SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A nuclear reprocessing plant called Mayak, in southern Russia, is suspected of involvement in a nuclear accident that sent a cloud of radioactive material over Europe in October. (Photo: @mattiaswac/Twitter)
Amid Russian Denials, Greenpeace Demands Probe into Source of Nuclear Radiation
Kremlin admits detecting increased radioactivity but denies that Mayak plant, the scene of earlier disaster, is the source
Nov 21, 2017
Greenpeace called for an investigation on Tuesday into the possible concealment of a nuclear incident in southern Russia, after Russian meteorologists confirmed on Tuesday that they recorded a rise in radiation coming from the Urals region in late September. The spike in radioactive ruthenium-106 isotopes coincided with a radioactive cloud that formed over much of Europe--but a reprocessing plant denied any involvement.
"An emergency discharge of ruthenium could be connected with the process of nuclear waste vitrification. Another possibility is that materials containing ruthenium-106 were placed in a metal remelting furnace. Both these activities take place in the Rosatom complex at Mayak," said Greenpeace in a statement.
The environmental group's Russian arm demanded that Russia's nuclear agency conduct "an in-depth inquiry and publish the results about the incidents at Mayak." Greenpeace also called for an examination into whether officials had been sufficiently transparent "and whether public health around a possible release of ruthenium 106-was sufficiently protected."
According to Radio Free Europe, officials in Chelyabinsk, a city in the southern Ural region where Mayak is located, "received no official information about dangerous levels of radiation in September."
But according to the meteorological service, levels of ruthenium-106 were found to be nearly 1,000 times higher than normal in parts of Russia in late September.
In the first week of October, both Austrian and German officials detected unusually high levels of radiation in their airspace. French researchers at the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRPS) suspected that the radiation had come from Russia, but Russian officials denied that there had been any recent incidents.
The IRPS has said that the isotope posed no health risks to people in any of the countries that saw elevated levels, but Greenpeace urged transparency about the possible nuclear leak.
Mayak was the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history in 1957--an incident which was concealed by the Soviets. Tens of thousands of people were contaminated after a storage tank containing radioactive waste exploded.
Jan Haverkamp, a nuclear energy expert consultant at Greenpeace Central Eastern Europe also spoke in favor of transparency and an in-depth investigation.
"Mayak looks like a logical source for this release, but the data do not yet exclude also other possibilities, including in neighboring Kazakhstan," Haverkamp said. "It is important there will be clarity as soon as possible, also to see if potential exposed people need support."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Greenpeace called for an investigation on Tuesday into the possible concealment of a nuclear incident in southern Russia, after Russian meteorologists confirmed on Tuesday that they recorded a rise in radiation coming from the Urals region in late September. The spike in radioactive ruthenium-106 isotopes coincided with a radioactive cloud that formed over much of Europe--but a reprocessing plant denied any involvement.
"An emergency discharge of ruthenium could be connected with the process of nuclear waste vitrification. Another possibility is that materials containing ruthenium-106 were placed in a metal remelting furnace. Both these activities take place in the Rosatom complex at Mayak," said Greenpeace in a statement.
The environmental group's Russian arm demanded that Russia's nuclear agency conduct "an in-depth inquiry and publish the results about the incidents at Mayak." Greenpeace also called for an examination into whether officials had been sufficiently transparent "and whether public health around a possible release of ruthenium 106-was sufficiently protected."
According to Radio Free Europe, officials in Chelyabinsk, a city in the southern Ural region where Mayak is located, "received no official information about dangerous levels of radiation in September."
But according to the meteorological service, levels of ruthenium-106 were found to be nearly 1,000 times higher than normal in parts of Russia in late September.
In the first week of October, both Austrian and German officials detected unusually high levels of radiation in their airspace. French researchers at the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRPS) suspected that the radiation had come from Russia, but Russian officials denied that there had been any recent incidents.
The IRPS has said that the isotope posed no health risks to people in any of the countries that saw elevated levels, but Greenpeace urged transparency about the possible nuclear leak.
Mayak was the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history in 1957--an incident which was concealed by the Soviets. Tens of thousands of people were contaminated after a storage tank containing radioactive waste exploded.
Jan Haverkamp, a nuclear energy expert consultant at Greenpeace Central Eastern Europe also spoke in favor of transparency and an in-depth investigation.
"Mayak looks like a logical source for this release, but the data do not yet exclude also other possibilities, including in neighboring Kazakhstan," Haverkamp said. "It is important there will be clarity as soon as possible, also to see if potential exposed people need support."
Greenpeace called for an investigation on Tuesday into the possible concealment of a nuclear incident in southern Russia, after Russian meteorologists confirmed on Tuesday that they recorded a rise in radiation coming from the Urals region in late September. The spike in radioactive ruthenium-106 isotopes coincided with a radioactive cloud that formed over much of Europe--but a reprocessing plant denied any involvement.
"An emergency discharge of ruthenium could be connected with the process of nuclear waste vitrification. Another possibility is that materials containing ruthenium-106 were placed in a metal remelting furnace. Both these activities take place in the Rosatom complex at Mayak," said Greenpeace in a statement.
The environmental group's Russian arm demanded that Russia's nuclear agency conduct "an in-depth inquiry and publish the results about the incidents at Mayak." Greenpeace also called for an examination into whether officials had been sufficiently transparent "and whether public health around a possible release of ruthenium 106-was sufficiently protected."
According to Radio Free Europe, officials in Chelyabinsk, a city in the southern Ural region where Mayak is located, "received no official information about dangerous levels of radiation in September."
But according to the meteorological service, levels of ruthenium-106 were found to be nearly 1,000 times higher than normal in parts of Russia in late September.
In the first week of October, both Austrian and German officials detected unusually high levels of radiation in their airspace. French researchers at the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRPS) suspected that the radiation had come from Russia, but Russian officials denied that there had been any recent incidents.
The IRPS has said that the isotope posed no health risks to people in any of the countries that saw elevated levels, but Greenpeace urged transparency about the possible nuclear leak.
Mayak was the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history in 1957--an incident which was concealed by the Soviets. Tens of thousands of people were contaminated after a storage tank containing radioactive waste exploded.
Jan Haverkamp, a nuclear energy expert consultant at Greenpeace Central Eastern Europe also spoke in favor of transparency and an in-depth investigation.
"Mayak looks like a logical source for this release, but the data do not yet exclude also other possibilities, including in neighboring Kazakhstan," Haverkamp said. "It is important there will be clarity as soon as possible, also to see if potential exposed people need support."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.