SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On the heels of President Donald Trump's Orwellian remark advising supporters that what they read in the news "is not what's happening," the White House released its own statement claiming that it supports a free press--directly after banning a reporter from a news conference.
After CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins, according to the Trump administration's version of events, "shouted questions and refused to leave despite repeatedly being asked to do so" at an Oval Office press meeting, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Bill Shine told Collins she would not be welcome at a later press conference in the Rose Garden.
"To be clear, we support a free press and ask that everyone be respectful of the president and guests at the White House," the communications officials concluded.
Journalists and free press advocates responded to the obvious disconnect in the White House's statement.
\u201cA free press does not \u2014 and will not \u2014 have the topics of its questions dictated by the White House. If the Trump folks were unclear on this, they should have consulted every other president before them.\u201d— Karen Tumulty (@Karen Tumulty) 1532599119
\u201c@PressSec responded by saying the WH asks \u201ceveryone be respectful of the presidency and guests at the White House.\u201d This coming from a spox for a president who labels the free press \u201cthe enemy of the people\u201d https://t.co/eOnLoNTbVn\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1532563291
\u201cA free press is a pillar of any free society. Banning a reporter because you don\u2019t like her questions is something dictators do. Shame on @realDonaldTrump for what happened to @kaitlancollins today. This White House is unbelievable.\u201d— David Cicilline (@David Cicilline) 1532570158
"I was blocked from attending an open press event at the White House because the White House did not like the questions I posed to President Trump earlier in the day during an event in the Oval Office with the president of the European Commission," Collins told her network.
After the two leaders made statements at the Oval Office event, Collins explained, "I and several other reporters started asking President Trump questions. This is a normal occurrence and it [was] also our only chance to ask President Trump questions that day."
"To address the thing about how Collins 'refused' to leave the session upon request: Such a 'refusal' could well be attributed to just about any pool representative who has filed into an Oval Office meeting," wrote media critic Erik Wemple at the Washington Post. "That's because Trump's long-suffering press wranglers start shouting 'time to go' at the very moment that the formalities conclude--and then Trump proceeds to drag things out by taking a question here, a question there. Reporters have pretty much learned to tune out the cries of the wranglers in hopes of securing answers to their shouted questions."
Collins' questions to the president addressed two of this week's major news stories--Trump's White House invitation to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a tape that his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, released in which the president was heard apparently arranging a payment to a former model who has claimed she had an affair with him.
"Did Michael Cohen betray you, Mr. President?" Collins asked. "Mr. President, are you worried about what Michael Cohen is going to say to prosecutors?...Why has Vladimir Putin not accepted your invitation, Mr. President?"
"Just because the White House is uncomfortable with a question regarding the news of the day doesn't mean the question isn't relevant and shouldn't be asked," said CNN in a statement. "This decision to bar a member of the press is retaliatory in nature and not indicative of an open and free press. We demand better."
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
On the heels of President Donald Trump's Orwellian remark advising supporters that what they read in the news "is not what's happening," the White House released its own statement claiming that it supports a free press--directly after banning a reporter from a news conference.
After CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins, according to the Trump administration's version of events, "shouted questions and refused to leave despite repeatedly being asked to do so" at an Oval Office press meeting, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Bill Shine told Collins she would not be welcome at a later press conference in the Rose Garden.
"To be clear, we support a free press and ask that everyone be respectful of the president and guests at the White House," the communications officials concluded.
Journalists and free press advocates responded to the obvious disconnect in the White House's statement.
\u201cA free press does not \u2014 and will not \u2014 have the topics of its questions dictated by the White House. If the Trump folks were unclear on this, they should have consulted every other president before them.\u201d— Karen Tumulty (@Karen Tumulty) 1532599119
\u201c@PressSec responded by saying the WH asks \u201ceveryone be respectful of the presidency and guests at the White House.\u201d This coming from a spox for a president who labels the free press \u201cthe enemy of the people\u201d https://t.co/eOnLoNTbVn\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1532563291
\u201cA free press is a pillar of any free society. Banning a reporter because you don\u2019t like her questions is something dictators do. Shame on @realDonaldTrump for what happened to @kaitlancollins today. This White House is unbelievable.\u201d— David Cicilline (@David Cicilline) 1532570158
"I was blocked from attending an open press event at the White House because the White House did not like the questions I posed to President Trump earlier in the day during an event in the Oval Office with the president of the European Commission," Collins told her network.
