SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bernie Sanders supporters gather near City Hall on day three of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on July 27, 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo: Jeff J. Mitchell/Getty Images)
As 'Petulant' Democratic Elites Howl in Protest, DNC Panel Gives Plan to Gut Power of Superdelegates Final Approval
The plan has widespread party support, but corporate lobbyists who "think their vote is more important" are desperately working to undermine it
Jul 12, 2018
In the face of fervent opposition from Democratic elites who "think their vote is more important" than the will of the party's base, the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) Rules and Bylaws arm cleared a major hurdle in the fight to curtail the power of superdelegates on Wednesday by approving a plan that would end their ability to cast votes for the presidential candidate on the first ballot at the party's convention.
"Many prioritize corporate interests over those of everyday people and thus automatically support the less progressive candidate."
--Alex Kotch, investigative reporter
"The activists that have been concerned that superdelegates will overturn the will of the voters should feel good about this," DNC member Elaine Kamarck said in a statement.
While the plan to gut the influence of superdelegates--who have been free since 1984 to put their weight behind any candidate no matter how the public voted--has received broad support from Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as an important first step toward making the party's process more "open and transparent," establishment figures who stand to lose power if the plan is implemented are staging a last-minute "revolt" to block the rule change.
As investigative reporter Alex Kotch noted in a Twitter thread on Wednesday, at least two of the Democratic insiders who are clinging desperately to their undue influence as superdelegates happen to be corporate lobbyists--a fact that Politico neglected to mention in its reporting on the party elites' "longshot bid to block the measure."
"They don't realize it but they're proving the point of Sanders and everyone else who's opposed to superdelegates," Kotch writes. "Many prioritize corporate interests over those of everyday people and thus automatically support the less progressive candidate."
\u201cTwo of the three superdelegates who are opposed to the Sanders plan:\n\nOne is a health care lobbyist\nAnother is a former lobbyist\n\n(Politico neglects to include this info) https://t.co/uVobZfIUFe\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
\u201cAs lobbyists, they somehow think their vote is more important than other people's votes. \n\nLOL:\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
\u201cThe U.S. Rep quoted in the article who's opposed to the change, Gerry Connolly (Va.), accepts a bunch of corporate PAC money from good corporate citizens like Northrup Grummon and AT&T. https://t.co/s7KWJGWEGq\n\nHere are his assets: https://t.co/zSAIX3IyxJ\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
Responding to Politico's story on the superdelegates' last-ditch attempt to undermine the push to curtail their power, The Humanist Report offered an alternative headline:
\u201cHere\u2019s a more apt headline: \u201cPetulant elites throwing tantrum at prospect of their votes not being 10,000x more powerful than regular peasant votes.\u201d https://t.co/oUlaXY9jLt\u201d— The Humanist Report (@The Humanist Report) 1531338532
Wednesday's vote in favor of the plan to ensure superdelegates cannot overturn the will of voters on the first ballot of the presidential nomination process was the final step before the proposal heads to a vote before the full DNC next month.
"Any attempt to derail the rules changes at the summer convention is thought to be a long-shot," concluded Astead Herndon of the New York Times.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the face of fervent opposition from Democratic elites who "think their vote is more important" than the will of the party's base, the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) Rules and Bylaws arm cleared a major hurdle in the fight to curtail the power of superdelegates on Wednesday by approving a plan that would end their ability to cast votes for the presidential candidate on the first ballot at the party's convention.
"Many prioritize corporate interests over those of everyday people and thus automatically support the less progressive candidate."
--Alex Kotch, investigative reporter
"The activists that have been concerned that superdelegates will overturn the will of the voters should feel good about this," DNC member Elaine Kamarck said in a statement.
While the plan to gut the influence of superdelegates--who have been free since 1984 to put their weight behind any candidate no matter how the public voted--has received broad support from Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as an important first step toward making the party's process more "open and transparent," establishment figures who stand to lose power if the plan is implemented are staging a last-minute "revolt" to block the rule change.
As investigative reporter Alex Kotch noted in a Twitter thread on Wednesday, at least two of the Democratic insiders who are clinging desperately to their undue influence as superdelegates happen to be corporate lobbyists--a fact that Politico neglected to mention in its reporting on the party elites' "longshot bid to block the measure."
