SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The internet freedom advocacy group Free Press gathered net neutrality supporters outside the FCC headquarters on December 13, as the panel voted to repeal net neutrality protections. (Photo: Free Press/Flickr/cc)
With 'Rock-Solid' Case to Defend Net Neutrality, Free Press Takes FCC to Court
"The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away" net neutrality protections that have the support of an overwhelming majority of Americans, says the group
Mar 02, 2018
The press freedom advocacy group Free Press expressed confidence on Thursday in its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) repeal of net neutrality protections as it filed a federal suit against the agency-approved rule change that would end one of the founding principles of the Internet.
"Free Press has a rock-solid legal argument against the FCC's repeal of the Net Neutrality rules," said Matt Wood, Free Press's policy director, in a statement. "The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away nondiscrimination protections, grounded in Title II of the Communications Act, that prevent ISPs from picking and choosing what speech they'll transmit and what they'll block or degrade."
"Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."--Matt Wood, Free Press
The FCC's 3-2 vote, along party lines, came after an anti-net neutrality campaign mounted by President Donald Trump's appointed chairman, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lobbyist.
The repeal of the rules would allow internet service providers to discriminate against certain websites, control download speeds, and charge users extra fees for broader access.
Just before the FCC's vote in December, 83 percent of Americans polled by the University of Maryland said they opposed the repeal. Since the panel went ahead with its decision, 25 states have signed executive orders or proposed legislation to protect the rules, while 50 senators have supported a resolution to nullify the FCC's order.
"Net Neutrality supporters are gathering momentum both on the legal and political fronts," said Wood. "Millions of people spoke out this week because they recognize how crucial the open internet is to promoting racial justice, free expression, innovation and economic opportunity. Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The press freedom advocacy group Free Press expressed confidence on Thursday in its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) repeal of net neutrality protections as it filed a federal suit against the agency-approved rule change that would end one of the founding principles of the Internet.
"Free Press has a rock-solid legal argument against the FCC's repeal of the Net Neutrality rules," said Matt Wood, Free Press's policy director, in a statement. "The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away nondiscrimination protections, grounded in Title II of the Communications Act, that prevent ISPs from picking and choosing what speech they'll transmit and what they'll block or degrade."
"Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."--Matt Wood, Free Press
The FCC's 3-2 vote, along party lines, came after an anti-net neutrality campaign mounted by President Donald Trump's appointed chairman, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lobbyist.
The repeal of the rules would allow internet service providers to discriminate against certain websites, control download speeds, and charge users extra fees for broader access.
Just before the FCC's vote in December, 83 percent of Americans polled by the University of Maryland said they opposed the repeal. Since the panel went ahead with its decision, 25 states have signed executive orders or proposed legislation to protect the rules, while 50 senators have supported a resolution to nullify the FCC's order.
"Net Neutrality supporters are gathering momentum both on the legal and political fronts," said Wood. "Millions of people spoke out this week because they recognize how crucial the open internet is to promoting racial justice, free expression, innovation and economic opportunity. Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."
The press freedom advocacy group Free Press expressed confidence on Thursday in its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) repeal of net neutrality protections as it filed a federal suit against the agency-approved rule change that would end one of the founding principles of the Internet.
"Free Press has a rock-solid legal argument against the FCC's repeal of the Net Neutrality rules," said Matt Wood, Free Press's policy director, in a statement. "The agency is dead wrong to think it can take away nondiscrimination protections, grounded in Title II of the Communications Act, that prevent ISPs from picking and choosing what speech they'll transmit and what they'll block or degrade."
"Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."--Matt Wood, Free Press
The FCC's 3-2 vote, along party lines, came after an anti-net neutrality campaign mounted by President Donald Trump's appointed chairman, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lobbyist.
The repeal of the rules would allow internet service providers to discriminate against certain websites, control download speeds, and charge users extra fees for broader access.
Just before the FCC's vote in December, 83 percent of Americans polled by the University of Maryland said they opposed the repeal. Since the panel went ahead with its decision, 25 states have signed executive orders or proposed legislation to protect the rules, while 50 senators have supported a resolution to nullify the FCC's order.
"Net Neutrality supporters are gathering momentum both on the legal and political fronts," said Wood. "Millions of people spoke out this week because they recognize how crucial the open internet is to promoting racial justice, free expression, innovation and economic opportunity. Lawmakers in Congress and the states are signing up by the hundreds to protect Net Neutrality. The courts will have their say, too, as they begin to assess the legal and factual errors underlying the FCC's wrongheaded repeal."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.