SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sean Hannity admitted that reports of President Trump's attempt to fire Robert Mueller were true on his show--but suggested the development didn't matter, despite agreement across the political spectrum that an attempt by the president to interfere with Mueller's investigation is a "red line." (Photo: @BusinessInsider/Twitter)
Forced to Backpedal on Trump-Mueller Story, Clip of Sean Hannity Fail Goes Viral
Over the course of one broadcast, the Fox News host went from denying the New York Times' report to confirming it to suggesting it was insignificant
Jan 26, 2018
Viewers of the Sean Hannity Show watched in real-time Thursday night as their host was forced to admit that reports of President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller were true, after he'd spent part of the broadcast attacking the New York Times' story.
Later, countless people online witnessed Hannity's coverage as the clip went viral.
Early in the show, Sean Hannity dismissed the Times'report that Trump had ordered the dismissal of Mueller, who stepped in to run the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign's ties to Russia after the president fired former FBI director James Comey last spring.
"The New York Times is trying to distract you," Hannity told his audience. "They have a story that Trump wanted Mueller fired sometime last June, and our sources, and I've checked in with many of them, they're not confirming that tonight...And how many times has the New York Times and others gotten it wrong?"
He later said that his sources could indeed confirm that the story was true.
Watch:
\u201cSean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren\u2019t confirming that!\n\nSean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That\u2019s his right. Anywho...\u201d— Matt Fuller (@Matt Fuller) 1516936984
Although Hannity's tone in his first mention of the story suggested that the Times' report, if true, would be a significant development, he took on a dismissive attitude when acknowledging that the president wanted to fire the official in charge of investigating him.
"Yeah, maybe Donald Trump wanted to fire the special counsel for conflict. Does he not have the right to raise those questions?" he said, shrugging, before quickly changing the subject to a high-speed car chase in Arizona.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have said that attempting to fire Mueller is a red line that the president must not cross.
On social media, Hannity's backtracking garnered attention from journalists and critics.
\u201cSean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren\u2019t confirming that!\n\nSean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That\u2019s his right. Anywho...\u201d— Matt Fuller (@Matt Fuller) 1516936984
\u201cI tell you, if Sean Hannity wasn\u2019t doing irreparable harm to our country this would be undeniably hilarious. https://t.co/iEIEniV1us\u201d— Jared Yates Sexton (@Jared Yates Sexton) 1516937846
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Viewers of the Sean Hannity Show watched in real-time Thursday night as their host was forced to admit that reports of President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller were true, after he'd spent part of the broadcast attacking the New York Times' story.
Later, countless people online witnessed Hannity's coverage as the clip went viral.
Early in the show, Sean Hannity dismissed the Times'report that Trump had ordered the dismissal of Mueller, who stepped in to run the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign's ties to Russia after the president fired former FBI director James Comey last spring.
"The New York Times is trying to distract you," Hannity told his audience. "They have a story that Trump wanted Mueller fired sometime last June, and our sources, and I've checked in with many of them, they're not confirming that tonight...And how many times has the New York Times and others gotten it wrong?"
He later said that his sources could indeed confirm that the story was true.
Watch:
\u201cSean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren\u2019t confirming that!\n\nSean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That\u2019s his right. Anywho...\u201d— Matt Fuller (@Matt Fuller) 1516936984
Although Hannity's tone in his first mention of the story suggested that the Times' report, if true, would be a significant development, he took on a dismissive attitude when acknowledging that the president wanted to fire the official in charge of investigating him.
"Yeah, maybe Donald Trump wanted to fire the special counsel for conflict. Does he not have the right to raise those questions?" he said, shrugging, before quickly changing the subject to a high-speed car chase in Arizona.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have said that attempting to fire Mueller is a red line that the president must not cross.
On social media, Hannity's backtracking garnered attention from journalists and critics.
\u201cSean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren\u2019t confirming that!\n\nSean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That\u2019s his right. Anywho...\u201d— Matt Fuller (@Matt Fuller) 1516936984
\u201cI tell you, if Sean Hannity wasn\u2019t doing irreparable harm to our country this would be undeniably hilarious. https://t.co/iEIEniV1us\u201d— Jared Yates Sexton (@Jared Yates Sexton) 1516937846
Viewers of the Sean Hannity Show watched in real-time Thursday night as their host was forced to admit that reports of President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller were true, after he'd spent part of the broadcast attacking the New York Times' story.
Later, countless people online witnessed Hannity's coverage as the clip went viral.
Early in the show, Sean Hannity dismissed the Times'report that Trump had ordered the dismissal of Mueller, who stepped in to run the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign's ties to Russia after the president fired former FBI director James Comey last spring.
"The New York Times is trying to distract you," Hannity told his audience. "They have a story that Trump wanted Mueller fired sometime last June, and our sources, and I've checked in with many of them, they're not confirming that tonight...And how many times has the New York Times and others gotten it wrong?"
He later said that his sources could indeed confirm that the story was true.
Watch:
\u201cSean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren\u2019t confirming that!\n\nSean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That\u2019s his right. Anywho...\u201d— Matt Fuller (@Matt Fuller) 1516936984
Although Hannity's tone in his first mention of the story suggested that the Times' report, if true, would be a significant development, he took on a dismissive attitude when acknowledging that the president wanted to fire the official in charge of investigating him.
"Yeah, maybe Donald Trump wanted to fire the special counsel for conflict. Does he not have the right to raise those questions?" he said, shrugging, before quickly changing the subject to a high-speed car chase in Arizona.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have said that attempting to fire Mueller is a red line that the president must not cross.
On social media, Hannity's backtracking garnered attention from journalists and critics.
\u201cSean Hannity: The New York Times is trying to distract you. They say Trump tried to fire Mueller, but our sources aren\u2019t confirming that!\n\nSean Hannity, minutes later: Alright, yeah, maybe our sources confirm Trump wanted to fire Mueller. But so what? That\u2019s his right. Anywho...\u201d— Matt Fuller (@Matt Fuller) 1516936984
\u201cI tell you, if Sean Hannity wasn\u2019t doing irreparable harm to our country this would be undeniably hilarious. https://t.co/iEIEniV1us\u201d— Jared Yates Sexton (@Jared Yates Sexton) 1516937846
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.