SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Civil libertarians and digital rights advocates are alarmed about an "insidious" and "dangerous" piece of federal legislation that the ACLU warns "threatens activists abroad, individuals here in the U.S., and would empower Attorney General Sessions in new disturbing ways."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data or CLOUD Act (S. 2383 and H.R. 4943), as David Ruiz at Electronic Fronteir Foundation (EFF) explains, would establish a "new backdoor for cross-border data [that] mirrors another backdoor under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, an invasive NSA surveillance authority for foreign intelligence gathering" recently reauthorized by Congress.
Ruiz outlines how the legislation would enable U.S. authorities to bypass Fourth Amendment rights to obtain Americans' data and use it against them:
The CLOUD Act allows the president to enter an executive agreement with a foreign nation known for human rights abuses. Using its CLOUD Act powers, police from that nation inevitably will collect Americans' communications. They can share the content of those communications with the U.S. government under the flawed "significant harm" test. The U.S. government can use that content against these Americans. A judge need not approve the data collection before it is carried out. At no point need probable cause be shown. At no point need a search warrant be obtained.
The EFF and ACLU are among two dozen groups that banded together earlier this month to pen a letter to Congress to express alarm that the bill "fails to protect the rights of Americans and individuals abroad, and would put too much authority in the hands of the executive branch with few mechanisms to prevent abuse."
And, as Fight for the Future notes, the "group of surveillance hawks from both parties" who are advocating for the CLOUD Act are "trying to railroad it through Congress without time for public debate by attaching it to the must-pass omnibus spending bill" that Congress needs to approve by Friday to avoid another government shutdown.
\u201cURGENT: Congress is deciding right now, in closed-door meetings, whether to include #CLOUDAct internet spying legislation in the must-pass omnibus spending bill that will be voted on this week. CONTACT YOUR REPS NOW: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521489575
"This controversial legislation would be a poison pill for the omnibus spending bill," declared Fight for the Future's deputy director, Evan Greer. "Decisions like this requires rigorous examination and public debate, now more than ever, and should not be made behind closed doors as part of back room Congressional deals."
The group also pointed out that big tech companies such as Apple, Facebook, and Google are among those lobbying lawmakers to include the CLOUD Act in the spending bill:
\u201cThe #CLOUDAct threatens your privacy\u2014but big tech companies want Congress to rush it into law. Sign the petition to tell your lawmakers to keep the CLOUD Act OUT of the must-pass omnibus bill: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521309137
Meanwhile, other opponents such as Freedom of the Press and European Digital Rights (EDRi) are calling on Americans to contact their federal representatives and urge them to vote against the measure:
\u201cA proposed bill called the CLOUD Act could allow police to seize Americans' data across borders, without following the privacy laws where the data is stored. This could circumvent the Fourth Amendment\u2014urge your reps to oppose it: https://t.co/erfBJYI4NB\u201d— Freedom of the Press (@Freedom of the Press) 1521131154
\u201cCLOUD Act: Civil society urges US Congress to consider global implications https://t.co/ONOE1M9bbM #CLOUDAct #eevidence #EUdataP #privacy #RuleOfLaw cc @VeraJourova\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1521479314
Although Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is among those opposing the bill in the Senate--including any attempt to tie it to this week's government spending bill--if the vote reauthorizing Section 702 is any indication, several Democrats could join with the Republican majority to push it through.
\u201cThe CLOUD Act will give Trump - or any president- far too much power to approve surveillance agreements with human rights abusing foreign governments without real oversight by Congress. The House shouldn't attach it to the spending bill.\u201d— Ron Wyden (@Ron Wyden) 1520892425
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Civil libertarians and digital rights advocates are alarmed about an "insidious" and "dangerous" piece of federal legislation that the ACLU warns "threatens activists abroad, individuals here in the U.S., and would empower Attorney General Sessions in new disturbing ways."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data or CLOUD Act (S. 2383 and H.R. 4943), as David Ruiz at Electronic Fronteir Foundation (EFF) explains, would establish a "new backdoor for cross-border data [that] mirrors another backdoor under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, an invasive NSA surveillance authority for foreign intelligence gathering" recently reauthorized by Congress.
Ruiz outlines how the legislation would enable U.S. authorities to bypass Fourth Amendment rights to obtain Americans' data and use it against them:
The CLOUD Act allows the president to enter an executive agreement with a foreign nation known for human rights abuses. Using its CLOUD Act powers, police from that nation inevitably will collect Americans' communications. They can share the content of those communications with the U.S. government under the flawed "significant harm" test. The U.S. government can use that content against these Americans. A judge need not approve the data collection before it is carried out. At no point need probable cause be shown. At no point need a search warrant be obtained.
The EFF and ACLU are among two dozen groups that banded together earlier this month to pen a letter to Congress to express alarm that the bill "fails to protect the rights of Americans and individuals abroad, and would put too much authority in the hands of the executive branch with few mechanisms to prevent abuse."
And, as Fight for the Future notes, the "group of surveillance hawks from both parties" who are advocating for the CLOUD Act are "trying to railroad it through Congress without time for public debate by attaching it to the must-pass omnibus spending bill" that Congress needs to approve by Friday to avoid another government shutdown.
