SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The European Union (EU) on Wednesday hit Google with a record-breaking EUR4.34 billion ($5.06 billion) antitrust fine and ordered the tech giant to make changes that will scale back its dominance of the mobile phone market.
Should Google be broken up? "The answer is yes."
Characterizing the move as "the EU's sharpest rebuke yet to the power of a handful of tech giants," the Wall Street Journalreported:
[T]he bloc's antitrust regulator found Wednesday that Google had abused the dominance of its Android operating system, which runs more than 80 percent of the world's smartphones, to promote and entrench its own mobile apps and services, particularly the company's search engine.
Android phones come preloaded with Google apps and services, including Search. Competitors have long complained that Android's dominance gives Google an unfair advantage in attracting users to those apps--and then using data from them to devise and target advertising. The preloaded apps stifle competing apps, the EU said.
With the decision, the EU argues that Google behaved illegally by leveraging its market power to encourage handset makers to pre-install those apps and services on their devices. At issue are several types of agreements that Google imposes on phone makers and telecommunications companies if they want to sell Android-based devices to their users--conditions that applied to handset makers even though Google provides the operating system to manufacturers free of charge.
"These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits. They have denied European consumers the benefits of effective competition in the important mobile sphere," declared EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager. "This is illegal under EU antitrust rules."
Concluding that Google has "imposed illegal restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators" since 2011, the European Commission warned in a statement that "Google must now bring the conduct effectively to an end within 90 days or face penalty payments of up to five percent of the average daily worldwide turnover of Alphabet, Google's parent company."
News of the fine, which "accounts for around 40 percent of Google's 2017 net profit of $12.62 billion," has already had an impact--the Journal reported that following the announcement, "Shares in Alphabet, the company's parent, fell as much as 1.1 percent in premarket trading." Google says it will appeal the decision.
Noting that the penalty "dwarfs Google's previous $2.7 billion record-breaking fine from the EU last year over manipulated search results," The Verge offered a comparison to those levied against other tech firms:
While the fine and mandate for changes were welcomed by tech experts, some called on Vestager to go further. Tweeting from a Wednesday morning press conference featuring Europe's comeptition chief, Open Markets Institute fellow Matt Stoller posed that the company should be broken up.
Executive director of the European Publishers Council Angela Mills Wade, meanwhile, urged EU regulators to go after Google for its dominance in digital advertising.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The European Union (EU) on Wednesday hit Google with a record-breaking EUR4.34 billion ($5.06 billion) antitrust fine and ordered the tech giant to make changes that will scale back its dominance of the mobile phone market.
Should Google be broken up? "The answer is yes."
Characterizing the move as "the EU's sharpest rebuke yet to the power of a handful of tech giants," the Wall Street Journalreported:
[T]he bloc's antitrust regulator found Wednesday that Google had abused the dominance of its Android operating system, which runs more than 80 percent of the world's smartphones, to promote and entrench its own mobile apps and services, particularly the company's search engine.
Android phones come preloaded with Google apps and services, including Search. Competitors have long complained that Android's dominance gives Google an unfair advantage in attracting users to those apps--and then using data from them to devise and target advertising. The preloaded apps stifle competing apps, the EU said.
With the decision, the EU argues that Google behaved illegally by leveraging its market power to encourage handset makers to pre-install those apps and services on their devices. At issue are several types of agreements that Google imposes on phone makers and telecommunications companies if they want to sell Android-based devices to their users--conditions that applied to handset makers even though Google provides the operating system to manufacturers free of charge.
"These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits. They have denied European consumers the benefits of effective competition in the important mobile sphere," declared EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager. "This is illegal under EU antitrust rules."
Concluding that Google has "imposed illegal restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators" since 2011, the European Commission warned in a statement that "Google must now bring the conduct effectively to an end within 90 days or face penalty payments of up to five percent of the average daily worldwide turnover of Alphabet, Google's parent company."
News of the fine, which "accounts for around 40 percent of Google's 2017 net profit of $12.62 billion," has already had an impact--the Journal reported that following the announcement, "Shares in Alphabet, the company's parent, fell as much as 1.1 percent in premarket trading." Google says it will appeal the decision.
Noting that the penalty "dwarfs Google's previous $2.7 billion record-breaking fine from the EU last year over manipulated search results," The Verge offered a comparison to those levied against other tech firms:
While the fine and mandate for changes were welcomed by tech experts, some called on Vestager to go further. Tweeting from a Wednesday morning press conference featuring Europe's comeptition chief, Open Markets Institute fellow Matt Stoller posed that the company should be broken up.
Executive director of the European Publishers Council Angela Mills Wade, meanwhile, urged EU regulators to go after Google for its dominance in digital advertising.
The European Union (EU) on Wednesday hit Google with a record-breaking EUR4.34 billion ($5.06 billion) antitrust fine and ordered the tech giant to make changes that will scale back its dominance of the mobile phone market.
Should Google be broken up? "The answer is yes."
Characterizing the move as "the EU's sharpest rebuke yet to the power of a handful of tech giants," the Wall Street Journalreported:
[T]he bloc's antitrust regulator found Wednesday that Google had abused the dominance of its Android operating system, which runs more than 80 percent of the world's smartphones, to promote and entrench its own mobile apps and services, particularly the company's search engine.
Android phones come preloaded with Google apps and services, including Search. Competitors have long complained that Android's dominance gives Google an unfair advantage in attracting users to those apps--and then using data from them to devise and target advertising. The preloaded apps stifle competing apps, the EU said.
With the decision, the EU argues that Google behaved illegally by leveraging its market power to encourage handset makers to pre-install those apps and services on their devices. At issue are several types of agreements that Google imposes on phone makers and telecommunications companies if they want to sell Android-based devices to their users--conditions that applied to handset makers even though Google provides the operating system to manufacturers free of charge.
"These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits. They have denied European consumers the benefits of effective competition in the important mobile sphere," declared EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager. "This is illegal under EU antitrust rules."
Concluding that Google has "imposed illegal restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators" since 2011, the European Commission warned in a statement that "Google must now bring the conduct effectively to an end within 90 days or face penalty payments of up to five percent of the average daily worldwide turnover of Alphabet, Google's parent company."
News of the fine, which "accounts for around 40 percent of Google's 2017 net profit of $12.62 billion," has already had an impact--the Journal reported that following the announcement, "Shares in Alphabet, the company's parent, fell as much as 1.1 percent in premarket trading." Google says it will appeal the decision.
Noting that the penalty "dwarfs Google's previous $2.7 billion record-breaking fine from the EU last year over manipulated search results," The Verge offered a comparison to those levied against other tech firms:
While the fine and mandate for changes were welcomed by tech experts, some called on Vestager to go further. Tweeting from a Wednesday morning press conference featuring Europe's comeptition chief, Open Markets Institute fellow Matt Stoller posed that the company should be broken up.
Executive director of the European Publishers Council Angela Mills Wade, meanwhile, urged EU regulators to go after Google for its dominance in digital advertising.