"They don't realize it but they're proving the point of Sanders and everyone else who's opposed to superdelegates," Kotch writes. "Many prioritize corporate interests over those of everyday people and thus automatically support the less progressive candidate."
\u201cTwo of the three superdelegates who are opposed to the Sanders plan:\n\nOne is a health care lobbyist\nAnother is a former lobbyist\n\n(Politico neglects to include this info) https://t.co/uVobZfIUFe\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
\u201cAs lobbyists, they somehow think their vote is more important than other people's votes. \n\nLOL:\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
\u201cThe U.S. Rep quoted in the article who's opposed to the change, Gerry Connolly (Va.), accepts a bunch of corporate PAC money from good corporate citizens like Northrup Grummon and AT&T. https://t.co/s7KWJGWEGq\n\nHere are his assets: https://t.co/zSAIX3IyxJ\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
Responding to Politico's story on the superdelegates' last-ditch attempt to undermine the push to curtail their power, The Humanist Report offered an alternative headline:
\u201cHere\u2019s a more apt headline: \u201cPetulant elites throwing tantrum at prospect of their votes not being 10,000x more powerful than regular peasant votes.\u201d https://t.co/oUlaXY9jLt\u201d— The Humanist Report (@The Humanist Report) 1531338532
Wednesday's vote in favor of the plan to ensure superdelegates cannot overturn the will of voters on the first ballot of the presidential nomination process was the final step before the proposal heads to a vote before the full DNC next month.
"Any attempt to derail the rules changes at the summer convention is thought to be a long-shot," concluded Astead Herndon of the New York Times.
In the face of fervent opposition from Democratic elites who "think their vote is more important" than the will of the party's base, the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) Rules and Bylaws arm cleared a major hurdle in the fight to curtail the power of superdelegates on Wednesday by approving a plan that would end their ability to cast votes for the presidential candidate on the first ballot at the party's convention.
"Many prioritize corporate interests over those of everyday people and thus automatically support the less progressive candidate."
--Alex Kotch, investigative reporter
"The activists that have been concerned that superdelegates will overturn the will of the voters should feel good about this," DNC member Elaine Kamarck said in a statement.
While the plan to gut the influence of superdelegates--who have been free since 1984 to put their weight behind any candidate no matter how the public voted--has received broad support from Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as an important first step toward making the party's process more "open and transparent," establishment figures who stand to lose power if the plan is implemented are staging a last-minute "revolt" to block the rule change.
As investigative reporter Alex Kotch noted in a Twitter thread on Wednesday, at least two of the Democratic insiders who are clinging desperately to their undue influence as superdelegates happen to be corporate lobbyists--a fact that Politico neglected to mention in its reporting on the party elites' "longshot bid to block the measure."
"They don't realize it but they're proving the point of Sanders and everyone else who's opposed to superdelegates," Kotch writes. "Many prioritize corporate interests over those of everyday people and thus automatically support the less progressive candidate."
\u201cTwo of the three superdelegates who are opposed to the Sanders plan:\n\nOne is a health care lobbyist\nAnother is a former lobbyist\n\n(Politico neglects to include this info) https://t.co/uVobZfIUFe\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
\u201cAs lobbyists, they somehow think their vote is more important than other people's votes. \n\nLOL:\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
\u201cThe U.S. Rep quoted in the article who's opposed to the change, Gerry Connolly (Va.), accepts a bunch of corporate PAC money from good corporate citizens like Northrup Grummon and AT&T. https://t.co/s7KWJGWEGq\n\nHere are his assets: https://t.co/zSAIX3IyxJ\u201d— Alex Kotch (@Alex Kotch) 1531342028
Responding to Politico's story on the superdelegates' last-ditch attempt to undermine the push to curtail their power, The Humanist Report offered an alternative headline:
\u201cHere\u2019s a more apt headline: \u201cPetulant elites throwing tantrum at prospect of their votes not being 10,000x more powerful than regular peasant votes.\u201d https://t.co/oUlaXY9jLt\u201d— The Humanist Report (@The Humanist Report) 1531338532
Wednesday's vote in favor of the plan to ensure superdelegates cannot overturn the will of voters on the first ballot of the presidential nomination process was the final step before the proposal heads to a vote before the full DNC next month.
"Any attempt to derail the rules changes at the summer convention is thought to be a long-shot," concluded Astead Herndon of the New York Times.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.