SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Democratic National Committee Deputy Chairman Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) addresses a rally against the Trump administration's education funding cuts outside the U.S. Capitol July 19, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Not Just Morally Wrong--It's Against the Law': Keith Ellison Calls Out Elon Musk for Anti-Union Threats
In letter, congressman asks Musk if he'll stop "threatening employees with retaliation for exercising federally protected rights"
Jun 01, 2018
As billionaire investor Elon Musk continues to face accusations of labor law violations after he tweeted an apparent threat at workers attempting to unionize his California Tesla factory, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) sent a letter on Friday demanding that Musk answer for his "anti-union" tweets as well as "a series of anti-worker incidents" that have reportedly taken place at Tesla's electric car factory over the past year.
"I hope that Mr. Musk realizes that retaliation he may take against his workers for trying to form a union isn't just morally wrong--it's against the law."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"Workers at a company with as many workplace health and safety issues as Tesla could benefit greatly from forming a union," Ellison wrote in his letter (pdf) to Musk, citing a recent investigation by Reveal that uncovered pervasive workplace injuries at Tesla that often went unreported. "I am concerned by Mr. Musk's tweets, which appear to be in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act."
Calling Reveal's reporting and Musk's tweets "troubling," Ellison demanded answers to four questions:
- Will you refrain in the future from threatening your employees with retaliation for exercising federally protected rights, including but not limited to their Section 7 rights to join a union and bargain collectively?
- Will you refrain in the future from stating or implying that employees will lose job-related benefits if they choose union representation?
- Will you refrain in the future from adverse action against an employee for choosing to join or support a union?
- Regarding the health and safety record at the Tesla plant, will you explain the thirteen injuries added to Tesla's official injury log for 2017 that were not reported initially?
"I hope that Mr. Musk realizes that retaliation he may take against his workers for trying to form a union isn't just morally wrong--it's against the law," Ellison noted in a tweet on Friday. "Considering the high rate of workplace injury at Mr. Musk's Tesla plant, it seems very sensible to me that workers there would want the benefits of a union."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As billionaire investor Elon Musk continues to face accusations of labor law violations after he tweeted an apparent threat at workers attempting to unionize his California Tesla factory, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) sent a letter on Friday demanding that Musk answer for his "anti-union" tweets as well as "a series of anti-worker incidents" that have reportedly taken place at Tesla's electric car factory over the past year.
"I hope that Mr. Musk realizes that retaliation he may take against his workers for trying to form a union isn't just morally wrong--it's against the law."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"Workers at a company with as many workplace health and safety issues as Tesla could benefit greatly from forming a union," Ellison wrote in his letter (pdf) to Musk, citing a recent investigation by Reveal that uncovered pervasive workplace injuries at Tesla that often went unreported. "I am concerned by Mr. Musk's tweets, which appear to be in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act."
Calling Reveal's reporting and Musk's tweets "troubling," Ellison demanded answers to four questions:
- Will you refrain in the future from threatening your employees with retaliation for exercising federally protected rights, including but not limited to their Section 7 rights to join a union and bargain collectively?
- Will you refrain in the future from stating or implying that employees will lose job-related benefits if they choose union representation?
- Will you refrain in the future from adverse action against an employee for choosing to join or support a union?
- Regarding the health and safety record at the Tesla plant, will you explain the thirteen injuries added to Tesla's official injury log for 2017 that were not reported initially?
"I hope that Mr. Musk realizes that retaliation he may take against his workers for trying to form a union isn't just morally wrong--it's against the law," Ellison noted in a tweet on Friday. "Considering the high rate of workplace injury at Mr. Musk's Tesla plant, it seems very sensible to me that workers there would want the benefits of a union."
As billionaire investor Elon Musk continues to face accusations of labor law violations after he tweeted an apparent threat at workers attempting to unionize his California Tesla factory, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) sent a letter on Friday demanding that Musk answer for his "anti-union" tweets as well as "a series of anti-worker incidents" that have reportedly taken place at Tesla's electric car factory over the past year.
"I hope that Mr. Musk realizes that retaliation he may take against his workers for trying to form a union isn't just morally wrong--it's against the law."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"Workers at a company with as many workplace health and safety issues as Tesla could benefit greatly from forming a union," Ellison wrote in his letter (pdf) to Musk, citing a recent investigation by Reveal that uncovered pervasive workplace injuries at Tesla that often went unreported. "I am concerned by Mr. Musk's tweets, which appear to be in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act."
Calling Reveal's reporting and Musk's tweets "troubling," Ellison demanded answers to four questions:
- Will you refrain in the future from threatening your employees with retaliation for exercising federally protected rights, including but not limited to their Section 7 rights to join a union and bargain collectively?
- Will you refrain in the future from stating or implying that employees will lose job-related benefits if they choose union representation?
- Will you refrain in the future from adverse action against an employee for choosing to join or support a union?
- Regarding the health and safety record at the Tesla plant, will you explain the thirteen injuries added to Tesla's official injury log for 2017 that were not reported initially?
"I hope that Mr. Musk realizes that retaliation he may take against his workers for trying to form a union isn't just morally wrong--it's against the law," Ellison noted in a tweet on Friday. "Considering the high rate of workplace injury at Mr. Musk's Tesla plant, it seems very sensible to me that workers there would want the benefits of a union."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.