SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Through its energy forecasts, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has been guiding governments towards energy decisions that are inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement, new research has found. (Photo: Oil Change International/IEEFA)
Study Details How IEA's Rosy Outlook for Fossil Fuels Is Driving World Towards Climate Disaster
"The IEA provides an energy roadmap that is supposed to lead us to safety, but in fact it takes us over the cliff."
Apr 05, 2018
A new groundbreaking report out Thursday details how one of the most influential organizations in the world when it comes to the global energy system, the International Energy Agency (IEA), is holding back governments from making the necessary transition away from fossil fuels and towards the kind of rapid transition to renewables that scientists say is necessary to ward off the worst-case scenarios of global warming and the climate crisis.
Published by Oil Change International and the Institute for Energy Efficiency and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the report--titled Off Track:How the International Energy Agency Guides Energy Decisions towards Fossil Fuel Dependence and Climate Change (pdf)--concludes that the IEA's ongoing guidance to countries that have agreed to do everything possible to meet the goal of the Paris climate agreement is undermining those commitments by painting a picture of a world that remains much too wedded to the use of oil, gas, and coal.
"The IEA promotes a vision of the future where the world remains dependent on fossil fuels," warns Greg Muttitt, research director at Oil Change International and lead author of the report. "As a basis for policy and investment decisions, this is in danger of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. All 30 of the IEA's member countries have signed the Paris Agreement, so the IEA should be helping them achieve climate goals, not holding them back."
\u201cNew study on "the fallen lighthouse" called International Energy Agency. \nShows how fossil biases in the @IEA predictions thwart the Paris agreement.\nCannot vouch for every detail but it seems excruciatingly well researched and my own analysis is used perfectly. https://t.co/JyC6rUdRtY\u201d— AukeHoekstra (@AukeHoekstra) 1522906782
\u201cIt's high time the @IEA revised their methodologies. Year on year, by grossly underestimating the renewables revolution and projecting a rosy future for coal oil gas, they have done a great disservice to our future, by directing investors to the solutions of the past @PriceofOil https://t.co/SJEel07vgF\u201d— Sam Kimmins (@Sam Kimmins) 1522918576
With a close look at the IEA's annual "New Policies Scenario" (NPS) report--arguably the most influential of its kind among world leaders and governments-- Muttitt's analysis reveals that the scenarios it lays out are in direct contradiction to the goals agreed to in the Paris accord. Specifically, it notes:
- The NPS implies burning an amount of fossil fuels that would exhaust the carbon budget for the 1.5degC target by 2022, and for a 2degC limit by 2034.
- Of the NPS' recommended upstream oil and gas investment, between 78 and 96 percent - US$ 11.2 to 13.8 trillion over 2018-40 - is incompatible with the Paris goals.
"The IEA provides an energy roadmap that is supposed to lead us to safety, but in fact it takes us over the cliff," Muttitt told the Guardian in a separate interview. "Any government or financial institution that uses these scenarios as a basis for investments in oil and gas is getting seriously bad information. It's shocking how far off the Paris agreement they are."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new groundbreaking report out Thursday details how one of the most influential organizations in the world when it comes to the global energy system, the International Energy Agency (IEA), is holding back governments from making the necessary transition away from fossil fuels and towards the kind of rapid transition to renewables that scientists say is necessary to ward off the worst-case scenarios of global warming and the climate crisis.
Published by Oil Change International and the Institute for Energy Efficiency and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the report--titled Off Track:How the International Energy Agency Guides Energy Decisions towards Fossil Fuel Dependence and Climate Change (pdf)--concludes that the IEA's ongoing guidance to countries that have agreed to do everything possible to meet the goal of the Paris climate agreement is undermining those commitments by painting a picture of a world that remains much too wedded to the use of oil, gas, and coal.
"The IEA promotes a vision of the future where the world remains dependent on fossil fuels," warns Greg Muttitt, research director at Oil Change International and lead author of the report. "As a basis for policy and investment decisions, this is in danger of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. All 30 of the IEA's member countries have signed the Paris Agreement, so the IEA should be helping them achieve climate goals, not holding them back."