After the two leaders made statements at the Oval Office event, Collins explained, "I and several other reporters started asking President Trump questions. This is a normal occurrence and it [was] also our only chance to ask President Trump questions that day."
"To address the thing about how Collins 'refused' to leave the session upon request: Such a 'refusal' could well be attributed to just about any pool representative who has filed into an Oval Office meeting," wrote media critic Erik Wemple at the Washington Post. "That's because Trump's long-suffering press wranglers start shouting 'time to go' at the very moment that the formalities conclude--and then Trump proceeds to drag things out by taking a question here, a question there. Reporters have pretty much learned to tune out the cries of the wranglers in hopes of securing answers to their shouted questions."
Collins' questions to the president addressed two of this week's major news stories--Trump's White House invitation to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a tape that his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, released in which the president was heard apparently arranging a payment to a former model who has claimed she had an affair with him.
"Did Michael Cohen betray you, Mr. President?" Collins asked. "Mr. President, are you worried about what Michael Cohen is going to say to prosecutors?...Why has Vladimir Putin not accepted your invitation, Mr. President?"
"Just because the White House is uncomfortable with a question regarding the news of the day doesn't mean the question isn't relevant and shouldn't be asked," said CNN in a statement. "This decision to bar a member of the press is retaliatory in nature and not indicative of an open and free press. We demand better."
On the heels of President Donald Trump's Orwellian remark advising supporters that what they read in the news "is not what's happening," the White House released its own statement claiming that it supports a free press--directly after banning a reporter from a news conference.
After CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins, according to the Trump administration's version of events, "shouted questions and refused to leave despite repeatedly being asked to do so" at an Oval Office press meeting, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Bill Shine told Collins she would not be welcome at a later press conference in the Rose Garden.
"To be clear, we support a free press and ask that everyone be respectful of the president and guests at the White House," the communications officials concluded.
Journalists and free press advocates responded to the obvious disconnect in the White House's statement.
\u201cA free press does not \u2014 and will not \u2014 have the topics of its questions dictated by the White House. If the Trump folks were unclear on this, they should have consulted every other president before them.\u201d— Karen Tumulty (@Karen Tumulty) 1532599119
\u201c@PressSec responded by saying the WH asks \u201ceveryone be respectful of the presidency and guests at the White House.\u201d This coming from a spox for a president who labels the free press \u201cthe enemy of the people\u201d https://t.co/eOnLoNTbVn\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1532563291
\u201cA free press is a pillar of any free society. Banning a reporter because you don\u2019t like her questions is something dictators do. Shame on @realDonaldTrump for what happened to @kaitlancollins today. This White House is unbelievable.\u201d— David Cicilline (@David Cicilline) 1532570158
"I was blocked from attending an open press event at the White House because the White House did not like the questions I posed to President Trump earlier in the day during an event in the Oval Office with the president of the European Commission," Collins told her network.
After the two leaders made statements at the Oval Office event, Collins explained, "I and several other reporters started asking President Trump questions. This is a normal occurrence and it [was] also our only chance to ask President Trump questions that day."
"To address the thing about how Collins 'refused' to leave the session upon request: Such a 'refusal' could well be attributed to just about any pool representative who has filed into an Oval Office meeting," wrote media critic Erik Wemple at the Washington Post. "That's because Trump's long-suffering press wranglers start shouting 'time to go' at the very moment that the formalities conclude--and then Trump proceeds to drag things out by taking a question here, a question there. Reporters have pretty much learned to tune out the cries of the wranglers in hopes of securing answers to their shouted questions."
Collins' questions to the president addressed two of this week's major news stories--Trump's White House invitation to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a tape that his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, released in which the president was heard apparently arranging a payment to a former model who has claimed she had an affair with him.
"Did Michael Cohen betray you, Mr. President?" Collins asked. "Mr. President, are you worried about what Michael Cohen is going to say to prosecutors?...Why has Vladimir Putin not accepted your invitation, Mr. President?"
"Just because the White House is uncomfortable with a question regarding the news of the day doesn't mean the question isn't relevant and shouldn't be asked," said CNN in a statement. "This decision to bar a member of the press is retaliatory in nature and not indicative of an open and free press. We demand better."