SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763
A federal judge brought the public one step closer on Thursday to discovering how much Exxon Mobil knew about its fossil fuel development's effects on the climate, as she threw out the company's lawsuit seeking to end a probe into its alleged cover-up.
The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are investigating whether the oil and gas giant lied to investors and the public about evidence of climate crisis in past decades. Exxon sued the two states after they subpoenaed documents showing its understanding of climate change and its communications with shareholders about the issue.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ruled against Exxon's argument that the two states are pursuing a "politically-motivated" attack on the company, and that its free speech rights were violated by the investigation.
\u201cExxon tried to shut down 2 state investigations by claiming its free speech rights were being violated. The judge didn't buy it. #exxonknew https://t.co/bp6NO418aG\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1522405800
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman applauded Caproni's decision, calling Exxon's case a "frivolous, nonsensical lawsuit that wrongfully attempted to thwart a serious state law enforcement investigation."
Maura Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, called the ruling "a victory for the people."
\u201cExxon\u2019s lawsuit to stop our investigation into what the company has known about the impact of burning fossil fuels was just dismissed in New York.\u201d— Maura Healey (@Maura Healey) 1522364984
Environmental campaigners joined the attorneys general in celebrating the decision, and looked ahead to the likely outcome--evidence of what Caproni called Exxon's alleged attempts to "sow confusion" about climate crisis.
\u201cMajor win for @AGSchneiderman and @MassAGO as judge dismisses suit from Exxon--probe into #Exxonknew will continue. \nhttps://t.co/byOwvyXAM1\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1522363270
\u201cA small step against @exxonmobil, a big win for #climate. #ExxonKnew that its own oil and gas development was causing #climatechange and purposely misled the public https://t.co/M6LkS13iCG \u2026 #ActOnClimate\u201d— Alaska Wilderness League (@Alaska Wilderness League) 1522415763