\u201cNew study on "the fallen lighthouse" called International Energy Agency. \nShows how fossil biases in the @IEA predictions thwart the Paris agreement.\nCannot vouch for every detail but it seems excruciatingly well researched and my own analysis is used perfectly. https://t.co/JyC6rUdRtY\u201d— AukeHoekstra (@AukeHoekstra) 1522906782
\u201cIt's high time the @IEA revised their methodologies. Year on year, by grossly underestimating the renewables revolution and projecting a rosy future for coal oil gas, they have done a great disservice to our future, by directing investors to the solutions of the past @PriceofOil https://t.co/SJEel07vgF\u201d— Sam Kimmins (@Sam Kimmins) 1522918576
With a close look at the IEA's annual "New Policies Scenario" (NPS) report--arguably the most influential of its kind among world leaders and governments-- Muttitt's analysis reveals that the scenarios it lays out are in direct contradiction to the goals agreed to in the Paris accord. Specifically, it notes:
- The NPS implies burning an amount of fossil fuels that would exhaust the carbon budget for the 1.5degC target by 2022, and for a 2degC limit by 2034.
- Of the NPS' recommended upstream oil and gas investment, between 78 and 96 percent - US$ 11.2 to 13.8 trillion over 2018-40 - is incompatible with the Paris goals.
"The IEA provides an energy roadmap that is supposed to lead us to safety, but in fact it takes us over the cliff," Muttitt told the Guardian in a separate interview. "Any government or financial institution that uses these scenarios as a basis for investments in oil and gas is getting seriously bad information. It's shocking how far off the Paris agreement they are."
A new groundbreaking report out Thursday details how one of the most influential organizations in the world when it comes to the global energy system, the International Energy Agency (IEA), is holding back governments from making the necessary transition away from fossil fuels and towards the kind of rapid transition to renewables that scientists say is necessary to ward off the worst-case scenarios of global warming and the climate crisis.
Published by Oil Change International and the Institute for Energy Efficiency and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the report--titled Off Track:How the International Energy Agency Guides Energy Decisions towards Fossil Fuel Dependence and Climate Change (pdf)--concludes that the IEA's ongoing guidance to countries that have agreed to do everything possible to meet the goal of the Paris climate agreement is undermining those commitments by painting a picture of a world that remains much too wedded to the use of oil, gas, and coal.
"The IEA promotes a vision of the future where the world remains dependent on fossil fuels," warns Greg Muttitt, research director at Oil Change International and lead author of the report. "As a basis for policy and investment decisions, this is in danger of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. All 30 of the IEA's member countries have signed the Paris Agreement, so the IEA should be helping them achieve climate goals, not holding them back."
\u201cNew study on "the fallen lighthouse" called International Energy Agency. \nShows how fossil biases in the @IEA predictions thwart the Paris agreement.\nCannot vouch for every detail but it seems excruciatingly well researched and my own analysis is used perfectly. https://t.co/JyC6rUdRtY\u201d— AukeHoekstra (@AukeHoekstra) 1522906782
\u201cIt's high time the @IEA revised their methodologies. Year on year, by grossly underestimating the renewables revolution and projecting a rosy future for coal oil gas, they have done a great disservice to our future, by directing investors to the solutions of the past @PriceofOil https://t.co/SJEel07vgF\u201d— Sam Kimmins (@Sam Kimmins) 1522918576
With a close look at the IEA's annual "New Policies Scenario" (NPS) report--arguably the most influential of its kind among world leaders and governments-- Muttitt's analysis reveals that the scenarios it lays out are in direct contradiction to the goals agreed to in the Paris accord. Specifically, it notes:
- The NPS implies burning an amount of fossil fuels that would exhaust the carbon budget for the 1.5degC target by 2022, and for a 2degC limit by 2034.
- Of the NPS' recommended upstream oil and gas investment, between 78 and 96 percent - US$ 11.2 to 13.8 trillion over 2018-40 - is incompatible with the Paris goals.
"The IEA provides an energy roadmap that is supposed to lead us to safety, but in fact it takes us over the cliff," Muttitt told the Guardian in a separate interview. "Any government or financial institution that uses these scenarios as a basis for investments in oil and gas is getting seriously bad information. It's shocking how far off the Paris agreement they are."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.