"Rather than seeing what the courts will let them get away with, Texas should be thinking about how to best serve its voters," said Myrna Perez of the Brennan Center. (Photo: Stephen Melkisethian/Flickr/cc)
Apr 28, 2018
In a move that frustrated voting rights advocates, a federal appeals court on Friday ruled that Texas can implement a revisied voter identification law that critics claim is unconstitutionally discriminatory.
"We continue to firmly believe that the Texas photo ID law is one of the most discriminatory and restrictive measures of its kind," Kristen Clarke of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, part of the legal team that challenged the measure, said following the court's decision.
\u201cWe continue to firmly believe that the #Texas #PhotoID law is one of the most discriminatory and restrictive measures of its kind. While today's 5th Circuit ruling is disappointing, we will continue working to eradicate barriers to the polls. @LawyersComm https://t.co/nofTNZyvqo\u201d— Kristen Clarke (@Kristen Clarke) 1524886303
In a 2-1 ruling, a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel reversed a district judge's 2017 ruling that Senate Bill 5 unconstitutionally discriminates against black and Latinx voters. The legislation in question is a revised version of Senate Bill 14, which was enacted in 2011 but eventually deemed discriminatory and blocked by federal courts.
S.B. 14 mandated that voters present a government-issued photo ID; S.B. 5 added a provision that required those who lacked such identification to sign an affidavit and present an alternate ID.
"No law should be allowed to stand that is merely built on the back of a plainly discriminatory law," Clarke declared.
In his dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge James Graves wrote (pdf) that "S.B. 5 does not fully remove the burden disproportionately placed on poor and minority voters; it just creates a new and different burden."
However, "even if S.B. 5 were, as Texas and the majority both claim, ostensibly to remove or otherwise lessen the discriminatory impacts of S.B. 14, it still does not change the reason--the discriminatory reason--why the state enacted a voter ID law in the first place," Graves concluded. "A hog in a silk waistcoat is still a hog."
"It is, essentially, the same law," explained ProPublica reporter Jessica Huseman, "and it was a mess."
\u201cToday, the 5th circuit allowed Texas' revised voter ID law to go into effect. It is, essentially, the same law that was in effect in 2016 \u2014 and it was a mess. I wrote a deep dive piece about that last year: https://t.co/QPqgHQdC74\u201d— Jessica Huseman (@Jessica Huseman) 1524869761
Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, expressed disappointment with the majority's ruling, but vowed to continue the fight.
"We maintain that no voter should ever be turned away from the polls because of an ID requirement," she said, "and we will continue to aggressively pursue the right to vote wherever it is challenged."
Myrna Perez, deputy director of the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, called on the state's elected officials to better serve their constituents.
Pointing out that "every court that has reviewed Texas' prior voter ID law has found that it would have a discriminatory effect," Perez said, "Rather than seeing what the courts will let them get away with, Texas should be thinking about how to best serve its voters."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a move that frustrated voting rights advocates, a federal appeals court on Friday ruled that Texas can implement a revisied voter identification law that critics claim is unconstitutionally discriminatory.
"We continue to firmly believe that the Texas photo ID law is one of the most discriminatory and restrictive measures of its kind," Kristen Clarke of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, part of the legal team that challenged the measure, said following the court's decision.
\u201cWe continue to firmly believe that the #Texas #PhotoID law is one of the most discriminatory and restrictive measures of its kind. While today's 5th Circuit ruling is disappointing, we will continue working to eradicate barriers to the polls. @LawyersComm https://t.co/nofTNZyvqo\u201d— Kristen Clarke (@Kristen Clarke) 1524886303
In a 2-1 ruling, a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel reversed a district judge's 2017 ruling that Senate Bill 5 unconstitutionally discriminates against black and Latinx voters. The legislation in question is a revised version of Senate Bill 14, which was enacted in 2011 but eventually deemed discriminatory and blocked by federal courts.
S.B. 14 mandated that voters present a government-issued photo ID; S.B. 5 added a provision that required those who lacked such identification to sign an affidavit and present an alternate ID.
"No law should be allowed to stand that is merely built on the back of a plainly discriminatory law," Clarke declared.
