Jan 05, 2018
The lobbying group that represents some of the nation's largest companies in Silicon Valley--including Google, Amazon, and Netflix--announced Friday that it would act as "intervernor" in a lawsuit against the FCC's recent decision to dismantle rules that enshrine net neutrality protections that have governed the web since its creation.
After the FCC submitted its final order on Thursday evening, the Internet Association said it would back legal actions to prevent it from going into effect as well as offering support to legislative efforts also underway.
"The final version of Chairman Pai's rule, as expected, dismantles popular net neutrality protections for consumers," said Michael Beckerman, the group's president and CEO, in a statement. "This rule defies the will of a bipartisan majority of Americans and fails to preserve a free and open internet. IA intends to act as an intervenor in judicial action against this order and, along with our member companies, will continue our push to restore strong, enforceable net neutrality protections through a legislative solution."
In a tweet, Netflix said the "Internet is united in defense of #netneutrality." As for the FCC, the popular video-streaming company added, "We will see you in court."
\u201cIn 2018, the Internet is united in defense of #NetNeutrality. As for the FCC, we will see you in court. https://t.co/Ucf4H1xhne\u201d— Netflix (@Netflix) 1515177014
Though not a direct party to any specific lawsuit, Gizmodo explains that acting as a legal intervenor allows the industry group to assert "its right to weigh in on the case in order to protect its members' interests, which would clearly be impeded by disposition of the case."
According to Gizmodo:
The legal battle will take place months from now in a court yet to be determined. The number of litigants is also currently unknown--interested parties have another 50 days or so to file if they wish to join the suit. Among those who've declared their intent to file is Free Press, a pro-net-neutrality advocacy group.
"We'll be going to court soon to challenge the FCC and ramping up pressure on Congress to throw the rules out altogether," Free Press President Craig Aaron told Gizmodo. "[FCC Chairman] Ajit Pai has awakened the public, now Net Neutrality is a kitchen-table issue, and the outcry is only going to get louder."
While a legal battle in the courts is seen as one way to stall or prevent implementation of the FCC's order, which the five-member commission passed along partisan lines last month, net neutrality defenders advocates say the best path to making protections permanent remains the passage of a Congressional Review Act (CRA).
\u201cWhile advocates and companies take on the FCC in the courts, we will continue our fight to overturn the #NetNeutrality repeal through a CRA in Congress https://t.co/WCxuHsVStB\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1515178278
A CRA would reverse the FCC rule changes and once again enshrine net neutrality as a core principle while restoring Title II protections of the Internet under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The lobbying group that represents some of the nation's largest companies in Silicon Valley--including Google, Amazon, and Netflix--announced Friday that it would act as "intervernor" in a lawsuit against the FCC's recent decision to dismantle rules that enshrine net neutrality protections that have governed the web since its creation.
After the FCC submitted its final order on Thursday evening, the Internet Association said it would back legal actions to prevent it from going into effect as well as offering support to legislative efforts also underway.
"The final version of Chairman Pai's rule, as expected, dismantles popular net neutrality protections for consumers," said Michael Beckerman, the group's president and CEO, in a statement. "This rule defies the will of a bipartisan majority of Americans and fails to preserve a free and open internet. IA intends to act as an intervenor in judicial action against this order and, along with our member companies, will continue our push to restore strong, enforceable net neutrality protections through a legislative solution."
In a tweet, Netflix said the "Internet is united in defense of #netneutrality." As for the FCC, the popular video-streaming company added, "We will see you in court."
\u201cIn 2018, the Internet is united in defense of #NetNeutrality. As for the FCC, we will see you in court. https://t.co/Ucf4H1xhne\u201d— Netflix (@Netflix) 1515177014
Though not a direct party to any specific lawsuit, Gizmodo explains that acting as a legal intervenor allows the industry group to assert "its right to weigh in on the case in order to protect its members' interests, which would clearly be impeded by disposition of the case."
According to Gizmodo:
The legal battle will take place months from now in a court yet to be determined. The number of litigants is also currently unknown--interested parties have another 50 days or so to file if they wish to join the suit. Among those who've declared their intent to file is Free Press, a pro-net-neutrality advocacy group.
"We'll be going to court soon to challenge the FCC and ramping up pressure on Congress to throw the rules out altogether," Free Press President Craig Aaron told Gizmodo. "[FCC Chairman] Ajit Pai has awakened the public, now Net Neutrality is a kitchen-table issue, and the outcry is only going to get louder."
While a legal battle in the courts is seen as one way to stall or prevent implementation of the FCC's order, which the five-member commission passed along partisan lines last month, net neutrality defenders advocates say the best path to making protections permanent remains the passage of a Congressional Review Act (CRA).
\u201cWhile advocates and companies take on the FCC in the courts, we will continue our fight to overturn the #NetNeutrality repeal through a CRA in Congress https://t.co/WCxuHsVStB\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1515178278
A CRA would reverse the FCC rule changes and once again enshrine net neutrality as a core principle while restoring Title II protections of the Internet under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
The lobbying group that represents some of the nation's largest companies in Silicon Valley--including Google, Amazon, and Netflix--announced Friday that it would act as "intervernor" in a lawsuit against the FCC's recent decision to dismantle rules that enshrine net neutrality protections that have governed the web since its creation.
After the FCC submitted its final order on Thursday evening, the Internet Association said it would back legal actions to prevent it from going into effect as well as offering support to legislative efforts also underway.
"The final version of Chairman Pai's rule, as expected, dismantles popular net neutrality protections for consumers," said Michael Beckerman, the group's president and CEO, in a statement. "This rule defies the will of a bipartisan majority of Americans and fails to preserve a free and open internet. IA intends to act as an intervenor in judicial action against this order and, along with our member companies, will continue our push to restore strong, enforceable net neutrality protections through a legislative solution."
In a tweet, Netflix said the "Internet is united in defense of #netneutrality." As for the FCC, the popular video-streaming company added, "We will see you in court."
\u201cIn 2018, the Internet is united in defense of #NetNeutrality. As for the FCC, we will see you in court. https://t.co/Ucf4H1xhne\u201d— Netflix (@Netflix) 1515177014
Though not a direct party to any specific lawsuit, Gizmodo explains that acting as a legal intervenor allows the industry group to assert "its right to weigh in on the case in order to protect its members' interests, which would clearly be impeded by disposition of the case."
According to Gizmodo:
The legal battle will take place months from now in a court yet to be determined. The number of litigants is also currently unknown--interested parties have another 50 days or so to file if they wish to join the suit. Among those who've declared their intent to file is Free Press, a pro-net-neutrality advocacy group.
"We'll be going to court soon to challenge the FCC and ramping up pressure on Congress to throw the rules out altogether," Free Press President Craig Aaron told Gizmodo. "[FCC Chairman] Ajit Pai has awakened the public, now Net Neutrality is a kitchen-table issue, and the outcry is only going to get louder."
While a legal battle in the courts is seen as one way to stall or prevent implementation of the FCC's order, which the five-member commission passed along partisan lines last month, net neutrality defenders advocates say the best path to making protections permanent remains the passage of a Congressional Review Act (CRA).
\u201cWhile advocates and companies take on the FCC in the courts, we will continue our fight to overturn the #NetNeutrality repeal through a CRA in Congress https://t.co/WCxuHsVStB\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1515178278
A CRA would reverse the FCC rule changes and once again enshrine net neutrality as a core principle while restoring Title II protections of the Internet under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.