The London Guantanamo Campaign staged a protest outside Britain's U.S. embassy, demanding the release of the 41 prisoners who remain at Guantanamo Bay. (Photo: @AishaManiar/Twitter)
Jan 11, 2018
Eleven Guantanamo Bay inmates filed a petition in a federal court on Thursday--the 16th anniversary of the arrival of the first prisoners who were captured in the United States' "War on Terror"--demanding their release from the prison.
The prisoners argued that President Donald Trump's pledge to keep them there indefinitely is unconstitutional and is based on his "suspicion of and antipathy toward Muslims."
Even if the court were to assume Petitioners were all captured in similar circumstances--and they were not--the limited purpose for which the laws of war may have authorized their detention at Guantanamo...has long since faded.--Guantanamo Bay inmates"Given President Donald Trump's proclamation against releasing any petitioners--driven by executive hubris and raw animus rather than by reason or deliberative national security concerns--these petitioners may never leave Guantanamo alive, absent judicial intervention," reads the petition.
The president has said that unlike former President Barack Obama, he has no plans to release any of the 41 prisoners in the facility, despite the Constitution's due process clause prohibiting indefinite detention. He has characterized all the inmates as "extremely dangerous people" despite the fact that some of them have been cleared for release and more than two dozen have never been charged with any crime.
The inmates note that even the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF), in which Congress granted the government the right to "use all necessary and appropriate force" to defeat the persons or groups behind the September 11, 2001 attacks, including imprisonment, does not support indefinite detainment:
Even if the court were to assume Petitioners were all captured in similar circumstances--and they were not--the limited purpose for which the laws of war may have authorized their detention at Guantanamo to prevent return to the battlefield, has long since faded more than 15 years after their capture. The conflict against the core Al Qaeda organization in connection with which they were captured has ended and been taken over by disparate battles involving new groups. The battlefields in which they were captured, if any, are no more, thus dissolving the only legitimate purpose of their detention.
A number of human rights organizations joined in the call for the inmates' release, demanding that Guantanamo Bay be closed.
"It is shocking that 16 years after the Guantanamo prison was opened, the United States still maintains a center to detain prisoners indefinitely without charge or trial. Some of the 41 remaining detainees have been cleared for transfer for years," said Daphne Eviatar, director of security with human rights at Amnesty International USA, in a statement. "The laws of war never envisioned the sort of endless conflict the U.S. government is waging. The Guantanamo detainees must either be charged and transferred to the United States for fair trials, or sent home or to another country where they'll be safe. To continue to imprison these men, many of whom the U.S. also tortured, is unconscionable."
The civil rights group Reprieve, which represents some of the prisoners being held in the prison, added that even U.S. officials have acknowledged that inmates are being held there based on faulty intelligence and forced "confessions."
"The U.S. has had 16 years to build a case against these men, and yet 28 of 41 prisoners are held without charge or a trial of any kind--a shocking violation of America's founding principles," said Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, an attorney with the group. "If the president won't close Guantanamo, then the other branches of government must take action instead to finally restore the rule of law."
In London, human rights activists with the London Guantanamo campaign held a candlelight vigil outside the U.S. embassy in honor of the 41 men being held in the prison. The group noted that the continued operation of Guantanamo Bay sends a message from the U.S. about indefinite detention as an acceptable practice.
"The rights-violating practices surrounding Guantanamo are now a model for the detention and incarceration polices of the U.S. and other states," said Aisha Maniar in a statement. "Plans to expand immigration detention for undocumented migrants and the deplorable conditions in such facilities are connected to Guantanamo's origins and existence...It is the failure of the international community, and not just of the U.S., to act to close Guantanamo that has helped to legitimize this status quo."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
9/11amnesty internationalbarack obamacivil libertiesconstitutional rightsguantanamohuman rightstrumpismwar on terror
Eleven Guantanamo Bay inmates filed a petition in a federal court on Thursday--the 16th anniversary of the arrival of the first prisoners who were captured in the United States' "War on Terror"--demanding their release from the prison.
The prisoners argued that President Donald Trump's pledge to keep them there indefinitely is unconstitutional and is based on his "suspicion of and antipathy toward Muslims."
Even if the court were to assume Petitioners were all captured in similar circumstances--and they were not--the limited purpose for which the laws of war may have authorized their detention at Guantanamo...has long since faded.--Guantanamo Bay inmates"Given President Donald Trump's proclamation against releasing any petitioners--driven by executive hubris and raw animus rather than by reason or deliberative national security concerns--these petitioners may never leave Guantanamo alive, absent judicial intervention," reads the petition.
The president has said that unlike former President Barack Obama, he has no plans to release any of the 41 prisoners in the facility, despite the Constitution's due process clause prohibiting indefinite detention. He has characterized all the inmates as "extremely dangerous people" despite the fact that some of them have been cleared for release and more than two dozen have never been charged with any crime.
The inmates note that even the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF), in which Congress granted the government the right to "use all necessary and appropriate force" to defeat the persons or groups behind the September 11, 2001 attacks, including imprisonment, does not support indefinite detainment:
Even if the court were to assume Petitioners were all captured in similar circumstances--and they were not--the limited purpose for which the laws of war may have authorized their detention at Guantanamo to prevent return to the battlefield, has long since faded more than 15 years after their capture. The conflict against the core Al Qaeda organization in connection with which they were captured has ended and been taken over by disparate battles involving new groups. The battlefields in which they were captured, if any, are no more, thus dissolving the only legitimate purpose of their detention.
