Clean Power Plan has been under the review by President Donald Trump's EPA since March. The rule was introduced in 2015 with the goal of bringing carbon emissions to 32 percent below pre-2005 levels, over 15 years.
Agency head Scott Pruitt is expected to "solicit input on a rule to replace" the plan, according to Reuters. The memo surfaced just a day after the New York Times reported how Pruitt has what is essentially an open-door policy for industry executives and lobbyists while shunning those pushing for environmental protections.
On social media, progressive voices stressed that the Clean Power Plan, while an imperfect solution to the issue of humans' contributions to climate change, represents the United States' strongest effort in recent years to reduce fossil fuel emissions and shift to other methods of producing energy. A growing number of countries around the world are taking their own steps in this direction, including China, which has steadily reduced its carbon emissions over the last four years, and Scotland, which announced on Tuesday that it would ban fracking.
\u201c@NRDC @EPA The future, job growth is in #CleanEnergy\nYou are on the wrong side of history @EPAScottPruitt\n\n#CleanPowerPlan @GOP\nhttps://t.co/4NVGygHJzh\u201d— NRDC \ud83c\udf0e\ud83c\udfe1 (@NRDC \ud83c\udf0e\ud83c\udfe1) 1507132818
Others drew attention to the EPA's own research which showed earlier this year that the Clean Power Plan would ultimately improve Americans' lives and prevent loss of life.
\u201cIf Trump repeals Clean Power Plan or replaces it w/a weaker plan, it will cost lives. EPA's own analysis shows this https://t.co/iALIspJQzo\u201d— Fred Krupp (@Fred Krupp) 1507133415
According to a CNN report in April, after the EPA announced it would review the plan, "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that when implemented, the plan would prevent 3,600 premature deaths a year. In addition, the agency said, it would prevent 1,700 heart attacks, 90,000 asthma attacks and 300,000 missed days of work or school a year."
Environmental advocates expressed concern about the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) planned repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration's central legislation aimed at cutting carbon emissions from power plants.
"Rolling back this plan will put us all in danger," wrote the National Resources Defense Council on Twitter on Wednesday after Reuters obtained an internal EPA memo indicating the move.
The Clean Power Plan has been under the review by President Donald Trump's EPA since March. The rule was introduced in 2015 with the goal of bringing carbon emissions to 32 percent below pre-2005 levels, over 15 years.
Agency head Scott Pruitt is expected to "solicit input on a rule to replace" the plan, according to Reuters. The memo surfaced just a day after the New York Times reported how Pruitt has what is essentially an open-door policy for industry executives and lobbyists while shunning those pushing for environmental protections.
On social media, progressive voices stressed that the Clean Power Plan, while an imperfect solution to the issue of humans' contributions to climate change, represents the United States' strongest effort in recent years to reduce fossil fuel emissions and shift to other methods of producing energy. A growing number of countries around the world are taking their own steps in this direction, including China, which has steadily reduced its carbon emissions over the last four years, and Scotland, which announced on Tuesday that it would ban fracking.
\u201c@NRDC @EPA The future, job growth is in #CleanEnergy\nYou are on the wrong side of history @EPAScottPruitt\n\n#CleanPowerPlan @GOP\nhttps://t.co/4NVGygHJzh\u201d— NRDC \ud83c\udf0e\ud83c\udfe1 (@NRDC \ud83c\udf0e\ud83c\udfe1) 1507132818
Others drew attention to the EPA's own research which showed earlier this year that the Clean Power Plan would ultimately improve Americans' lives and prevent loss of life.
\u201cIf Trump repeals Clean Power Plan or replaces it w/a weaker plan, it will cost lives. EPA's own analysis shows this https://t.co/iALIspJQzo\u201d— Fred Krupp (@Fred Krupp) 1507133415
According to a CNN report in April, after the EPA announced it would review the plan, "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that when implemented, the plan would prevent 3,600 premature deaths a year. In addition, the agency said, it would prevent 1,700 heart attacks, 90,000 asthma attacks and 300,000 missed days of work or school a year."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.