\u201cURGENT: Congress is deciding right now, in closed-door meetings, whether to include #CLOUDAct internet spying legislation in the must-pass omnibus spending bill that will be voted on this week. CONTACT YOUR REPS NOW: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521489575
"This controversial legislation would be a poison pill for the omnibus spending bill," declared Fight for the Future's deputy director, Evan Greer. "Decisions like this requires rigorous examination and public debate, now more than ever, and should not be made behind closed doors as part of back room Congressional deals."
The group also pointed out that big tech companies such as Apple, Facebook, and Google are among those lobbying lawmakers to include the CLOUD Act in the spending bill:
\u201cThe #CLOUDAct threatens your privacy\u2014but big tech companies want Congress to rush it into law. Sign the petition to tell your lawmakers to keep the CLOUD Act OUT of the must-pass omnibus bill: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521309137
Meanwhile, other opponents such as Freedom of the Press and European Digital Rights (EDRi) are calling on Americans to contact their federal representatives and urge them to vote against the measure:
\u201cA proposed bill called the CLOUD Act could allow police to seize Americans' data across borders, without following the privacy laws where the data is stored. This could circumvent the Fourth Amendment\u2014urge your reps to oppose it: https://t.co/erfBJYI4NB\u201d— Freedom of the Press (@Freedom of the Press) 1521131154
\u201cCLOUD Act: Civil society urges US Congress to consider global implications https://t.co/ONOE1M9bbM #CLOUDAct #eevidence #EUdataP #privacy #RuleOfLaw cc @VeraJourova\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1521479314
Although Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is among those opposing the bill in the Senate--including any attempt to tie it to this week's government spending bill--if the vote reauthorizing Section 702 is any indication, several Democrats could join with the Republican majority to push it through.
\u201cThe CLOUD Act will give Trump - or any president- far too much power to approve surveillance agreements with human rights abusing foreign governments without real oversight by Congress. The House shouldn't attach it to the spending bill.\u201d— Ron Wyden (@Ron Wyden) 1520892425
Civil libertarians and digital rights advocates are alarmed about an "insidious" and "dangerous" piece of federal legislation that the ACLU warns "threatens activists abroad, individuals here in the U.S., and would empower Attorney General Sessions in new disturbing ways."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data or CLOUD Act (S. 2383 and H.R. 4943), as David Ruiz at Electronic Fronteir Foundation (EFF) explains, would establish a "new backdoor for cross-border data [that] mirrors another backdoor under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, an invasive NSA surveillance authority for foreign intelligence gathering" recently reauthorized by Congress.
Ruiz outlines how the legislation would enable U.S. authorities to bypass Fourth Amendment rights to obtain Americans' data and use it against them:
The CLOUD Act allows the president to enter an executive agreement with a foreign nation known for human rights abuses. Using its CLOUD Act powers, police from that nation inevitably will collect Americans' communications. They can share the content of those communications with the U.S. government under the flawed "significant harm" test. The U.S. government can use that content against these Americans. A judge need not approve the data collection before it is carried out. At no point need probable cause be shown. At no point need a search warrant be obtained.
The EFF and ACLU are among two dozen groups that banded together earlier this month to pen a letter to Congress to express alarm that the bill "fails to protect the rights of Americans and individuals abroad, and would put too much authority in the hands of the executive branch with few mechanisms to prevent abuse."
And, as Fight for the Future notes, the "group of surveillance hawks from both parties" who are advocating for the CLOUD Act are "trying to railroad it through Congress without time for public debate by attaching it to the must-pass omnibus spending bill" that Congress needs to approve by Friday to avoid another government shutdown.
\u201cURGENT: Congress is deciding right now, in closed-door meetings, whether to include #CLOUDAct internet spying legislation in the must-pass omnibus spending bill that will be voted on this week. CONTACT YOUR REPS NOW: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521489575
"This controversial legislation would be a poison pill for the omnibus spending bill," declared Fight for the Future's deputy director, Evan Greer. "Decisions like this requires rigorous examination and public debate, now more than ever, and should not be made behind closed doors as part of back room Congressional deals."
The group also pointed out that big tech companies such as Apple, Facebook, and Google are among those lobbying lawmakers to include the CLOUD Act in the spending bill:
\u201cThe #CLOUDAct threatens your privacy\u2014but big tech companies want Congress to rush it into law. Sign the petition to tell your lawmakers to keep the CLOUD Act OUT of the must-pass omnibus bill: https://t.co/3FE3xVjw9H\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521309137
Meanwhile, other opponents such as Freedom of the Press and European Digital Rights (EDRi) are calling on Americans to contact their federal representatives and urge them to vote against the measure:
\u201cA proposed bill called the CLOUD Act could allow police to seize Americans' data across borders, without following the privacy laws where the data is stored. This could circumvent the Fourth Amendment\u2014urge your reps to oppose it: https://t.co/erfBJYI4NB\u201d— Freedom of the Press (@Freedom of the Press) 1521131154
\u201cCLOUD Act: Civil society urges US Congress to consider global implications https://t.co/ONOE1M9bbM #CLOUDAct #eevidence #EUdataP #privacy #RuleOfLaw cc @VeraJourova\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1521479314
Although Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is among those opposing the bill in the Senate--including any attempt to tie it to this week's government spending bill--if the vote reauthorizing Section 702 is any indication, several Democrats could join with the Republican majority to push it through.
\u201cThe CLOUD Act will give Trump - or any president- far too much power to approve surveillance agreements with human rights abusing foreign governments without real oversight by Congress. The House shouldn't attach it to the spending bill.\u201d— Ron Wyden (@Ron Wyden) 1520892425