In his dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge James Graves wrote (pdf) that "S.B. 5 does not fully remove the burden disproportionately placed on poor and minority voters; it just creates a new and different burden."
However, "even if S.B. 5 were, as Texas and the majority both claim, ostensibly to remove or otherwise lessen the discriminatory impacts of S.B. 14, it still does not change the reason--the discriminatory reason--why the state enacted a voter ID law in the first place," Graves concluded. "A hog in a silk waistcoat is still a hog."
"It is, essentially, the same law," explained ProPublica reporter Jessica Huseman, "and it was a mess."
\u201cToday, the 5th circuit allowed Texas' revised voter ID law to go into effect. It is, essentially, the same law that was in effect in 2016 \u2014 and it was a mess. I wrote a deep dive piece about that last year: https://t.co/QPqgHQdC74\u201d— Jessica Huseman (@Jessica Huseman) 1524869761
Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, expressed disappointment with the majority's ruling, but vowed to continue the fight.
"We maintain that no voter should ever be turned away from the polls because of an ID requirement," she said, "and we will continue to aggressively pursue the right to vote wherever it is challenged."
Myrna Perez, deputy director of the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, called on the state's elected officials to better serve their constituents.
Pointing out that "every court that has reviewed Texas' prior voter ID law has found that it would have a discriminatory effect," Perez said, "Rather than seeing what the courts will let them get away with, Texas should be thinking about how to best serve its voters."
In a move that frustrated voting rights advocates, a federal appeals court on Friday ruled that Texas can implement a revisied voter identification law that critics claim is unconstitutionally discriminatory.
"We continue to firmly believe that the Texas photo ID law is one of the most discriminatory and restrictive measures of its kind," Kristen Clarke of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, part of the legal team that challenged the measure, said following the court's decision.
\u201cWe continue to firmly believe that the #Texas #PhotoID law is one of the most discriminatory and restrictive measures of its kind. While today's 5th Circuit ruling is disappointing, we will continue working to eradicate barriers to the polls. @LawyersComm https://t.co/nofTNZyvqo\u201d— Kristen Clarke (@Kristen Clarke) 1524886303
In a 2-1 ruling, a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel reversed a district judge's 2017 ruling that Senate Bill 5 unconstitutionally discriminates against black and Latinx voters. The legislation in question is a revised version of Senate Bill 14, which was enacted in 2011 but eventually deemed discriminatory and blocked by federal courts.
S.B. 14 mandated that voters present a government-issued photo ID; S.B. 5 added a provision that required those who lacked such identification to sign an affidavit and present an alternate ID.
"No law should be allowed to stand that is merely built on the back of a plainly discriminatory law," Clarke declared.
In his dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge James Graves wrote (pdf) that "S.B. 5 does not fully remove the burden disproportionately placed on poor and minority voters; it just creates a new and different burden."
However, "even if S.B. 5 were, as Texas and the majority both claim, ostensibly to remove or otherwise lessen the discriminatory impacts of S.B. 14, it still does not change the reason--the discriminatory reason--why the state enacted a voter ID law in the first place," Graves concluded. "A hog in a silk waistcoat is still a hog."
"It is, essentially, the same law," explained ProPublica reporter Jessica Huseman, "and it was a mess."
\u201cToday, the 5th circuit allowed Texas' revised voter ID law to go into effect. It is, essentially, the same law that was in effect in 2016 \u2014 and it was a mess. I wrote a deep dive piece about that last year: https://t.co/QPqgHQdC74\u201d— Jessica Huseman (@Jessica Huseman) 1524869761
Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, expressed disappointment with the majority's ruling, but vowed to continue the fight.
"We maintain that no voter should ever be turned away from the polls because of an ID requirement," she said, "and we will continue to aggressively pursue the right to vote wherever it is challenged."
Myrna Perez, deputy director of the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, called on the state's elected officials to better serve their constituents.
Pointing out that "every court that has reviewed Texas' prior voter ID law has found that it would have a discriminatory effect," Perez said, "Rather than seeing what the courts will let them get away with, Texas should be thinking about how to best serve its voters."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.