A number of human rights organizations joined in the call for the inmates' release, demanding that Guantanamo Bay be closed.
"It is shocking that 16 years after the Guantanamo prison was opened, the United States still maintains a center to detain prisoners indefinitely without charge or trial. Some of the 41 remaining detainees have been cleared for transfer for years," said Daphne Eviatar, director of security with human rights at Amnesty International USA, in a statement. "The laws of war never envisioned the sort of endless conflict the U.S. government is waging. The Guantanamo detainees must either be charged and transferred to the United States for fair trials, or sent home or to another country where they'll be safe. To continue to imprison these men, many of whom the U.S. also tortured, is unconscionable."
The civil rights group Reprieve, which represents some of the prisoners being held in the prison, added that even U.S. officials have acknowledged that inmates are being held there based on faulty intelligence and forced "confessions."
"The U.S. has had 16 years to build a case against these men, and yet 28 of 41 prisoners are held without charge or a trial of any kind--a shocking violation of America's founding principles," said Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, an attorney with the group. "If the president won't close Guantanamo, then the other branches of government must take action instead to finally restore the rule of law."
In London, human rights activists with the London Guantanamo campaign held a candlelight vigil outside the U.S. embassy in honor of the 41 men being held in the prison. The group noted that the continued operation of Guantanamo Bay sends a message from the U.S. about indefinite detention as an acceptable practice.
"The rights-violating practices surrounding Guantanamo are now a model for the detention and incarceration polices of the U.S. and other states," said Aisha Maniar in a statement. "Plans to expand immigration detention for undocumented migrants and the deplorable conditions in such facilities are connected to Guantanamo's origins and existence...It is the failure of the international community, and not just of the U.S., to act to close Guantanamo that has helped to legitimize this status quo."
Eleven Guantanamo Bay inmates filed a petition in a federal court on Thursday--the 16th anniversary of the arrival of the first prisoners who were captured in the United States' "War on Terror"--demanding their release from the prison.
The prisoners argued that President Donald Trump's pledge to keep them there indefinitely is unconstitutional and is based on his "suspicion of and antipathy toward Muslims."
Even if the court were to assume Petitioners were all captured in similar circumstances--and they were not--the limited purpose for which the laws of war may have authorized their detention at Guantanamo...has long since faded.--Guantanamo Bay inmates"Given President Donald Trump's proclamation against releasing any petitioners--driven by executive hubris and raw animus rather than by reason or deliberative national security concerns--these petitioners may never leave Guantanamo alive, absent judicial intervention," reads the petition.
The president has said that unlike former President Barack Obama, he has no plans to release any of the 41 prisoners in the facility, despite the Constitution's due process clause prohibiting indefinite detention. He has characterized all the inmates as "extremely dangerous people" despite the fact that some of them have been cleared for release and more than two dozen have never been charged with any crime.
The inmates note that even the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF), in which Congress granted the government the right to "use all necessary and appropriate force" to defeat the persons or groups behind the September 11, 2001 attacks, including imprisonment, does not support indefinite detainment:
Even if the court were to assume Petitioners were all captured in similar circumstances--and they were not--the limited purpose for which the laws of war may have authorized their detention at Guantanamo to prevent return to the battlefield, has long since faded more than 15 years after their capture. The conflict against the core Al Qaeda organization in connection with which they were captured has ended and been taken over by disparate battles involving new groups. The battlefields in which they were captured, if any, are no more, thus dissolving the only legitimate purpose of their detention.
A number of human rights organizations joined in the call for the inmates' release, demanding that Guantanamo Bay be closed.
"It is shocking that 16 years after the Guantanamo prison was opened, the United States still maintains a center to detain prisoners indefinitely without charge or trial. Some of the 41 remaining detainees have been cleared for transfer for years," said Daphne Eviatar, director of security with human rights at Amnesty International USA, in a statement. "The laws of war never envisioned the sort of endless conflict the U.S. government is waging. The Guantanamo detainees must either be charged and transferred to the United States for fair trials, or sent home or to another country where they'll be safe. To continue to imprison these men, many of whom the U.S. also tortured, is unconscionable."
The civil rights group Reprieve, which represents some of the prisoners being held in the prison, added that even U.S. officials have acknowledged that inmates are being held there based on faulty intelligence and forced "confessions."
"The U.S. has had 16 years to build a case against these men, and yet 28 of 41 prisoners are held without charge or a trial of any kind--a shocking violation of America's founding principles," said Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, an attorney with the group. "If the president won't close Guantanamo, then the other branches of government must take action instead to finally restore the rule of law."
In London, human rights activists with the London Guantanamo campaign held a candlelight vigil outside the U.S. embassy in honor of the 41 men being held in the prison. The group noted that the continued operation of Guantanamo Bay sends a message from the U.S. about indefinite detention as an acceptable practice.
"The rights-violating practices surrounding Guantanamo are now a model for the detention and incarceration polices of the U.S. and other states," said Aisha Maniar in a statement. "Plans to expand immigration detention for undocumented migrants and the deplorable conditions in such facilities are connected to Guantanamo's origins and existence...It is the failure of the international community, and not just of the U.S., to act to close Guantanamo that has helped to legitimize this status quo."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.